Background. Accurate acetabular cup positioning is considered to be essential to prevent postoperative dislocation and improve the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recently various devices such as navigation systems and patient-specific guides have been used to ensure the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning. Objectives. The present study evaluated the usefulness of CT-based three-dimensional THA preoperative planning for acetabular cup positioning. Methods. This study included 120 hips aged mean 68.3 years, who underwent primary THA using CT-based THA preoperative planning software ZedHip® (LEXI, Tokyo Japan) and postoperative CT imaging (Fig.1). The surgical approach adopted the modified Watson-Jones approach in the lateral decubitus position and Trident HA acetabular cups were used for all cases. Preoperatively the optimum cup size and position in the acetabular were decided using the ZedHip® software, taking into consideration femoral anteversion and to achieve the maximum range of motion in dynamic motion simulation. Radiographic inclination (RI) was selected in the range between 40°∼45° and radiographic anteversion (RA) in the range between 5°∼25°. Three-dimensional planning images of the cup positioning were obtained from the ZedHip® software, and the distances between the edge of the implant and anatomical landmarks such as the edge of the anterior or superior acetabular wall were measured on the three-dimensional images and recorded (Fig.2). Intraoperatively, the RI and RA were confirmed by reference to these distances and the acetabular cup was inserted. Relative positional information of the implant was extracted from postoperative CT imaging using the ZedHip® software and used to reproduce the position of the implant on preoperative CT imaging with the software image matching function. The difference between the preoperative planning and the actual implant position was measured to assess the accuracy of acetabular cup positioning using the ZedHip® software. Results. Actual cup size corresponded with that of preoperative planning in 95% of cases (114 hips). Postoperative mean RI was 42.3° ± 4.2° (95% confidence interval (CI), 41.5° ∼ 43.0°) and mean RA was 16.1° ± 5.9° (95%CI, 15.0° ∼ 17.1°). Deviation from the target RI was 4.2° ± 3.7° (95%CI, 3.5° ∼ 4.9°) and deviation from the target RA was 4.0° ± 3.6° (95%CI, 3.4° ∼ 4.7°). Overall 116 hips (96.7%) were within the RI safe zone (30° ∼ 50°) and 108 hips (90.0%) were within the RA safe zone (5° ∼ 25°), and 105 hips (87.5%) were within both the RI and RA safe zones (Fig.3). Mean cup shift from preoperative planning was 0.0mm ± 3.0mm to the cranial side in the cranio-caudal direction, 2.1mm ± 3.0mm to the anterior side in the antero-posterior direction, and 1.7mm ± 2.1mm to the lateral side in the medio-lateral direction. Conclusion. The accuracy of acetabular cup positioning using our method of CT-based three-dimensional THA preoperative planning was slightly inferior to reported values for CT-based navigation, but obviously superior to those without navigation and similar to those with portable navigation. CT-based three-dimensional THA preoperative planning is effective for acetabular cup positioning, and has better cost performance than expensive CT-based navigation. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) is used to create porous surfaces that promote bone ingrowth in an effort to improve initial stability and optimize long-term biological fixation. The acetabular cup that was studied is manufactured with titanium alloy powder via electron beam melting. Electron beam melting integrates the porous and solid substrate rather than sintering a porous coating to a solid surface. The 3D-printed acetabular cup's high surface coefficient of friction (up to 1.2), combined with its geometry, creates a predictable press-fit in the acetabulum, improving initial mechanical stability and ultimately leading to reproducible biologic fixation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes and implant fixation of this 3D-printed acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS. Four hundred twenty-eight subjects from 8 US and international research sites underwent primary THA with the 3D-printed acetabular cup. All sites received IRB approval prior to conducting the study, and all participants signed the informed consent. Screw usage and number used during surgery were used as a surrogate measurement for initial implant fixation. Clinical performance outcomes included pre- and post-operative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), patient satisfaction, and revision assessment. 215 patients had a minimum 1-year post-operative follow-up visit. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences (p<0.05). RESULTS. Acetabular screws were used in 206 of 428 cases (48.1%); 85.9% used 1 screw, 12.6% used 2 screws, and 1.5% used 3 screws. For patients with a 1-year post-operative visit, the HHS improved by 49.8 points to 91.9 from 42.1, and the OHS improved by 27.7 points to 44.4 from16.7. Patient satisfaction scores at the 1-year post-operative visit were 9.7±0.7 (n=94). There was no significant difference between genders with regard to BMI, the 1-year post-operative HHS, OHS, or patient satisfaction scores. However, the males were significantly younger (59.8 vs. 62.9 years) and had significantly higher pre-operative HHS (45.7 vs. 37.9) and OHS scores (17.8 vs. 15.3). There were 9 revisions reported. DISCUSSION. For initial implant fixation, compared to a similar, non-3D-printed acetabular cup in the same product line, the 3D-printed cup used significantly fewer screws per case (n=1 for 85.9% cases vs. n=2 for 85.7% of cases) in a fewer percentage of cases (48.1% vs. 70.4%), suggesting greater initial stability and “scratch fit”. The 3D-printed acetabular cup also displayed positive early clinical results as evidenced by the pronounced improvement in clinical outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to the 1-year post-operative visit. These 1-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Patient satisfaction scores were also excellent (9.7/10). There were nine revisions; however, four of these were due to patient falls and one was due to infection. SIGNIFICANCE. The 3D-printed acetabular cup evaluated in this study demonstrated improved implant fixation and positive early clinical outcomes for THA

The angle of acetabular inclination is an important measurement in total hip replacement (THR) procedures. Determining the acetabular component orientation intra-operatively remains a challenge. An increasing number of innovators have described techniques and devices to achieve it. This paper describes a mechanical inclinometer design to measure intra-operative acetabular cup inclination. Then, the mechanical device is tested to determine its accuracy. The aim was to design an inclinometer to measure inclination without existing instrumentation modification. The device was designed to meet the following criteria: 1. measure inclination with acceptable accuracy (+/− 5o); 2. easy to use intra-operatively (handling & visualization); 3. adaptable and useable with majority of instrumentation kits without modification; 4. sterilizable by all methods; 5. robust/reusable. The prototype device was drafted by computer aided design (CAD) software. Then a prototype was constructed using a 3D printer to establish the final format. The final device was CNC machined from SAE 304 stainless steel. The design uses an eccentrically weighted flywheel mounted on two W16002-2RS ball bearings pressed into symmetrical housing components. The weighted wheel is engraved with calibrated markings relative to its mass centre. Device functioning is dependent on gravity maintaining the weighted wheel in a fixed orientation while the housing can adapt to the calibration allowing for determining the corresponding measurement. The prototype device accuracy was compared to a digital device. A digital protractor was used to create an angle. The mechanical inclinometer (user blinded to digital reading) was used to determine the angle and compared to the digital reading. The accuracy of the device compared to the standard freehand technique was assessed using a saw bone pelvis fixed in a lateral decubitus position. 18 surgeons (6 expert, 6 intermediate, 6 novice) were asked to place an uncemented acetabular cup in a saw bone pelvis to a target of 40 degrees. First freehand then using the inclinometer. The inclination was determined using a custom-built inertial measurement unit with the user blinded to the result. Comparison between the mechanical and digital devices showed that the mechanical device had an average error of −0.2, a standard deviation of 1.5, and range −3.3 to 2.6. The average root mean square error was 1.1 with a standard deviation of 0.9. Comparison of the inclinometer to the freehand technique showed that with the freehand component placement 50% of the surgeons were outside the acceptable range of 35–45 degrees. The use of the inclinometer resulted all participants to achieve placement within the acceptable range. It was noted that expert surgeons were more accurate at achieving the target inclination when compared to less experienced surgeons. This work demonstrates that the design and initial testing of a mechanical inclinometer is suitable for use in determining the acetabular cup inclination in THR. Experimental testing showed that the device is accurate to within acceptable limits and reliably improved the accuracy of uncemented cup implantation in all surgeons

