Aims. The factors that predispose to recurrent instability and revision stabilization procedures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability remain unclear. We sought to determine the rate and risk factors associated with ongoing instability in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for instability of the shoulder. Materials and Methods. We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database to identify patients with a diagnosis of anterior instability of the shoulder undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2003 and 2011. Patients were followed for a minimum of three years. Baseline demographics and subsequent further surgery to the ipsilateral shoulder were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for recurrent instability. Results. A total of 5719 patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 24.9 years (. sd.  9.3); 4013 (70.2%) were male. A total of 461 (8.1%) underwent a further procedure involving the ipsilateral shoulder at a mean of 31.5 months (. sd.  23.8) postoperatively; 117 (2.1%) had a closed reduction and 344 (6.0%) had further surgery. Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was the most common subsequent surgical procedure (223; 65.4%). Independent risk factors for recurrent instability were: age < 19 years (odds ratio 1.86), Caucasian ethnicity (hazard ratio 1.42), bilateral instability of the shoulder (hazard ratio 2.17), and a history of closed reduction(s) prior to the initial repair (hazard ratio 2.45). Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with significantly higher rates of ongoing persistent instability than revision open stabilization (12.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.041). Conclusion. The incidence of a further procedure being required in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability was 8.1%. Younger age, Caucasian race, bilateral instability, and closed reduction prior to the initial repair were independent risk factors for recurrent instability, while subsequent revision arthroscopic Bankart repair had significantly higher rates of persistent instability than subsequent open revision procedures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:324–30

Aims. Patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder commonly have an anterior osseous defect of the glenoid. Once the defect reaches a critical size, stability may be restored by bone grafting. The critical size of this defect under non-physiological loading conditions has previously been identified as 20% of the length of the glenoid. As the stability of the shoulder is load-dependent, with higher joint forces leading to a loss of stability, the aim of this study was to determine the critical size of an osseous defect that leads to further anterior instability of the shoulder under physiological loading despite a Bankart repair. Patients and Methods. Two finite element (FE) models were used to determine the risk of dislocation of the shoulder during 30 activities of daily living (ADLs) for the intact glenoid and after creating anterior osseous defects of increasing magnitudes. A Bankart repair was simulated for each size of defect, and the shoulder was tested under loading conditions that replicate in vivo forces during these ADLs. The critical size of a defect was defined as the smallest osseous defect that leads to dislocation. Results. The FE models showed a high risk of dislocation during ADLs after a Bankart repair for anterior defects corresponding to 16% of the length of the glenoid. Conclusion. This computational study suggests that bone grafting should be undertaken for an anterior osseous defect in the glenoid of more than 16% of its length rather than a solely soft-tissue procedure, in order to optimize stability by restoring the concavity of the glenoid

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Aims. The aims of this study were to validate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following arthroscopic Bankart repair, and to identify preoperative threshold values of these scores that could predict the achievement of MCID and PASS. Methods. A retrospective review was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between January 2020 and January 2023. Inclusion criteria required at least one episode of shoulder instability and a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Preoperative and one-year postoperative scores were assessed. MCID and PASS were estimated using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined preoperative patient-reported outcome measure thresholds predictive of achieving MCID and PASS. Results. MCID thresholds were determined as 169.6, 6.8, 7.2, and 1.1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. PASS thresholds were calculated as ≤ 480, ≥ 80, ≥ 87, and ≤ 1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 760 (WOSI) and ≤ 50 (Rowe) predicted achieving MCID for WOSI score (p < 0.001). Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 60 (ASES) and ≥ 2 (VAS) predicted achieving MCID for VAS score (p < 0.001). A preoperative threshold of ≥ 40 (Rowe) predicted achieving PASS for Rowe score (p = 0.005). Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 50 (ASES; p = 0.002) and ≤ 2 (VAS; p < 0.001) predicted achieving PASS for the ASES score. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 43 (ASES; p = 0.046) and ≤ 4 (VAS; p = 0.024) predicted achieving PASS for the VAS. Conclusion. This study defined MCID and PASS values for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Higher preoperative functional scores may reduce the likelihood of achieving MCID but increase the likelihood of achieving the PASS. These findings provide valuable guidance for surgeons to counsel patients realistically regarding their expectations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1118–1124

