Although there is some clinical evidence of ceramic bearings being associated with a lower infection rate after total hip arthroplasty (THA), available data remains controversial since this surface is usually reserved for young, healthy patients. Therefore, we investigated the influence of five commonly-used biomaterials on the adhesion potential of four biofilm-producing bacteria usually detected in infected THAs.

In this in-vitro research, we evaluated the ability of S. aureus, S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, E. coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa to adhere to the surface of solid biomaterials, including a 28mm cobalt-chromium metal head, a 28mm fourth-generation ceramic head, a 48mm fourth-generation ceramic insert, a 48mm highly-crossed linked polyethylene insert and a 52mm titanium porous-coated acetabular component. After an initial vortex step, a bacterial separation from the surface of each specimen was done until no remaining attached bacteria were observed by digital optical microscope. The colony-forming units were counted to determine the number of viable adherent bacteria and the bacterial density.

We found no differences on global bacterial adhesion between the different surfaces. E. coli presented the least adherence potential among the analysed pathogens (p<0.001). The combination of E. coli and S. epidermidis generated an antagonist effect over the adherence potential of S. epidermidis individually (58±4% vs. 48±5%; p=0.007). The combination of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus presented a trend to an increased adherence of P. aeruginosa independently, suggesting an agonist effect (71% vs. 62%; p=0.07).

In this study, ceramic bearings appeared not to be related to a lower bacterial adhesion than other biomaterials. However, different adhesive potentials among bacteria may play a major role on infection's inception.

Aims

Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos R + G bone cement were introduced to replace the original cement Refobacin Palacos R in 2005. Both cements were assumed to behave in a biomechanically similar fashion to the original cement. The primary aim of this study was to compare the migration of a polished triple-tapered femoral stem fixed with either Refobacin Bone Cement R or Palacos R + G bone cement. Repeated radiostereometric analysis was used to measure migration of the femoral head centre. The secondary aims were evaluation of cement mantle, stem positioning, and patient-reported outcome measures.

Aims

The main aims were to identify risk factors predictive of a radiolucent line (RLL) around the acetabular component with an interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique in the first year after THA, and evaluate whether these risk factors influence the development of RLLs at five and ten years after THA.

Aims

The widely used and well-proven Palacos R (a.k.a. Refobacin Palacos R) bone cement is no longer commercially available and was superseded by Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G in 2005. However, the performance of these newly introduced bone cements have not been tested in a phased evidence-based manner, including roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).