Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation was evaluated after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures in a randomized, controlled clinical study performed for United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. PEMF significantly increased fusion rates at six months, but 12-month fusion outcomes for subjects at elevated risk for pseudoarthrosis were not thoroughly reported. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of PEMF treatment on subjects at increased risk for pseudoarthrosis after ACDF procedures. Two evaluations were performed that compared fusion rates between PEMF stimulation and a historical control (160 subjects) from the FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study: a Objectives
Methods
A combined anterior and posterior surgical approach
is generally recommended in the treatment of severe congenital kyphosis,
despite the fact that the anterior vascular supply of the spine
and viscera are at risk during exposure. The aim of this study was
to determine whether the surgical treatment of severe congenital thoracolumbar
kyphosis through a single posterior approach is feasible, safe and
effective. We reviewed the records of ten patients with a mean age of 11.1
years (5.4 to 14.1) who underwent surgery either by pedicle subtraction
osteotomy or by vertebral column resection with instrumented fusion
through a single posterior approach. The mean kyphotic deformity improved from 59.9° (45° to 110°)
pre-operatively to 17.5° (3° to 40°) at a mean follow-up of 47.0
months (29 to 85). Spinal cord monitoring was used in all patients
and there were no complications during surgery. These promising
results indicate the possible advantages of the described technique
over the established procedures. We believe that surgery should
be performed in case of documented progression and before structural
secondary curves develop. Our current strategy after documented
progression is to recommend surgery at the age of five years and
when 90% of the diameter of the spinal canal has already developed. Cite this article:
Transarticular screw fixation with autograft
is an established procedure for the surgical treatment of atlantoaxial instability.
Removal of the posterior arch of C1 may affect the rate of fusion.
This study assessed the rate of atlantoaxial fusion using transarticular
screws with or without removal of the posterior arch of C1. We reviewed
30 consecutive patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion with a
minimum follow-up of two years. In 25 patients (group A) the posterior
arch of C1 was not excised (group A) and in five it was (group B).
Fusion was assessed on static and dynamic radiographs. In selected
patients CT imaging was also used to assess fusion and the position
of the screws. There were 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of
51.2 years (23 to 77) and a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (2 to 11.6).
Stable union with a solid fusion or a stable fibrous union was achieved
in 29 patients (97%). In Group A, 20 patients (80%) achieved a solid
fusion, four (16%) a stable fibrous union and one (4%) a nonunion.
In Group B, stable union was achieved in all patients, three having
a solid fusion and two a stable fibrous union. There was no statistically
significant difference between the status of fusion in the two groups.
Complications were noted in 12 patients (40%); these were mainly
related to the screws, and included malpositioning and breakage.
The presence of an intact or removed posterior arch of C1 did not
affect the rate of fusion in patients with atlantoaxial instability
undergoing C1/C2 fusion using transarticular screws and autograft. Cite this article:
To investigate the efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation in correcting thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis in adolescent patients. Thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis has been traditionally treated through an anterior approach and instrumented arthrodesis with the aim to include in the fusion the Cobb-to-Cobb levels and preserve distal mobile spinal segments. Posterior instrumentation has been extensively used for thoracic or thoracic and lumbar scoliosis. In the advent of all-pedicle screw constructs there is debate on whether thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis is best treated through an anterior or a posterior instrumented arthrodesis.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
We report septic shock as postoperative complication following an instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis on a patient with multiple body piercings. The management of this potentially catastrophic complication and outcome of treatment is been discussed. Body piercing has become increasingly more common due to change in culture or as a fashion statement. This has been associated with local or generalized ill effects including tissue injury, skin and systemic infections, and septic shock. There is no clear guideline pathway regarding removal and reinsertion of body piercings in patients who undergo major surgery. Complications following Orthopaedic or Spinal procedures associated with body piercing have not been reported.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
To compare the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques in correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pedicle screw constructs have been extensively used in the treatment of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It has been suggested that greater implant density may achieve better deformity correction. However, this can increase the neurological risk related to pedicle screw placement, prolong surgical time and blood loss and result in higher instrumentation cost.Purpose of the study
Summary of Background Data
To determine radiographic variables that predict the need for distal extension of the fusion beyond Cobb-to-Cobb levels in treating thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) scoliosis (Lenke 5) in adolescent patients. We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of the senior author's consecutive series of 53 adolescent patients with TL/L scoliosis treated by posterior instrumented spinal arthrodesis using an all-pedicle screw construct. Our patients were categorised into 2 groups: patients with instrumented fusion between Cobb-to-Cobb levels of the TL/L curve (Group 1), and patients that required distal extension beyond the caudal Cobb level (Group 2). Pearson correlation and binary logistic regression analyses (significance p<0.05) were performed to identify variables that predict the need for distal extension.Aim:
Method:
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques. We retrospectively analyzed a series of 51 patients with a thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were 26 patients in the convex pedicle screw group who had screws implanted periapically (Group 2) and a control group of 25 patients with bilateral pedicle screws (Group 1). The patients’ charts were reviewed and pre- and postoperative radiographs evaluated. Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded.Aims
Methods
