Background. Increasing number of studies investigating surgical patients have reported longer length of stay (LOS) in hospital after an operation with higher ASA grades. However, the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on LOS in hospital post Total Knee Replacement (TKR) remains a controversial topic with conflicting findings in reported literature. In our institution, we recently adopted a weight reduction program requiring all patients with raised BMI to participate in order to be considered for elective TKR. Objectives. This has prompted us to investigate the impact BMI has on LOS compared to the more established impact of ASA grade on patients following Primary TKR. Methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all elective primary TKR patients between November 2013 and May 2014. LOS was compared in BMI groups <30, 30–40 and >40 and ASA grades 1–2 and 3–4. ANOVA and independent t-test were used to compare mean LOS between BMI groups and ASA grades, respectively. Results. Two hundred and thirty six TKR were analysed. Mean LOS in BMI groups <30, 30–40 and >40 were 6.0, 6.4 and 6.0 days, respectively (p = 0.71). Mean LOS in ASA groups 1–2 and 3–4 were 5.8 and 7.6, respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions. In patients undergoing primary TKR, ASA grade is a better predictor of LOS than BMI. Our data further adds to the evidence that high BMI alone is not a significant factor in prolonging LOS after a primary TKR. This should be taken into account when allocating resources to optimise patients for surgery. Level of evidence. III - Evidence from case, correlation, and comparative studies

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is associated with a higher risk of revision compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The outcomes of knee arthroplasty are typically presented as implant survival or incidence of revision after a set number of years, which can be difficult for patients and clinicians to conceptualise. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more relatable estimate of risk projection over a patient's remaining lifetime, and make comparisons to TKA. All primary UKAS performed from 1999 to 2019 (n=13,481) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were included. The lifetime risk of revision was calculated and stratified by age, gender and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. The lifetime risk of revision for UKA was highest in the youngest patients (46-50 years; 40.4%) and lowest in the oldest patients (86-90 years; 3.7%). Lifetime risk of revision was higher for females (range 4.3%-43.4% cf. males 2.9%-37.4%) and patients with higher ASA status (ASA 3-4 range 8.8%-41.2% cf. ASA 1 1.8%-29.8%), regardless of age. The lifetime risk of UKA was two-fold higher than TKA (ranging from 3.7%-40.4% UKA, 1.6%-22.4% TKA) across all age groups. Increased risk of revision in the younger patients was associated with aseptic loosening in both males and females, and pain in females. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) accounted for 4% of all UKA revisions, in contrast to 27% for TKA; risk of PJI was higher for males than females for both procedures. The lifetime risk of revision is a more meaningful measure of arthroplasty outcomes and can aid with patient counselling prior to UKA. Findings from this study show the increased lifetime risk of UKA revision for younger patients, females and those with higher ASA status

