We carried out excision of a solitary bony metastasis from renal-cell carcinoma in 25 patients in the hope that this would produce a prolonged disease-free interval. Two patients had excisions only, five had amputations and 18 had excision and endoprosthetic replacement. The one-, three- and five-year cumulative survival rates were 88%, 54% and 13%, respectively. There were three complications. One patient developed a local recurrence and three had problems related to the endoprosthesis. We recommend radical excision of a solitary bony metastasis from renal-cell carcinoma to achieve local control of the tumour for the remainder of the patient’s life

Aims

The early mortality in patients with hip fractures from bony metastases is unknown. The objectives of this study were to quantify 30- and 90-day mortality in patients with proximal femoral metastases, and to create a mortality prediction tool based on biomarkers associated with early death.

Aims. We first sought to compare survival for patients treated surgically for solitary and multiple metastases in the appendicular skeleton, and second, to explore the role of complete and incomplete resection (R0 and R1/R2) in patients with a solitary bony metastasis in the appendicular skeleton. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study on a population-based cohort of all adult patients treated surgically for bony metastases of the appendicular skeleton between January 2014 and December 2019. We excluded patients in whom the status of bone metastases and resection margin was unknown. Patients were followed until the end of the study or to their death. We had no loss to follow-up. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis (with log-rank test) to evaluate patient survival. We identified 506 operations in 459 patients. A total of 120 operations (in 116 patients) were for solitary metastases and 386 (in 345 patients) for multiple metastases. Of the 120 operations, 70 (in 69 patients) had no/an unknown status of visceral metastases (solitary group) and 50 (in 49 patients) had visceral metastases. In the solitary group, 45 operations (in 44 patients) were R0 (resections for cure or complete remission) and 25 (in 25 patients) were R1/R2 (resections leaving microscopic or macroscopic tumour, respectively). The most common types of cancer in the solitary group were kidney (n = 27), lung (n = 25), and breast (n = 20). Results. The one-year patient survival was 47% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 57) for the solitary bony metastases and 34% (95% CI 29 to 39) for multiple bone metastases (p < 0.001). The one-year patient survival was 64% (95% CI 52 to 75) for solitary bony metastases without/with unknown visceral metastases and 23% (95% CI 11 to 36) for solitary bony metastases with visceral metastases (p < 0.001). The one-year patient survival was 75% (95% CI 62 to 89) for a solitary bony metastasis after R0 surgery and 42% (95% CI 22 to 61) for a solitary bony metastasis with R1/R2 surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Our study suggests that the surgical treatment of patients with a solitary bony metastasis to the appendicular skeleton results in better survival than for patients with multiple bony metastases. Furthermore, aggressive treatment of a solitary bony metastasis with R0 surgery may improve patient survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1206–1215

Neck of femur fractures are a common trauma presentation and patients with a history of malignancy are sent for long leg femur views (LLF), to exclude a distal lesion which would alter the management plan (Intra-medullary nail/Long stem Hemiarthroplasty). The aim of this is to identify incidence of malignancy on LLF views, the length of time in between each xray (XR) and to identify demographics. Data was retrospectively collected from 01/01/2021 to 31/01/2021 from a single centre. All patients admitted to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital had their electronic records (Bluespier, PACS, Clinical Portal) accessed. These confirmed if patients had a past medical history of malignancy, if they had LLF view and the time differences between diagnostic pelvis XR and LLF XR. A total of 784 patients were identified in the specified time period. Of these, 138 were identified with a malignancy and there were 85 LLF views completed. LLF views diagnosed 1 patient with known prostate cancer that had a new distal femoral metastasis (Incidence = 1.28 cases per 1000). This patient underwent further imaging (MRI Femur) and received a long stem hip hemiarthroplasty. The average length of wait between the images was 9 hours 27 minutes. LLF views can alter management of patients with malignancy and are therefore useful to perform. There can be a long delay between each image. Therefore we recommend imaging tumour with common bony metastasis (Renal, Thyroid, Breast, Prostrate, Lung) and other remaining tumours with known secondary metastasis. Imaging primary low risk (eg basal cell carcinoma) can lead to long delays in a frail patient cohort and consideration should be given to rationalise appropriate use of resources

