We retrospectively reviewed 40 hips in 36 patients who had undergone acetabular reconstruction using a titanium Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts between May 2001 and April 2006. Impacted bone allografts were used for the management of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Type II defects in 17 hips, and bulk bone allografts together with impacted allografts were used for the management of Type III defects in 23 hips. A total of five hips showed radiological failure at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (4.5 to 9.3), two of which were infected. The mean pre-operative Merle d’Aubigné score was 10 (5 to 15) vs 13.6 (9 to 18) at the latest follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate at ten years, calculated using radiological failure or revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the endpoint, was 87% (95% confidence interval 76.3 to 97.7). A separate experimental analysis of the mechanical properties of the device and the load-displacement properties of bone grafts showed that a structurally hard allograft resected from femoral heads of patients with osteoarthritis should be preferentially used in any type of defect. If impacted bone allografts were used, a bone graft thickness of < 25 mm was acceptable in Type II defects. This clinical study indicates that revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts yielded satisfactory mid-term results

We present our experience from use of acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty when bone defects are present. From 1987 to 2000, acetabular reinforcement rings were utilized in 59 revisions, in 52 patients with a mean age of 60 years (31–81). In 48 hips, Ganz rings were used and in 11 hips, Burch-Sch-neider rings. For the existing defects of the acetabulum, morsellized bone allograft was used. The patients were evaluated clinically with the modified Merle d’ Aubigne-Postel scale and radiologically with the criteria of Gill-Sledge-Muller. Acetabular reconstruction was successful in 51 of 59 hips (86.5%) after a mean follow-up period of 7 years (2–15). One of the 11 Burch-Schneider rings failed (9.1%) and 7 of the 48 Ganz, raising the failure rate of this ring up to 14.6%. Complications included dislocation in 5 cases, deep vein thrombosis in 2, superficial infection in 1 and pubis rami fracture in 2 cases. Reinforcement rings in our opinion could be of valuable help in reconstruction of the bone deficient acetabulum. Although in this study, it is not possible for these two rings to be directly compared, Burch-Schneider one appears to have a more clear role and lower failure rate. However, in order to evaluate in a more reliable way the true fate of the acetabular reinforcement rings, especially in the presence of the limited role of biological fixation, longer follow-up time is needed

We retrospectively evaluated 42 hips which had undergone acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device between September 1994 and December 1998. We used autogenous bone chips from the ilium and ceramic particle morsellised grafts, even in large acetabular bone defects, in the early stages of the study. Thereafter, femoral head allograft was used as bulk graft in patients with large acetabular defects. Ceramic blocks and the patients’ contralateral femoral head were also used as bulk graft. The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (4.3 to 12). Survivorship analysis was performed using radiological failure of the acetabular component, irrespective of whether it was revised, or not, as the end-point. The survival rate of the morsellised graft group (25 hips) and the bulk graft group (17 hips) at ten years was 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 42.5% to 63.5%) and 82% (95% CI 72.4% to 91.6%), respectively. The mid-term results of revision total hip replacement with the Kerboull device were better when bulk graft was used in any size of bone defect

Introduction. For the total hip cases with severe bone defect, using acetabular reinforcement plate is one of effective method. But the shape of every defect is different. So it is very important to make it into proper shape. It would be not only time consuming but also the procedure requires many times trial insertion through the muscle which can be a cause big damage on it. To reduce the time and the damage, we have manufactured a chemical wood model for each case and shaped each acetabular reinforce plates. Materials and Methods. Three total hip cases, one primary case of rheumatoid arthritis with big bone absorption and 2 revision cases with big bone absorption were operated with acetabular reinforcement plate (LIMA Italy) shaped on their pelvic chemical wood model. Using Mimics®, CAT scan DICOM data were transferred STL CAD data. Then using Magics® chemical wood model was designed and manufactured by a compact CNC machine. Then each plate was bent and fitted for each defect 3-Dimensionally. Results. In all three cases, the acetabular reinforcement plates were inserted without any more shape modification. Discussion. It is very difficult to estimate how long the surgical time was saved and how much soft tissue damage was reduced. However, every preoperative shaping took more than 15 min even we can use not only plate benders but also vise and other tools. We had to check the plate fitting to the model at leased 10 times. Therefore, this procedure could be said that it has save at least 15 min and muscle damage for 10 times trial. For better estimation, we are going to record how long we need for the preoperative shaping and how many times we need to check fitting on the model

