Aim. Polypropylene (PPE) synthetic mesh is increasingly used in knee arthroplasty surgery to salvage a disrupted extensor mechanism. Despite its clinical success, it is associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is hypothesized to be caused by bacterial biofilm. The purpose of the current study is to describe the progression of PPE-based biofilm formation over time and to determine if intraoperative antiseptic solutions could be used to effectively remove biofilm when treating PJI. Method. Commercially available knotted monofilament PPE mesh. 1. was cut into 10mm circular shape, immersed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus and cultured individually in 48-well plates for 10 days to elucidate the biofilm grown on mesh over time. At every 24 hours, a triplicate of samples was retrieved and biofilm on the mesh was dislodged by sonicating at 52 kHz for 15 minutes and quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after overnight growth. The biofilm growth was also verified using scanning electron microscopy. The effect of saline and antiseptic solutions was verified by exposing 1) 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate. 2. , 2) acetic acid-based mixture. 3. , 3) diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), 4) undiluted povidone-iodine (10%). 4. , and 5) 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine & 3% hydrogen peroxide on immature and mature biofilms for 3 minutes, created by culturing with bacteria for 24 hours and 72 hours respectively. All experiments were performed in quintuples and repeated. Antiseptic treatments that produced a three-log reduction in CFU counts compared to controls were considered clinically significant. Results. PPE-mesh produced reliable CFU counts at 24 hours and reached peak growth at 72 hours. For immature biofilm, all formulations of povidone-iodine produced significant reductions in CFU counts compared to controls. Although not meeting the established threshold, saline irrigation removed 86.5% of CFUs, while formulation based on chlorohexidine and acetic acid removed 99.2% and 99.7% respectively. For mature biofilm, formulations based on povidone-iodine and acetic acid produced significant reductions in CFU counts. Conclusions. Our findings suggest biofilm may form on mesh as early as 24 hours after bacterial exposure. Povidone-iodine formulations were consistently the most effective in removing biofilm on mesh surfaces. We recommend that surgeons consider using an antiseptic solution, preferably povidone-iodine-based, in addition to regular saline lavage when attempting to salvage a PPE mesh in the setting of PJI. 1. Marlex mesh (CR Bard, Davol Inc, Warwick, RI), . 2. Irrisept (Irrimax Corp, Gainesville, FL), . 3. Bactisure (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN), . 4. Aplicare (Inc, Meriden, CT)

Aim

Identifying the optimal agent for irrigation for periprosthetic joint infection remains challenging as there is limited data. The ideal solution should have minimal cytotoxicity while maintaining bactericidal activity. We developed a novel activated-zinc solution containing zinc-chloride (ZnCl₂) and sodium-chlorite (NaClO₂). The purpose of this study was 1.) to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 concentrations (“CZ1”, “CZ2”) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2.) to evaluate untoward effects of the solution on local wound tissue 24 hours after solution exposure in pig wound models.

Aim. Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surgery. Antiseptic solutions are commonly used, but evidence on the optimal antiseptic, concentration, and irrigation time is lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the anti-biofilm capacity of povidone iodine, H. 2. 0. 2. , acetic acid and Bactisure™ after different exposure times, as well as their combinations. Method. Surgical steel discs inoculated with methicillin susceptible (MSSA) and resistant S. aureus (MRSA), P. aeruginosa, and S. epidermidis were exposed to the following antiseptic solutions: 0.3% (PI0.3) and 10% povidone iodine (PI10), H. 2. 0. 2. , 3% Acetic acid (AA3) and Bactisure™. Combinations included AA3, H. 2. 0. 2. , and PI10 in various orders. Exposure time for the antiseptics solutions was 1, 3 and 5 minutes, while combinations had a 9-minute total exposure, 3 minutes per antiseptic sequentially. All experiments were performed in triplicate and with a sterile saline control. nThe reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) was measured after sonication, and biofilm structure was analyzed via scanning electron microscopy. Results. PI showed the highest antibiofilm activity. PI0.3 eradicated bacteria on the discs after 3 and 5 minutes of exposure, but only achieved a 77.1% reduction after 1 minute. After PI10 treatment, we did not recover any bacteria regardless of exposure time. H. 2. 0. 2. , AA3, and Bactisure™ reached a significantly lower bacterial decrease at all exposure times compared to PI0.3 and PI10. AA3 was less effective against MSSA and S. epidermidis. H. 2. 0. 2. showed less activity against MRSA than PI0.3, PI10, and Bactisure™. Combinations of antiseptics starting with AA3 showed the best results in terms of CFU reduction and cell viability. Conclusions. We propose a sequential combination of AA3 + H. 2. 0. 2. + PI10 with an exposure time of 9 minutes for the chemical debridement in PJI surgery. First, AA3 performs debridement and disruption of the biofilm. Then, H. 2. 0. 2. has a bactericidal effect and increases the porosity of the cell wall, and PI10 has a final bactericidal effect. If combinations are unavailable, PI is a cost-effective alternative