The spine is one of the most common sites of bony metastasis, with 80% of prostate, lung, and breast cancers metastasizing to the vertebrae resulting in significant morbidity. Current treatment modalities are systemic chemotherapy, such as Doxorubicin (Dox), administered after resection to prevent cancer recurrence, and systemic antiresorptive medication, such as Zolendronate (Zol), to prevent tumor-induced bone destruction. The large systemic doses required to elicit an adequate effect in the spine often leads to significant side-effects by both drugs, limiting their prolonged use and effectiveness. Recently published work by our lab has shown that biocompatible 3D-printed porous polymer scaffolds are an effective way of delivering Dox locally over a sustained period while inhibiting tumor growth in vitro. Our lab has also generated promising results regarding antitumor properties of Zol in vitro. We aim to develop 3D-printed scaffolds to deliver a combination of Zol and Dox that can potentially allow for a synergistic antitumor activity while preventing concurrent bone loss locally at the site of a tumor, avoiding long systemic exposure to these drugs and decreasing side effects in the clinical setting. The PORO Lay polymer filaments are 3D-printed into 5mm diameter disks, washed with deionized water and loaded with Dox or Zol in aqueous buffer over 7 days. Dox or Zol-containing supernatant was collected daily and the drug release was analyzed over time in a fluorescence plate reader. The polymer-drug (Dox or Zol) release was tested in vitro on prostate and lung cancer cell lines and on prostate- or lung-induced bone metastases cells. Alternatively, direct drug treatment was also carried out on the same cells in vitro. Following treatment, all cells were subject to proliferation assay (MTT and alamar blue), viability assay (LIVE/DEAD), migration assay (Boyden chamber) and invasion assay (3D gel matrix). 3D-printed scaffolds loaded with both Dox and Zol will also be tested on cells. We have established an effective dose (EC50) for prostate and lung cancer cell lines and bone metastases cells with direct treatment with Zol or Dox. We have titrated the drug loading of scaffolds to allow for a release amount of Dox at the EC50 dose over 7 days. In ongoing experiments, we are testing the release of Zol. We have shown Dox releasing scaffolds inhibit cancer cell growth in a 2D culture over 7 days using the above cellular assays and testing the scaffolds with Zol is currently being analyzed. 3D-printed porous polymers like the PORO Lay series of products offer a novel and versatile opportunity for delivery of drugs in future clinical settings. They can decrease systemic exposure of drugs while at the same time concentrating the drugs effect at the site of tumors and consequently inhibit tumor proliferation. Their ability to be loaded with multiple drugs can allow for achieving multiple goals while taking advantage of synergistic effects of different drugs. The ability to 3D-print these polymers can allow for production of custom implants that offer better structural support for bone growth

The February 2024 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does primary tumour resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of the pelvis with metastasis at diagnosis?; Proximal femur replacements for an oncologic indication offer a durable endoprosthetic reconstruction option: a 40-year experience; The importance of awaiting biopsy results in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures: do we need to biopsy solitary pathological fractures?; Effect of radiotherapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in 1,200 extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patients; What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation; Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence; Survival differences of patients with resected extraskeletal osteosarcoma receiving two different (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; Solitary versus multiple bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton: should the surgical treatment be different?.

Within a study group of 102 consecutive patients diagnosed at a supra-regional bone tumour unit with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus, an association with previously treated breast cancer was noted. There were 58 female patients and 44 male patients. The study group contained six females (10%, mean age 53 years) who had previously been treated for breast cancer, a higher proportion than would be expected. They were referred following identification of a solitary area of increased activity on routine screening with isotope bone scan, presumed to be a solitary bony metastasis. Most (86%) of this breast carcinoma sub-group had developed low-grade bone chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade 0.5-I) and only one case (14%) had developed high-grade chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade II-III). A suspicious long bone lesion on bone scan in a patient with a past medical history of breast cancer must, therefore, not be assumed to be a metastasis without further investigation; the possibility of a chondral lesion should be considered. It is important that patients receive a full multidisciplinary team investigation prior to treatment in order to obtain the correct tissue diagnosis, as the management of these conditions is often different. Our study suggests there may be a relationshipbetween patients previously treated for breast cancer and the development of subsequent chondrosarcoma

Introduction: Within a study group of 102 consecutive patients diagnosed with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus, an association with previously treated breast cancer was noted. We researched this proposed relationship. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients diagnosed histologically with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus over a six-year period at a supra-regional bone tumour unit. We identified those patients who had previously been treated for breast cancer. Results: There were 58 female and 44 male patients. The study group contained six females (10%, mean age 53 years) who had previously been treated for breast cancer, a higher proportion than would be expected. They were referred following identification of a solitary area of increased activity on routine screening with isotope bone scan, presumed to be a solitary bony metastasis. Most (86%) of this breast carcinoma sub-group had developed low-grade bone chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade 0.5-I) and only one case (14%) had developed high-grade chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade II–III). Discussion: A suspicious long bone lesion on bone scan in a patient with a past medical history of breast cancer must, therefore, not be assumed to be a metastasis without further investigation; the possibility of a chondral lesion should be considered. It is important that patients receive a full multidisciplinary team investigation prior to treatment in order to obtain the correct tissue diagnosis, as the management of these conditions is often different. Our study suggests there may be a relationship between patients previously treated for breast cancer and the development of subsequent chondrosarcoma

