Prediction tools are instruments which are commonly used to estimate the prognosis in oncology and facilitate clinical decision-making in a more personalized manner. Their popularity is shown by the increasing numbers of prediction tools, which have been described in the medical literature. Many of these tools have been shown to be useful in the field of soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). In this annotation, we aim to provide an overview of the available prediction tools for eSTS, provide an approach for clinicians to evaluate the performance and usefulness of the available tools for their own patients, and discuss their possible applications in the management of patients with an eSTS.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1011–1016.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is rare but increasingly diagnosed and associated with poor prognosis. Primary surgical resection with wide margins and adjuvant radiation-therapy is considered gold standard in treatment of primary SS. Although (Neo)adjuvant chemo- and radiationtherapy are used in the primary treatment of SS, they are not advocated outside a clinical trial setting. In patients with primary SS and pulmonary metastases, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is often added to the treatment protocol but it’s effect on overall survival seems limited. Between 1985 and 2004 33 patients with primary SS were treated in our clinic. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with pulmonary metastases at presentation (9) or during postoperative follow-up (8). Wide resection or focally marginal resection followed by radiotherapy was used as primary treatment for all patients. All primary metastasized patients were treated with adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy including Isofosfamide. Average survival in this group was 32 months (5 year OS 50%), compared to 60 months in the late metastasized patient-group (2 and 5 year OS 50 and 11%). Wide resection was not related to improved overall survival when compared to marginal margins and additional radiation therapy. In the early metastasized group combined chemo-radiaton therapy provided no significant improvement in overall survival over adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone. However additional chemotherapy in the late metastasized group was slightly associated with increased overall survival (5 year OS 0% vs 66%). Treatment of early pulmonary metastasized SS remains highly dependent of the individual preference of patient and physician. In contrast to the reported prolonged disease free/overall survival of Enneking stage IIA and IIB SS patients, aggressive surgical and chemo-radiation therapy has not yet been associated with improvement of disease free/overall survival in stage III disease. Patients presenting with late pulmonary metastasis might benefit from adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy treatment

The February 2024 Oncology Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does primary tumour resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of the pelvis with metastasis at diagnosis?; Proximal femur replacements for an oncologic indication offer a durable endoprosthetic reconstruction option: a 40-year experience; The importance of awaiting biopsy results in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures: do we need to biopsy solitary pathological fractures?; Effect of radiotherapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in 1,200 extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patients; What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation; Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence; Survival differences of patients with resected extraskeletal osteosarcoma receiving two different (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; Solitary versus multiple bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton: should the surgical treatment be different?.

Aims

Our aim was to develop and validate nomograms that would predict the cumulative incidence of sarcoma-specific death (CISSD) and disease progression (CIDP) in patients with localized high-grade primary central and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma.

Vascularised fibular grafts (VFGs ) are a valuable surgical technique in limb salvage after resection of a tumour. The primary objective of this multicentre study was to assess the risk factors for failure and complications for using a VFG after resection of a tumour.

The study involved 74 consecutive patients (45 men and 29 women with mean age of 23 years (1 to 64) from four tertiary centres for orthopaedic oncology who underwent reconstruction using a VFG after resection of a tumour between 1996 and 2011. There were 52 primary and 22 secondary reconstructions. The mean follow-up was 77 months (10 to 195).

In all, 69 patients (93%) had successful limb salvage; all of these united and 65 (88%) showed hypertrophy of the graft. The mean time to union differed between those involving the upper (28 weeks; 12 to 96) and lower limbs (44 weeks; 12 to 250). Fracture occurred in 11 (15%), and nonunion in 14 (19%) patients.

In 35 patients (47%) at least one complication arose, with a greater proportion in lower limb reconstructions, non-bridging osteosynthesis, and in children. These complications resulted in revision surgery in 26 patients (35%).

VFG is a successful and durable technique for reconstruction of a defect in bone after resection of a tumour, but is accompanied by a significant risk of complications, that often require revision surgery. Union was not markedly influenced by the need for chemo- or radiotherapy, but should not be expected during chemotherapy. Therefore, restricted weight-bearing within this period is advocated.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:853–61.