INTRODUCTION. Unlike current acetabular cups, this novel ceramic cup has a Ti/HA coating which removes the requirement for assembly into a metal shell which avoiding potential chipping/misalignment and reducing wall thickness [Figure 1]. This study examines the resistance of novel thin-walled, direct to bone fixation ceramic cups to critical impact loads. METHODS. Samples of the smallest (Ø46mm) and largest (Ø70mm) diameter ReCerf. TM. acetabular cups and corresponding femoral head implants were implanted into Sawbones foam blocks considered representative of pelvic cancellous bone. Two different positional configurations were tested and were considered worst case and the extremes of surgical compromise; P1 simulates the cup fully supported by the acetabulum with a high inclination angle (70°) and a vertical impaction axis (worst case loading near the cup rim) and. P2 simulates the cup implanted with a lower inclination (55°) but with the superior section unsupported by acetabulum bone [Figure 2]. For each size, three acetabular cups were tested in each position. The impact fixture was positioned within a drop weight rig above a bed of sand and ≈22mm of pork belly representative of soft tissues damping effect and the implant components aligned to achieve the defined impact point on the cup [Figure 2]. Lateral falls were tested on all available samples applying impact energy of 140J [1] and 3m/s impact velocity [2]. After the lateral fall test, each sample was tested under impact conditions equivalent to a frontal car crash considering a peak impact force of 5.7kN occurring 40ms from initial contact (able to produce acetabular fracture)[3]. RESULTS. None of the testing simulating a lateral fall produced fracture or any other damage to the ceramic acetabular cup. In 7 of the 12 tests, the impact force was sufficient to fracture the foam block representing the periprosthetic bone. The cups showed a good stability within the blocks, with a maximum recorded cup spinning angle relative to the acetabulum of 4.5˚. Subsequent testing simulating a car crash resulted in the fracture of two samples out of 12, one of the largest and one of the smallest ReCerf. TM. cups. In both instances, failure occurred very close to the inner edge. Of the remaining 10 samples no cup fractures were observed. All foam acetabulum blocks were severely damaged and 5 blocks fractured. The maximum recorded cup spinning angle following the car crash impact was 5.8˚. SIGNIFICANCE. Extreme testing scenarios presented here are not a regulatory requirement for manufacturers and have not previously been considered for ceramic acetabular components. Fracture is a possible failure mode of ceramics but this testing has proven that modern ceramics can withstand lateral falls and the large majority can withstand subsequent loading equivalent to head on car-crash; loading under which pelvic bone fracture and significant injury is far more likely to occur than implant fracture

Lewinnek's safe zone recommendation to minimise dislocations was a target of 5–25° for anteversion angle and 30–50° for inclination angle. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that mal-positioning of the acetabular cup can also lead to edge loading, liner fracture, and greater conventional polyethylene wear. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of acetabular cup position on highly crosslinked polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA) at long-term follow-up. We identified all patients that underwent primary THA with a minimum of 10 years follow-up using an institutional database in London, Ontario, Canada. Patients with a single implant design consisting of a 28 mm cobalt chromium head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner (ram extruded, GUR 1050, 100 kGy gamma irradiated, remelted, ethylene oxide sterilised) were selected for inclusion. In total, 85 hips from 79 recruited patients were analysed. Patients underwent a supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) exam in which the x-ray sources and detectors were positioned to obtain an anterior-posterior and cross-table lateral radiograph. Acetabular cup anteversion angle, inclination angle, and 3D penetration rate (including wear and creep) were measured from the stereo radiograph pairs. At a mean follow-up of 13 years (range, 10–17 years) the mean penetration rate was 0.059 mm/year (95% CI: 0.045 to 0.073 mm/year). Mean anteversion angle was 18.2° (range, −14 to 40°) and mean inclination angle was 43.6° (range, 27 to 61°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone, 67% hips met the target for anteversion angle, 77% met the target for inclination angle, and 51% met the target for both. There was no correlation between anteversion angle and penetration rate (r = −0.14, p = 0.72) or between inclination angle and penetration rate (r = 0.11, p = 0.35). There was also no difference (p = 0.07) in penetration rate between hips located within the Lewinnek safe zone for both anteversion angle and inclination angle (mean 0.057 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.079 mm/year) and those outside the safe zone (mean 0.062 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.042 to 0.083 mm/year). Acetabular cup position had no effect on the wear rate of highly crosslinked polyethylene at long-term follow-up. Although care should still be taken to correctly position the acetabular cup for stability, highly crosslinked polyethylene is a forgiving bearing material that can withstand a wide range of cup positions without negatively impacting longevity due to wear

Introduction. Proper acetabular cup placement is very important factor for successful clinical results in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malposition of acetabular cup has been linked to increased rates of dislocation, impingement, pelvic osteolysis, cup migration, leg length discrepancy and polyethylene wear. Recently, some authors reported usefulness of navigation systems to set the acetabular cups with correct position. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of acetabular cup placement in THA using computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system. Material and Methods. Subjects were 235 hip joints we performed primary THA using CT based navigation system (Stryker® Navigation System, Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) from 2008 to 2014 and could assess the implant position by postoperative CT images. Their average age was 65.1 years (range 35–88). In all cases, non-cemented acetabular cups were implanted. TriAD cups (Stryker®) were used in 31 hips, and Tritanium cups (Stryker®) were used in 15 hips, and Trident cups (Stryker®) were used in 189 hips. Registration in this navigation system used surface matching system. We designed cup implantation using preoperative CT images and 3-dimensional (3-D) templates. The planned position of acetabular cup was in principle 40 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion. However, we adjusted the better position of the cups according to pelvic tilt and femoral neck anteversion. When we placed acetabular cups, the position, inclination and anteversion, were measured by navigation system. After surgery, the positions of the cups were measured using postoperative CT images, navigation software and 3-D templates. Postoperative position using CT images were adjusted according to preoperative pelvic plane. The discrepancies between intraoperative navigation data and postoperative CT images data were analyzed as accuracy of navigation system in cup placement. Results. No complications related to navigation procedures were encountered. There was no case with acetabular cup displacement obviously. The discrepancies between intraoperative data and postoperative data were an average difference of 1.6 degrees (SD, 1.4 degrees) for inclination and 2.1 degrees (SD, 1.7 degrees) for anteversion. Discussion and Conclusions. In THA, cup position is very important factor of postoperative long-term success. However, it is not easy to place the acetabular cup with proper position using conventional devices. CT-based navigation system was reported that it had many advantages than previous techniques in preoperative planning, setting the implants and analysis of postoperative data. But in registration with surface matching, learning-curve was pointed out and might be a problem for proper placement of implants. Therefore, we performed this study after some navigation THA cases. In the results of this study, the discrepancies between intraoperative and postoperative data were average 1.6 degrees for inclination and 2.1 degrees for anteversion. The accuracy of navigation system was good in inclination and anteversion of the cups, and there was no complication related it. CT-based navigation system is very useful device

Introduction: In vitro studies have shown that low clearance bearings have the potential to generate low wear. However, cementless acetabular cups are designed to be press fitted into the acetabulum, which could generate compressive stresses and non-uniform cup deformation during implantation. Deformation of the low clearance acetabular cups could also potentially lead to clamping or seizure of the joints and high frictional torque leading to implant failure. To obtain the benefit of low clearance and low wear, without compromising the tribological performance of the cup, a deflection compensation (DefCom) cup was designed. DefCom offers the benefits of low wear associated with low clearance components whilst reducing the risk of component seizure and high frictional torque due to component deformation. Aim: The study was conducted in order to evaluate the tribological performance of a DefCom acetabular cup. Materials and Methods: 50 mm diameter metal-on-metal DefCom hip resurfacing cups were used in this study. The components had an average clearance of 105±3 μm at the articulating sphere. Three of the cups were deformed plastically, along the ilial-ischeal column of the acetabulum. The degree of deformation was measured using the coordinate measuring machine, measuring the change in diameter of the cup in the direction of deformation. The cups were deformed on average by 65μm. The devices were tested in a ProSim hip wear Simulator for 5 million cycles. The lubricant was new born calf serum with 0.2% sodium azide diluted with de-ionised water to achieve protein concentration of 20 mg/ml. The flexion/extension was 30° and 15° with an internal/external rotation of ±10°. The force was Paul-type stance phase loading with a maximum load of 3 kN and a swing phase load of 0.3 kN, conducted at 1 Hz. Results: The DefCom and deformed DefCom components showed a similar bi-phasic wear pattern to that of the BHR devices. Showing a period of ‘running in’ wear up to 1 Mc and then a reduced wear rate during the steady state phase from 1 Mc onwards. The DefCom devices produced a wear rate of 0.24 mm3/Mc, whilst the deformed DefCom joints produced a wear rate of 0.48 mm3/Mc for the running-in phase. Steady state wear was achieved for all joints after 1 Mc. The average steady state wear (1.0–5.0 Mc) rate for the DefCom joints was 0.12 mm3/Mc, with 0.14 mm3/Mc for the deformed joints joint. The wear rate for the non-deformed DefCom device is lower than that generated by the BHR, which were 0.72 mm3/Mc and 0.18 mm3/Mc for the running-in and steady state wear, respectively. Conclusion: The study has shown that the DefCom acetabular cup has the potential to reduce the initial running-in wear by reducing the clearance at the contact area between the head and cup, whilst compensating for deformation that may occur during cup implantation