Aim. Irrigation and debridement with an irrigation solution are essential components of the surgical management of acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Nevertheless, there is a lack of agreement regarding the most effective solution to use. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature concerning the efficacy of different irrigation solutions over bacterial biofilm. Method. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus databases from inception to September 1, 2023. We combined terms related to PJI, biofilm and irrigation solutions studied in vitro. We performed a network meta-analysis to analyze which irrigation solution achieved a higher reduction of colony forming units (CFU) after specific exposure times, always with a maximum of five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Effect-size was summarized with logarithmic response ratio (logRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-scores. Results. We screened 233 potential sources. Following deduplication, screening and full-text review, four studies with ten irrigation solutions for different duration of exposures were included, always less than five minutes, replicating intraoperative conditions. Solutions were studied over mature biofilms of most frequent bacteria grown over metal, bone cement or polyethylene surfaces. The highest effect was achieved with povidone iodine 10% during 5 minutes (logRR: −12.02; 95% CI: −14.04, −9.99). The best ranked solutions were povidone iodine 10% during five, three and one minute (respective p-scores: 0.977, 0.932, 0.887) and its combination with hydrogen peroxide for 3 minutes (p-score: 0.836). Povidone iodine 0.3% acting for 5 minutes completed the top 5 best ranked solutions in this study (p-score: 0.761). We assumed that there were no inconsistencies in our network because after examining both scenarios, with and without inconsistencies, the results were not significantly different. Conclusions. Our results show that 10% povidone-iodine is the best antiseptic solution when studied in vitro in the context of prosthetic joint infection. However, the included studies did not evaluate the possible cytotoxic effects of these solutions. This should also be taken into account before choosing the most appropriate antiseptic solution

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent nosocomial infections and depends on many factors: patient, microorganism, antiseptic solution use, antibiotic prophylaxis, hand scrubbing, wound care or hospital stay lenght. With the present paper the authors aim to study the SSI incidence after Total Knee (TKA) or Hip Arthroplasty (THA). All patients who underwent primary TKA or THA between January 2011 and May 2012 at our institution were considered. Patients who died within 1 year after the procedure of unrelated causes were excluded. Data collected included ASA classification, type of procedure, total and post-operative hospital stay, type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Data were collected from the consultation at 1 month and 1 year post-operative, clinical registries and telephone interview. SSI was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Suspected cases of SSI included antibiotic administration longer than 5 days or absence of antibiotic prescription, hospital stay after the procedure longer than 9 days, patient referring infection symptoms, and clinical data reports of infection or re-intervention. During the studied period and after exclusion of 5 cases, a total of 251 surgeries (104 TKA, 147 THA) were performed, of which 2 were urgent. For both TKA and THA, the average total hospital stay was 9 days (8 days post-operative). The majority were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 2 and 3. There were 4 SSI (1,60%), 2 TKA (1,92%) and 2 THA (1,36%), all of them after discharge. Their average total hospital stay was 10,5 days. Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 93% of the patients (97,4% a cephalosporin), with an average length of 5,7 days. Recommended hospital stay after a TKA or THA is about 5 days. On HELICS-CIRURGIA 2006–2010 report it was 10 days, similar to ours. In infected patients, our total hospital stay was lower (10,5 vs 26). Recommended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis is 24h. On HELICS-CIRURGIA more than 50% had it for more than 24h, which also happened with us; our antibiotic coverage was similar. Comparing to HELICS-CIRURGIA, the predominance of ASA 2 and 3 classifications was similar, but the overall SSI rate was lower (1,6% vs 2,24%). We conclude we must reduce hospital stay and antibiotic duration and keep the surveillance of SSI after TKA or THA

Over a two-year period, 265 Norwegian orthopaedic surgeons working at 71 institutions performed 63 484 operations under a tourniquet. Their replies to a questionnaire revealed that they mostly followed modern guidelines in their use of the tourniquet. Most felt that the tourniquet could be left on for two hours, and that it could be re-applied after 15 minutes. A total of 26 complications (one in 2442 operations) that might have been due to the tourniquet were reported, of which 15 were neurological. Three were in the upper limb (one in 6155 operations) and 12 in the lower limb (one in 3752 operations). Two were permanent (one in 31742 operations), but the remainder resolved within six months. One permanent and one transient complication occurred after tourniquet times of three hours. The incidence of tourniquet complications is still at least as high as that estimated in the 1970s.