Aims. The Bankart and Latarjet procedures are two of the most common surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. However, the outcomes in the adolescent population remain unclear, and there is no information regarding the arthroscopic Latarjet in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures in the management of anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Methods. We present a retrospective, matched-pair study of teenagers with anterior glenohumeral instability treated with an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) or an arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure with a minimum two-year follow-up. Preoperative demographic and clinical features, factors associated with dislocation, and complications were collected. Recurrence, defined as dislocation or subluxation, was established as the primary outcome. Clinical and functional outcomes were analyzed using objective (Rowe), and subjective (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)) scores. Additionally, the rate of return to sport was assessed. Results. A total of 51 adolescents were included, of whom 46 (92%) were male, with 17 (33%) in the Latarjet group and 34 (66%) in the Bankart group. The mean age at time of surgery was 18 years (15 to 19). There were no intraoperative complications. At a median follow-up of nine years (IQR 2 to 18), recurrence was observed in 12 patients in the Bankart group (35.3%) and one patient in the Latarjet group (5.9%) (p = 0.023). Satisfactory postoperative outcomes were obtained, with mean Rowe, WOSI, and SANE scores noted at 95 (10 to 100), 325 (25 to 1,975), and 87.5 (10 to 100), respectively. Most patients (29 in the Bankart group (85.3%) and 16 in the Latarjet group (94.1%)) were able to return to sport (p = 0.452). Conclusion. The ABR and AL procedures both obtain satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes in the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability in adolescents with a low complication rate. However, the ABR is associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1041–1048

In this study we evaluated whether the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) could detect those patients at risk of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Between April 2008 and June 2010, the ISIS and WOSI were recorded pre-operatively in 110 patients (87 male, 79%) with a mean age of 25.1 years (16 to 61) who underwent this procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. . A telephone interview was performed two-years post-operatively to determine whether patients had experienced a recurrent dislocation and whether they had returned to pre-injury activity levels. In all, six (5%) patients had an ISIS > 6 points (0 to 9). Of 100 (91%) patients available two years post-operatively, six (6%) had a recurrent dislocation, and 28 (28%) did not return to pre-injury activity. No patient who dislocated had an ISIS > 6 (p = 1.0). There was no difference in the mean pre-operative WOSI in those who had a re-dislocation and those who did not (p = 0.99). The pre-operative WOSI was significantly lower (p = 0.02) in those who did not return to pre-injury activity, whereas the ISIS was not associated with return to pre-injury activity (p = 0.13). . In conclusion, neither the pre-operative ISIS nor WOSI predicted recurrent dislocation within two years of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with a lower pre-operative WOSI were less likely to return to pre-injury activity. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1688–92

Introduction. The Bankart lesion is the most common form of labro-ligamentous injury in patients with traumatic dislocations of the shoulder. Various methods have been described each with its own advantages and disadvantages. We describe 5-year results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless anchors. Patients and Methods. There were 38 patients, with involvement of the dominant arm in 28 patients. Recurrent dislocation was the most common indication in 21 patients, followed by first dislocation in 9 patients and second dislocation in 8 patients. All patients were done under general anesthesia and regional block in beach-chair position. Standard portals were used and repair done using 2.9 mm pushlock knotless anchors (Arthrex®). Patients had sling for 4 weeks and followed by a strict physiotherapy rehab protocol. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter. Results. Only one patient had symptoms of recurrent instability, but was not keen on further surgery. Two patients had limitation of external rotation to 10 degrees. The mean Carter-Rowe score was 77.3. 90% of patients were happy to recommend surgery. Conclusion. Arthroscopic Bankart repair appears to produce good mid-term results for patients with shoulder instability

