Abstract. Objectives. Catastrophic neck injuries in rugby tackling are rare (2 per 100,000 players per year) with 38% of these injuries occurring in the tackle. The aim of this study was to determine the primary mechanism of cervical spine injury during rugby tackling and to highlight the effect of tackling technique on intervertebral joint loads. Methods. In vivo and in vitro experimental data were integrated to generate realistic computer simulations representative of misdirected tackles. MRI images were used to inform the creation of a musculoskeletal model. In vivo kinematics and neck muscle excitations were collected during lab-based staged tackling of the player. Impact forces were collected in vitro using an instrumented anthropometric test device during experimental simulations of rugby collisions. Experimental kinematics and muscle excitations were prescribed to the model and impact forces applied to seven skull locations (three cranial and four lateral). To examine the effects of technique on intervertebral joint loads the model's neck angle was altered in steps of 5° about each rotational axis resulting in a total of 1,623 experimentally informed simulations of misdirected tackles. Results. Neck flexion angles and cranial impact locations had the largest effects on maximal compression, anterior shear and flexion moment loads. During posterior cranial impacts compression forces and flexion moments increased from 1500 to 3200 N and 30 to 60 Nm respectively between neck angles of 30° extension and 30° flexion. This was more evident at the C5-C6 and C6-C7 joints. Anterior shear loads remained stable throughout neck angle ranges however during anterior impacts they were directed posteriorly when the neck was flexed. Conclusions. The combination of estimated joint loads in the lower cervical spine support buckling as the primary injury mechanism of anterior bilateral facet dislocations observed in misdirected rugby tackles and highlights the importance of adopting a correct tackling technique. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The Cochrane Collaboration has produced three new reviews relevant to bone and joint surgery since the publication of the last Cochrane Corner. These are relevant to a wide range of musculoskeletal specialists, and include reviews in lateral elbow pain, osteoarthritis of the big toe joint, and cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients

Head collisions in sport can result in catastrophic cervical spine injuries. Musculo-skeletal (MSK) modelling can help analyse the relationship between players' motion, external loading and internal stresses that lead to injury. However, the literature lacks sport specific MSK models. In automotive research the intervertebral disc behaviour has been represented as viscoelastic elements (“bushing”), whose stiffness and damping parameters are often estimated under quasi-static conditions and may lack validity in dynamic impacts. The aim of this study was to develop a validated cervical spine model for axial impacts for future use in the analysis of head-first rugby collisions. A drop test rig was used to replicate a sub-catastrophic axial head impact. A load of 80 N from 0.5 m was applied to the cranial aspect of a C2-C6 porcine spinal specimen mounted in the neutral position. The 3D motion of C3-C5 vertebras (4 kHz) and the cranial axial load (1 MHz) were measured via motion capture (Qualysis, Sweden) and a uniaxial load cell (RDP Electronics Ltd, UK). Specimen specific models were created in NMSBuilder and OpenSim after the vertebrae geometries were obtained from the segmentation of micro-CT images of the specimens. The compressive viscoelastic properties of four vertebral joints (C2-C3 through to C5-C6) were optimised via a Genetic Algorithm (MATLAB v2016b, The Mathworks Inc) to minimise tracking errors. The optimisation converged to a solution of 140–49000 kN/m and 2000–8000 Ns/m for stiffness and damping respectively (RMSE=5.1 mm). Simulated joint displacements ranged between 0.09 – 1.75 mm compared to experimental 0.1 – 0.8 mm. Optimal bushing parameters were higher than previously reported values measured through quasi-static testing. Higher stiffness and damping values could be explained by the higher-dynamics nature of the event analysed related to a different part of the non-linear intervertebral disc load-displacement curve