Objectives. This study aims to evaluate if micro-CT can work as a method for the 3D assessment and analysis of cancellous bone by comparing micro-CT with undecalcified histological sections in OVX rats. Methods. The mandible and tibia of sham, ovariectomised (OVX) and zoledronate-injected ovariectomised (OVX-ZOL) rats were assessed morphometrically. Specimens were scanned by micro-CT. Undecalcified histological sections were manufactured from the specimen scanned by micro-CT and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Bivariate linear regressions and one-way analysis of variance were undertaken for statistics using SPSS 16.0.1 software. Results. There were highly significant correlations between undecalcified histological sections and micro-CT for all parameters (bone volume density (BV/TV), bone surface density (BS/BV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp))in the mandible and tibia. Bone histomorphometric parameters analysed by both methods exhibited significant differences among sham, OVX, and OVX-ZOL groups. There were significant correlations between mandible and tibia in BV/TV, BS/BV, and Tb.Sp. Conclusions. Micro-CT is a complementary tool to histological sections in basic research that could improve our understanding of bone histomorphometry. The mandible can be used as an effective site to assess bone morphometry of OVX or metabolic bone disease rat models. Cite this article: H. Liu, W. Li, Y. S. Liu, Y. S. Zhou. Bone micro-architectural analysis of mandible and tibia in ovariectomised rats: A quantitative structural comparison between undecalcified histological sections and micro-CT. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:253–262

Fragility fractures are skeletal complications associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) causing disability, hospitalization, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Increased circulating sclerostin and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are two potential mechanisms underlying low bone turnover and increased fracture risk. We have recently shown that T2D affects the expression of genes controlling bone formation (SOST and RUNX2) and that accumulation of AGEs is associated with impaired bone formation in T2D. We hypothesized that Wnt/B- catenin target genes are down-regulated in bone of T2D subjects as a consequence of decreased SOST and AGEs accumulation. To this end, we studied gene expression in extracts of bone samples obtained from femoral heads of 14 subjects with relatively well-controlled T2D (HbA1c 6.5±1.7%) and 21 control, non-diabetic postmenopausal women (age >65 years) undergoing hip replacement. There were no differences in age (73.2± .8 vs. 75.2±8.5 years) or BMI (27.7±5.6 vs. 29.9±5.4 kg/m2) between control and T2D groups, respectively. Expression of LEF1 mRNA was significantly lower in T2D compared to non-diabetic subjects (p=0.002), while DKK1 was not different between groups (p=0.108). Correlation analysis showed that DKK1 (r2=0.038; p=0.043) and HbA1c (r2=0.503; p=0.048) increased with age in T2D. COL1A1 mRNA trended lower in T2D compared to controls (p=0.056). Bone volume (9,333 ± 1,443 vs. 15,53 ± 2,442 mm2; p=0.048), mineralized volume (9,278 ± 1,418 vs. 15,45 ± 2,444 mm. 2. ; p=0.048) and BV/TV (0,2125 ± 0,03114 vs. 0,3719 ± 0,03196 %; p=0.002) measured by bone histomorphometry were lower in T2D compared to controls. Our data show that even in patients with relatively good glycemic control, T2D decreases expression of Wnt/B-catenin target genes andCOL1A1, associated with decreased bone density. These results may help understand the mechanisms underlying bone fragility in T2D

Summary. Osteoporosis reduces particle-induced osteolysis in rat model. Introduction. Wear particle induced osteolysis is considered to be a vital factor that reduces the life span of joint prosthesis. Osteoporosis is not rare in patients with indication for arthroplasty. However, the influence of osteoporosis on wear particles induced osteolysis is not clear. This study is aimed to explore on this issue by using animal model. Methods. 42 female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats aged 6 months were randomly divided into 3 groups: A, B and C group. Group A and B contained 18 rats each, and group C contained 6 rats. The rats in group A underwent bilateral ovariectomy. Group B was normal control, and group C was sham control. After 3 months, 6 rats in group A, 6 rats in group B and all the rats of group C were sacrificed. Bone mineral density (BMD), μCT and bone histomorphometry were conducted. The rest of rats in group A were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A1 and group A2, and so were the rats in group B. 5mg titanium particles were implanted onto the calvaria of groups A1 and B1, and isometric PBS solution were injected to group A2 and B2. Calvaria were harvested after 14 days. Calvaria were analyzed by μCT and histomorphometry to measure the osteolysis area of calvarial sagittal suture. Results. Compared with B and C group, BMD and bone histomorphometry index of group A was significantly reduced (P<0.05), and tibial trabeculae of group A was slimmer. Area of calvarial sagittal suture osteolysis were 0.262±0.009mm. 2. , 0.130±0.013mm. 2. , 0.307±0.013mm. 2. and 0.178±0.011mm. 2. in A1, A2, B1and B2 groups, respectively. There was significant difference among the groups. Conclusions. Osteoporosis may reduce particle-induced osteolysis in rat model

Corticosteroids are prescribed for the treatment of many medical conditions and their adverse effects on bone, including steroid-associated osteoporosis and osteonecrosis, are well documented. Core decompression is performed to treat osteonecrosis, but the results are variable. As steroids may affect bone turnover, this study was designed to investigate bone healing within a bone tunnel after core decompression in an experimental model of steroid-associated osteonecrosis. A total of five 28-week-old New Zealand rabbits were used to establish a model of steroid-induced osteonecrosis and another five rabbits served as controls. Two weeks after the induction of osteonecrosis, core decompression was performed by creating a bone tunnel 3 mm in diameter in both distal femora of each rabbit in both the experimental osteonecrosis and control groups. An in vivo micro-CT scanner was used to monitor healing within the bone tunnel at four, eight and 12 weeks postoperatively. At week 12, the animals were killed for histological and biomechanical analysis.

In the osteonecrosis group all measurements of bone healing and maturation were lower compared with the control group. Impaired osteogenesis and remodelling within the bone tunnel was demonstrated in the steroid-induced osteonecrosis, accompanied by inferior mechanical properties of the bone.

We have confirmed impaired bone healing in a model of bone defects in rabbits with pulsed administration of corticosteroids. This finding may be important in the development of strategies for treatment to improve the prognosis of fracture healing or the repair of bone defects in patients receiving steroid treatment.

Impacted bone allograft is often used in revision joint replacement. Hydroxyapatite granules have been suggested as a substitute or to enhance morcellised bone allograft. We hypothesised that adding osteogenic protein-1 to a composite of bone allograft and non-resorbable hydroxyapatite granules (ProOsteon) would improve the incorporation of bone and implant fixation. We also compared the response to using ProOsteon alone against bone allograft used in isolation. We implanted two non-weight-bearing hydroxyapatite-coated implants into each proximal humerus of six dogs, with each implant surrounded by a concentric 3 mm gap. These gaps were randomly allocated to four different procedures in each dog: 1) bone allograft used on its own; 2) ProOsteon used on its own; 3) allograft and ProOsteon used together; or 4) allograft and ProOsteon with the addition of osteogenic protein-1.

After three weeks osteogenic protein-1 increased bone formation and the energy absorption of implants grafted with allograft and ProOsteon. A composite of allograft, ProOsteon and osteogenic protein-1 was comparable, but not superior to, allograft used on its own.

ProOsteon alone cannot be recommended as a substitute for allograft around non-cemented implants, but should be used to extend the volume of the graft, preferably with the addition of a growth factor.