Abstract. Introduction. Several studies have shown that patients over 65 years have a higher mortality with covid. Combine with inherently increased morbidity and mortality in neck of femur (NoFF) fractures, it is logical to think that this subset would be most at risk. Aims. Investigate whether there is actual increase in direct mortality from Covid infection in NoFF patients, also investigate other contributing factors to mortality with covid positivity and compare the findings with current available literature. Methods. 1-year cross sectional, retrospective study from 1st March 2020 at two DGHs, one in Wales and one in England. Surgically treated NoFF patients with isolated intra/extracapsular fracture included. Mortality analysis done by creating a matched comparison group for each risk factor and combinations known to confer highest mortality. Chi square test for independence used to compare COVID status with 1 year mortality. Results. 610 patients, 62 patients had COVID-19RTPCR+ive test during hospital stay/in the community. 21(34%) deaths in COVID positive and 95 (17.33%) deaths in COVID negative patients. There was no mortality in ASA 1 or 2 patients. Analysis of asa matching with 10-year age ranges from 65years revealed a nearly double mortality rate in covid+ group as opposed to covid negative for both ASA 3 and 4 groups. Parameters such as preinjury mobility, residential status, AMTS score, time to surgery, did not seem to play a significant role in mortality. Conclusion. First of its kind study with a large subset of patients and unique parameters to identify causes leading to mortality in the vulnerable population of NoFF. Higher morality in Covid positive NoFF patients, but increase may not be as significant as identified by most current studies in the literature and still within the confines of NHFD stats(2019). Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. There are numerous advantages of discharging patients early after any surgery. Day case arthroplasty in hip and knee is already brought into practice at many centres. We present our journey towards discharging elective shoulder arthroplasty patient on same after their surgery. An initial retrospective study of patients who underwent elective shoulder replacement between 2017 and 2020 were studied. It was identified that a selected group of patients could be discharged on the same of their surgery. The criteria to select a patient for this service was laid down that include ASA 1 or 2, good family support on discharge, personal wishes of patients and early identification of potential patients in the clinic and planning for day case shoulder arthroplasty56 consecutive patients underwent elective arthroplasty of shoulder. Among them 22 patients were discharges on the next day of surgery. The potential patients those could discharged on same were identified to be 11 out of 22 were under ASA 2 and had good family support at home on discharge. Average length of stay after surgery was 2.17 days. We have prospectively discharged 2 patients following the new criteria. This study demonstrates how outpatient elective shoulder could be implemented at other centres. Patient participation and selection with proper planning is key for success here. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Abstract. Objective. To investigate the safety and cost-effectiveness of interscalene brachial plexus block/regional anaesthesia (ISB-RA) in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder replacement. Methods. This retrospective study included 15 patients with symptomatic rotator cuff arthropathy who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) under ISB-RA without general anaesthesia in the beach chair position from 2010 to 2018. The mean patient age was 77 years (range 59–82 years). Patients had associated medical comorbidities: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2–4. Assessed parameters were: duration of anaesthesia, intra-operative systolic blood pressure variation, sedation and vasopressor use, duration of post-operative recovery, recovery scores, length of stay, and complications. A robust cost analysis was also performed. Results. The mean (range) duration of anaesthesia was 38.66 (20–60) min. Maximum and minimum intra-operative systolic blood pressure ranges were 130–210 and 75–145 mmHg, respectively (mean [range] drop, 74.13 [33–125] mmHg). Mean (range) propofol dose was 1.74 (1–3.0) mg/kg/h. The Median (interquartile range) post-operative recovery time was 30 (20–50) min. The mean (range) postoperative recovery score (local scale, range 5–28 where lower values are superior) was 5.2 (5–8). The mean (range) length of stay was 8 (1–20 days); the two included patients with ASA grade 2 were both discharged within 24 hours. One patient with predisposing history developed pneumonia; however, there were no complications related to ISB-RA. The mean (range) cost per patient was £101.36 (£59.80-£132.20). Conclusions. Our data demonstrate that rTSA under ISB-RA is safe, cost-effective and a potentially viable alternative for patients with multiple comorbidities. Notably, patients with ASA grade 2 who underwent rTSA under ISB-RA had a reduced length of stay and were discharged within 24 hours

C. Difficile infections in elderly patients with hip fractures is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Antibiotic regimens with penicillin and its derivatives is a leading cause. Antibiotic prophylactic preferences vary across different hospitals within NHS. We compared two antibiotic prophylactic regimens - Cefuroxime only prophylaxis and Teicoplanin with Gentamicin prophylaxis in fracture neck of femur surgery, and evaluated the incidence of C. Difficile diarrhea and Surgical Site Infection (SSI). To assess the Surgical Site Infection and C. Difficile infection rate associated with different regimens of antibiotics prophylaxis in fracture neck of femur surgery. Data was analyzed retrospectively. Neck of femur fracture patients treated surgically from 2009 in our unit were included. Age, gender, co morbidities, type of fracture, operation, ASA grade was collected. 1242 patients received Cefuroxime only prophylaxis between January 2009 and December 2012 (Group 1) and 486 patients received Teicoplanin with Gentamicin between October 2015 and March 2017 (Group 2). There were 353 males and 889 female patients in Group 1 and 138 males and 348 female patients in Group 2. The co morbidities in both groups were comparable. Incidence of C. Difficile diarrhea and Surgical Site Infection (SSI) was noted. Statistical analysis with chi square test was performed to determine the ‘p’ value. C. Diff diarrhea rate in Group 2 was 0.41 % as compared to 1.29 % in Group 1. The Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rate in Group 2 was 0.41 % as compared to 3.06 % in Group 1. The comparative results were statistically significant (p = 0.0009). Prophylactic antibiotic regimen of Teicoplanin with Gentamicin showed significant reduction in C. Difficile diarrhea & Surgical Site Infection in fracture neck of femur patients undergoing surgery

