Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is the most widely published operation in the orthopaedic literature. Over recent years there has been increased interest in the surgical technique and role of concomitant procedures performed during ACLr. The National Ligament Registry (NLR) collects robust data on ACLr performed in the UK. In this registry analysis we explore trends in ACLr surgery and how they relate to published literature and the growing industry portfolio available to surgeons. Methods. Using data from the NLR, 14,352 ACLr performed between 2013–2021 were analysed. High impact papers on ACLr were then cross referenced against this data to see if surgical practice was influenced by literature or whether surgical practice dictated publication. Common trends were also compared to key surgical industry portfolios (Arthrex, Smith and Nephew) to see how new technology influenced surgical practice. Results. The number of ACLr performed in isolation is decreasing. The number of ACL reconstructions involving meniscal surgery shows an increasing trend since 2013, with 57% of ACLr in 2021 now involving meniscus surgery. The number of ACLr with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has increased sharply since 2018, preceding the stability trial publication in 2020. Graft preference and size has remained static despite the introduction of new graft harvest and fixation devices. Additional procedures such as other ligament reconstruction and additional cartilage surgery have also remained static over time. Conclusion. In this analysis we looked at surgical trends in ACLr and their relation to literature and industry. Meniscal intervention is increasing, in keeping with the growing level of literature in this area. In the setting of LET, a high impact level 1 study appears to have significantly changed the practice of UK surgeons with a sharp increase in the number of LET procedures being performed. Industry appears to have little influence on the change in surgical trends, suggesting high quality evidence is what drives innovation in ACLr while industry supports rather than influences innovation. It will be interesting to see the impact of the stability 2 study, recent work on the medial structures of the knee and the commissioning of cartilage centres on future trends

Introduction. It has been contentious whether an anatomic double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)is superior to that of a single-bundle technique. It has been hypothesized in the literature that the double-bundle technique could provide function closer to that of the anatomical knee joint. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes after single-bundle ACLR versus double-bundle ACLR. We hypothesized that the double-bundle technique would not be superior to the single-bundle technique. Methods. A retrospective, non-randomized, matched-paired comparative study was performed. Patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either a double-bundle or single-bundle technique, between 2003 and 2008 were included and matched 1:1. Matching included age, sex, BMI, time from injury to surgery, side of injury and type of sport. Patients who underwent revision procedures, multiligament reconstruction or other ACLR techniques were excluded. Patients were subsequently followed up, noting occurrence of graft rupture and any other complications. Results. A total of 1377 ACLRs were performed during the study period. Seven hundred and fifty-six patients were excluded, leaving 396patients to be included in the matching (198 matched pairs). Mean follow-up time was 176.7 +/− 7.7 months (range, 166–211 months). Overall, 40 patients (10.1%) suffered from a graft rupture which consisted of 22 patients (11.1%) in the single-bundle group and 18patients (9.1%) in the double-bundle group. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox model and demonstrated that graft failure had no significant association with the surgical technique (hazard ratio (HR), 0.857(0.457;1.609), p=0.6313). (Figure 1) Five patients (2.5%) in the single-bundle group and 7 patients (3.5%) in the double-bundle group underwent secondary surgery for cyclops syndrome(p=0.5637). Three patients (1.5%) in the single-bundle group and 2 patients (1.0%) in the double-bundle group underwent arthrolysis(p=0.6547). Seven patients (3.5%) in the single-bundle group underwent secondary meniscectomy compared to 6 patients (3.0%) in the double-bundle group (p=0.7630). Conclusion. Double-bundle ACLR is not superior to single-bundle ACLR at long-term follow up. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons do not need to use a double-bundle technique when performing ACL reconstruction. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries amongst elite athletes and usually require an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to enable return to sport. Secondary surgery can result in a longer rehabilitation period and often a. significant time away from sport which can have implications to the athlete including contract obligations and sponsorship. Advances in ACLR techniques and meniscal repair techniques as well as an awareness of meniscal root lesions, ramp lesions and lateral extraarticular procedures (LEAPs) during ACL surgery has improved outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of secondary surgery following the introduction of a systematic arthroscopic evaluation of the knee, improved meniscal repair techniques and the addition of a concomitant LEAP This systematic approach was introduced after October 2012 (10/2012). Methods. Professional athletes who underwent primary ACLR with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified from the (blinded for review). Those who had undergone major concomitant procedures such as multi-ligament reconstruction or osteotomy were excluded. Analysis of the database and review of medical records identified athletes who had underwent secondary surgery procedures. Results. A total of 342 athletes with a mean follow-up of 100.2 +/− 51.9 months (range, 24–215 months) were analysed. 130 athletes underwent surgery before 10/2012 and 212 athletes underwent surgery after 10/2012. Overall, 74 patients (21.6%) underwent secondary surgery. 39 patients (30.0% including 13.1% for graft rupture) before 10/2012 and 35 patients (16.5% including 6.6% for graft rupture) after 10/2012. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox model and demonstrated that athletes undergoing ACLR before10/2012 were at almost 2-fold risk of secondary surgery (hazard ratio (HR), 1.768(1.103;2.836), p=0.0256) when compared with those undergoing ACLR after 10/2012. (Figure 1). Conclusion. Professional athletes undergoing ACLR with a systematic arthroscopic evaluation with the use of advanced meniscal repair techniques and the combination with a LEAP result in a significantly lower rate of secondary surgery. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Over the past 30 years multiple wars and embargos have reduced healthcare resources, infrastructure, and staff in Iraq. Subsequently, there are a lack of physiotherapists to provide rehabilitation after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The implementation of home-based rehabilitation programmes may provide a potential solution to this problem. This study, set in in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, describes the epidemiology and outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) followed by home-based rehabilitation alone. Methods. A cohort observational study of patients aged ≥ 16 years with an ACL rupture who underwent an ACLR under a single surgeon. This was performed arthroscopically using a hamstring autograft (2 portal technique). Patients completed a home-based rehabilitation programme of appropriate simplicity for the home setting. The programme consisted of stretching, range of motion and strengthening exercises based on criterion rehabilitation progressions. A full description of the programme is provided at: . https://ngmvcharity.co.uk/. . Demographics, mechanisms of injury, operative findings, and outcome data (Lysholm, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and revision rates) were collected from 2016 to 2021. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results. The cohort consisted of 545 patients (547 knees), 99.6% were male with a mean age of 27.8 years (SD 6.18 years). The mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 40.6 months (SD 40.3). Despite data attrition Lysholm scores improved over the 15-month follow-up period, matched data showed the most improvement occurred within the first 2 months post-operatively. A peak score of 90 was observed at nine months. Post-operative TAS results showed an improvement in level of function but did not reach pre-injury levels by the final follow-up. At final follow-up, six (1.1%) patients required an ACLR revision. Conclusion. Patients who completed a home-based rehabilitation programme in Kurdistan had low revision rates and improved Lysholm scores 15 months post-operatively. To optimise resources, further research should investigate the efficacy of home-based rehabilitation for trauma and elective surgery in low- to middle-income countries and the developed world

