Aims. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are often the preferred forms of treatment for patients with atraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head when conservative treatment fails. Little has been reported about the survival of HA and TSA for this indication. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in revision rates between HA and TSA in these patients, to determine whether one of these implants has a superior survival and may be a better choice in the treatment of this condition. Methods. Data from 280 shoulders with 159 primary HAs and 121 TSAs, which were undertaken in patients with atraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head between January 2014 and January 2023 from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were undertaken. Results. Within four years of follow-up, a total of 15 revisions were required, involving seven HAs (4%) and eight TSAs (7%). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.523). Two HAs were revised because of progressive glenoid erosion, and three TSAs were revised for loosening of the glenoid component. The cumulative percentages of revision of HA and TSA were 6% and 8%, respectively (HR 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7)). Conclusion. We found no significant difference in short- to mid-term implant survival between the use of a HA and a TSA in the treatment of atraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head, without significant glenoid wear. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(1):97–102

Thirty shoulders, in 20 patients, which had undergone core decompression for symptomatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head were reviewed 2 to 14 years later (average 5.6). Twenty-two showed good or excellent clinical results; the other eight shoulders had required arthroplasty. All 14 shoulders with stage I or II radiological changes (Ficat and Arlet 1980) at operation had good or excellent results. We advocate early core decompression for symptomatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head

Aims. Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. To address these challenges, various augmentation techniques to increase medial column support have been developed. There are currently no recent studies that definitively establish the superiority of augmented fixation over non-augmented implants in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or bone-graft augmentation versus those who underwent locking-plate fixation without augmentation for proximal humeral fractures. Methods. The search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles involving patients with complex proximal humeral fractures treated using open reduction with locking-plate fixation, with or without augmentation, were considered. A meta-analysis of comparative studies comparing locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or with bone-graft augmentation versus locking-plate fixation without augmentation was performed. Results. A total of 19 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and six comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 120 patients received locking-plate fixation with bone-graft augmentation, 179 patients received locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation, and 336 patients received locking-plate fixation without augmentation. No statistically relevant differences between the augmented and non-augmented cohorts were found in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score and Constant-Murley Score. The cement-augmented group had a significantly lower rate of complications compared to the non-augmented group. Conclusion. While locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation appears to produce a lower complication rate compared to locking-plate fixation alone, functional outcomes seem comparable between augmented and non-augmented techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):646–655

The February 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does indomethacin prevent heterotopic ossification following elbow fracture fixation?; Arthroscopic capsular shift in atraumatic shoulder joint instability; Ultrasound-guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham; Combined surgical and exercise-based interventions following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Are vascularized fibula autografts a long-lasting reconstruction after intercalary resection of the humerus for primary bone tumours?; Anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with limited forward elevation; Tension band or plate fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures?; Is long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty needed?

Sickle-cell disease (SCD) is probably the commonest cause of avascular necrosis worldwide, and its prevalence appears to be rising in developed countries. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head is a common complication but has not been previously studied in detail. We have reviewed 138 patients with SCD for clinical, radiological and functional abnormalities of the shoulder, using a radiological classification designed for avascular necrosis of the shoulder. Radiographic lesions, frequently bilateral, were found in 28% and only 53% of patients had normal shoulder function. The management of this relatively common complication is difficult. Joint replacement is likely to fail and early diagnosis is important

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using small and standard baseplates in Asian patients, and to investigate the impact of a mismatch in the sizes of the glenoid and the baseplate on the outcomes.