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a significant clinical problem. The acetabular cup position is one of the main factors in the incidence of dislocation after THA. We reviewed dislocation cases in 247 primary THA. Between 1997 and 2001, 247 patients underwent a primary THA procedure. The original diagnoses in these patients were as follows: osteoarthritis (OA, n = 190), osteonecrosis (ION, n=28), rheumatiod arthritis (RA, n=16), and rapidly destructive coxarthropathy (RDC, n=13). A posterolateral approach was used in all cases. We examined mainly the acetabular cup position (ante-version and inclination angle) using anteroposterior radiographs. Six dislocations (2.4%) occurred : three anterior dislocations and three posterior dislocations. Dislocation rate according to the original diagnoses were as follows, 2 dislocations in OA (1.1%), 2 dislocations in RA(12.5%), 2 dislocations in RDC(15.4%) and no dislocation in ION. All cases were treated with close reduction and no component revision was needed. On X-P measurement of setting the acetabular cup in all cases, the mean ante-version angle was 16.3617;6.8 degrees and inclination angle was 43.3& #61617;7.3 degrees. In comparison with these measurement values, there was no statistical difference between the dislocation groups and no-dislocation groups. The number of the cases within Lewinnek’s safe zone in acetabular cup was 178 (72%). The dislocation rate in these 178 cases was low (1.1%). Setting the acetabular cup in adequate position is one of the major factors avoiding dislocation after THA. We have been performimg computer - assisted THA since 2003. Computer - assisted surgery enables the acetabular cup position to be precisely planned before surgery and allows superior positioning during surgery

Introduction. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is the sole polymeric material currently used for weight- bearing surfaces in total joint replacement. However, the wear of UHMWPE in knee and hip prostheses after total joint replacement is one of the major restriction factors on the longevity of these implants. In order to minimize the wear of UHMWPE and to improve the longevity of artificial joints, it is necessary to clarify the factors influencing the wear of UHMWPE. A number of studies have investigated the factors influencing the wear of UHMWPE acetabular cup liner in hip prosthesis. Most of these studies, however, have focused on the main articulating surfaces between the femoral head and the polyethylene liner. Materials and Methods. In a previous study (Cho et al., 2016), the generations of cold flow into the screw holes in the metal acetabular cup were observed on the backside of the retrieved UHMWPE acetabular cup liners as shown in Figure 1. We focused on the screw holes in the metal acetabular cup (Figure 2) as a factor influencing the wear behavior of polyethylene liner in hip prosthesis. In this study, computer simulations of the generation of cold flow into the screw holes were performed using the finite element method (FEM) in order to investigate the influence of the screw holes in the metal acetabular cup on the mechanical state and wear behavior of polyethylene liner in hip prosthesis. Results. An example of the results of the FEM simulations performed in this study is shown in Figure 3. In the region which the cold flow into the screw holes occurred, it was found that locally high contact stresses which exceed the yield stress of UHMWPE and considerable plastic strains were generated throughout the overall thickness between the backside and top surface of the polyethylene liners. On the contrary, in the case of the polyethylene liner combined with the metal acetabular cup without screw hole, although the regions of high contact stress and high plastic strain had a tendency to be limited around contact surface compared with those of the combination with screw holes, the values of contact stress and plastic strain were lower than the combination with screw holes. Discussion and Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the cold flow generated by the existence of the screw holes in the metal acetabular cup of hip prosthesis reduces the wear resistance of the UHMWPE acetabular cup liner. It would appear that the cold flow into the screw holes contributes to structural weakening of the UHMWPE and reduction of the polyethylene thickness, thus increase of internal stresses and plastic strains in and around the regions of cold flow. Therefore, it is required that improvement of the screw holes in the metal acetabular cup and/or improvement of fixation method of the metal acetabular cup to a pelvis in order to enhance the wear resistance of the polyethylene liner. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Cementless cup with structural allograft is one of option for acetabular revision in the cases which has severe bone loss. This study was performed to verify that the structural allograft with cementless cup could be one of good options for revision of acetabular cup with severe bone defect and to verify that the allograft resorption affect the stability of cementless acetabular cup. Materials and Methods. We reviewed 25 cases of 25 patients who underwent acetabular cup rvision using cementless porous coated hemispherical cup with structural allograft from May 1992 to July 2011 July 2011. There were nine males and sixteen females with an average age of 50.0 years. The average follow-up period was 76.7(28∼212) months. The clinical evaluation was performed using Harris Hip Score(HHS) and UCLA activity score. Radiologically, the degree of resorption of grafted bone, incorporation of allograft bone with normal bone, osteolysis and cup loosening were evaluated. Results. Clinically, the average Harris hip score was improved from 54 preoperatively to 93.4 at the last follow-up. The average UCLA activity score was also improved from 4.3 preoperatively to 6.4 at the last follow-up. Radiologically, the incorporation of allograft was accomplished in 11.4 months and the resorption of grafted bone was noted in 3 cases(12%), but the allograft resorption had not progressed to moderate degree even in long term follow-up. There was no cup loosening and average survivor rate was 100% in 6 years. There was no infection, allograft nonunion, osteolysis. Conclusion. Cementless cup with structural allograft in acetabular cup reconstruction can provide excellent mi-term results in both clinical and radiological aspects. Structural allograft can provide strong mechanical support for the bone ingrowth of cementless cup. The clinical result of this study auggest that cementless cup with structural allograft can be a good option for acetabular cup revision with severe bone defect. Resorption of structural allograft rarely occurred, and the resorption of structural allograft does not affect stablility of cup even in long term follow-up

Acetabular cup placement in total hip replacement surgery is often difficult to assess, especially in the lateral position and using the posterior approach. On table control X-Rays are not always accessible, especially in the government sector. Conventional techniques and computer assisted surgery (CAS), are currently the two most popular methods for proper placement of the acetabular cup in Lewinnek's safe zone of orientation (anteversion 15°–10° and lateral inclination 40°±10°). We developed a simple way to get accurate cup placement using Smartphone technology. Methods:. A spirit level application was downloaded to the Smartphone. The acetabulum inclination was measured on the pre-operative X-Rays. The phone is placed in a sterile bag and then used intra-operatively, to measure and set our acetabular cup orientation to our pre-operative measurements. The inclination level was measured before and after final placement of the acetabular cup. This was compared to the acetabular cup inclination in our post-operative X-Rays. Results:. In our series of 50 cup placements we found high accuracy. The results show less than 5° deviation between our pre-, intra- and post-operative measurements. Conclusions:. Smartphone technology proves to be good alternative to conventional methods and CAS, to improve Acetabular Cup placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background. Supine positioning during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA THA) facilitates use of fluoroscopy, which has been shown to improve acetabular component positioning on plane radiograph. This study aims to compare 2- dimensional intraoperative radiographic measurements of acetabular component position with RadLink to postoperative 3- dimensional SterEOS measurements. Methods. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and RadLink (El Segundo, CA) were used to measure acetabular cup position intraoperatively in 48 patients undergoing DAA THA. Cup position was measured on 6-week postoperative standing EOS images using 3D SterEOS software and compared to RadLink findings using Student's t-test. Safe-zone outliers were identified. We evaluated for measurement difference of > +/− 5 degrees. Results. RadLink acetabular cup abduction measurement (mean 43.0°) was not significantly different than 3D SterEOS in the anatomic plane (mean 42.6°, p = 0.50) or in the functional plane (mean 42.7°, p = 0.61) (Fig. 1–2). RadLink acetabular cup anteversion measurement (mean 17.9°) was significantly different than 3D SterEOS in both the anatomic plane (mean 20.6°, p = 0.022) and the functional plane (mean 21.2°, p = 0.002) (Fig. 3–4). RadLink identified two cups outside of the safe-zone. However, SterEOS identified 12 (anatomic plane) and 10 (functional plane) outside of the safe-zone (Fig. 5–7). In the functional plane, 58% of anteversion and 92% of abduction RadLink measurements were within +/− 5° of 3D SterEOS. Conclusion. Intraoperative fluoroscopic RadLink acetabular anteversion measurements are significantly different than 3D SterEOS measurements, while abduction measurements are similar. Significantly more acetabular cups are placed outside of the safe- zone when evaluated with 3D SterEOS versus RadLink

