We studied the merits of physical examination after inversion injury of the ankle in 160 consecutive patients. They had an explanatory operation if they had a positive arthrogram and/or positive signs on a delayed physical examination. To determine the interobserver variation in delayed physical examination, five different examiners were asked to give independent assessment of the injury. Those with limited clinical experience produced more accurate results when physical examination was performed at five days after the injury, rather than within 48 hours. The specificity and sensitivity of delayed physical examination for the presence or absence of a lesion of an ankle ligament were found to be 84% and 96%, respectively. The interobserver agreement for the delayed physical examination of the ankle was good (kappa values 0.5, 0.6, 0.6 and 1.0). Delayed physical examination gives information of diagnostic quality which is equal to that of arthrography, and causes little discomfort to the patient.
The recommended indications for total ankle replacement (TAR) are limited, leaving fusion as the only definitive alternative. As longer-term clinical results become more promising, should we be broadening our indications for TAR? Our single-centre series has 133 Mobility TARs with 3–48 months' follow-up. 16 patients were excluded who were part of a separate RCT. The series was divided into two groups. ‘Ideal’ patients had all of the following criteria: age >60y, BMI <30, varus/valgus talar tilt <10°, not diabetic, not Charcot, not post-traumatic. The ‘Not ideal’ group contained those who did not fit any single criteria. We compared complications and outcome scores between both groups.Background
Materials and Methods