Purpose of the study: Proximal fractures of the humerus account for 10% of fractures in persons aged over 65 years. There is no optimal treatment. The goal of surgery is to restore joint congruency, preserve vascular supply, and allow functional recovery. We describe the results obtained with a surgical technique designed to meet these goals. Material and methods: Fifteen 3-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus were treated with transosseous suture. Mean age of patients was 58 years. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female. Follow-up was 18 months on average. The patients were placed in a lounge chair position for the deltopectoral or transdeltoid approach. For this type of fracture, the humeral head is displaced medially or laterally, so that care must be taken to ensure the realignment in the sagittal and coronal planes. The DASH and Constant scores were noted for the operated and non-operated shoulders. Signs of bone healing were noted on the plain x-rays. Results: The mean DASH was 12, mean Constant score for the operated shoulder was 80 versus 90 for the other shoulder. The mean neck-shaft angle was 139°. There was one case of lost reduction but with a good final result. There was one case converted to arthroplasty. Discussion: This technique is in line with the current trend for biological preservation minimising the aggression to the humeral head blood supply. There was no risk of migration with the fixation material used and no need to remove implants. Conclusion: Transosseous suture of proximal fractures of the humerus is a mini-invasive method which provides good functional results avoiding voluminous metal implants, known to be costly and source of complications. The incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head is low, in agreement with the international literature

In 42 elderly patients, 33 women and nine men with a mean age of 72 years, we treated displaced fractures of the proximal humerus (34 three-part, 8 four-part) using a blade plate and a standard deltopectoral approach. Functional treatment was started immediately after surgery. We reviewed 41 patients at one year and 38 at final follow-up at 3.4 years (2.4 to 4.5). At the final review, all the fractures had healed. The clinical results were graded as excellent in 13 patients, good in 17, fair in seven, and poor in one. The median Constant score was 73 ± 18. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head occurred in two patients (5%). We conclude that rigid fixation of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus with a blade plate in the elderly patient provides sufficient primary stability to allow early functional treatment. The incidence of avascular necrosis and nonunion was low. Restoration of the anatomy and biomechanics may contribute to a good functional outcome when compared with alternative methods of fixation or conservative treatment. Regardless of the age of the patients, we advocate primary open reduction and rigid internal fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus

Two-part surgical neck fractures, two-part greater tuberosity fractures and three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus represent a frequently encountered clinical problem. Many types of conservative treatments have been proposed, with a poor functional outcome, however; when the fracture fragments are displaced, surgery is required. Because the open reduction and the internal fixation disrupts soft tissue and increases the risk of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, closed or minimally open reduction and percutaneous pin fixation should represent an advantage. We report on 31 patients affected by fractures of the proximal humerus (n=6, two-part surgical neck fractures; n=5, with two-part greater tuberosity fractures; n=10, three-part fractures; and n=11, four- part fractures) treated with minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation. The average age was 57 years. Most of the four-part fractures were of the valgus type with no significant lateral displacement of the articular segment. A small skin incision was performed laterally at the shoulder and a rounded-tipped instrument was introduced to obtain the fracture reduction; this latter was stabilised by percutaneous pins and cannulate screws. A satisfactory reduction was achieved in most cases. The average follow-up was 24 months (range 18–47). Only one patient, with four-part fractures associated with lateral displacement of the humeral head, showed avascular necrosis and received a prosthetic implant. Minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation is a non-invasive technique with a low risk of avascular necrosis and infection. This surgical technique allows a stable reduction with minimal soft tissue disruption and facilitates postoperative mobilisation

We report seven cases in which open or closed reduction of a shoulder dislocation associated with a fracture of the humeral neck led to displacement of the neck fracture. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head developed in all six patients with anatomical neck fractures. All five anterior dislocations also had a fracture of the greater tuberosity and both posterior dislocations had a fracture of the lesser tuberosity. The neck fracture had not initially been recognised in three of the seven cases. In five cases attempted shoulder reduction led to complete displacement of the head segment, which was treated by open reduction and minimal internal fixation. In the other two cases, shoulder reduction caused only mild to moderate displacement which was accepted and the fracture was treated conservatively. We conclude that biplane radiography is essential before reduction of a shoulder dislocation. Neck fractures must always be ruled out, especially where there are tuberosity fractures. In our series, careful closed reduction under general anaesthesia with optimal relaxation and fluoroscopic control did not prevent iatrogenic displacement. Prophylactic stabilisation of the neck fracture should be considered before reduction of such a fracture-dislocation. It may be, however, that the prevention of displacement by prophylactic stabilisation does not always prevent late avascular necrosis; we observed this in one case