Correct femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical in obtaining good clinical outcomes. We aimed to delineate whether any difference exists between the anteromedial (AM) and trans-tibial (TT) portal femoral tunnel placement techniques on the primary outcome of ACLR graft rupture. Adult patients (>18year old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2011 – January 2018 were identified and divided based on portal technique (AM v TT). The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Univariate analysis was used to delineate association between independent variables and outcome. Binary logistic regression was utilised to delineate odds ratios of significant variables. 473 patients were analysed. Median age at surgery was 27 years old (range 18–70). A total of 152/473, (32.1%) patients were AM group compared to 321/473 (67.9%) TT. Twenty-five patients (25/473, 5.3%) sustained graft rupture. Median time to graft rupture was 12 months (IQR 9). A higher odds for graft rupture was associated with the AM group, which trended towards significance (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.90 – 4.56, p=0.081). Older age at time of surgery was associated with a lower odds of rupture (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.98, p=0.014). There is no statistically significant difference in ACLR graft rupture rates when comparing anteromedial and trans-tibial portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. There was a trend towards higher rupture rates in the anteromedial portal group

Introduction. Tunnelwidening in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can result in the staged revision procedures with a need for bone transplantation prior to revision reconstruction. Limited knowledge exist regarding to quality of different transplantation methods. The present study used CT-scanning to evaluate tunnel bone density after allogenic bone chips and bone cylinder transplantation. We hypothesized that bone chips transplantation resulted in higher bone density than bone cylinder transplantation due to possible voids between individual cylinders in the tunnels. Methods. The records of 24 patients operated for 1st stage revision ACLR from April 2003 to march 2010 were included in the study. twelve patients had their tunnels transplanted with bone chips and twelve patients with bone cylinders from allogenic femoral heads. Bone chips were created by fine bone milling and cylinders were extracted by 7–8 mm core drilling. Bone density 3–4 months after transplantation were evaluated by CT scanning reconstruction slides with 5 mm intervals throughout the tunnel length using histomorphometry. Results. There were 15 females and 9 males with an average age of 32 yrs. Using bone chips the bone density in the tibial tunnels was 55% and the femoral tunnels the bone density was 68% Using bone cylinders bone density was 60% in the tibial tunnels and 53% in the femoral tunnels. The femoral bone density in the bone chip group was significantly higher than the bone cylinders (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Transplantation with bone chips results in superior bone quality in the femoral tunnels where as no difference where demonstrated in the tibial tunnels