Introduction. Recent gains in knowledge reveal that the ideal acetabular cup position is in a narrower range than previously appreciated and that position is likely different based on femoral component anteversion. For that reason more accurate acetabular cup positioning techniques will be important for contemporary THA. It is well known that malalignment of the acetabular component in THA may result in dislocation, reduced range of motion or accelerated wear. Up to 8% of THA patients have cups malaligned in version by more than ±10° outside of the Lewinnek safe zone. This type of malalignment may result in dislocation of the femoral head and instability of the joint within the first year, requiring reoperation. Reported incidences of reoperation are 1-9% depending on surgical skills and technique. In addition, cup malalignment is becoming increasingly important as adoption of hard on hard bearings increases as the success of large head hard on hard bearings seems to be more sensitive to cup positioning. This study reports the accuracy of a haptic robotic system to ream the acetabulum and impact an acetabular cup compared to manual instrumentation. Methods. Six fresh frozen cadaveric acetabula were CT scanned and three-dimensional templating of the center of rotation, anteversion and inclination of the cup was determined pre-operatively. Half of the specimens were prepared with manual instrumentation while half were prepared with robotic guidance. Haptic and visual feedback were provided through robotics and an associated navigation system to guide reaming and impaction of the cup. The robot constrained the orientation and position of the instruments thus constraining the inclination, anteversion and center of rotation of the reamer, trial and the final cup. Post-operative CT's were used to determine the achieved cup placement and compared to the pre-operative plans. Results. In all cases, robotic guidance resulted in placement of the acetabular cup within ±3° of anteversion, ±3° of relative to the pre-op plan. The average absolute inclination error was 1.5±1.2° and the average absolute anteversion error 1.3±1.4°. Cup placement with robotic assistance was significantly more accurate and precise than with manual instrumentation. With manual instrumentation the errors were, on average, 4.2 times higher in inclination and 4.8 times higher in anteversion compared to robotic instrumentation. Conclusion. This haptic robotic system substantially improved the accuracy of acetabular reaming and placement of the final cup compared to traditional manual techniques. With greater knowledge of ideal acetabular cup position, highly accurate techniques may allow surgeons to decrease the risk of dislocation, promote durability and improve the ability to restore appropriate leg length and offset. Haptic robotics has proven to be safe and effective in both knee and hip surgery and provides the potential to redefine the “instrument set” used for orthopedic procedures

Introduction. Modern acetabular cups require a convenient bone stock for sufficient cup fixation. Thereby, fixation stability is influenced by the chosen interference fit of the acetabular cup, the cup surface structure, circularity of the reamed acetabulum and by the acetabular bone quality. The ideal implantation situation of the cup is commonly compromised by joint dysplasia and acetabular bone defects. The aim of the present experimental study was to characterise implant fixation of primary acetabular cups in case of definite acetabular cavity defects. Materials and Methods. For the experimental determination bone substitute blocks (100 × 100 × 50 mm) made of polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam with a density of 7 pcf were used. The created acetabular defect situations were derived from the defect classification according to Paprosky. The defect geometries in the PMI foam blocks were realised by a CNC drilling machine. Thereby the defects are described in the dorso-ventral direction by the angle α and in medio-lateral direction by the angle β (given as angle combination α/β) related to the centre of rotation of the reamed cavity. For the lever-out tests the defect types IIb and IIIa (each with different α and β angles) were considered and compared to the intact fixation situation. Therefore, a macrostructured titanium cup (Allofit, Zimmer GmbH, Wintherthur, Switzerland) with an outer diameter of 56 mm were displacement-controlled (v = 20 mm/min) pushed into the 2 mm diametric under reamed PMI-foam cavities. Three cups were inserted until the cup overhang pursuant to surgical technique was reached. Subsequently the cups were displacement-controlled (v = 20 mm/min) levered out via a rod which was screwed into the implant pole by perpendicular displacement (U. axial. ) of the rod in direction of the defect aperture. The lever-out moments were calculated by multiplying the first occurring force maximum (F. max. ) with the effective lever arm length (l. lever. ), whereby moments caused by the deadweight of the rod were considered. Primary stability was defined by the first maximum lever-out moment. Results. The calculated lever-out moments were in a range from 15.5 ± 1.4 Nm to 1.4 ± 0.5 Nm. Defects with a 90° dorso-ventral opening angle showed 57 ± 17% lower lever-out moments. Defects with a 120° dorso-ventral opening angle showed 80 ± 6% lower lever-out moments compared to the cup fixation into intact cavities. Moreover, medio-lateral angles greater than 20° reduced the lever-out moment by 79 ± 12% compared to the intact cavities. Conclusion. The determined lever-out moments underline the reduction of fixation stability of acetabular cup by loss of circumferential rim and absent of superior wall support of the acetabular bone. Thereby, the fixation stability is influenced by the degree of dorso-ventral and medio-lateral defect manifestation. Hence, the fixation stability depends on the cavity surface and in particular the surface of the bone-implant interface in the fixation zone of the acetabular cup Thus, dorso-ventral defect sizes with greater opening angle than 60° and medio-lateral defect sizes greater than 20° are critically for sufficient fixation of primary acetabular cup implants

INTRODUCTION. Poor acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can cause dislocation and impingement, and lead to osteolysis (Little et al., 2009) and inflammatory soft tissue reactions (Haan et al., 2008). While the intrinsic accuracy of cup positioning in navigation is reported as low as 1° (Parratte et al., 2009), a large anterior pelvic tilt may lead to an offset of the same magnitude in the final cup anteversion (Wolf et al., 2005). The objectives of this study are to demonstrate feasibility of a new, non-invasive radiographic tool for accurate preoperative determination of a patient's specific pelvis angle, and intraoperative and postoperative assessment of the acetabular cup orientation with respect to boney landmarks. METHODS. The methodology stitches multiple radiographic views around the pelvis using a multi-planar radiography setup (Amiri et al., 2011) and reconstructs the reference boney landmarks and the acetabular cup in three dimensions using previously developed algorithms and software (Amiri et al., 2012). To validate the methodology, a Sawbone model of the pelvis and femur was implanted with a standard cementless metal-on-polyethylene THA, and was tracked and digitized by an Optotrak motion tracking system. Five radiographic views were acquired at the pubic tubercle (PT) and anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) levels (Views 1 to 5 in Fig 1). Imaging and analysis were repeated 10 times. Custom software (Joint 3D) was used to reconstruct the right and left PT and ASIS by fitting spheres to the corresponding pairs of images (Fig 1). The three-dimensional pose of the acetabular cup was reconstructed in the software by solving a back-projection equation of the elliptical shadow of the cup opening. Accuracies were measured as mean differences from the digitized references. A sample of the reconstructed graphical output for the anterior pelvic plane (APP) and the cup, in comparison to the digitized reference, is shown in Fig 2. Repeatability was estimated as standard deviation of the measures for the reconstructed locations of the boney landmarks and the APP (known as a standard reference plane for cup placement). RESULTS. Accuracy for the pelvis pose angles was <1.6°, with SD <0.8° (Fig 3). Pelvic tilt was the most accurate with accuracy of 0.1° and SD=0.4°. For the acetabular cup, accuracy was 2.5° or better, with SD <0.2°. Accuracies in the cup operative anteversion and inclination were 2.4° and 0.6°, with SD=0.4° and 0.9°, respectively. DISCUSSION. The measured accuracies were within an acceptable range, according to previous studies that recommended a 5° cut-off error for acetabular anteversion. The method shows accuracy and radiation dose advantages over current radiographic, fluoroscopic and computed tomography methods. These results suggest that the proposed method is feasible for assessing cup placement with reference to the functional and anatomical references. CONCLUSION. Use of this technique could improve acetabular cup placement and reduce the incidence of instability, wear and loosening, by providing tools to incorporate the individual's pelvic pose in preoperative planning of the surgery, and by serving as an accurate and reliable tool for intraoperative and postoperative assessment of the acetabular cup position