Introduction: Management of displaced comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly is still controversial. Conservative treatment may result in severe disability due to malunion and shoulder stiffness. Rigid fixation of these fractures by plates may offer stability in anatomic position, but requires in most cases extensive soft tissue exposure and may result in a relatively high incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Therefore, many authors are today of the opinion that hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder joint in such fractures is preferable to rigid fixation. This study reviews our experience with hemiartroplasty of the shouldere in elderly patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Material & Methods: This study consists of 39 Pts. (27F, 12M; 72–89 year old, mean 76.5Y; 12 with 3 parts fractures and 27 with 4 parts fracture) treated by hemiarthroplasty of the proximal humerus. Patients were followed for 2–8 years (mean 4Y), and evaluated by the Neer‘s shoulder grading score and radiographs. Results: 74% of the patients treated by hemiarthroplasty had satisfactory results. They were almost free of pain, but most of them had only a moderate improvement in shoulder motion (active abduction or flexion of 110–130 degrees were observed in 4/39, of 90–110 degrees in 7/39, of 50–90 degrees in 17/39 and of 30–50 degrees in 11/29). Conclusions: Based on this study it seems that pain relief by hemiarthroplasty may be achieved in most older patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus, but the gain in shoulder function is relatively limited

Introduction: Proximal humeral fractures have been increasing in recent years with the increase in population over 60 years old. 20 to 30% of these fractures require surgical treatment according to the Neer criteria: fragments dislocation greater than 1 cm and/or an angle greater than 45°. A rigid fixation of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone is not satisfactory; new solutions are sought. The authors describe a minimally invasive technique that uses an intramedullary elastic implant – helix wire. Objective: Evaluate functional outcomes and complication rates in patients with humeral subcapital fractures who underwent fixation with helix wire. Material: Cross-sectional study evaluating patients with subcapital fracture of the humerus who underwent fixation with helix wire. Methods: There were operated 32 patients with proximal humeral fractures with helix wire implant, with an average age of 71 years old (41–90). 9 men and 23 women. According to Neer’s classification: 18 two parts fractures, 12 three parts and 2 four parts. Osteosynthesis with cannulated screws was associated to the helix wire in three and four parts fractures. In all patients the shoulder was immobilized for 3 weeks. After 3 weeks patients started rehabilitation. Results: Of the 32 fractures, 30 consolidated and there were no avascular necrosis of the humeral head. A fracture has evolved to pseudarthrosis. One patient abandoned follow-up 4 weeks after surgery, and was therefore not possible to assess the consolidation. 17 patients were assessed with mean follow-up of 18 months (4–52 months). The mean Constant score obtained was 66.2 points (53–90). 3 months after surgery all patients resumed their daily activities to the level before the fracture. Discussion and Conclusion: This minimally invasive technique provides good stability, with minimum damage of soft tissue and vascular preservation of the humeral head. Our choice is based on the number of consolidations achieved through this technique and functional evaluation of these patients, which we consider satisfactory, taking into account that the functional requirements are lower than those of a young person. Intramedullary helical implant (helix wire) is simple and biological, suitable for elderly patients with poor bone, which enables percutaneous osteosynthesis using the techniques of indirect reduction and the association, when appropriate, of cannulated screws

