Aims. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials have different surface properties and it has been suggested that the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings. Patients and Methods. Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance with methods of the Cochrane group. Results. Our search strategy revealed 2272 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These comprised 11 randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The overall quality of included studies was high but the observational studies were at high risk of bias due to inadequate adjustment for confounding factors. The overall cumulative incidence of PJI across all studies was 0.78% (1514/193 378). For each bearing combination, the overall incidence was as follows: MoP 0.85% (1353/158 430); CoP 0.38% (67/17 489); and CoC 0.53% (94/17 459). The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the three bearing combinations in terms of risk of PJI. Conclusion. On the basis of the clinical studies available, there is no evidence that bearing choice influences the risk of PJI. Future research, including basic science studies and large, adequately controlled registry studies, may be helpful in determining whether implant materials play a role in determining the risk of PJI following arthroplasty surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:134–42

Utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has steadily increased since its 2003 introduction in the American market. Although RTSA was originally indicated for elderly, low demand patients, it is now being increasingly used to treat rotator cuff arthropathy, humeral fractures, neoplasms and failed total and hemi shoulder arthroplasty. There is, therefore, a growing interest in bearing surface wear of RTSA polyethylene humeral liners. In the current study, we examined humeral liners retrieved as part of an IRB approved study to determine the amount of bearing surface wear. We hypothesized that wear of the bearing surface by intentional contact with the glenosphere (mode I) would be minor compared to that produced by scapular notching and impingement of the humeral liner (mode II). Twenty-three retrieved humeral liners were retrieved at revision surgery after an average of 1.5 years implantation time. The average age at implantation was 68 years (range 50–85). Shoulders were revised for loosening (7), instability (6), infection (6), pain (2), and other/unknown reasons (2). The liners were scanned using microCT at a resolution of 50 µm and then registered against unworn surfaces to estimate the bearing surface wear depth. The depth of surface penetration due to impingement of the liner with surrounding structures was measured and the location of the deepest penetration was noted. Mode I wear of the bearing surface was detectable for five of the retrieved liners. The penetration depth was 100 µm or less for four of the liners and approximately 250 microns for the fifth liner. It was noted that the liners with discernable mode I wear were those with longer implantation times (average 2.4 years). Material loss and abrasion of the rim due to mode II wear was noted with measurable penetration in 18 of the liners. Mode II wear penetrated to the bearing surface in 11 liners. It was generally noted that volumetric material loss was dominated by mode II wear (Figure 1). In this study of short to medium term retrieved RTSA humeral liners, mode I wear of the bearing surface was a minor source of material loss. Mode II wear due to scapular notching or impingement of the rim was the dominant source of volumetric wear. This is in agreement with a previous study that we have performed on a smaller cohort of seven liners. It is noteworthy that we were able to detect measurable mode I wear for liners with moderate implantation times. The quantity of bearing surface wear that will be seen in long term retrievals remains unknown at this time

Aims. The purpose of this study is to examine six types of bearing surfaces implanted at a single institution over three decades to determine whether the reasons for revision vary among the groups and how long it takes to identify differences in survival. Methods. We considered six cohorts that included a total of 1,707 primary hips done between 1982 and 2010. These included 223 conventional polyethylene sterilized with γ irradiation in air (CPE-GA), 114 conventional polyethylene sterilized with gas plasma (CPE-GP), 116 crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE), 1,083 metal-on-metal (MOM), 90 ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), and 81 surface arthroplasties (SAs). With the exception of the COC, all other groups used cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral heads. The mean follow-up was 10 (0.008 to 35) years. Descriptive statistics with revisions per 100 component years (re/100 yr) and survival analysis with revision for any reason as the endpoint were used to compare bearing surfaces. Results. XLPE liners demonstrated a lower cumulative incidence of revision at 15 years compared to the CPE-GA and CPE-GP groups owing to the absence of wear-related revisions (4% for XLPE vs 18%, p = 0.02, and 15%, p = 0.003, respectively). Revisions for adverse local tissue reactions occurred exclusively among the MOM (0.8 re/100 year) and SA groups (0.1 re/100 year). The revision rate for instability was lower among hips with 36 mm and larger head sizes compared to smaller head sizes (0.2% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Conclusion. The introduction of XLPE has eliminated wear-related revisions through 15-year follow-up compared to CPE-GP and CPE-GA. Dislocation incidence has been reduced with the introduction of larger diameter heads but remains a persistent concern. The potential for adverse local tissue reactions with MOM requires continued follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):105–111