Purpose: Although arthroscopic Bankart repair is yet an established procedure in the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability, it is still not known whether it reproduces the good results of the open repair procedure. Aim of this investigation was to compare the functional and subjective outcome between open and arthroscopic Bankart repair. Material and methods: A retrospective cross sectional study design on the comparison of open and arthoscopic Bankart treatments between 1995 and 2004 was implemented at the Dresden Orthopedic Surgery Department. In this period a total of 223 patients underwent surgery due to anterior shoulder instability, among which 212 patients had posttraumatic instability. A diagnostic arthroscopy was performed in all patients, but only 40 patients with intact capsulolabral complex and without capsular laxity were treated arthroscopically, the remaining 183 patients underwent an open Bankart procedure. A total of 186 patients with posttraumatic anterior instability could be clinically re-examined within 1 to 5 years after initial surgery, among which 147 patients underwent an open and 39 patients an arthroscopic Bankart procedure. The median age of this sample was 27 years (interquartile range 21 – 37 years) at initial surgery, 21% of these patients were female. Results: After open surgery 11 of 147 patients (8%) and 6 of 39 (15%) after arthroscopic surgery reported one or more re-dislocation after initial treatment, which occurred after a mean dislocation free time of 62 versus 40 months, respectively (95% confidence intervals 59 – 65 versus 36 – 44 months). Both a univariate analysis (Logrank test p=0.012) and a multivariate Cox regression analysis (Likelihood Ratio p=0.023) confirmed a statistically significant difference in the time between initial surgery to first reluxation. 4 of the 11 re-dislocations after open and 1 of 6 after arthroscopic surgery occurred after a new accident. That makes a re-dislocation rate without new adequate trauma of 5% after open and 13% after arthroscopic treatment. ROM showed no difference between open and arthroscopic Bankart procedure for abduction and a mild difference for external rotation. 21 of 115 (18%) patients had an external rotation lag of 20° or more after open surgery versus 1 of 34 (3%) after arthroscopic treatment (Fisher p=0,027). The Rowe score demonstrated “good” or “excellent” functional results in 102 of 117 (87%) patients versus 28 of 35 (80%) patients after open versus arthroscopic treatment (Fisher p=0,285). Conclusion: In this sample arthroscopic Bankart repair demonstrated more frequently and significantly earlier re-dislocation after initial surgery than did the open treatment alternative. External rotation lags of at least 20° occured more frequently after the open procedure

Background: There is a huge controversy regarding the period of immobilization after Bankart stabilisation. This ranges from 2 days to 5 weeks for open repair and from 3 to 6 weeks for arthroscopic Bankart repair. We believe it is inappropriate to immobilise the operated shoulder after Bankart repair. In our study all the patients were allowed to use their arm, the same day, pain permitting. No restrictions were imposed for the type and range of movement for those who had open repair. With arthroscopic repair they were asked to limit their shoulder abduction upto 45-degreee and external rotation to neutral. Method: In this retrospective study (1998–2003) we have analyzed the outcome of mobilisation of operated shoulder on the same day.43 primary stabilisations were performed by the senior author.one patient was uncontactble. We reviewed the records of 42 patients. Subsequently the General Practitioners were contacted to collect information about these patients and the patients were contacted, if needed. Out of 42 patients 34 were males and 8 females. 35 patients had an average of 7 episodes of anterior shoulder dislocations (range 2–25), 7 had unstable shoulder pre-operatively.30 had open repair, 12 had arthroscopic stabilisation. The average follow-up is 3.5years(1–6 years). Result: 41 patients did hot have any further episode of frank anterior shoulder dislocation and they had returned to their previous level of activities. Only one patient injured his operated shoulder year later while playing football. He underwent arthroscopic capsular shrinkage for traumatic deformation of the capsular and inferior glenohumeral ligament. Conclusion: In primary straightforward Bankart stabilisation, same day mobilisation does not increase the risk of anterior shoulder dislocation

Recurrence represents the leading complication of arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. Even with modern suture anchor techniques, a recurrence rate of between 5 to 20% persists; emphasizing that arthroscopic Bankart repair cannot apply to all patients and selection must be done. Numerous prognostic factors have already been reported, but strict observance would eliminate almost all patients from arthroscopic Bankart repair. We hypothesised that clinical and radiological risk factors could be present and identifiable in the normal outpatient visit, and they could be integrated into a severity score. A case-control study was undertaken, comparing patients identified as failures after arthroscopic Bankart repair (i.e, recurrent instability) with those who had a successful result (i.e., no recurrence). Recurrence was defined as any new episode of dislocation or any subjective complains of subluxation. During a four-year period one hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability, with or without shoulder hyperlaxity, were operated by the senior shoulder surgeon with an arthroscopic suture anchor technique and followed for a minimum of two years. Patients were excluded if concomitant pathology, including multidirectional instability, were present. Bony lesions were not excluded. A complete pre and postoperative questionnaire, physical exam, and anteroposterior x-ray were recorded. Mean follow-up was 31.2 months (range, twenty-four to fifty-two months). Nineteen patients had a recurrent anterior instability (14.5%). Preoperative evaluation demonstrated that age below twenty years old, involvement in athletic competition, participation in contact or forced-overhead sports, presence of shoulder hyperlaxity, Hill-Sachs lesion visible on AP external X-ray, and loss of inferior glenoid sclerotic contour on AP x-ray were all factors related to increased recurrence. These factors were integrated in an Instability Severity Index Score and tested retrospectively on the same population. Patients with a score of six or less had a recurrence risk of 10% and those over six had a recurrence risk of 70% (p< 0.001). This study proved that a simple scoring system based on factors of a preoperative questionnaire, physical exam, and anteroposterior x-ray can help the surgeon to select patients who would benefit from arthroscopic stabilization with suture anchors and those for whom an open surgery, like the Latarjet procedure, is a better option