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is an extremely disabling condition (Gerber et al, JSES 1998. 7(6):586–90). The results of stemmed arthroplasty for this condition are good, with Hattrup and Cofield reporting 79% subjective improvement at nine years (JSES 2000;9:177–82). This study reports the outcomes of surface replacement shoulder arthroplasties for AVN over a 16 year period. Between 1986 and 2001 twenty-seven arthroplasties were performed in patients with advanced avascular necrosis of the humeral head. All patients had secondary degenerative changes. AVN was secondary to corticosteriods and trauma in most cases. The mean age of the patients was 60 years (range 35 to 86). These included 16 hemiarthroplasties and 7 total shoulder arthroplasties. All prostheses were of the Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty (CSRA) type. The average follow up period was 6 years (range 1 to 13). The average preoperative Constant score was 17. This improved to 74 at follow-up. Forward flexion improved from 63 degrees preoperatively to 133 degrees at follow-up. Abduction improved from 49 degrees to 118 degrees. External rotation improved from −3 degrees to 61 degrees. Pain scores improved from 0 to 11.7, using a 15 point visual analogue scale. 81% of patients had slight and no difficulty performing their routine activities of daily living. The remaining 19% still had some difficulty with routine activities. Four of the patients performed regular overhead activity and recorded some difficulty in doing this, whereas they had great difficulty pre-operatively. There were no cases of loosening. No difference was seen in any of the results between the hemi-arthroplasty and total shoulder replacement patients. Surface replacement arthroplasty is a suitable procedure for degenerative disease secondary to AVN of the humeral head, with results similar to stemmed prostheses. It has the advantage of preserving bone stock

Displaced proximal humeral fractures are notoriously difficult to treat. We performed internal fixation of 55 such fractures with the Polarus locked intramedullary nail. 43 (78%) were women; the mean age was 74 (range 15–91). The mechanism of injury was RTA in four, sporting injury in a further four and a simple fall in 47 (85%). According to Neer’s classification, 25 were two part fractures, 20 three part and 10 four part. 47 fractures were fixed acutely (within seven days). The average operative time, including patient positioning was 60 minutes. In 43 cases the standard size nail was used (11mm diameter, 150mm length). In the majority of cases (80%) either two or three proximal locking screws were used. In 15 cases (27%) open reduction was necessary. Patients were followed up for an average of eight months. Three patients needed removal of backed out proximal screws under local anaesthetic. In one patient the nail migrated superiorly and was removed once the fracture had united. One patient developed symptomatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head, successfully treated by removing the proximal screws. Two patients developed fracture malunion and underwent conversion to hemiarthroplasty. One patient required arthroscopic release of a secondary frozen shoulder. Patients completed an Oxford Shoulder questionnaire at an average of 18 months postoperatively (range 5–42 months). The median Oxford Shoulder score was 33 (95% CI 25–38) with a mean score of 34.6. Previous studies of Polarus nailing have reported satisfactory results, but with limited follow up of a small number of patients. Our study of 55 cases with an average 18 month follow up confirms good functional rapid recovery in the majority of patients. Only five patients required removal of the metalwork and only two patients required conversion to hemiarthroplasty. We recommend the Polarus nail as a useful addition to the shoulder trauma surgeon’s armamentarium

Introduction: Throughout known medical literature the proximal humeral fracture is mentioned with an approximately 5% contribution to all fractures. The optimal operative strategy regarding proximal humeral fractures is still being discussed controversely. This study was conducted to show implant associated problems and their clinical relevance. Materials and methods: Of a total 198 patients with proximal humeral fractures 166 patients, 98 females and 68 males at a mean age of 74,7 years were treated operatively from 2000 to 2004 in our clinic with an angle-stabile plate osteosynthesis and underwent a clinical and radiological follow-up. Retrospectively we characterised the fractures by using the most common classification of NEER and assessed the functional results with the CONSTANT score. Results: The 166 evaluated patients with 8 cases of a type I fracture, 13 patients with type II fracture, 34 patients with type III fracture, 47 cases with type IV fracture, 42 patients with type V fracture and 22 cases with type VI were all operatively treated with an angle-stabile plate osteosynthesis. 142 patients underwent early assisted physical therapy. Of all assessed patients the average CONSTANT score was 79,7 points. Among the 8 patients with type I fracture the average CONSTANT score was 84,4 points, among the 13 patients with type II fracture it reached an average 87,4 points. The average score of the 34 patients with type III fracture was 78,8 points. The more complex fractures, according to NEER’s classification, reached average scores of 71,2 points among the 47 cases with type IV fractures, 69,8 points (42 patients, type V) and 61,6 points (22 patients, type VI). The presence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head in 18 cases resulted in a significantly worse functional outcome and therefore a lower average score of 48,1 points. For 36 patients the follow-up revealed intraarticular dislocation of the proximal locking screws which required operative revision in 15 cases. Conclusion: Even in the complex proximal humeral fracture one can achieve good clinical results for the patients by using an angle-stabile plate osteosynthesis and therefore establishing a secure and rigid situation for an optimized consecutive physical therapy, especially in the elderly. To prevent from intraarticular screw placement the proximal locking screws should be chosen shorter, if possible, then initially measured

