Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 116 - 116
1 Apr 2012
Pickard R Sharma A Reynolds J Nnadi C Lavy C Bowden G Wilson-MacDonald J Fairbank J
Full Access

A literature review of bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion was undertaken from peer reviewed journals to form a basis for guidelines on their clinical use. A PubMed search of peer reviewed journals between Jan 1960 and Dec 2009 for clinical trials of bone graft substitutes in spinal fusion was performed. Emphasis was placed on RCTs. Small and duplicated RCTs were excluded. If no RCTs were available the next best clinical evidence was assessed. Data were extracted for fusion rates and complications. Of 929 potential spinal fusion studies, 7 RCTs met the inclusion criteria for BMP-2, 3 for BMP-7, 2 for Tricalcium Phosphate and 1 for Tricalcium Phosphate/Hydroxyapatite (TCP/HA). No clinical RCTs were found for Demineralised Bone Matrix (DBM), Calcium Sulphate or Calcium Silicate. There is strong evidence that BMP-2 with TCP/HA achieves similar or higher spinal fusion rates than autograft alone. BMP-7 achieved similar results to autograft. 3 RCTs support the use of TCP or TCP/HA and autograft as a graft extender with similar results to autograft alone. The best clinical evidence to support the use of DBMs are case control studies. The osteoinductive potential of DBM appears to be very low however. There are no clinical studies to support the use of Calcium Silicate. The current literature supports the use of BMP-2 with HA/TCP as a graft substitute. TCP or HA/TCP with Autograft is supported as a graft extender. There is not enough clinical evidence to support other bone graft substitutes. This study did not require ethics approval and no financial support was received


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 63 - 63
1 Apr 2012
Michael A Vollans S Rankine J Rao A
Full Access

To assess radiological fusion rates in posterolateral fusions using SiS-CaP. Retrospective, radiological follow-up study. Single surgeon series of 76 consecutive patients were evaluated, in a regional spinal unit. All patients had clinical and radiological (MRI) spinal canal stenosis secondary to degenerative spondylosis or spondylolisthesis. Surgery consisted of instrumentation, decompression and meticulous preparation of the posterolateral graft bed by removal of all soft tissues posterior to the inter-transverse membrane and decortication of transverse processes (TPs). SiS-CaP putty was injected into this gutter and moulded around the instrumentation. Good quality, well prepared bone chips from the posterior decompression were seeded into the putty. Patient radiographs were reviewed at 3-6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Radiographs were assessed using a protocol to examine granularity, bone formation and evidence of pseudarthrosis, based upon previously reported literature . 1. and our personal experience. Of the 76 patients, 26 were excluded. M:F was 21:29. Mean age was 58yrs. Average number of motion segments fused per case was 2.2. There was one pseudarthrosis with metalwork fracture, and thus a total fusion rate of 98%. In addition, one patient had scanty bridging of TPs, and one patient had lucency around the S1 screws. SiS-CaP, as a bone graft substitute in posterolateral instrumented fusions, gives comparable results to published fusion rates using autologous iliac crest grafting and/or Bone Morphogenic Protein . 2. Moreover, it avoids the associated morbidity of iliac bone harvest


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 64 - 64
1 Apr 2012
Michael A Loughenbury P Dunsmuir R Rao A Millner P
Full Access

To determine the current practice of scoliosis surgery in the UK. A 10 point questionnaire was constructed to identify the philosophy of surgeons on various aspects of scoliosis surgery such as choice of implant, bone graft, autologous blood transfusion (ABT), cord monitoring and computer assisted surgery. Results are compared with the current best evidence. Consultants and Fellows attending the 2009 British Scoliosis Society meeting. 50 questionnaires were completed: 45 Consultants and 5 Fellows. All pedicle screw construct favored by 25/50, hybrid 24/50 (one undecided). Posterior construct of less than 10 levels, 20/50 would not cross-link, 11/50 used one and 19/20 used two or more. More than ten levels 17/50 considered cross-links unnecessary, 4/50 used one and 29/50 used two or more. 88% preferred titanium alloy implants, while a mixture of stainless steel and cobalt chrome was used by others. For bone graft, substitutes (24), iliac crest (14), allograft (12) and demineralised bone matrix (9) in addition to local bone. 10/50 would use recombinant bone morphogenetic protein (3 for revision cases only). 39/50 routinely used intra-operative cell salvage or ABT drains and 4/50 never used autologous blood. All used cord monitoring, Sensory (19/50), Motor (2/50) and combined (29/50). None used computer-aided surgery. 26 operated alone 12 operated in pairs and 12 varied depending on type of case. This survey has brought to light interesting variations in scoliosis surgery in UK. It may reflect the conflicting evidence in the literature


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1366 - 1372
1 Oct 2017
Rickert M Fleege C Tarhan T Schreiner S Makowski MR Rauschmann M Arabmotlagh M

Aims

We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of using a polyetheretherketone cage with (TiPEEK) and without a titanium coating (PEEK) for instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Materials and Methods

We conducted a randomised clinical pilot trial of 40 patients who were scheduled to undergo a TLIF procedure at one or two levels between L2 and L5. The Oswestry disability index (ODI), EuroQoL-5D, and back and leg pain were determined pre-operatively, and at three, six, and 12 months post-operatively. Fusion rates were assessed by thin slice CT at three months and by functional radiography at 12 months.