Background. Increasing evidence suggests a link between the bearing surface used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the occurrence of infection. It is postulated that polyethylene has immunomodulatory effects and may influence bacterial function and survival, thereby impacting the development of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to investigate the association between polyethylene type and revision surgery for PJI in THA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). We hypothesized that the use of XLPE would demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in revision rates due to PJI compared to N-XLPE. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) spanning September 1, 1999, to December 31, 2021, were used to compare the infection revision rates between THA using N-XLPE and XLPE. We calculated the Cumulative Percentage Revision rate (CPR) and Hazard Ratio (HR) while controlling for factors like age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) grade, and head size. Results. From the total 361,083 primary THAs, 26,827 used N-XLPE and 334,256 used XLPE. Excluding data from the first 6 months post-surgery, 220 revisions occurred in the N-XLPE group and 1,055 in the XLPE group for PJI. The HR for infection revision was significantly higher in N-XLPE compared to XLPE, at 1.64 (95% CI, 1.41–1.90, p<0.001). Conclusions. This analysis provides evidence of an association between N-XLPE and revision for infection in THA. We suspect that polyethylene wear particles contribute to the susceptibility of THA to PJI, resulting in a significantly higher risk of revision for infection in N-XLPE hips compared to those with XLPE. Level of Evidence. Therapeutic Level III

Purpose. South African arthroplasty surgeons commonly make use of new bearing surface technology. This new technology only has short term, industry funded clinical trials or simulator studies available to prove its performance and motivate its use. These products are being used despite the availability of conventional components with proven long term in vivo efficacy. In the light of the recent Du Puy ASR recall, which also showed initial good clinical results, we reviewed the available data on some of the new available bearing surface technology. Methods. We performed a literature search to identify the best available clinical data regarding duration of follow up and number of patients for a selection of new bearing surfaces and compared it to well known long term clinical follow up studies and joint registry data of conventional products. Results. New bearing surface technologies have no long term clinical supportive data. Short and medium term results are available, however these are limited and mainly industry funded. Simulator data constituts the bulk of research used as motivation for the introduction of new technologies. Conclusion. The currently available data on new bearing surface technology is not adequate to provide the arthroplasty surgeon with a confident opinion on long term safety and efficacy. Surgeons should be careful when recommending new products to their patients, who are usually well informed of new technology but often without the necessary insight. NO DISCLOSURES

The bearing surface is the critical element in determining the longevity of a total hip arthroplasty. Over the past decade problems associated with bearing surfaces and modular femoral tapers have had an impact on surgeon selection of both acetabular liners and modular femoral heads. The purpose of this study was to analyse THA bearing surface trends from 2007 through 2014 using a large national database. A retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was conducted from 2007 to 2014. All patients who underwent a primary THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) procedure codes. Bearing surface data was extracted by identifying patients with ICD-9 procedure modifier codes. Patient and hospital characteristics were recorded for each patient. Descriptive statistics were employed to characterise bearing surface trends for the following bearing surfaces: metal on polyethylene (MoP); ceramic on polyethylene (CoP); ceramic on ceramic (CoC) and metal on metal (MoM). Univariate analysis was performed to identify differences between the bearing surface groups. During the study period, 2,460,640 primary THA discharges were identified, of which 1,059,825 (43.1%) had bearing surface data available for further analysis. The breakdown of the bearing surfaces used for these THAs were as follows: MoP − 49.1% (496,713); CoP − 29.1% (307,907); CoC − 4.2% (44,823); and MoM − 19.9% (210,381). MoM utilization peaked in 2008 with 51,033 cases representing 40.1% of THAs implanted that year. The usage steadily declined and by 2014 there were only 6,600 MoM cases representing only 4.0% of the THAs. From 2007 to 2014, the use of CoP bearing surfaces increased from 11,482 discharges (11.1% of cases) in 2007, to 83,300 discharges (50.8% of cases) in 2014. CoP utilization surpassed MoP in 2014. MoP accounted for 54.7% of discharges in 2011 and just 42.1% in 2014. During the study period, MoM bearing surface usage declined precipitously, while CoP surpassed MoP as the most prevalent bearing surface used in total hip arthroplasty patients. These changes in bearing surface usage over time were clearly influenced by concerns regarding high failure rates associated with MoM articulations and reports of taper corrosion associated with modular metal femoral heads