To determine risk factors of infection in total knee arthroplasty. This descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics for a duration of three years from January 2016 to January 2019. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were all patients operated in another hospital and revision total knee replacement. All patients were followed up at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post-operatively. Signs of inflammation and inflammatory markers such as total leukocyte count (TLC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR were measured. Risk factors like age, body mass index (BMI), ASA, co-morbid conditions were also noted. A total of 78 patients underwent primary unilateral Total Knee Replacement (TKR) during the study period. Of these, 30 (34.09%) were male and 48 (61.54%) female patients. Mean age of patients was 68.32 ± 8.54 years. Average BMI 25.89 Kg/m2 .Osteoarthritis was the pre-dominant cause of total knee replacement (94.87%). Among co-morbid factors 33.33% were diabetic, 28.20% having ischemic heart disease and 12.82% with chronic lung disease. Upon anaesthesia fitness pre-operatively, 91.02% patients had an American society of anaesthesiologist score (ASA) between 0–2 while 07 (8.97%) between 3- 5. Average duration of surgery was 85.62± 4.11 minutes. 6.41% cases got infected. In majority of the infected cases (60%), Staphylococcus aureus was the infective organism. Diabetes Mellitus (p=0.01) and Obesity (p=0.02) had a significant relation to post-operative infection. Pre-operative risk evaluation and prevention strategies along with early recognition of infection and control can greatly reduce the risk of joint infection post-TKR which will not only improve the mobility of patient but also its morbidity and mortality as well. Key Words:. C-reactive protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), Staphylococcus aureus, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Abstract. Introduction. Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique. Methods. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. For THR, analysis comparing computer-guided versus conventional technique demonstrated HR of 0.771 (95%CI 0.573–1.036) p=0.085, and 0.594 (95%CI 0.297–1.190) p=0.142, for revision for all-causes and dislocation, respectively. When comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique, HR for revision for all-causes was 0.480 (95%CI 0.067 –3.452) p=0.466. For TKR, compared to conventional surgery, HR for all-cause revision for procedures performed using computer guidance and patient-specific jigs were 0.967 (95% CI 0.888–1.052) p=0.430, and 0.937 (95% CI 0.708–1.241) p=0.65, respectively. HR for analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique was 2.0940 (0.2423, 18.0995) p = 0.50. Conclusions. This is the largest study investigating this topic utilising propensity score analysis methods. We did not find a statistically significant difference in revision for all-causes and dislocation although these analyses are underpowered to detect smaller differences in effect size between groups. Additional comparison for revision for dislocation between robotic-assisted versus conventionally performed THR was not performed as this is a subset of revision for all-causes and wide confidence intervals were already observed for that analysis. It is also important to mention this NJR analysis study is of an observational study design which has inherent limitations. Nonetheless, this is the most feasible study design to answer this research question requiring use of a large data set due to revision being a rare outcome. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Objectives. Conventional approaches (including Tobit) do not accurately account for ceiling effects in PROMs nor give uncertainty estimates. Here, a classifier neural network was used to estimate postoperative PROMs prior to surgery and compared with conventional methods. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were estimated with separate models. Methods. English NJR data from 2009 to 2018 was used, with 278.655 knee and 249.634 hip replacements. For both OKS and OHS estimations, the input variables included age, BMI, surgery date, sex, ASA, thromboprophylaxis, anaesthetic and preoperative PROMs responses. Bearing, fixation, head size and approach were also included for OHS and knee type for OKS estimation. A classifier neural network (NN) was compared with linear or Tobit regression, XGB and regression NN. The performance metrics were the root mean square error (RMSE), maximum absolute error (MAE) and area under curve (AUC). 95% confidence intervals were computed using 5-fold cross-validation. Results. The classifier NN and regression NN had the best RMSE, both with the same scores of 8.59±0.04 for knee and 7.88±0.04 for hip. The classifier NN had the best MAE, with 6.73±0.03 for knee and 5.73±0.03 for hip. The Tobit model was second, with 6.86±0.03 for knee and 6.00±0.01 for hip. The classifier NN had the best AUC, with (68.7±0.4)% for knee and (73.9±0.3)% for hip. The regression NN was second, with (67.1±0.3)% for knee and (71.1±0.4)% for hip. The Tobit model had the best AUC among conventional approaches, with (66.8±0.3)% for knee and (71.0±0.4)% for hip. Conclusions. The proposed model resulted in an improvement from the current state-of-the-art. Additionally, it estimates the full probability distribution of the postoperative PROMs, making it possible to know not only the estimated value but also its uncertainty