Introduction. Component positioning is of great importance in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and navigation systems can help guide surgeons in the optimal placement of the implants. We report on a newly developed navigation system which employs an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure acetabular cup inclination and anteversion. Aims. To assess the accuracy of the IMU when used for acetabular cup placement and compare this with an established optical navigation system (ONS). Methods. At the time of acetabular cup impaction, the IMU and ONS were separately mounted on the impactor handle. Cup inclination and anteversion as measured by each device were recorded. Post-operative CTs were acquired for all patients and used to determine the final cup position. Results. Data were recorded for a total of 100 patients undergoing THA; 51 had a direct anterior approach (DAA) and 49 had a posterior approach (PA). In the DAA group, the mean difference in IMU versus CT measured cup inclination was −0.7°(range −6 to 8º) compared with mean difference of ONS versus CT of −2° (range −8 to 5º). Mean difference in IMU versus CT measured anteversion was − 1.3° (range −10 to 10º) compared with a mean difference of −1.1° (range −23 to 20º) between ONS and CT. In the PA group, mean difference in IMU versus CT inclination was 1.3º (range −8 to 6º) compared with mean difference between ONS versus CT of 1.6° (range −5 to 7º). Mean difference in anteversion was 3.7° (range −7 to 16º) between IMU and CT and 7.3° (range −3 to 19º) between ONS and CT. Conclusion. The novel IMU can be used to accurately determine the position of the acetabular cup at the point of impaction, demonstrating comparable accuracy with an established navigation system in the direct anterior approach, and even greater accuracy in the posterior approach

Abstract. Objectives. The importance of cup position on the performance of total hip replacements (THR) has been demonstrated in in vitro hip simulator tests and clinically. However, how cup position changes during gait has not been considered and may affect failure scenarios. The aim of this study was to assess dynamic cup version using gait data. Methods. Pelvic movement data for walking for 39 unilateral THR patients was acquired (Leeds Biomedical Research Centre). Patient's elected walking speed was used to group patients into high- and low-functioning (mean speed, 1.36(SD 0.09)ms. −1. and 0.85(SD 0.08)ms. −1. respectively). A computational algorithm (Python3.7) was developed to calculate cup version during gait cycle. Inputs were pelvic angles and initial cup orientation (assumed to be 45° inclination and 7° version, anterior pelvic plane was parallel to radiological frontal plane). Outputs were cup version angles during a gait cycle (101 measurements/cycle). Minimum, maximum and average cup version during gait cycle were measured for each patient. Two-sample t-test (p=0.05) was used to compare groups. Results. Over a gait cycle the mean minimum, maximum and average version angles for the high-functioning group were −4.5(SD 4.4)°, 5.0(SD 4.3)°, 9.5(SD 4.0)° and for low-functioning group 2.0(SD 3.7)°, 6.2(SD 2.9)°, 8.1(SD 3.2)°. There were no significant differences for the minimum, maximum and average version angles between the two groups. Conclusions. The study shows that dynamic acetabular cup version changes substantially during gait and this must be considered clinically and in pre-clinical testing. There was no significant difference between the two groups; however, dynamic cup version was more negative in high-functioning compared to low-functioning patients. Further studies on a larger cohort are required to determine whether patients’ profiles can be stratified to provide enhanced inputs for pre-clinical THR testing. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup in total hip replacement (THR) remains a major problem. Current diagnostic imaging techniques are ineffective at detecting early loosening, especially for the acetabular component. The aim of this preliminary study was to assess the viability of using a vibration analysis technique to accurately detect acetabular component loosening. Methods. A simplified acetabular model was constructed using a Sawbones foam block into which an acetabular cup was fitted. Different levels of loosening were simulated by the interposition of thin layer of silicon between the acetabular component and the Sawbones block. This included a simulation of a secure (stable) fixation and various combinations of cup zone loosening. A constant amplitude sinusoidal excitation with a sweep range of 100–1500 Hz was used. Output vibration from the model was measured using an accelerometer and an ultrasound probe. Loosening was determined from output signal features such as the number and relative strength of the observed harmonic frequencies. Results. Both measurement methods were capable of measuring the output vibration. Preliminary findings show different patterns in the output signal spectra were visible when comparing the stable cup with the 1mm of simulated spherical loosening at driving frequencies 1050 Hz, 1100 Hz and 1150 Hz (p < 0.05) using the accelerometer, whereas for ultrasound at frequencies 950 Hz and 1350 Hz (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Experimental testing showed that vibration analysis could be used as a potential detection method for acetabular cup component loosening using either an accelerometer or ultrasound probe to detect the vibration. However, the capacity of ultrasound to overcome the attenuating effect of the surrounding soft tissues and its high signal to noise ratio suggest it has the best potential for clinical use

Acetabular cup orientation in hip arthroplasty is critical to prevent edge loading and impingement. Aerial alignment guides position the cup at a specified angle to the orthogonal planes, but only if the pelvis is in strict lateral-decubitus. Computer navigation can also be used to position the acetabular cup, but there are limitations associated with defining the pelvic reference plane. It can also be postulated that a fixed angle of inclination and anteversion is not suitable for every patient and every cup design. This paper describes the development and testing of instrumentation that allows patient specific acetabular cup placement without knowing the exact pelvic orientation. Stage 1 determines the cup position during a trial reduction. A Judd nail retractor is left in the pelvis during the trial reduction. A single-use laser pointer is attached to the top of this nail, is free to move and can be locked in position. The trial acetabular cup has a handle protruding at a fixed angle from the face of the cup. At the end of this handle is another single-use laser pointer that projects a laser beam parallel to the axis of the cup onto the wall/ceiling. Keeping the handle parallel to the medio-lateral axis to control inclination angle, the leg is moved through a range of motion (ROM). The anteversion of the trial cup is adjusted until a position is found where flexion extension ROM is possible without impingement and satisfactory abduction-adduction is achieved with stability. Once this position is found, the Judd nail laser (fixed to the pelvis) is adjusted until its projected point, on the wall/ceiling, coincides with that from the trial handle. The Judd nail laser is then fixed in position, the hip dislocated and trial components removed. Stage 2 aligns the definitive acetabular cup. The introducer has a laser pointer pointing parallel to its axis (away from the patient) and is attached to the definitive cup. The definitive cup is placed in the acetabulum and the introducer adjusted until its projected laser coincides with that from the Judd nail. The cup is then in the same orientation as determined during the trial reduction and can be impacted. To demonstrate the accuracy of the laser alignment method, the position of the definitive cup was compared to that of the trial cup in polyurethane foam models. With the laser points projected onto an object > 2m away, the accuracy was ±2°. To compare the laser guided instrumentation with the conventional aerial device, the ROM of the definitive cup was assessed in Sawbones resurfaced pelvis/femur models. The pelvis orientation was rotated by ±10° about the medio-lateral axis and the superio-inferior axis to investigate the effect of the pelvis being unknowingly out of lateral-decubitus. In the worst case of pelvis position, the aerial halved the required flexion and allowed double the required extension. The laser guided instrumentation maintained the physiological range of flexion/extension regardless of pelvis position and is therefore considered an improvement on current technology and a viable alternative to computer navigation