Alternative bearing surfaces has been introduced to reduce wear debris-induced osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and offered favorable results. Large population-based data for total joint surgery permit timely recognition of adverse results and prediction of events in the future. The purpose of this study was to present the epidemiology and national trends of bearing surface usage in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Korea using nationwide database. A total of 30,881 THAs were analyzed using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database for 2007 through 2011. Bearing surfaces were sub-grouped according to device code for national health insurance claims and consisted of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and metal-on-metal (MoM). The prevalence of each type of bearing surface was calculated and stratified by age, gender, hospital type, primary payer, and procedure volume of each hospital. The number of primary THAs increased by 25.2% from 5,484 in 2007 to 6,866 in 2011. The average age of the entire study population was 58.1 years, and 53.5% were male [Table 1]. CoC was the most commonly used bearing surface (76.7%), followed by MoP (11.9%), CoP (7.3%), and MoM (4.1%). The distribution of bearing surfaces was identical to that in the general population regardless of age, gender, hospital type, and primary payer [Table 2]. The mean age of patients that received hard-on-hard bearing surfaces (CoC and MoM) was significantly younger than that of patients receiving hard-on-soft bearing surfaces (CoP and MoP) (56.9 years vs. 62.6 years). During the study period, 55.1% of THAs that used a hard-on-hard bearing surface were performed in males, while 53.0% of THAs that used a hard-on-soft bearing surface were performed in females. The order of prevalence of bearing surfaces was identical in low- and medium-volume hospitals (CoC was first, MoP was second, CoP was third, and MoM was fourth). The mean hospital charges did not differ according to the bearing surface used, with the exception of CoP, which was associated with a lower mean hospital charge. There were no changes in the distribution of bearing surfaces in each year between 2007 and 2011. Overall, the percentage of THAs that used CoC bearing surfaces increased substantially from 71.6% in 2007 to 81.4% in 2011, while the percentage that used CoP, MoP, and MoM decreased significantly [Fig. 1]. One of the reasons for the dominant usage of hard-on-hard bearing surfaces may be that the principal diagnosis of primary THAs and the patient age group distribution in Korea differ from those in other countries. The most common indication for primary THA is osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Korea. In contrast, the majority of primary THAs are performed for osteoarthritis in Western countries. The choice of bearing surface may be affected by many factors, including the nation's medical delivery system, payment type, disease pattern, and age distribution of patients that undergo THA. In future, the results of a large-scale nationwide study on primary THAs using CoC bearing surfaces in Korea will be reported. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Aims. We wished to investigate the influence of metal debris exposure on the subsequent immune response and resulting soft-tissue injury following metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty. Some reports have suggested that debris generated from the head-neck taper junction is more destructive than equivalent doses from metal bearing surfaces. . Patients and Methods. We investigated the influence of the source and volume of metal debris on chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) concentrations in corresponding blood and hip synovial fluid samples and the observed agglomerated particle sizes in excised tissues using multiple regression analysis of prospectively collected data. A total of 199 explanted MoM hips (177 patients; 132 hips female) were analysed to determine rates of volumetric wear at the bearing surfaces and taper junctions. . Results. The statistical modelling suggested that a greater source contribution of metal debris from the taper junction was associated with smaller aggregated particle sizes in the local tissues and a relative reduction of Cr ion concentrations in the corresponding synovial fluid and blood samples. Metal debris generated from taper junctions appears to be of a different morphology, composition and therefore, potentially, immunogenicity to that generated from bearing surfaces. Conclusion. The differences in debris arising from the taper and the articulating surfaces may provide some understanding of the increased incidence of soft-tissue reactions reported in patients implanted with MoM total hip arthroplasties compared with patients with hip resurfacings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:925–33