Purpose: Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head is an uncommon condition. Arthroplasty remains the treatment of choice when the head has lost its spherical shape. The purpose of this work was to assess clinical and radiological results in a monocentric consecutive series of 19 shoulders. Material and methods: Twelve men and five women, mean age 56 years were treated for humeral head osteonecrosis with a shoulder prosthesis. Seven patients had quadripolar necrosis: two had four prostheses (2 shoulder + 2 hip), three had three prostheses (1 shoulder + 2 hip), and two had two prostheses (1 shoulder + 1 hip). Osteonecrosis was idiopathic in six cases, related to corticosteroid treatment in ten, radiotherapy in two, and Gaucher disease in one. The Arlet and Ficat classification showed stage II=3, stage IV=13 and stage V=3. There were rotator cuff tears in two patients. Fourteen simple humeral prostheses and five total shoulder prostheses were implanted. Results: At mean seven years follow-up (2–12), the Neer classification showed excellent outcome in seven shoulders, satisfactory outcome in nine, and unsatisfactory outcome in three. Eighty-nine percent of the patients were satisfied. The Constant pain score improved from 1.5 points to 11.5 points, the activity score from 7.2 to 14.6, and motion from 15 to 27. Active anterior flexion was 120°, external rotation 34°, internal rotation at L3. The rough Constant score was 58 and the weighted score 78%. There were no lucent lines around the humeral implants, but a complete line was present around two glenoid implants which were radiographically loosened. These two shoulders presented glenoiditis with glenoid wear. No surgical revisions have been performed to date. Discussion: Shoulder prosthesis has given satisfactory results for osteonecrosis of the humeral head with resolution of pain in 80% of patients. Shoulder motion remains limited in relation with the often significant preoperative stiffness. Results have been better in patients with less advanced disease preoperatively and preserved motion. In our series, poor results were found in patients whose osteonecrosis was radiation-related

Purpose of the study: The humeral head is the second most frequent localization of non-traumatic osteonecrosis. For certain etiologies, for example sickle-cell anemia, the frequency is similar to that observed for the femoral head. There have nevertheless been very few publications on this pathology and its treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess outcome in a series of 771 cases of humeral head osteonecrosis in order to establish the natural history of the disease, criteria predictive of outcome, and therapeutic options. Material and methods: The diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the humeral head was established for 771 humeri in 424 patients between 1981 to 2000. Minimum follow-up was five years (maximum 23 and mean 13 years). Outcome was assessed in terms of the clinical course, specifically the need for surgery due to pain or functional impotency. The radiological assessment was made on serial AP and lateral views taken every year or two years. The extent of the osteonecrosis was assessed on the basis of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings when available (after 1985). The ARlet and Ficat classification established for the femoral head was adapted to the shoulder: grade I: osteonecrosis of the humeral head visualized solely with MRI; grade II: radiologically detectable osteonecrosis; grade III: subchondral dissection without loss of spherical shape: grade IV: loss of spherical shape without visible osteoarthritis: grade V: osteoarthritis. Results: Bilateral osteonecrosis was observed in 82% of the 424 patients. This gave 771 cases of humeral head necrosis. There was no gender predominance. Mean age at diagnosis was 32 years (range 18–57 years). The most frequent etiology was sickle-cell anemia (307 patients), followed by corticosteroid therapy (80 patients). Other etiologies were much less frequent: alcohol abuse, Gaucher’s disease, hyperlipidemia. Osteonecrosis of the humeral head was generally associated with another localization, particularly involving the hip and the knee joints. Multifocal osteonecrosis was also a common finding. Among the patients whose dignosis of osteonecrosis was established before symptom onset (scintigraphy or MRI performed in patients with multifocal osteonecrosis), the natural history was on average three years between MRI diagnosis and onset of pain. For 46% of the cases, pain appeared at grade I, before the development of radiographic signs. In 54% of the cases, grade II occurred before pain. It took six years before all of the cases with osteonecrosis diagnosed in a non-symptomatic phase produced pain. Factors affecting the rapidity of the radiological course were: etiology, size of the necrotic focus, presence and rapidity of osteonecrosis in other localizations (hip and knee). The humeral head lost its spherical shape on average four to five years after the diagnosis of osteoarthritic degradation of the joint, at about seven to eight years of evolution. Among the 256 patients followed for more than ten years, 51% required surgery. These 131 operations were for: drilling with bone marrow grafting (grade I or II) (n=62), cimentoplasty after loss of spherical shape but before glenohumeral osteoarthritis (n=15), resection of sequestered necrosis after loss of spherical shape (n=12), shoulder arthroplasty (n=42). Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrated that the natural history of osteonecrosis of the humeral head has a poor long-term outcome. Shoulder arthroplasty is rarely required during the first decade of the disease. Other therapeutic alternatives can help avoid or retard the need for shoulder arthroplasty in these very young patients