Summary. Our meta-analysis showed that pooled mean blood loss during spinal tumour surgeries was 2180 ml. Standardised methods of calculating and reporting intra-operative blood loss are needed as it would be beneficial in the pre-operative planning of blood replenishment during surgery. Introduction. The vertebral column is the commonest site of bony metastasis, accounting for 18,000 new cases in North America yearly. Patients with spinal metastasis are often elderly, have compromised cardiovascular status, poor physiological reserve and altered immune status, all of which render them more susceptible to the complications of intra-operative blood loss and associated transfusion. Currently no consensus exists regarding the expected volume of blood lost during metastatic spine tumour surgery with various papers quoting anywhere between 1L to 6L. Knowledge of the expected blood loss prior to surgery however is important as it facilitates pre-operative planning, intra- and post-operative management of fluid balance and blood transfusion. We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature on spine tumour surgery to answer the question: “What is the expected blood loss in major spinal tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disease?”. Methods. A comprehensive online search of the English literature using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. We included articles published from 31 January 1992 until 31 January 2012. This initial online search yielded 98 relevant articles. Two senior investigators independently reviewed all abstracts. The full text of articles that were deemed eligible for further consideration obtained and reviewed. Eighty five articles were excluded at this stage, largely due to lack of clear blood loss data, leaving 13 eligible articles. A hand search of the reference lists of relevant articles yielded 5 more articles. A total of 18 articles were included in the final meta-analysis of blood loss data. Disagreements regarding eligibility of articles for analysis were resolved by consensus. Selected articles for final analysis were independently graded according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) Levels of Evidence. We evaluated the possibility of publication bias by obtaining a funnel plot (created by plotting the sample size against the effect estimate). The Egger's regression asymmetry test was used to assess the existence of publication bias. Results. Eighteen selected articles had a total of 785 patients who had undergone major spine tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disorders. The pooled estimate of the blood loss occurring during spinal tumour surgeries was calculated to be 2180ml (95%CI: 1805–2554ml). Apart from two studies which reported significant mean blood loss of more than 5500 ml, the resulting funnel plot suggested absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger's test which did not show any small-study effects (p=0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies with I2=90% (p<0.001). Conclusions. The expected blood loss of a patient undergoing major surgery for spinal tumour constitutes more than a third of the circulating blood volume in a typical cancer patient with significantly impaired physiological reserve. Moreover, cases of catastrophic blood loss exceeding 5L exist in almost every series evaluated in this paper, with some reaching as much as 17–18L. Blood loss is a significant problem during spine tumour surgery and concerted effort is needed to address it

Aims

Surgery is often indicated in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) to improve pain and maximize function. Few studies are available which report on clinically meaningful outcomes such as quality of life, function, and pain relief after surgery for MBD. This is the published protocol for the Bone Metastasis Audit — Patient Reported Outcomes (BoMA-PRO) multicentre MBD study. The primary objective is to ascertain patient-reported quality of life at three to 24 months post-surgery for MBD.

The December 2014 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteosarcoma subtly different beasts; sports and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the knee; is curettage without tissue diagnosis sensible in cartilaginous tumours?; autoclaved autograft in bone tumour reconstruction; vascularised graft a step too far in bone defects?; interdigitated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in high-grade sarcoma; predicting life expectancy in patients with painful metastasis; and osteolytic lesions of the hands and feet.

The October 2014 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: how best to reconstruct humeral tumours; not everything is better via the arthroscope; obesity and sarcoma; frozen autograft; en-bloc resection and metastatic disease; positive margins in soft-tissue injuries; lipomatous tumours explored; and what happens with recurrence of osteosarcoma.

Breast cancer is generally managed surgically with adjuvant agents which include hormone therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and bisphosphonate therapy. However, some of these adjuvant therapies may cause adverse events, including wound infection, neutropenia, bone marrow suppression and fever. The simultaneous presentation of osteonecrosis and osteomyelitis has not previously been described in patients with breast cancer undergoing hormone therapy and chemotherapy.

We report a patient with breast cancer who developed bone infarcts in both legs as well as osteomyelitis in the right distal tibia after treatment which included a modified radical mastectomy, hormone therapy and chemotherapy. Simultaneous osteonecrosis and osteomyelitis should be considered in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy and hormone therapy who present with severe bone pain, especially if there have been infective episodes during treatment.

Bone sarcomas are rare cancers and orthopaedic surgeons come across them infrequently, sometimes unexpectedly during surgical procedures. We investigated the outcomes of patients who underwent a surgical procedure where sarcomas were found unexpectedly and were subsequently referred to our unit for treatment. We identified 95 patients (44 intra-lesional excisions, 35 fracture fixations, 16 joint replacements) with mean age of 48 years (11 to 83); 60% were males (n = 57). Local recurrence arose in 40% who underwent limb salvage surgery versus 12% who had an amputation. Despite achieving local control, overall survival was worse for patients treated with amputation rather than limb salvage (54% vs 75% five-year survival). Factors that negatively influenced survival were invasive primary surgery (fracture fixation, joint replacement), a delay of greater than two months until referral to our oncology service, and high-grade tumours. Survival in these circumstances depends mostly on factors that are determined prior to definitive treatment by a tertiary orthopaedic oncology unit. Limb salvage in this group of patients is associated with a higher rate of inadequate marginal surgery and, consequently, higher local recurrence rates than amputation, but should still be attempted whenever possible, as local control is not the primary determinant of survival.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:665–72.