Dislocation is a common reason for revision following total hip replacement. This study investigated the relationship between the bearing surface and the risk of revision due to dislocation. It was based on 110 239 primary total hip replacements with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis collected by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between September 1999 and December 2007. A total of 862 (0.78%) were revised because of dislocation. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces had a lower risk of requiring revision due to dislocation than did metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene surfaces, with a follow-up of up to seven years. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants were more likely to have larger prosthetic heads and to have been implanted in younger patients. The size of the head of the femoral component and age are known to be independent predictors of dislocation. Therefore, the outcomes were stratified by the size of the head and age. There is a significantly higher rate of revision for dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces than in metal-on-polyethylene implants when smaller sizes (≤ 28 mm) of the head were used in younger patients (< 65 years) (hazard ratio = 1.53, p = 0.041) and also with larger (> 28 mm) and in older patients (≥ 65 years) (hazard ratio = 1.73, p = 0.016)

Purpose Of Study. The study was started in 2004 to determine the best bearing surface in the long term, and to measure the metal ion levels generated by each of the bearing surfaces. We present the latest updated results. Material and methods. A prospective randomised study was started in 2004 to compare the wear characteristics of Ceramic on X linked Polyethylene (C.O.P.), Ceramic on Ceramic (C.O.C), Ceramic on Metal (C.O.M.) and Metal on Metal (M.O.M) bearings. The level of Cobalt and Chrome ions in red blood cells have been documented at serial intervals, using the ICP – MS method. Aside from the bearing surfaces the rest of the implant is standard, using a Pinnacle Cup, Corail Stem and 28mm heads. 256 Cases were enrolled on the study. To date 71 cases have been lost due to death (26), revision (9) and lost to follow up (36), leaving us with 185 for follow-up. An even spread of cases in each bearing surface are still available for follow up, viz. 46 C.O.P, 48 C.O.C., 44 C.O.M. and 47 M.O.M. Average follow up is currently 4.8 years, ranging up to 9 years. Results. To date no difference could be determined on the wear properties, with all bearings being acceptable. The only wear that could be measured was with C.O.P. bearings. Metal ion levels at no stage have been raised in the C.O.P. and C.O.C. bearings. Initially C.O.M. bearings had lower levels than M.O.M. bearings, but by 36 months were virtually the same with the mean below the 2ug/L level. At 60 month follow up values on almost half of the cases show markedly lower metal ions in the C.O.M. group. Outliers in both groups were associated with poorly placed cups, with the C.O.M. bearing being more forgiving that the M.O.M. group. Conclusion. To date the C.O.P. and C.O.M. bearings are performing the best of the 4 bearing combinations. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction: Dislocation is the most common complication resulting in re-operation following total hip arthroplasty, accounting for 33.5% of revisions. This study investigates the relationship between bearing surface and the risk of revision due to dislocation. Materials and Methods: Analysis was based on 110,239 primary total hip arthroplasties with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Data were collected by the Austra-lian Orthopaedic National Joint Replacement Registry from September 1999 to December 2007. The bearing surfaces were: 20627 (18.7%) ceramic-on-ceramic, 14001 (12.7%) ceramic-on-polyethylene, 12208 (11.1%) metal-on-metal, and 62437 (56.6%) metal-on-polyethylene. In 966 (0.8%) hips the bearing surface was unknown. Results: There were 862 (0.8%) hips revised due to dislocation, with a rate of 0.3 revisions per 100 component years. Survival analysis with an end point of revision due to dislocation was performed. Revision for dislocation is potentially associated with variables other than bearing surface (including age and femoral component head size). Therefore analyses were stratified by femoral head size (≤28mm and > 28mm), and age (< 65 years and ≤65 years). There is a significantly higher rate of revision for dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces compared to metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces after adjustment for age, sex and head size in the head size < =28mm/Age < 65 group (hazard ratio = 1.53, 95% C.I. = 1.02 to 2.30, p=0.041) and the head size > 28mm/Age > =65 group (hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% C.I. = 1.10 to 2.74, p=0.016). Discussion: Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision due to dislocation in the femoral head sizes and ages discussed above, compared with metal-on-polyethylene. Possible mechanisms for this observed difference may include patient selection, the limits to head and liner offset options when using ceramic bearing surfaces or higher rates of revision after dislocation due to ceramic head or liner damage. However our results are based on a seven year follow-up, and higher rates of late dislocation with polyethylene bearings may be observed in association with higher wear rates compared with ceramic liners