Introduction: Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 4–5% of all fractures. The number one cause of this type of fracture is age related osteoporosis associated with minimal trauma. Approximately 80% of these fractures are non or minimally-displaced, and can be treated conservatively with good results. However, treatment of displaced complex fractures is still controversial. The disadvantage of open procedures is the risk of damaging the blood supply to the humeral head, leading to a higher incidence of avascular necrosis. Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation (CRPF) is a minimal invasive procedure with a lower risk of damaging the blood supply. The main complication of this technique is loosening of the guide wires and displacement of the fragments requiring a second operation. Purpose: The guide wire loosening leads us to improve the technique by adding an external fixator to stabilize the guide wires and secure fragment positioning. We report our experience of treating displaced fractures of the proximal humerus with Closed Reduction and External Fixation (CREF). Materials and methods: Between the years 1996–2001 we operated on 37 patients for 38 complex fractures and fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus. We had 16 two part fractures, 13 three part fractures, 3 four part fractures, 5 two part fracture dislocation and 1 four part fracture dislocation according to the Neer’s classification. The mean age was 60 years old ranging from 16–90 with a male to female ratio of 1:1. The patients were placed in a beach chair position using an image intensifier for AP and axillary views. Because the closed reduction was unsatisfactory, six patients underwent open reduction and external fixation. The remaining 32 shoulders underwent CREF. Passive motion exercises were initiated on the first postoperative day. The external fixator was removed after four to six weeks (mean time for external fixator – 5.3 weeks). After removing the external fixator the patients began with active assisted mobilization of the shoulder and isometric strengthening exercises. Results: The average follow up was 31.6 months (range 6–60 months). No loosening was observed upon removal of the external fixator, however the following complications were encountered: 5 patients had superficial pin tract infections, 1 patients developed an avascular necrosis of the humeral head, 1 patient had a non union of the fracture. Of the remaining patients, 13 patients had an excellent result, 15 patients had a good result and 5 patients had a fair result. Conclusions: CREF is a minimal invasive technique for complex fractures of the proximal humerus, greatly reducing the damage to the blood supply when compared to open surgical procedures. It offers a better stabilization than CRPF, thus reducing the complication rate. The percutaneous technique causes less scaring and therefore a shorter rehabilitation program. Consequently, this procedure is recommended for complex fractures of the proximal humerus

Aims

Open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF) for displaced proximal humerus fractures can achieve reliably good long-term outcomes. However, a minority of patients have persistent pain and stiffness after surgery and may benefit from open arthrolysis, subacromial decompression, and removal of metalwork (ADROM). The long-term results of ADROM remain unknown; we aimed to assess outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure for stiffness following ORPF, and assess predictors of poor outcome.

Aims

The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.