Positioning of the hip resurfacing is crucial for its long term survival and is critical in young patients for some reasons; manly increase the wear in the components and change the load distribution. THR have increased in the last years, mainly in young patients between 45 to 59 years old. The resurfacing solution is indicated for young patients with good bone quality. A long term solution is required for these patients to prevent hip revision. The resurfacing prosthesis Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was analyzed in the present study by in vitro experimental studies. This gives indications for surgeons when placing the acetabular cup. One synthetic left model of composite femur (Sawbones®, model 3403), which replicates the cadaveric femur, and four composite pelvic bones (Sawbones®, model 3405), were used to fix the commercial models of Hip resurfacing (Birmingham model). The resurfacing size was chosen according to the head size of femurs with 48 mm head diameter and a cup with 58 mm. They were introduced by an experimented surgeon with instrumental of prosthesis. The cup is a press fit system and the hip component was cemented using bone cement Simplex, Stryker Corp. The acetabular cup was analyzed in 4 orientations; in anteverion with 15º and 20°; and in inclination 40 and 45°. Combinations of these were also considered. The experimental set-up was applied according to a system previously established by Ramos et al. (2013) in the anatomic position. The femur rotates distally and the Pelvic moves vertically as model changes, such that the same boundary conditions are satisfied. This system allows compensating motions of the acetabular cup orientation. A vertical load of 1700 N was applied on all cases, which have resulted in joint reaction force of 2.4 kN. The femur and iliac bone was instrumented with rosettes. 5 repetitions at each position were conducted. When the femur was instrumented with three rosettes in medial, anterior and posterior aspect, the maximum strain magnitude was observed in the medial aspect of femur with a minimum principal strain of −2070µε for 45° inclination and 20° of anterversion. The pubic region was found most critical region after instrumenting the Iliac bone with four rosettes, with a minimum principal strain around −2500µε (rosette 1), for the 45° inclination and 20° of anterversion. We have observed the great influence of the inclination on the strain distribution, changing its magnitude from compression to traction in different bone regions. The minimum principal strain is more critical in medial aspect of the femur and the influence of strain is about 7% when orientation and inclination change. The maximum influence was observed in the anterior aspect, where the anteversion presents a significant influence. The results show the interaction between inclination and anterversion in all aspects, being observed lower values in lower angles. The orientation of the acetabular cup significantly influences the strain distribution on the iliac surface. Besides, as anterversion increases, more strains are induced, mainly in the region of iliac body (rosette 3)

Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate how rim poly locking scallop cutting depth could affect the rigidity of acetabular cup. Materials and Methods. (11) generic FEA models including (5) 50mm OD Ti6Al4VELI hemispherical acetabular shells with thicknesses of 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0mm, and (6) 4mm thick hemispherical shells with standard rim poly indexing scallops varied in cutting depths from inner diameter of the cup in 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5mm. All cups were analyzed in ANSYS® Workbench™ FEA software with a loading condition of 2000N applied to the cup rim per V15 ISO/TC 150/SC 4 N. Verification was carried out by the physical test of a same generic Ti6Al4VELI 50mmOD and 5mm thick solid hemispherical shell under 2000N rim directed load. The cup deformation was compared with FEA results. The maximum deformation of FEA scalloped cups were compared with that of solid hemispherical cups with different shell thickness. Results. The average value for physical test was 0.265(0.282/0.268) mm. The FEA result of the same 50mm OD and 5mm thick shell was 0.2464mm representing a 7% difference. (Figure 1) FEA results for solid hemisphere cups and scalloped shells are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively. Conclusion and Discussion. Cup deformation increased in the average of 40% for every 0.5mm shell thickness decrease from 5mm to 3mm for 50mm OD solid cup. The increase of rim scallop depth from 0 to 2.5mm was equivalent to a 0.5mm shell thickness reduction for 4mm thick 50mm OD cup. The higher deformation reading in physical test was likely caused by the accumulations of the fixture deformations. Intraoperative acetabular cup deformation is a clinical issue. It increases the risk of ceramic liner fracture when the liner is inserted in the out of round cup. The increase of shell thickness is a simple and effective way to reduce the cup deformation. However it also reduces the poly thickness and that puts the adverse effects to the poly wear property and poly rim fatigue strength. The common design of the indexing scallops in the rim of cup helps the rotational locking for the poly liner. But the drawbacks including the reduction of cup stiffness must be noticed. The shallower scallop design may be warranted to maximize the cup rigidity in a given cup thickness and maximize poly thickness in a given cup rigidity

Introduction. Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty helps acetabular preparation and implantation with the assistance of a robotic arm. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is also helpful for acetabular preparation and implantation, however, there is no report to compare these methods. The purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular cup position between the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Methods. We studied 31 hips of 28 patients who underwent the robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty (MAKO group) between August 2018 and March 2019 and 119 hips of 112 patients who received THA under CT-based navigation (CT-navi group) between September 2015 and November 2018. The preoperative diagnosis of all patients was osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. They received the same cementless cup (Trident, Stryker). Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty were performed by four surgeons while THA under CT-based navigation were performed by single senior surgeon. Target angle was 40 degree of radiological cup inclination (RI) and 15 degree of radiological cup anteversion (RA) in all patients. Propensity score matching was used to match the patients by gender, age, weight, height, BMI, and surgical approach in the two groups and 30 patients in each group were included in this study. Postoperative cup position was assessed using postoperative anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph by the Lewinnek's methods. The differences between target and postoperative cup position were investigated. Results. The acetabular cup position of all cases in both Mako and CT-navi group within Lewinnek's safe zone (RI: 40±10 degree; RA: 15±10 degree) in group were within this zone. Three was no significant difference of RI between Mako and CT-navi group (40.0 ± 2.1 degree vs 39.7± 3.6 degree). RA was 15.0 ± 1.2 degree and 17.0 ± 1.9 degree in MAKO group and in CT-navi group, respectively, with significant difference (p<0.001). The differences of RA between target and postoperative angle were smaller in MAKO group than CT-navi group (0.60± 1.05 degree vs 2.34± 1.40 degree, p<0.001). The difference or RI in MAKO group was smaller than in CT-navi, however, there was no significance between them (1.67± 1.27 degree vs 2.39± 2.68 degree, p=0.197). Conclusions. Both the assistance of the robotic arm and the CT-based navigation system were helpful to achieve the acetabular cup implantation, however, MAKO system achieved more accurate acetabular cup implantation than CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty for the patients with OA secondary to DDH. Longer follow-up is necessary to investigate the clinical outcome

Purposes. To compare the acetabular component size relative to the patient's native femoral head size between conventional THA (CTHA) approach and robotic-guided THA (RGTHA) to infer which of these techniques preserves more acetabular bone. Methods. Patients were included if they had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and underwent total hip replacement between June 2008 and March 2014. Patients were excluded if they had missing or rotated postoperative anteroposterior radiographs. RGTHA patients were matched to a control group of CTHA patients, in terms of pre-operative native femoral head size, age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and approach. Acetabular cup size relative to femoral head size was used as a surrogate for amount of bone resected. We compared the groups according to two measures describing acetabular cup diameter (c) in relation to femoral head diameter (f): (1) c-f, the difference between cup diameter and femoral head diameter and (2) (c-f)/f, the same difference as a fraction of femoral head diameter. Results. 57 matched pairs were included in each group. There were no significant differences between groups for demographic measures, femoral head diameter, or acetabular cup diameter (p>0.05). However, measures (1) and (2) did differ significantly between the groups, with lower values in the RGTHA group (p<0.02). Conclusion. Using acetabular cup size relative to femoral head size as an approximate surrogate measure of acetabular bone resection may suggest greater preservation of bone stock using RGTHA compared to CTHA. Further studies are needed to validate the relationship between acetabular cup size and bone loss in THA