Introduction:. Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a proven and effective surgical procedure. One of the main limiting factors of the longevity of THR is the performance of the bearing surface. The optimum bearing surface choice, however, remains controversial. We wanted to understand what influenced the choice of bearing surfaces amongst South African orthopaedic surgeons. We also wanted to know if there was any consensus between surgeons and the orthopaedic trade. Aims, material and methods:. There is no epidemiological registry-based data available in South Africa in respect of bearing surfaces used in hip replacements. We sent out an electronic survey to all members of the South African Orthopaedic Association as well as to trade representatives. Patient parameters influencing the choice of bearing surfaces were surveyed and these included age, gender, level of activity and diagnosis. We used a regressional and tree analysis methodology to interpret the results. Results:. We received 133 responses from orthopaedic surgeons. There were no differences in decision making and bearing surface choices according to the surgeon's experience, type of practice or fellowship training. It was statistically significant that age was the first and most important factor when deciding upon a bearing surface. The patient's activity level then played a secondary role in the final choice. We show that gender and clinical diagnosis played no significant part in decision-making. Ceramic-on-ceramic combinations were used most commonly in younger patients and metal-on-polyethylene in older patients. 73% of surgeons chose metal-on-polyethylene in patients older than 70 years. There were no surgeons who selected metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-metal combinations for any patients. Metal-on-polyethylene was the first choice in 51% of patients with a low-activity level and 23% of those patients with a high level of activity. Ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene was the first choice in patients with a high level of activity by 32% and 34% of surgeons respectively. We received 51 responses from the trade representatives surveyed. There was no difference between the surgeons and the trade representatives in respect of their decision making when advising on bearing surfaces to be used in specific patients. Conclusion:. While each bearing surface combination has advantages and disadvantages we have demonstrated the rationale behind the decision making and the current trends in choices of bearing surfaces by South African orthopaedic surgeons. We note that our surgeon's choices are in line with international trends, especially in respect of metal containing bearing surfaces. We have also shown that the orthopaedic trade representative's guidelines are in keeping with those of the profession

Hip bearing surfaces materials are typically broadly reported in national registry (metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic etc). We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by detailed types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with detailed head and shell/liner bearing material combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 were included in the primary analysis (Monobloc cups: n=378,979 and Modular cups: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the overall risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the overall risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The overall and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is reduced for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup in reference to THRs with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner/cup

Introduction: This study evaluated the sphericity of bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Methods: All the prosthetic metal femoral heads and the UHMWPE liners evaluated in this study were obtained straight from manufacturers (DePuy Johnson and Johnson, Howmedica Osteonics, Kyocera, Smith and Nephew, Zimmer). Out-of-roundness was assessed as an indicator representing sphericity. A total of 50 femoral heads and 22 UHMWPE liners were evaluated in 1995. Out-of-roundness of ball bearings were measured for the control study. A total of 43 femoral heads and 40 UHMWPE liners were evaluated in 1999 and 2000. Results: The out-of-roundness of the femoral heads and the UHMWPE liners were significantly inferior to those of ball bearings. The out-of-roundness of the UHMWPE liners was significantly inferior to that of the femoral heads. The out-of-roundness of the femoral head on the sagittal plane was significantly inferior to that on the transverse plane. Several significant differences were found among different manufacturers. Overall, the out-of-roundness of the femoral head on the sagittal plane and UHMWPE liners had improved significantly in 1999/2000 compared to that in 1995. Discussion: We previously reported that UHMWPE wear in poor out-of-roundness coupling (femoral head: 9.5 μm, socket: 36 μm) was 148% greater compared to those in good out-of-roundness coupling (femoral head: 0.5 μm, socket: 0.6 μm) at 1 million cycle experiments (J Arthroplasty 15:332, 2000). Some prosthetic femoral heads indicated more than 9.5 μm out-of-roundness in the present study, and these femoral heads with poor sphericity might be unfavorable to wear if implanted. We consider that sphericity of UHMWPE liners should be also improved to reduce initial UHMWPE wear. The sphericity of bearing surfaces can be improved by appropriate changes in manufacturing technique. Further improvement is desirable, since this is expected to prolong the functional performance of the prosthesis after total hip arthroplasty