Aims. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the minimum five-year outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD) in patients with Paprosky type III acetabular defects and destruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. Patients and Methods. We identified 36 patients (37 hips) who underwent revision THA under these circumstances using the KARD, fresh frozen allograft femoral heads, and reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. The Merle d’Aubigné system was used for clinical assessment. Serial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were used to assess migration of the acetabular component. Results. At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (5 to 19.3), the mean Merle d’Aubigné score increased from 12.5 (5 to 18) preoperatively to 16.5 (10 to 18) (p < 0.0001). The survival rate at ten years was 95.3% (. sd. 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 86.4 to 100) and 76.5% (. sd. 9.9, 95% CI 57.0 to 95.9) using aseptic loosening and radiological loosening as the endpoints, respectively. Conclusion. These results show that the use of the KARD with reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum in revision THA is associated with acceptable clinical results and survival at mid-term follow-up with, however, a high rate of migration of the acetabular component of 21.6%. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:725–32

Introduction: Treatment of acetabular defects can be difficult, especially in case of roof destruction. Since 9 years, we use a variant of Paprosky’s technique which consists in rebuilding the roof by structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement ring. The purpose of this study is to present this technique and the follow up results. Patients: This retrospective study concerns 21 patients (23 hips) with severe acetabular bone loss (8 cases of stage 2 and 15 cases of stage 3 of Paprosky): 4 septical and 19 aseptical loosening. Between 1998 and 2005, all patients were operated with the same surgical technique using an allogeneic structural allograft (femoral head or distal femur) and an acetabular reinforcement ring (20 of KERBOULL, 3 of GANZ) associated with a cemented PE cup. Method: Review included a clinical and X-ray evaluation (analysis of the refocusing of the hip, the positioning and the stability of implants and the graft incorporation). Results: Mean duration of follow-up is 3,5 years [1–8,3]. Preoperative PMA score rised from 6,6 [0–12] to 15,8 [12–18] in postoperative. There was no peroperative complication. After surgery, 2 cases of early hip dislocation required PE block; 2 cases of sepsis were treated, one by washing and one by a surgical revision. In 60% of cases, immediate total weight bearing was allowed. The immediate postoperative X-rays showed that the rotation center of the hip was 5,2 mm [0–10] far from the ideal rotation center (26% of cases: 0 mm) and the PE cup was implanted with a lateral inclination of 42,5° [30–55]. In postoperative X-ray follow up, one case of acetabular aseptic loosening was found which didn’t need hip revision. In all other cases no modification of implants position neither of hip rotation center was noted. In 79% of cases, we had total graft incorporation; in 17% of cases, an non evolutive radiolucent area between graft and bone and in 4% of cases (loosening) a graft migration. Conclusion: The use of a structural allograft combined with acetabular reinforcement ring allows hip reconstruction in severe acetabular bone loss with good medium term results

The study reviews 24 patients with 27 total hip arthroplasties in which an acetabular reinforcement ring with hook was used for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to underlying hip dysplasia. There were 19 female and 5 male patients with a mean age of 50.6 years (31 to 70) at the time of surgery. A bulk autograft for acetabular reconstruction was used in four cases with Crowe Type III and IV dysplasia. In eight cases cancellous bone alone was used to fill the gap between the reinforcement ring and the acetabulum. All patients had a polyethylene cup cemented into the ring and 22 cases had a straight Müller CDH stem cemented into the shaft. Mean follow-up was 10.7 years (range: 8.1 to 12.7). No clinical or radiographic signs of loosening of the reinforcement ring were found in 24 (88.9 %) of the 27 THAs. Two revisions (7.4%) were performed for aseptic loosening and one acetabular component had radiographic signs of loosening. The Merle D`Aubigné score had increased from 7 to 15 points. The acetabular reinforcement ring continues to have favourable results in this specific patient group and may also prevent graft resorption and cup migration