Purpose: Arthroscopic stabilization for post-traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability is designed to minimize soft tissue dissection while achieving similar or improved outcomes relative to open techniques. This study’s purpose was to determine the rate of post-operative recurrent instability and evaluate health related quality of life (HRQL) and shoulder range of motion (ROM) following arthroscopic Bankart repair using a bioabsorbable knotless implant. Method: Forty-three patients were prospectively evaluated following arthroscopic anterior stabilization to assess for recurrent instability, HRQL, and shoulder ROM. Assessments were performed pre-operatively and 3, 6 and 12–24 months postoperatively. The HRQL measures included the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), and the Constant Score. Repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to evaluate ROM and HRQL. Results: The mean WOSI score improved from 45.67±17.99 pre-operatively to 83.16±18.58 at final follow-up. The mean ASES scores improved from 80.1±13.06 pre-operatively to 92.25±15.08, while the Constant score improved from 77.52±16.11 pre-operatively to 85.18±26.76. At final follow-up, 4 of 43 patients (9.3%) had experienced recurrent instability. For these 4 subjects, the WOSI score was significantly lower at final follow-up than those who did not experience recurrent instability (61.73±5.76 versus 84.38±16.94). The ASES and Constant scores at final follow-up were not significantly different between these two groups. Conclusion: Arthroscopic anterior stabilization using a bioabsorable tack led to a recurrent instability rate similar to previous reports, and resulted in improved HRQL and shoulder ROM. The WOSI score was better able to detect problems in HRQL related to instability than either the ASES or Constant score

We have undertaken to review Bankart stabilisations performed by the senior author in Newcastle since 1998. We employ a modification of the technique as described by Rowe et al, but without a coracoid osteotomy and using suture anchors. Where there is also an element of inferior instability this was combined with a capsular shift at the same time. We performed a retrospective case note review of all patients in the study period, following this all patients were sent out a postal questionnaire based on the Oxford Instability Score (OIS). A total of 50 Bankart repairs were performed in the study period, no significant wound infections or haematomas were recorded. 3 patient had further dislocations and required revision surgery; a further 2 patients had ongoing symptoms of instability one of which has had revision. Response rate to the questionnaire was 62%. Mean OIS for patients following primary stabilisation was 21.7 (possible scores from 12 – excellent outcome to 60 – poor outcome). OIS following Bankart stabilisation of the shoulder has not been previously reported. These results compare favourably to original scores published by Carr et al (1999) who included both patients treated by surgery and physiotherapy alone. The OIS was shown to be very sensitive in detecting instability symptoms noted at clinical review. The response pattern of the scores closely mirrored that from Carr and co-workers

Little is known about how arthroscopic knots behave in terms of reverse slippage and creep during the first few hours following a Bankart repair. We aimed to assess differences between knot types tied with a variety of suture materials when exposed to loading which might be expected during the first 12 hours following a repair. This study uses an apparatus to model the tensioning of a slipknot, the closing of a Bankart lesion and any reverse slippage occurring on removal of the tensioning force. Eight examples each of the Duncan loop and SMC knots were tied by an experienced surgeon using 4 different suture materials (PDS, Ethibond, Panacryl, Fibrewire). An arthroscopic knotting technique was used utilising a knot pusher. Each knot was locked with 3 half-hitches alternating direction and post each time. Any reverse slippage occurring during the tying process was recorded. Each knot was then left in situ for 12 hours under loads equivalent to a repaired Bankart lesion and any subsequent reverse slippage was recorded at the end of this period. After initial passing of the Duncan loop the sutures were ranked inversely to size of suture loop (resistance to slippage) in order Panacryl (5.08±0.15mm); Fibrewire (5.7±1.03mm); Ethibond (7.22±3.47mm) and PDS (8.2±5.16mm). After passing of locking hitches, they ranked Ethibond (5.13±0.24mm); PDS (5.15±0.09mm); Panacryl (5.17±0.13mm) and Fibrewire (5.66±0.5mm – significant p< 0.05). After 12 hrs, some evidence of reverse slippage was noted, Ethibond (5.23±0.27mm); PDS (5.27±0.13mm); Panacryl (5.3±0.16mm) and Fibrewire (5.66±0.5mm – significant p< 0.05). The SMC knot showed similar results. If a slip-knot back slips it can be tightened with the first locking hitch. After this further hitches do not tighten the knot further. Some slippage was noted during the first 12 hrs. Using arthroscopic techniques, Fibrewire performs less well than other materials