The gold standard for PJI treatment comprises the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers, which are limited in their load bearing capacity[1]. Thus, developing an antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE bearing surface can improve the mechanical properties of spacers and improve the quality of life of PJI patients. In this study, we incorporated vancomycin into UHMWPE to investigate its elution characteristics, mechanical properties and its efficacy against an acute PJI in an animal model. Vancomycin hydrochloride was incorporated into UHMWPE (2 to 14%) by blending and consolidation. We studied drug elution with blocks in PBS and UV-Vis spectroscopy at 280 nm. We determined the tensile mechanical properties and impact strength [3]. We implanted osteochondral plugs in rabbits using either control UHMWPE, bone cement (40g) containing vancomycin (1g) and tobramycin (3.6g) or vancomycin-eluting UHMWPE (n=5) plugs in the patellofemoral groove of rabbits. All rabbits received a beaded titanium rod in the tibial canal. All groups received two doses of 5×10. 7. cfu of bioluminescent S. aureus in the distal tibial canal prior to insertion of the rod and the articular space after closure of the joint capsule. No intravenous antibiotics were used. Bioluminescence signal was measured when the rabbits expired, or at 21-day post-op. Hardware, polyethylene implants, and joint tissues were sonicated to further quantify live bacteria via plate seeding. Vancomycin elution increased with increasing drug loading. Vancomycin elution above MIC for 3 weeks and optimized mechanical properties were obtained at 6–7 wt% vancomycin loading in UHMWPE. In our lapine acute infection model using bioluminescent S. aureus, knees treated with UHMWPE without antibiotics and bone cement containing vancomycin and tobramycin had significantly higher bioluminescence compared to those treated with vancomycin-eluting UHMWPE. These results suggest that an antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE spacer with acceptable properties as a bearing surface could be used to treat periprosthetic joint infection in lieu of bone cement spacers and this could allow safer load bearing and a higher quality of life for the patients during treatment. In addition, this presents a safer alternative in cases where the second stage surgery for the implantation of new components is hindered

Lubricated metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing surfaces are not easily separated, unlike ceramic- or metal-on-UHMWPE (COP, MOP), due to interfacial forces and low diametric clearance that provides a ‘suction-fit’. In vivo videofluoroscopic studies have shown that patients with MOP/COP THRs exhibit separation of bearing surfaces by up to 3.1 mm during normal gait and 5.4 mm during active abduction while patients with MOM bearings do not. In this regard, MOM bearings may have similarities to constrained bearings with the potential to lower dislocation rates. All patients under 70 years old undergoing primary THRs for primary osteoarthritis were prospectively registered on a computer database. From 1993–8, patients were offered a 28 mm COP bearing. After 1998, as part of a clinical trial, a 28 mm MOM bearing was inserted instead. For all cases, we used a metal-backed, uncemented acetabulum allowing a modular 10-degrees posteriorly augmented insert (Duraloc/PFC/Ultima, J& J) and the same cemented femoral stem (Ultima, J& J). The same experienced surgeon performed all operations using the posterior approach. Interfacial forces between bearing surfaces were assessed in vitro with a variable-speed-motor winch (APT) and a load-cell (E375/RDP) by recording peak-retaining-forces of bearing couples during separation with variable impact-distraction velocities. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square and student’s t-test. We identified 140 COP THRs in 129 patients and 109 MOM THRs in 100 patients. Nine of 140 (6.4%) COP bearings dislocated within 3 months of surgery compared to 1 of 109 (0.9%) in the MOM group (p=0.024). No significant differences were identified between groups when comparing patient and prosthesis factors. In vitro assessment demonstrated that MOM bearing possessed interfacial retaining forces up to 30N more than COP bearing (p< 0.001). This study demonstrates a significantly lower dislocation rate in THR with MOM bearing compared with COP. A potential explanation is the differential ease of separation that the two lubricated bearing couples possess due to interfacial retaining forces (viscous tension and ionic adhesive forces) exerted by the lubricating fluid