Objectives. Porous metal surfaces have been a popular option for acetabular component fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). New THA component designs are introduced periodically with the expectation of better wear properties and survivorship. Since its approval for use in 2002 there have been few clinical outcome studies published on the Pinnacle acetabular cup system. We hypothesised that the hemispherical porous coated Pinnacle acetabular cup system with a range of cup options and bearing surfaces would give us predictably good fixation and survivorship at five years post implantation. Materials and Methods. A total of 1391 Pinnacle acetabular cups (De Puy, a Johnson & Johnson company, Warsaw IN) were implanted between the period March 2003 to August 2011 by four senior surgeons. There were a total of 29 patients requiring revision surgery. Of these revisions, 23 were excluded from the final analysis. Sixteen were for early infection requiring debridement of the hip joint and exchange of the modular liner and femoral head. Five patients sustained femoral peri-prosthetic fractures requiring further surgery with retention of the acetabular component in all cases. Of the remaining 8 revision cases, only 6 had more than two years follow-up. All patients had pre and post-operative Harris hip scores, WOMAC and SF-12 scores. All patients were assessed with serial radiographs immediately post-operatively, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, every 2 years thereafter. Component migration and revisions (excluding infection and peri-prosthetic fractures) are reported as failures. Post-operative radiographs were evaluated for component migration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were drawn to show survivorship for cup type and bearing type. Results. A total of 894 Pinnacle acetabular components implanted into 796 patients were available for inclusion in the final analysis. There were 358 males with an average age of 63.70 years and 438 females with an average age of 64.55 years. The average period for follow-up was 44.95 months with 133 patients having more than five years of follow-up. Only one cup showed signs of aseptic loosening and component migration on plain radiographs, this patient had previously sustained an acetabular fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation ans subsequently developed osteoarthritis. The cup failed to adequately in-grow and migrated medially to an intra-pelvic position, this was revised to a Trabelcular Metal cup with bone grafting to the acetabulum. There were two cases revised for instability. Three revisions were performed for aseptic loosening of the femoral components which were revised with retention of the acetabular cups. Conclusion. Published data on the performance of various porous coated cups have demonstrated varying degrees of osteolysis, however the Pinnacle cup has shown excellent midterm results postulated to be associated with the taper lock liner mechanism of the Pinnacle cups resulting in less micromotion and, therefore, reduced hydraulic pressure pumping polyethylene wear debris behind the cup. Our study confirms excellent overall survivorship of the Pinnacle acetabular porous coated cup system at a minimum of two years followup in over 790 patients

Metal on metal press-fit acetabular cups are the worst performing acetabular cup type with severe failure consequences compared to cups made from more inert materials such as polyethylene or ceramic. The cause of failure of these cup types is widely acknowledged to be multi-factorial, therefore creating a complex scenario for analysis through clinical studies. A factorial analysis has been carried out using an experimentally validated finite element analysis to investigate the relative influence of four input factors associated with acetabular cup implantation on output parameters indicating potential failure of the implantation. These input factors were: cup material stiffness; cup inclination; cup version; cup seating; and level of press-fit. The output parameter failure indicators were: wear; tensile strains in the underlying bone; bone remodelling; and cup-bone micromotions. The factorial analysis concluded that the most significant influence was that of cup inclination on wear, and the second most significant was the influence of the level of press-fit on bone remodelling at the acetabular rim. Significant influence was also observed between version angle and wear, and cup-seating and micro-motion. The results demonstrated the clear multi-factorial nature of implant failure and highlighted the importance of correct implant positioning and fit

Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful orthopedic operations, yet it continues to be plagued with problems despite the many advances in the procedure. Inconsistent placement of the acetabular cup persists even in the hands of most experienced surgeons, leading to early and late failure including instability, impingement, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and component loosening. Cup mal-position is the single greatest cause of early instability and late polyethylene wear. Despite advent of recent technology including navigation and use of fluoroscopy cup mal-alignment persists. Several studies show 50% of experienced surgeons missing the target ranges using Lewinnnk desired safe zones. The act of impaction of the cup with a mallet is a crude and unreliable process. The surgeon's mallet imparts large and uncontrolled forces on the impaction rod creating variable torques, leading to inconsistent cup placement. Navigation and Fluoroscopy add precision to the operation however that level of precision is not maintained throughout the course of the operation. There is a market need for a tool that helps maintain “precision tolerance” through out the course of the operation. A new device is theoretically proposed and prototyped for this process (Patent Pending). The new paradigm involves elimination of impaction forces created by unpredictable blows of the mallet. A low energy and high frequency device is utilized to insert and position the acetabular cup without the use of the mallet. The cup is inserted (not impacted) with significantly less force than the typical 2000N forces created with a mallet. The cup is also simultaneously positioned to the desired alignment while the device is active with the surgeon effectively feeling minimal haptic resistance to the movement of the cup. The system therefore proposes to eliminate cup mal-alignment for all surgeons, removing the primary cause of hip dislocations as well as factors contributing to late failure. In addition the idea allows the academic surgeon to better study the relationship of the position of the cup and clinical outcomes eliminating the need to use “safe zone ranges”. As well, this process completely eliminates acetabular fractures as a complication of this operation. Two devices were prototyped with use of electrical and pneumatic energy. Both devices proved the concept. Both devices allowed modulation of the applied force and “effective” disarming of the frictional forces involved in cup impaction, allowing insertion and positioning of the acetbular cup to occur with smooth haptic control and without the use of violent force. The device can be used individually, with navigation and fluoroscopy, with robots and/or with any other intra-operative measurement device and can be a significant adjunct for THR. Cup Mal-Alignment is an unsolved problem in THR surgery causing poor outcomes for patients, anxiety and a sense of failure for the surgeons, and a great cost to society in general. A new device is described to solve this problem. The science involved is proposed and described in detail and primarily involves understanding and utilizing the mechanical properties of bone/pelvis and understanding and manipulating the complex frictional forces at play

Following hip arthroplasty carried out using the Slooff-Ling impaction grafting technique micro-motion of the acetabular cup is frequently seen within the bone graft bed. In some cases this can lead to gross migration and rotation of the acetabular cup, resulting in failure of the arthroplasty. The movement of the cup is thought to be due to the irrecoverable deformation of bone graft under shear and compressive forces. Previous experimental studies have addressed ways in which the behaviour of the bone graft material may be improved, for example through washing and the use of improved particle size distribution. However there has been a limited amount of research carried out into assessing the behaviour of the acetabular construct in-vivo. This study presents a 3D finite element model of the acetabular construct and hemi-pelvis following impaction grafting of a cavitory defect. A sophisticated elasto-plastic material model was developed based on research carried out by the group to describe the bone graft bed. The material model includes the non-linear stiffness response, as well as the shear and consolidation yield response of the graft. Loading associated with walking, sitting down, and standing up is applied to the model. Distinct patterns of migration and rotation are observed for the different activities. When compared in a pseudo-quantitative manner with clinical observations results were found to be similar. Walking is found to account for superior migration, and rotation in abduction of the acetabular cup, while sitting down and standing up are found to account for posterior migration, and lateral rotation. The developed 3D model can be used in the assessment of cup designs and fixation devices to reduce the rate of aseptic failure in the acetabular region

Introduction. Proper cup positioning is a critical component in the success of total hip arthroplasty surgery. A multicenter study has been initiated to study a new type of highly cross-linked polyethylene. This study provides a unique opportunity to a review the acetabular cup placement of over 500 patients implanted in the past 2 years from 13 medical centers from the U.S., Mexico, and Europe. Methods. 482 patients have received primary total hip arthroplasty using components from a single manufacturer in 5 centers in the US and Mexico and 7 centers in Europe. The acetabular anteversion and inclination were measured in post-operative radiographs. An acceptable window of cup position is defined at 5–25° of anteversion and 30–45° of inclination. Results. The measured cup anteversion and inclination averaged 15.89° ± 8.91° (0.00–42.25°) and 43.27° ± 7.17° (23.46–67.79°), respectively. Of the patient radiographs read, 71% were within the acceptable range of anteversion, 55% were in the acceptable range of inclination, and 41% satisfied both criteria. The best performing center had 86% of patients within the acceptable range of anteversion, 63% in the acceptable range of inclination, and 57% satisfied both criteria. The worst performing center had 54% within the acceptable range of anteversion, 29% in the acceptable range of inclination, and 17% satisfied both criteria. Conclusion. A significant variation in acetabular cup anteversion and inclination exists in this study both within and between the participating high volume centers. Correlation to mid- and long-term clinical outcome will show the clinical relevance of the finding, but liner designs with unsupported polyethylene should be used with caution