Introduction and Objective. Lower limb fractures are amongst the most common surgically managed orthopaedic injuries, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as the conventional method of treatment of the fibula. In recent years, dedicated intramedullary implants have emerged for fibula fixation in tandem with the move towards minimally invasive surgery in high-risk patients. This is the largest multicentre review to date with the aim of establishing the clinical outcomes following intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of the fibula and to identify the absolute indication for fibula IMN fixation. Materials and Methods. A retrospective study of adult patients in all UK hospitals, who underwent fibula nail fixation between 01/01/2018 and 31/10/2020 was performed. Primary outcome measures included time to union, infection rate, other post-operative complications associated with the fixation and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcome measure was to identify the indication for fibula nailing. Data tabulation was performed using Microsoft Excel and analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23 (SPSS Statistics). Results. 2 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) and 9 Trauma Units (TUs) were eligible for inclusion. 102 patients were included and 91% were classified as ankle fractures of 68% (n=69) were Weber B, 24% (n=24) Weber C and 8% (n=9) were either distal tibial fractures with an associated fibula fracture or pilon fractures. The mean age was 64 years of which 45 were male patients and 57 were female. The average BMI was 30.03kg/m. 2. and 44% of patients were ASA 3. 74% of patients had poor pre-op skin condition including swelling and open wounds. The calculated infection rate for fibula nail was 4.9% and metal-work complication rate was 4.9%. The average time to union was 13 weeks and length of inpatient stay was 15 days (SD +/− 12 days). Conclusions. MEFNO has demonstrated that fibula nail is an ideal implant in patients who have a physiologically higher risk of surgery, poor skin condition and a complex fracture pattern. The time to union, complication and infection risks are lower than that reported in literature for ankle ORIFs

Abstract. Objectives. Up to 19% of patients who undergo surgery for an acute hip fracture are readmitted to the hospital within three months of the index operation. We aimed to identify risk factors for unplanned clinic attendance, readmission, and mortality within the first 12 months postoperatively and subsequently determine if there is a role for routine follow-up. Methods. Patients greater than 65 years old who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty using an uncemented Thompson implant for treatment of a traumatic non-pathological hip fracture were identified from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution between August 2007 and February 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities, place of residence, mobility status, unplanned attendance to an orthopaedic clinic with symptoms relating to the respective limb, readmission, and mortality were recorded. Results. Five hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients were identified. Unplanned clinic attendance was correlated to age (p = 0.000, B = −0.0159, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.200 to −0.65), with patients between the ages of 65 – 70 years most likely to require unplanned clinic review postoperatively. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (p = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.014 to 0.163) and frequency of unplanned outpatient attendance (p = 0.000, 95% CI: 0.120 to 0.284) were significantly associated with increased readmission within 12 months of the index procedure with patients who were regarded as ASA > 2 most likely to require readmission within the first postoperative year. Conclusion. To our knowledge, this is the first piece of research that identifies causative factors for unplanned clinic attendance and acute readmission during the first postoperative year in acute hip fracture patients treated by hemiarthroplasty. Routine scheduled follow-up of patients based on risk stratification may be effective in reducing the financial burden of unplanned clinic attendance. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip replacement. A recent systematic review of patient risk factors for PJI identified male gender, smoking status, increasing BMI, steroid use, previous joint surgery and comorbidities of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and depression as risk factors for developing PJI. Limitations of the current literature include the short term follow up of most published studies. We investigated the role of patient, surgical and healthcare factors on the risk of revision of a primary hip replacement for PJI at different time-points in the post-operative follow-up. It is important that those risk factors are identified so that patients can be appropriately counselled according to their individual risk profile prior to surgery and modifiable factors can be addressed to reduce the risk of PJI at an individual and healthcare system level. Materials and Methods. Primary hip replacements and subsequent revision procedures performed for PJI from 2003–2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Patient (age, gender, ASA grade, BMI), perioperative (surgical indication, type of anaesthesia, thromboprophylaxis regime, surgical approach, hip replacement and bearing surface and use of femoral or acetabular bone graft) and healthcare system characteristics (surgeon grade, surgical volume) were linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics to obtain information on specific ethnicity and comorbidities (derived from the Charlson index). Multilevel piecewise exponential non-proportional hazards models were used to estimate their effects at different post-operative periods (0–3 months, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 and >24 months post-operation). Results. The index hip replacements consisted of 623,253 primaries with 2,705 subsequently revised for PJI, 14% within 3 months, 8% between 3–6 months, 14% between 6–12 months, 22% between 1–2 years and 42% ≥2 years after the index procedure. Risk factors for revision of PJI included male gender, high BMI, high ASA grade and younger age. Their effects were period-specific. Patients with chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes or dementia had high early risk of revision for PJI, as did patients operated for a fractured neck of femur (<3 months). Metal-on-metal bearings (>12 months) and lateral surgical approach (≥3 months) also influenced the mid- and long-term revision risk for PJI. No or modest associations were found with the operating surgeon grade, surgical volume and hospital surgical volume. Conclusion. The effects of patient, perioperative and healthcare system risk factors for PJI after primary hip replacement are time-dependent. Modifiable risk factors such as the type of surgical approach and bearing surface have also been found