Introduction. Previous studies of long-term CoCr alloy femoral components for TKA have identified 3rd body abrasive wear and inflammatory cell induced corrosion (ICIC). The extent of femoral condyle surface damage in contemporary CoCr femoral components is currently unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and morphology of damage (3rd body scratches and ICIC) at the bearing surface in retrieved TKA femoral components from contemporary designs. Methods. 308 CoCr femoral TKA components were collected as part of an ongoing, multi-institutional orthopedic implant retrieval program. The collection included contemporary designs from Stryker (Triathlon n=48, NRG n=10, Scorpio n=31), Depuy Synthes (PFC n=27) and Zimmer (NexGen n=140, Persona n=1) and Biomet (Vanguard n=51). Hinged knee designs and unicondylar knee designs were excluded. Components were split into groups based on implantation time: short-term (1–3y, n=134), intermediate-term (3–5y, n=73) and long-term (6–15y, n=101). Each grouping was mainly revised for instability, infection and loosening. Third-body abrasive wear of CoCr was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring method similar to the Hood method (Figure 1). A score of 1 had minimal damage and a score of 4 corresponded to damage covering more than 50% of the evaluated area. ICIC damage was reported as location of affected area. A white light interferometer (Zygo New View 5000) was also used to analyze the topography of severe damage of the bearing surface. For this analysis, three representative components from each cohort were selected and analyzed in three locations on the apex of the bearing surface. We analyzed the following roughness parameters: Ra, Rsk, and Rku. Results. On the CoCr bearing surface, the primary damage mechanisms were large scratches, small random scratches, and ICIC damage (Figure 2). Mild to severe damage (Damage Score ≥ 2) was observed in 96% of the short-term, 98% intermediate-term and 94% of long-term components. Severe damage (Damage Score = 4) was observed in 43% of the short-term, 50% intermediate-term and 56% of long-term components. ICIC damage observed on a portion of the bearing surface was detected in 43% of the short-term components, 30% of the intermediate-term components and 26% of the long term components. Apparent ICIC damage on the bearing and/or a non-bearing region of the component was observed in 85% of the short-term components, 75% of the intermediate-term components and 80of long-term TKA components. The Ra, Rsk, and Rku were similar between cohorts (Table 1). Discussion. Abrasive wear of the femoral components was frequently observed in retrieved contemporary femoral components for TKA, regardless of their implantation time, and can most likely be attributed to third body damage caused by bone or bone cement debris. The prevalence of severe CoCr damage scores was highest in the long-term cohort, while the appearance of ICIC damage was lowest in the long-term cohort. Surface roughness parameters were similar in all three cohorts suggesting that the mechanism for this damage is comparable throughout the first 15 years of service. Future work is necessary to quantify the in vivo release of CoCr from abrasive wear and corrosion mechanisms, and the effects of increased surface roughness on wear of the polyethylene counter face