The study reviews 24 patients with 27 total hip arthroplasties in which an acetabular reinforcement ring with hook was used for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to underlying hip dysplasia. There were 19 female and 5 male patients with a mean age of 50.6 years (31 to 70) at the time of surgery. A bulk autograft for acetabular reconstruction was used in four cases with Crowe Type III and IV dysplasia. In eight cases cancellous bone alone was used to fill the gap between the reinforcement ring and the acetabulum. All patients had a polyethylene cup cemented into the ring and 22 cases had a straight Müller CDH stem cemented into the shaft. Mean follow-up was 10.7 years (range: 8.1 to 12.7). No clinical or radiographic signs of loosening of the reinforcement ring were found in 24 (88.9 %) of the 27 THAs. Two revisions (7.4%) were performed for aseptic loosening and one acetabular component had radiographic signs of loosening. The Merle D`Aubigné score had increased from 7 to 15 points. The acetabular reinforcement ring continues to have favourable results in this specific patient group and may also prevent graft resorption and cup migration

Introduction: The Acetabular Reinforcement Ring (ARR) (ME Müller®) was introduced in 1977 as successor of the Endler ring, especially to allow total hip replacement (THR) in patients with congenital hip dislocation, serious dysplasia and revision of loose cups. The Polyethylen (PE)-inlay can be freely oriented in the fixed ARR. It is the first implant with screws having angular stability as the screw-heads are blocked when cementing the inlay in the ring. Patients and Methods: Out of 2251 primary THR performed between 1984 and 2005 at our hospital the ARR was used in 399 hips (363 patients). The indication for a THR with ARR was mainly a deficient acetabular bone stock as judged by the operating surgeon. 51 % of the patients had osteoarthritis, 22% dysplasia, 7% fractures, 6,5% osteonecrosis, 5% protrusion acetabuli, 4% rheumatoid arthritis and 4,5% other diagnosis. The mean age at operation was 66.4 years, 64% were females. Intraoperatively, the ARR was placed with its medial border adjacent to the tear drop figure. The weight bearing area was fixed with 3–4 cancellous screws in the acetabular bone stock. Regular clinical and radiological follow-up 3months, 1, 2, 5, 10,15 and 20 years was planned. The radiographs were assessed for osteolysis, radiolucent lines and screw breakage after 15 years. Survival for revision due to aseptic loosening was calculated by Kaplan Meier. Results: The overall survival regarding aseptic loosening of the cup was 100% after 10 years, 97,2% after 15 and 93,2% after 20 years. Of the 96 patients (104 rings) operated at least 15 years ago, one was lost for follow-up. Three rings were revised due to aseptic loosening (11, 12, 16 years after implantation) and one was removed due to infection (1,8 years after implantation). 54 patients (with 56 rings) died before they reached the 15 years control. None of them was revised for aseptic loosening of the ring. 37 patients (43 hips) remained for 15-years control, six of them refused to come and were contacted by questionnaire or phone. Two cups were radiologically loose with broken screws but not symptomatic. The mean HHS after 15 years was 80.1. Conclusion: The ARR shows a very good long term survival even in patients with difficult acetabular situations such as deficient bone stock. The design allows an application in a variety of positions. Even at a teaching hospital good long term results could be reached with this implant

Total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains a difficult and challenging problem. How to reconstruct acetabular deficiencies has become increasingly important. One of the major causes inducing loosening of acetabular reinforcement ring with hook (Ganz ring) is insufficient initial stability. In this study, three-dimensional finite element models of the pelvis with different degrees of bone defect and acetabular components were developed to investigate the effects of the number of screws, screw insert position (Fig. 1), and bone graf quality on the initial stability under the peak load during normal walking. The size of pelvic bone defect, the number of screws and the position of screws were varied, according to clinical experience, to assess the change of initial stability of the Ganz ring. The Ganz ring was placed in the true acetabulum and the acetabular cup was cemented into the Ganz ring with 45 degrees abduction and 15 degrees of screws. The Insert position, nodes on the sacroiliac joint and the pubic symphysis were fixed in all degrees of freedom as the boundary condition. The peak load during normal walking condition was applied to the center of the femoral head (Fig. 2). According to the Crowe classification, as the degree of acetabular dysplasia was increased, the relative micromotion between the Ganz ring and pelvis was also increased. The peak micromotion increased as the stiffness of bone graft decreased. Increasing the numbers of screws, the relative micromotion tended to be reduced and varied the screw insertion position that affects the relative micromotion in the Ganz ring-pelvic interface (Fig. 3). This study showed that increasing the number of inserted screws can reduce the relative micromotion. Both the insert position and graft bone property affect the stability of the Ganz ring while the insert position has a greater impact. The current study is designed to lay the foundation for a biomechanical rationale that will support the choice of treatment