To report the results of the vertical apical suture Bankart lesion repair. Fifty-nine patients (52 men and 7 women) with a mean age of twenty-seven years (range, 16 to 53 years) were studied. The mean duration of instability was 4. 1 years and mean follow-up was 42 months (range 24 to 58 months). A laterally based T-shape capsular incision was performed with the horizontal component directed towards the glenoid neck and into the Bankart lesion. A vertical apical suture through the superior and inferior flaps of the Bankart lesion, tightens the anterior structures to allow them to snug onto the convex decorticated surface of the anterior glenoid. The inferior flap of the capsule was then shifted superiorly and the superior flap shifted inferiorly to augment the anterior capsule, with the shoulder in 20 degrees of abduction and 30 degrees of external rotation. At final review, according to the system of Rowe et al., 94. 9% (56 patients) had a rating of good or excellent. Three patients had a recurrent dislocation due to further trauma. The mean loss of forward elevation was 1 degree, external rotation with the arm at the side was 2. 4 degrees and external rotation in 90 degrees abduction was 2. 2 degrees. Of forty-four patients participating in sport, thirty-five (79. 5%) returned to the same sport at the same level of activity, seven returned to the same sport at a reduced level of activity and two patients did not return to sport. The vertical apical suture repair offers a 94. 9% stability rate, a maintained range of motion and a 79. 5% return to pre-injury level of sporting activity. It is technically less demanding than the Bankart procedure. All sutures used are absorbable. Complications related to non-absorbable implants and absorbable anchors and tacks are avoided

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for recurrent instability of the shoulder and assess the ability to return to sport in patients with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage (ABR-HSR). Methods. This retrospective study included 133 consecutive patients with a mean age of 30 years (14 to 69) who underwent ABR-HSR; 103 (77%) practiced sports before the instability of the shoulder. All had large/deep, engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (Calandra III). Patients were divided into two groups: A (n = 102) with minimal or no (< 10%) glenoid bone loss, and B (n = 31) with subcritical (10% to 20%) glenoid loss. A total of 19 patients (14%) had undergone a previous stabilization, which failed. The primary endpoint was recurrent instability, with a secondary outcome of the ability to return to sport. Results. At a mean follow-up of four years (1.0 to 8.25), ten patients (7.5%) had recurrent instability. Patients in group B had a significantly higher recurrence rate than those in group A (p = 0.001). Using a multivariate logistic regression, the presence of glenoid erosion of > 10% (odds ratio (OR) = 35.13 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8 to 149); p = 0.001) and age < 23 years (OR = 0.89 (0.79 to 0.99); p = 0.038) were associated with a higher risk of recurrent instability. A total of 80 patients (78%) could return to sport, but only 11 athletes (65%) who practiced high-risk (collision or contact-overhead) sports. All seven shoulders which were revised using a Latarjet procedure were stable at a mean final follow-up of 36 months (11 to 57) and returned to sports at the same level. Conclusion. Patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss (> 10%) and younger age (≤ 23 years) are at risk of failure and reoperation after ABR-HSR. Furthermore, following this procedure, one-third of athletes practicing high-risk sports are unable to return at their pre-instability level, despite having a stable shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):718–724

Primary traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder are common injuries which are complicated by persistent instability in a high proportion of patients. Surgery is successful and has been well described in the literature. Current controversies centre on the role of open and arthroscopic techniques. We describe the outcomes of a new mini-incision surgical (MIS) technique which was developed within our institution.

27 patients with traumatic shoulder instability (2 bilateral) were prospectively entered into a database between June 1998 and March 2008. The mean age was 31 years and the mean follow up period was 53 months. 29 shoulders underwent diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy and mini-incision surgery using a delto-pectoral approach and 3 bio-absorbable anchors.

Patients reported no re-dislocation in 24 shoulders (83%). 5 shoulders, including one with a bony Bankart lesion, re-dislocated with additional trauma. One shoulder required revision to a Bristow-Latarjet. Satisfaction was very good in 16 and good in 9 shoulders (83%). 19 patients had minimal or no pain. 8 patients experienced moderate shoulder pain with the other two complaining of severe pain. QuickDASH scores were encouraging.