The main objective of joint arthroplasty is to improve activities of daily living of the patient. However, normal daily activities may lead to separation of articular surfaces of an artificial joint, possibly as a result of a combined impact and sliding motion. Therefore, the properties of articular surfaces define the durability of implant materials. Modification of bearing surfaces with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC) increases the hydration of the surfaces and decreases the wear of the substrates. Hence, a PMPC layer can potentially cushion the impact and improve the resistance of cross-linked polyethylene (CLPE). This study aimed to explore the fatigue and wear resistance of PMPC-grafted hydrated CLPE under impact-to-wear conditions using a pin-on-disk tester. The surfaces of a CLPE disk (3- or 6-mm thick) were modified with PMPC by photoinduced polymerization and were sterilized using gamma rays. The wear resistance of PMPC-grafted CLPE disks against a Co-Cr-Mo alloy pin was evaluated and compared to that of untreated disks. The disks were fixed to the tester with a metal plate (Ti-6Al-4V alloy) that had a central hole. The test was performed for 2 × 10. 6. cycles of repetitive impact and unidirectional sliding with the maximum load of 150 N, sliding distance of 10 mm, and frequency of 1 Hz [Fig. 1]. Gravimetric wear was determined by weighing the disks, and soak controls were used to compensate for fluid absorption. Volumetric changes in the surfaces of the disks were evaluated using a three-dimensional non-contact optical profiler. The average gravimetric wear (mg) after 2 × 10. 6. cycles was 0.000/0.120 for CLPE (3/6 mm) and −0.073/–0.137 for PMPC-CLPE (3/6 mm). The weight gain of the PMPC-CLPE disks was due to their greater fluid absorption compared to that of the soak controls under the impact-to-wear conditions, as judged from the fact that during the load-soak in the lubricant this gain was observed for all the disks irrespectively of PMPC grafting. PMPC-grafting decreased the gravimetric wear of CLPE (p < 0.01) in the 6-mm group, whereas the thickness of the CLPE disks had no substantial effect on the wear resistance [Fig. 2]. In all cases, three-dimensional measurements detected a remarkable volumetric penetration in the impact-sliding surfaces and an extrusion of CLPE from the backside surfaces into the hole in the metal plate. Both the volumetric penetration and backside extrusion were smaller in the 6-mm group. The PMPC grafting had no discernible effect on these volumetric changes [Fig. 3]. Even after 2 × 10. 6. cycles of impact loads, mechanical fracture or delamination of the impact-sliding or backside surfaces were hardly observed in all the groups. The results of this study revealed that: (1) PMPC-grafting of CLPE surfaces decreased the gravimetric wear irrespectively of the disk thickness; and (2) thinner CLPE increased the risk of volumetric changes, including penetration in the impact-sliding surface and extrusion of the backside surface. In conclusion, PMPC grafting can potentially improve the wear resistance of the bearing surface of biomaterials even under impact-to-wear conditions, increasing the longevity of artificial joints

We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with head and shell/liner combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 are included in the primary analysis (Monobloc: n=378,979 and Modular: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the all-cause risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the all-cause risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The all-cause and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is lower for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup than commonly used alternatives such as cobalt chrome heads and HCLPE liner/cup

The search for the ideal bearing surface in Total Hip Replacements continues. The current ‘best’ materials are felt to be combinations of metal, ceramics and cross-linked polyethylene. Laboratory studies suggest that ceramic-on-metal articulations may provide distinct advantages. This study aims to identify the best bearing surface combination with the lowest adverse side effect profile. Between February 2004 and September 2007, 164 hips were replaced in 142 patients. 39% were male and 69% were female. The average age at surgery was 53 years (17-72 years). Follow-up assessment included radiographs, the Harris Hip Score and whole blood samples for metal ion levels. Complications to date included 3 hips which needed femoral revision because of surgery related factors, and 3 cases of sepsis of which 1 settled and 2 needed revision. One hip needed revision of head and liner to a larger bearing size for recurrent dislocations, and is no longer being followed up for blood metal ions. Post-operative whole blood metal ion levels were compared to pre-operative levels to determine the increase or decrease in metal ion levels. There were no changes in those patients with ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene articulations. Moderately raised whole blood metal ion levels were noted at 3 months in the ceramic-on-metal group, while the metal-on-metal group show the greatest increase. This study agrees with laboratory bearing surface wear studies demonstrating lower wear rates in the ceramic-on-metal group compared to the metal-on-metal group. With concerns related to high blood metal ion levels in metal-on-metal articulations, ceramic-on-metal bearing surfaces may well become a bearing surface of choice in the future, but progress needs to be monitored in the longer term