Between 1993 and 2003, 67 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in 65 patients, including 52 women and 13 men, using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules supported by a Kerboull-type reinforcement acetabular device. The average age at the time of index surgery was 68.6 years. The Acetabular bone loss according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) system was type II for 7 hips, type III for 58 hips, and type IV for one hip. The Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device used was Kerboull Cross Plate in 18 hips and KT Plate in 49 hips. HA granules of sizes 0.9 to1.2 mm (G4) and 3.0–5.0 mm (G6) were mixed in a ratio of 1:1. Autografts were used to reconstruct the major segmental defects in 7 hips. At the time of this study 30 hips were lost of follow-up. Among 30 hips 22 hips were lost of follow-up because of the death of the patients. The remaining 37 hips were examined clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up period of the series was 12.8 years. Complications were examined and clinical evaluation was done using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. The criterion for loosening of the acetabular component was cup migration exceeding 3 mm or angular rotation exceeding 3 degrees or breakage of the device. Among the entire series of 67 hips postoperative complications included dislocation in 3 hips, infection in 2 hips and revision in 4 hips. Two hips were revised for loosening and the other two hips were revised for infection. The JOA hip score increased from a mean value of 48.0 preoperatively to 76.8 at the last follow-up. Radiologically 5 hips were loose. Two hips among them were revised. Survival rate of the acetabular component at 10 years was 97.1% using acetabular revision for loosening as the end point and 90.6% using radiological loosening as the end point. Acetabular reconstruction with HA granules and a Kerboull-type acetabular device provided satisfactory clinical and radiographic results at 12.8 post-operative years

Aims: Acetabular reinforcement rings have been designed to deal with severe acetabular bone deþciencies in revision arthroplasty of the hip. We report midterm results of 3 different designs. Methods: Between 1986 and 2001, 346 ace-tabular revisions with reinforcement rings were performed at our institution. 20 Burch-Schneider Cages, 135 Ganz and 191 Mueller Rings were implanted. Average Age of the patients at the time of the intervention was 67 years (range 27–93 years). The average follow-up was 4 years (range 1–15 years). Bone defects were classiþed according to the AAOS-Classiþcation. Homologous allografts were used in most cases to reconstruct the acetabulum. Three different techniques were used for allograft preparation: Bone chips, bulk and morselized allografts. Results: Clinical results were moderate in most cases as multiple revisions or other disabling conditions have inßuenced the outcome. Mid-term survival was > 90% at 4 years. An attempt was made to correlate aseptic loosening with allograft preparation methods. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be achieved at midterm using all three devices. However resorption of allografts leading to migration, dislocation or failure remain a major concern when acetabular reconstruction is used in revision hip arthroplasty

Conventional cemented acetabular components are reported to have a high rate of failure when implanted into previously irradiated bone. We recommend the use of a cemented reconstruction with the addition of an acetabular reinforcement cross to improve fixation. We reviewed a cohort of 45 patients (49 hips) who had undergone irradiation of the pelvis and a cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an acetabular reinforcement cross. All hips had received a minimum dose of 30 Gray (Gy) to treat a primary nearby tumour or metastasis. The median dose of radiation was 50 Gy (Q1 to Q3: 45 to 60; mean: 49.57, 32 to 72). . The mean follow-up after THA was 51 months (17 to 137). The cumulative probability of revision of the acetabular component for a mechanical reason was 0% (0 to 0%) at 24 months, 2.9% (0.2 to 13.3%) at 60 months and 2.9% (0.2% to 13.3%) at 120 months, respectively. One hip was revised for mechanical failure and three for infection. Cemented acetabular components with a reinforcement cross provide good medium-term fixation after pelvic irradiation. These patients are at a higher risk of developing infection of their THA. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:177–84

Introduction

Failure of acetabular components has been reported to lead to large bone defects, which determine outcome and management after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although Kerboull-type (KT) plate (KYOCERA Medical Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) has been used for compensating large bone loss, few studies have identified the critical risk factors for failure of revision THA using a KT plate. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between survival rates for radiological loosening and the results according to bone defect or type of graft.