Intracapsular neck of femur fractures may be treated with fixation or arthroplasty, depending on fracture characteristics and patient factors. Two common methods of fixation are the sliding hip screw, with or without a de-rotation screw, and cannulated screws. Each has its merits, and to date there is controversy around which method is superior, with either method thought to risk avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) rates in the region of 10–20%. Fixation with cannulated screws may be performed in various ways, with current paucity of evidence to show an optimum technique. There are a multitude of factors which are likely to affect patient outcomes: technique, screw configuration, fracture characteristics and patient factors. We present a retrospective case series analysis of 65 patients who underwent cannulated screw fixation of a hip fracture. Electronic operative records were searched from July 2014 until July 2019 for all patients with a neck of femur fracture fixed with cannulated screws: 68 were found. Three patients were excluded on the basis of them having a pathological fracture secondary to malignancy, cases were followed up for 2 years post-operatively. Electronic patient records and X-rays were reviewed for all included patients. All X-rays were examined by each team member twice, with a time interval of two weeks to improve inter-observer reliability. 65 patients were included with 2:1 female to male ratio and average age of 72 years. 36 patients sustained displaced fractures and 29 undisplaced. Ten patients sustained a high-energy injury, none of which developed AVN. Average time to surgery was 40 hours and 57 patients mobilised on day one post-operatively. All cases used either 7 or 7.3mm partially threaded screws in the following configurations: 2 in triangle apex superior, 39 triangle apex inferior, 22 rhomboid and 2 other, with 9 cases using washers. All reductions were performed closed. Five (8%) of our patients were lost to follow-up as they moved out of area, 48 (74%) had no surgical complications, seven (11%) had mild complications, three (5%) moderate and two (3%) developed AVN. Both of these sustained displaced fractures with low mechanism of injury, were female, ASA 2 and both ex-smokers. One received three screws in apex inferior configuration and one rhomboid, neither fixed with washers. Our AVN rate following intracapsular hip fracture fixation with cannulated screws is much lower than widely accepted. This study is under-powered to comment on factors which may contribute to the development of AVN. However, we can confidently say that our practice has led to low rates of AVN. This may be due to our method of fixation; we use three screws in an apex inferior triangle or four screws in a rhomboid, our consultant-led operations, closed reduction of all fractures, or our operative technique. We pass a short thread cannulated screw across the least comminuted aspect of the fracture first in order to achieve compression, followed by two or three more screws (depending on individual anatomy) to form a stable construct. Our series shows that fixation of intracapsular hip fractures with cannulated screws as we have outlined remains an excellent option. Patients retain their native hip, have a low rate of AVN, and avoid the risks of open reduction

Over 70,000 hip fractures occur annually in the UK. Both SIGN (111) and NICE (124) give guidance on optimal management of these patients. Both suggest cemented hemiarthroplasty should be used in those without contra-indications, as cemented implants are associated with less thigh pain, subsidence and a better functional outcome. Cardiorespiratory compromise secondary to bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) is however a concern in those with pre-existing cardiorespiratory disease (NYHA grade 3–4, pulmonary hypertension) or pathological fracture [3]. The aim of our study was to audit the practice of a University of Glasgow hospital with regard to cemented hemiarthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed data on all patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture at the Southern General Hospital between 01/01/12-02/04/12. Patient demographics, pre-operative plan, procedure performed, ASA grade and pre-morbid mobility were recorded. Results. Twenty-three hemiarthroplasties were performed. The median age was 82 (70–101). No patient aged over 90 underwent cemented hemiarthroplasty. Cemented implants (JRI, Furlong) were used in 26% (n=6) while 74% (n=17) underwent uncemented (Stryker, Austin-Moore) hemiarthroplasty. ASA grade was recorded in eight (35%). There were four ASA-2 patients (mild systemic disease not limiting activity) of which 75% underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Pre-morbid mobility was recorded in eight (35%). All three independently mobile patients underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Six (26%) had a documented pre-operative plan with regards to cement use. This study highlights the disparity between current recommendations and our Centres’ practice. Most notable were: poor recording of pre-operative mobility, poor documentation of a pre-operative surgical plan, the low use of cemented fixation even in fit mobile patients and the lack of ASA grade recording (stratification of risk) by our anaesthetic colleagues. We suggest a documented pre-operative discussion between the surgeon and anaesthetist to establish BCIS risk and decide on use of cemented arthroplasty taking into account age and mobility

Acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Conservative management is reserved for those unfit for extensive reconstruction, or those who achieve ‘secondary congruence' of a complex fracture. We present demographic data and the results of conservative management in patients over 65 years of age. The Fracture Outcome Research Database (FORD) at our unit was interrogated for all patients over 65 years, who had sustained an acetabular fracture between June 2008 and June 2016. 410 patients were identified. Following exclusions, thirty-two patients were included for analysis. They had a mean age of 80 (66–91), and a mean ASA equivalent score of 3.1 (2–4). Mean follow up was five (1–9) years. Twenty-five patients lived in their own home and seven in a nursing home. Thirty had low energy injures, two high energy. Twenty-four (75%) had anterior column posterior hemitransverse fractures, seven (22%) had associated both column and one (3%) had a T-type fracture. The mean length of inpatient stay was 43 days (4–140). Maximum post-operative mobility was limited to a hoist in eight (25%), a frame with or without assistance in 15 (47%), a stick in five (16%) and independence in four (13%). Thirty-day mortality was 6%- and one-year mortality 22%. The data demonstrates that conservative treatment in this cohort leads to long inpatient stays, poor mobility and significant levels of mortality. Complex reconstruction remains demanding on both surgeon and patient. Innovative ways of managing these patients are needed to improve outcomes

Surgical training in the UK is under increasing pressure with a high demand for service provision. This raises concerns about the resultant negative impact this is having on training opportunities for surgical trainees in theatre due to a high demand for surgical procedures to be performed expediently by consultants. This is due to the assumption that trainee take significantly longer time to operate in theatre and thus result in a slow progress of theatre lists. Our study evaluated the differences in operative time between orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic consultants, as well as provide realistic timings for each stage encompassed within the entire duration a patient is in theatre. From our trauma unit electronic theatre database, we retrospectively collected data for six Joint Committee of Surgical Training (JCST) mandatory procedures. Information collected included patients' ASA grading, total surgical time and grade of surgeons. A total of 956 procedures were reviewed: 71.8% hip procedures, 14.2% intramedullary nail fixations and 14.2% ankle fixations. 46.2% and 53.8% of the procedures were performed by consultants and trainees as first surgeon, respectively. On average, consultants were found to be 13 minutes quicker in performing the hip procedures and this difference was found to be statically significant (p < 0.05). However, trainees were found to be quicker in performing intramedullary femoral nailings and simple ankle fixations, but consultant were faster at performing intramedullary tibial nailings and complex ankle fixations. However, the differences were not found to be statistically significant (p > 0.05)

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are uncommon but are devastating complications of total knee replacement (TKR). We analysed the risk factors of revision for PJI following primary TKR and their association with PJI at different post-operative periods. Primary TKRs and subsequent revision surgeries performed for PJI from 2003–2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Multilevel piece-wise exponential non-proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of the investigated factors at different post-operative periods. Patient, perioperative and healthcare system characteristics were investigated and data from the Hospital Episode Statistics for England were linked to obtain information on specific comorbidities. The index TKRs consisted of 679,010 primaries with 3,659 subsequently revised for PJI, 7% within 3 months, 6% between 3–6months, 17% between 6–12months, 27% between 1–2years and 43% ≥2 years from the index procedure. Risk factors for revision for PJI included male sex, high BMI, high ASA grade and young age. Patients with chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes and liver disease had higher risk of revision for PJI, as had patients who had a primary TKR for an indication of trauma or inflammatory arthropathy. Surgical procedure, fixation method, constraint and bearing type influenced the risk of revision for PJI. Their effects were period-specific. No or small associations were found with the operating surgeon grade, surgical volume and hospital surgical volume. These findings from the world's largest joint replacement registry show a more complex picture than the meta-analyses published to date with specific time-dependent effects for the identified risk factors

Administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) reduces the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. The optimal type of antibiotic used, and duration of prophylaxis are subject to debate. We compared the risk of revision surgery for PJI in the first year following THA and TKA by AP regimen. A national survey collecting information on hospital-level AP regimen policy was conducted across the Netherlands and linked to data from the LROI arthroplasty registry for 2011–2015. PJI status was defined using the surgical indication reported at revision by surgeons in the registry form. Restricted cubic splines Poisson model adjusted for hospital clustering were used to conduct the comparisons on 130,712 THAs and 111,467 TKAs performed across 99 institutions. These included 399 THAs and 303 TKAs revised for an indication of PJI. Multiple shot of Cefazolin (MCZ), of cefuroxime (MCX) and single shot of Cefazolin (SCZ) were respectively administrated to 87%, 4% and 9% of patients. For THA, the rates of revision for PJI were respectively 31/10,000 person-years 95%CI[28, 35], 39[25, 59] and 23[15, 34] in the groups which received MCZ, MCX and SCZ; respectively, the rates for TKA were 27[24, 31], 40[24, 62] and 24[16, 36]. No evidence of difference between AP regimens was found in the unadjusted and adjusted model (age, gender, BMI and ASA grade). Further work is advocated to confirm whether there is an association between AP regimen collected at patient-level and the risk of subsequent revision for PJI

Introduction. Infections in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are a burden to the healthcare system. An infection in total joint arthroplasty costs nearly $60,000–80,000 to the system. 3 major tenets to decrease surgical site infections, focus on patient preoperative optimization, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative care. Intraoperative vancomycin powder been successful in lowering infection rates in other areas of orthopaedics. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether topical intraoperative vancomycin powder had any effect on surgical site infection, complication rate, or reoperation rate. Our hypothesis was vancomycin powder may decrease the rate of surgical site infections without any effect on wound complications. Materials & Methods. 208 consecutive patients undergoing either total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) were given intraoperative vancomycin powder or none. 64 patients received vancomycin poweder compared to 164 patients who did not. All preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management was similar. Preoperative data including age, sex, BMI, diabetes status and comorbidities were recorded. Surgical techniques included medial parapatellar or subvastus for TKA, posterolateral for THA. 90-day culture positive infection and reoperation rates were recorded. Results. Preoperative variables between the two groups were similar. Average age, ASA, BMI, diabetes status and other preoperative patient variables were not significantly different (p=0.31, 0.19, 0.65, 0.31). 5/64 patients (7.8%) in the vancomycin group underwent reoperation, compared with 13/164 (9.0%) in the no vancomycin group. There was no difference in the rate of reoperations (p=0.777). Of these patients, 3/64 (4.69%) patients in the vancomycin group had a positive infection compared with 8/164 (5.55%) in the no vancomycin group. There was no significant differences between the two infection rates (p=0.807). Discussion. Surprisingly, vancomycin powder did not have any effect on reoperation nor infection rates in our study group. Although other studies may have shown a decrease in infection, ours failed to do so. Due to low study numbers, we could not differentiate deep versus superficial surgical site infections. Based on our study, we are unable to recommend the use of intraoperative vancomycin powder for total joint arthroplasty

Contrary to NICE guidance there remains a role for Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty (AM) for patients with significant pre-existing comorbidities who are at higher risk of death and complications following cemented hemiarthroplasty. We analysed prospectively-collected data comparing uncemented AM hemiarthroplasty in frail, poorly-mobile patients, and cemented hemiarthroplasty. We analysed age, pre-operative morbidity, duration of operation, death rate and complication rate. AM patients were significantly older with significantly higher ASA grades. It took significantly longer to optimise them before surgery. AM was significantly shorter to perform. There was no significant difference in complications requiring re-operation. Twice as many AM patients developed post-operative pneumonia despite absence of cement. Twice as many AM patients died after surgery and a significant proportion died within the first month despite no increased risk of repeat operation, shorter operating time and no risk of cement-disease. We infer that these patients would likely have fared badly had they undergone a longer, cemented procedure. A modern cemented prosthesis costs £691 more than AM. There exists a subset of patients within the neck of femur cohort who are significantly more unwell. Contrary to guidelines, we suggest that the cheaper, user-friendly Austin-Moore can be a reasonable prosthesis to use for this cohort