Our technique combines the ability to appreciate all shoulder pathology arthroscopically with the visualisation gained in open Bankart surgery. Functionally, patients do well. The higher than expected re-dislocation rate is concerning. We advise that long term outcomes are needed.

Coracoid fractures during screw insertion and graft osteolysis are serious concerns with standard screw fixation techniques in Latarjet procedure. This study tends to evaluate the outcome of mini open Latarjet using Arthrex mini-plate for coracoids graft fixation. We did retrospective analysis of 30 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart's repair. A low profile wedge plate (Arthrex) with two low profile screws was used for fixation of the coracoid graft. CT analysis was performed at final follow up to see graft union and results were evaluated using American shoulder and elbow score (ASES) and Western Ontario shoulder instability score (WOSIS). Mean follow up time was 24 months. Postoperatively, mean forward elevation was 162.8 degrees and external rotation was 44.6 degrees. All patients returned to their previous occupation. None reported to be having any recurrent subluxation post-surgery. The mean ASES score was 92.5 while the mean WOSIS score was 76.84%. Only one patient had screw backing out from the plate. There was no case of coracoid graft osteolysis. The mini-open Latarjet procedure with graft fixation with Arthrex mini-plate provides satisfactory outcome and stabilization in patients who present with dramatic bone loss and failed soft tissue reconstruction. It not only ensures early rehabilitation but also minimum loss of external rotation. The only drawback is the relatively high cost of the implant

The purpose of this study was to report the results of the vertical apical suture Bankart lesion repair. Fifty-nine patients (52 men and seven women) with a mean age of twenty-seven years (range, 16–53 years) underwent this procedure. The mean duration of instability was 4 years and mean follow-up was 42 months (minimum of two years). A laterally based T-shape capsular incision is performed with the horizontal component directed towards the glenoid neck and into the Bankart lesion. A vertical apical suture through the superior and inferior flaps of the Bankart lesion, tighten the anterior structures to allow them to snug onto the convex decorticated surface of the anterior glenoid. At final review, according to the system of Rowe et al., 94.9% (56 patients) had a rating of good or excellent. Three patients had a recurrent dislocation due to further trauma. The mean loss of forward elevation was 1 degree, external rotation with the arm at the side was 2.4 degrees and external rotation in 90 degrees abduction was 2.2 degrees. Of forty-four patients participating in sport, thirty-five (79.5%) returned to the same sport at the same level of activity, even returned to the same sport at a reduced level of activity and two patients did not return to sport. The vertical apical suture repair offers a 94.9 percent success rate in terms of stability, a maintained range of motion and a 79.5% return to pre-injury level of sporting activity. It is technically less demanding than the Bankart procedure. All sutures used are absorbable. Complications related to non-absorbable implants and absorbable anchors and tacks are avoided

The April 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Arthroscopic Bankart repair in athletes: in it for the long run?; Functional outcomes and the Wrightington classification of elbow fracture-dislocations; Hemiarthroplasty or ORIF intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients; Return to sport after total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty; Readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty; Arthroscopic Bankart repair in the longer term; Bankart repair with(out) remplissage or the Latarjet procedure? A systematic review and meta-analysis; Regaining motion among patients with shoulder pathology: are all exercises equal?

Bone defects are frequently observed in anterior shoulder instability. Over the last decade, knowledge of the association of bone loss with increased failure rates of soft-tissue repair has shifted the surgical management of chronic shoulder instability. On the glenoid side, there is no controversy about the critical glenoid bone loss being 20%. However, poor outcomes have been described even with a subcritical glenoid bone defect as low as 13.5%. On the humeral side, the Hill-Sachs lesion should be evaluated concomitantly with the glenoid defect as the two sides of the same bipolar lesion which interact in the instability process, as described by the glenoid track concept. We advocate adding remplissage to every Bankart repair in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion, regardless of the glenoid bone loss. When critical or subcritical glenoid bone loss occurs in active patients (> 15%) or bipolar off-track lesions, we should consider anterior glenoid bone reconstructions. The techniques have evolved significantly over the last two decades, moving from open procedures to arthroscopic, and from screw fixation to metal-free fixation. The new arthroscopic techniques of glenoid bone reconstruction procedures allow precise positioning of the graft, identification, and treatment of concomitant injuries with low morbidity and faster recovery. Given the problems associated with bone resorption and metal hardware protrusion, the new metal-free techniques for Latarjet or free bone block procedures seem a good solution to avoid these complications, although no long-term data are yet available. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1100–1110