We wanted to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of acetabular revision using the acetabular reinforcement ring and allograft impaction in patients with severe acetabular bony defect. 41 hips revision arthroplasty using reinforcement ring were performed between April 1997 and October 2005 and were followed up for more than two years. The cause of primary arthroplasty was AVN in 18 cases, secondary osteoarthritis (OA) in 17 cases, fracture in cases and primary OA in 1 case. The cause of revision arthroplasty was acetabular cup loosening in 20 cases, massive osteolysis in 14 cases, infection in 4 cases, liner dissociation in 2 cases, and recurrent dislocation in 1 case. The average period between primary and revision arthroplasty was 11.4 years (range 0.6 to 29.1 years). Acetabular defects were classified based on the AAOS classification and Paprosky classification system. All were treated with autografts or allografts. Muller ring was used in 18 cases, Burch-Schneider ring was used in 14 cases, and Ganz ring in 9 cases. Clinical evaluations were performed according to the Harris hip score (HHS), and the radiographic results were evaluated by progression of acetabular component loosening, union of bone grafts, periacetabular osteolysis, and migration of the hip center. The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 64.9 was improved to 91.8 points at the latest follow-up. There were 39 cases of type 3 defect, 2 cases of type 4 defect according to the AAOS classification and 8 cases of type 2B defect, 3 cases of type 2C defect, 28 cases of type 3A defect, and 2 cases of type 3B defect according to Paprosky classification. Radiographically, the bone grafts were well united except one case. The mean preoperative hip center of rotation which was vertically 32.3mm, horizontally 33.2 mm migrated to vertically 26 mm, horizontally 33.2 mm postoperatively and it was statistically significant. The mean preoperative abductor lever arm of 41.7 mm changed to 45 mm postoperatively which was statistically insignificant. However the mean preoperatiave body lever arm of 89.4 mm changed to 96.9 mm postoperatively which was statistically significant. Postoperative complications were cup loosening in 1 case, dislocation in 2 cases, and recurrence of deep infection in 1 case. Clinically and radiographically, acetabular reconstruction using reinforcement ring showed very promising short term result. We conclude that reinforcement ring can provide stable support for grafted bone in severe bone defect. But meticulous surgical technique to get initial firm stability of ring and optimal indication in mandactory for the successful result

Introduction. Acetabular reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a case with severe bone loss is most challenging for surgeon. Relatively high rate of failure after the reconstruction surgery have been reported. We have used Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices with morsellised or bulk bone allografts for these cases. The purpose of this study was to examine the midterm results of revision THA using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices. Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed 20 hips of revision THA (20 patients) between February 2002 and August 2010. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 67.4 years (range 45–78). All of the cases were female. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.5 years (range 2.1–10.4). The reasons of revision surgeries were aseptic loosening in 10 hips, migration of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in 8 hips, and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 hips. We classified acetabular bone defects according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification; we found two cases of Type II and eighteen cases of Type III. In terms of bone graft, we performed both bulk and morsellised bone grafts in 6 hips and morsellised bone grafts only in 14 hips. We assessed cup alignment using postoperative computed tomography (CT) and The post-operative and final follow-up radiographs were compared to assess migration of the implant. We measured the following three parameters: the angle of inclination of the acetabular device (Fig. 1); the horizontal migration (Fig. 2a); and vertical migration (Fig. 2b). Substantial migration was defined as a change in the angle of inclination of more than 3 degrees or migration of more than 3 mm. The pre- and postoperative hip functions were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. Results. The mean cup inclination and anteversion were 38.4 degrees and 10.6 degrees, respectively. The mean change in the angle was 1.9 degrees in inclination of the device. The average horizontal migration was 1.0 mm, and the vertical migration was 2.0 mm. Only one hip showed substantial migration with breakage of the device. This failure case represented a large amount of posterior pelvic tilt in standing position postoperatively. The mean JOA hip score was increased from 46.7 to 74.8. Discussion. Poor outcome using Kerboull-type reinforcement plate with morsellised bone graft only has been demonstrated by many reports. In these literatures, bulk bone graft was recommended particularly in the case of large bone defect such as larger than half of the rounded plate of the device or more than 2 cm of thickness. In our case series, acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull- type acetabular reinforcement device and bone graft gives satisfactory mid-term results even with morsellized bone graft only. One possible interpretation is that most of our cases had relatively small bone defect according to the staging of severity of the superior segmental bone loss made by Kawanabe et al. We suggest that the progressive posterior pelvic tilt should be considered to be a risk of poor outcome of the acetabular reconstruction using this device. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

