The effects of Rats were divided into 3 groups: Group I (n=8) was intact control group and no intervention and treatment was applied to this group. Group II (n=16) was surgical control group and Group III (n=16) was It was seen that measurement results of SFI were statistically significantly difference between groups (p<0,001). In the sciatic nerve tissue samples taken from the rats, it was not determined a statistically significant difference between MDA, SOD, GPx and CAT levels detected by ELISA method (p>0,05). In the histological evaluation, it was seen that The obtained results in this study show that;
We undertook a retrospective analysis of 306
procedures on 233 patients, with a mean age of 12 years (1 to 21),
in order to evaluate the use of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP)
monitoring for the early detection of nerve compromise during external
fixation procedures for limb lengthening and correction of deformity.
Significant SSEP changes were identified during 58 procedures (19%).
In 32 instances (10.5%) the changes were transient, and resolved
once the surgical cause had been removed. The remaining 26 (8.5%)
were analysed in two groups, depending on whether or not corrective
action had been performed in response to critical changes in the
SSEP recordings. In 16 cases in which no corrective action was taken,
13 (81.2%, 4.2% overall) developed a post-operative neurological
deficit, six of which were permanent and seven temporary, persisting
for five to 18 months. In the ten procedures in which corrective
action was taken, four patients (40%, 1.3% overall) had a temporary
(one to eight months) post-operative neuropathy and six had no deficit. After appropriate intervention in response to SSEP changes, the
incidence and severity of neurological deficits were significantly
reduced, with no cases of permanent neuropathy. SSEP monitoring
showed 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity for the detection of
nerve injury during external fixation. It is an excellent diagnostic
technique for identifying nerve lesions when they are still highly
reversible.
The diagnosis of nerve injury using thermotropic liquid crystal temperature strips was compared blindly and prospectively against operative findings in 36 patients requiring surgical exploration for unilateral upper limb lacerations with suspected nerve injury. Thermotropic liquid crystal strips were applied to affected and non-affected segments in both hands in all subjects. A pilot study showed that a simple unilateral laceration without nerve injury results in a cutaneous temperature difference between limbs, but not within each limb. Thus, for detection of a nerve injury, comparison was made against the unaffected nerve distribution in the same hand. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an absolute temperature difference ≥ 1.0°C was diagnostic of a nerve injury (area under the curve = 0.985, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 93.8%). Thermotropic liquid crystal strip assessment is a new, reliable and objective method for the diagnosis of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. If implemented in the acute setting, it could improve the reliability of clinical assessment and reduce the number of negative surgical explorations.