In revision THA, the solid acetabular reconstruction in the true acetabulum is often challenging. We are using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement devices after packing hydroxyapatite granules for acetabular bone defects. We report our 3–7 year clinical and roentgenographical results. Twenty-one acetabuli in 20 patients were reconstructed in the true acetabuli with Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices and porous hydroxyapatite granules (Sumitomo Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.). The mean age of the patients at operation was 68 years. The mean follow-up period was 5 years and 3 months (38–88 months). Acetabular bone deficiencies were evaluated according to AAOS classification (type II: 5 hips, type III: 16 hips). Porous hydroxyapatite granules (20–60 grams) were grafted to all the acetabuli. Autologous cortico-cancellous bone grafts or hydroxyapatite blocks were used to reconstruct the segmental defects in 6 hips. All the acetabuli were reinforced with Ker-boull-type reinforcement devices and Charnley-type cemented prostheses were implanted. Clinical and roent-genographical results were evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score and Hodgkinson classification. Average hip score was improved from 42 points to 75 points. No re-revision was done. No infection was noted. The roentgenograms showed neither migration nor loosening of the acetabular components. Porous hydroxyapatite granules are one of the best bone substitutes because of their mechanical and biochemical properties. Oonishi reported very good results of his acetabular reconstruction using this material. The Kerboull-type acetabular devices are very effective to the reconstruction in the true acetabulum. Excellent results of these devices were reported by Kerboull. Ace-tabular reconstrution using both of them showed very good clinical and roentgenographical results during 3 to 7 post-operative years in our series

Deficiencies of acetabular bone stock at revision hip replacement were reconstructed with two different types of allograft using impaction bone grafting and a Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring. We compared a standard frozen non-irradiated bone bank allograft (group A) with a freeze-dried irradiated bone allograft, vitalised with autologous marrow (group B). We studied 78 patients (79 hips), of whom 87% (69 hips) had type III acetabular defects according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons classification at a mean of 31.4 months (14 to 51) after surgery. At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 69.9 points (13.5 to 97.1) in group A and 71.0 points (11.5 to 96.5) in group B. Each hip showed evidence of trabeculation and incorporation of the allograft with no acetabular loosening. These results suggest that the use of an acetabular reinforcement ring and a living composite of sterile allograft and autologous marrow appears to be a method of reconstructing acetabular deficiencies which gives comparable results to current forms of treatment

Aims

Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but serious. Few studies carried out on small cohorts have reported them in the literature. The aim of this work is to describe the specific characteristics of post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures, and the outcome of their surgical treatment in terms of function and complications.

The purpose of our study was to find out the midterm results of the Müller acetabular roof reinforcement ring in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. From 1988 to 1998, 48 total hip arthroplasties using the acetabular roof reinforcement ring (39 patients) was performed by one surgeon (PDB). We reviewed all patients who had a minimum of five year follow up. There were 37 hips (31 patients) with a mean follow up of 7 years (5 to 12 years). Acetabular deficiencies were classified according to the AAOS classification. Acetabular reconstruction was done using the Müller acetabular roof reinforcement ring with the polyethylene cup cemented to the ring, and morcellized cancellous bone graft. Müller straight stem femoral prosthesis was used in all cases for femoral reconstruction. All patients were followed up annually and outcome assessed using Harris hip score. There were 27 primary procedures and 10 revisions. 30 patients (81%) had cavitary, 2 (5%) had segmental and 5 (14%) had combined defects. Survival analysis was done with failure defined as radiological evidence of loosening of the acetabular component. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). 5 patients died due to unrelated causes and 2 patients were lost for follow up. The mean Harris hip score improved from 42 preoperatively to 82 postoperatively (p< 0. 001)(Wilcoxon Signed Rank test). Both mean pain and function score showed improvement from 12 to 39 postoperatively (p< 0. 001) and 12 to 32 (p< 0. 001) respectively. 5 patients had radiological loosening of the ring. The migration rate was 13%. The cumulative survival rate at 12 years, excluding all patients who died and were lost for follow up, was 79. 3% (95% confidence interval 71. 4 to 87. 2, standard error 4). There was no statistical difference in the failure rate between primary and revision procedures (chi-square test). This series show satisfactory medium term results with Müller roof reinforcement ring and cancellous bone graft in acetabular deficiencies with poor bone stock