Initial stability of cementless components in bone is essential for longevity of Total Hip Replacements. Fixation is provided by press-fit: seating an implant in an under-reamed bone cavity with mallet strikes (impaction). Excessive impaction energy has been shown to increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture of bone. However, if implants are not adequately seated they may lack the stability required for bone ingrowth. Ideal fixation would maximise implant stability but would minimise peak strain in bone, reducing the risk of fracture. This in-vitro study examines the influence of impaction energy and number of seating strikes upon implant push-out force (indicating stability) and peak dynamic strain in bone substitute (indicating likelihood of fracture). The ratio of these factors is given as an indicator of successful impaction strategy. A custom drop tower with simulated hip compliance was used to seat acetabular cups in 30 Sawbone blocks with CNC milled acetabular cavities. 3 impaction energies were selected; low (0.7j), medium (4.5j) and high (14.4j), representing the wide range of values measured during surgery. Each Sawbone was instrumented with strain gauges, secured on the block surface close to the acetabular cavity (Figure 1). Strain gauge data was acquired at 50 khz with peak tensile strain recorded for each strike. An optical tracker was used to determine the polar gap between the cup and Sawbone cavity during seating. Initially 10 strikes were used to seat each cup. Tracking data were then used to determine at which strike the cups progressed less than 10% of the final polar gap. This value was taken as number of strikes to complete seating. Tests were repeated with fresh Sawbone, striking each cup the number of times required to seat. Following each seating peak push-out forces of the cups were recorded using a compression testing machine. 10, 5 and 2 strikes were required to seat the acetabular cups for the low, medium and high energies respectively. It was found that strain in the Sawbone peaked around the number of strikes to complete seating and subsequently decreased. This trend was particularly pronounced in the high energy group. An increase in Sawbone strain during seating was observed with increasing energy (270 ± 29 µε [SD], 519 ± 91 µε and 585 ± 183 µε at low, medium and high energies respectively). The highest push-out force was achieved at medium strike energy (261 ± 46N). The ratio between push-out and strain was highest for medium strike energy (0.50 ± 0.095 N/µε). Push-out force was similar after 5 and 10 strikes for the medium energy strike. However push-out recorded at ten strikes for the high energy group was significantly lower than for 2 strikes (<40 ± 19 N, p<0.05). These results indicate that a medium strike energy with an appropriate number of seating strikes maximizes initial implant stability for a given peak bone strain. It is also shown that impaction with an excessive strike energy may greatly reduce fixation strength while inducing a very high peak dynamic strain in the bone. Surgeons should take care to avoid an excessive number of impaction strikes at high energy. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction: Correct placement of the acetabular cup is a crucial step in total hip replacement to achieve a satisfactory result and remains a challenge with free hand techniques. Imageless navigation may provide a viable alternative to freehand technique and improve placement significantly. The purpose of this study therefore was to assess and validate intra-operative placement values as displayed by the navigation unit to postoperative measurement of cup position using high resolution CT scans. Methods: 32 patients underwent primary hip joint replacement using imageless navigation. The average age was 66.5 years (range 32–87). 23 non-cemented and 9 cemented acetabular cups were implanted. During surgery we aimed for 45 degrees of inversion and 15 degrees of anteversion. A pelvic CT scan using a multi-slice CT was used to assess the position of the cup radiographically. Results: 2 patients were excluded because of dislodgement of the tracking pin. Pearson correlation revealed a strong significant correlation (r=0.68; p< 0.006), for cup inclination and a moderate non-significant correlation (r=0.53; p=0.45) between intra-operative readings and cup placement. Discussion: These findings can be explained with possible introduction of systematic error. Even though the acquisition of anatomic landmarks are simple they must be acquired with great precision. An error of 1 cm can result in a mean anteversion error of 6 degrees and inclination error of 2.5 degrees. Whilst navigation results in highly accurate cup placements in relation to inclination, ante-version of the cup can not be determined accurately

Introduction:. The lateral radiographs are useful in evaluation of the acetabular cup anteversion. However, this method was affected by variations in pelvic position and radiographic technique. In this study, we employed the ischial axis (IA) as an anatomical landmark on the lateral radiographs, and we investigated a relationship between IA and the anterior pelvic plane (APP) using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Using these findings, we report a new method for accurate measurement of the acetabular cup anteversion on plain lateral radiographs using IA as an anatomical reference. Materials and Methods:. At first, preoperative3D-CT images were obtained in 109 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all patients. The angle between the IA (defined by a line connecting the anterior edge of the greater sciatic notch and the lesser sciatic notch) and APP (defined by the bilateral anterosuperior iliac spine and the symphysis) was measured on 3D-CT (Fig. 1). Secondly, postoperative lateral radiographs were obtained at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks after surgery in 15 patients. The angle between a line tangential to the opening of the cup and a line perpendicular to APP was measured (Fig. 2). Three methods of acetebular cup position assessment were compared: 1) the present method, 2) Woo and Morrey method, and 3) software (2D template, Kyocera) method. Results:. The mean angle between IA and APP was 18.0 ± 3.5°. The mean acetabular cup anteversion measured using present method was 21.3°, Woo and Morrey method was 26.6°, and software method was 21.2°. The mean SDs of present method was 0.64°, Woo and Morrey method was 1.17°, and software method was 0.46°. Conclusions:. APP, considered as vertical in weight bearing, has a relatively consistent relationship between IA. The findings of this study provide a more consistent measurement of acetabular cup by reducing variation due to pelvic position

Introduction. Durable bone fixation of uncemented porous-coated acetabular cups can be observed at a long-term, however, polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis may affect survivorship. Accurate wear measurements correlated with clinical data may offer unique research information of clinical interest about this highly debated issue. Objetive. We assessed the clinical and radiological outcome of a single uncemented total hip replacement (THR) after twenty years analysing polyethylene wear and the appearance of osteolysis. Materials and Methods. 82 hips implanted between 1992 and 1995 were prospectively evaluated with a mean follow-up of 20.6 years (range, 18 to 23). A hemispherical porous-coated acetabular cup matched to a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem and a 28 mm standard PE liner, sterilised by gamma irradiation in air, was used in all hips. Radiological position and the possible appearance of loosening and osteolysis were recorded over time. Penetration of the prosthetic head into the liner was measured by the Roentgen Monographic Analysis (ROMAN) Tool at 6 weeks, 6 months, one year and yearly thereafter. Results. Six cups were revised due to wear and four due to late dislocation. All cups were radiographically well-fixed and all stems showed radiographic ingrowth. Six un-revised hips showed osteolysis on the acetabular side and two on the proximal femoral side. Creep at one year was 0.30 (±0.23) mm. Mean total femoral head penetration was 1.23 mm at 10 years, 1.52 mm at 15 years and 1.92 mm at 23 years. Overall mean wear was 0.12 (± 0.1) mm/year and 0.09 (±0.06) mm/year after the creep period. Mean wear was 0.08 (± 0.06) mm/year in hips without osteolysis and 0.14 (±0.03) mm/year in revised hips or with osteolysis (p<0.001). Conclusions. Although continued durable fixation can be observed with a porous-coated cups and a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem, true wear continues to increase at a constant level over time. PE wear remains as the main reason for revision surgery and osteolysis in uncemented THR after twenty years

Originally introduced in 1997, porous tantalum is an attractive alternative metal for orthopaedic implants because of its unique mechanical properties. Porous tantalum has been used in numerous types of orthopaedic implants, including acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. The early clinical results from porous tantalum acetabular cups have been promising. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of bone ingrowth and the incidence of osteolytic lesions in the acetabular cup -at 10 year follow up – in patients who had a total hip arthroplasty with a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup. 50 consecutive patients underwent a total hip arthroplasty with a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular component. All patients had computed tomography at an average of 10 years of follow-up. The computed tomography scan used a standard, validated protocol to evaluate bony ingrowth in the cup and for the presence of osteolysis. The computed tomographic scans showed evidence of extensive bony ingrowth, and no evidence of osteolysis. This study reports the 10-year results of a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup. This is the first study to evaluate a porous tantalum acetabular cup with the use of computed tomography. These results show that a porous tantalum monoblock cup has excellent bony ingrowth and no evidence osteolysis at 10 year follow-up. These results suggest that porous tantalum is an attractive material for implantation in young, active patients

We measured the proximal migration of 265 acetabular cups over seven years and correlated the findings with clinical outcome and acetabular revision for aseptic loosening. Cups which eventually became aseptically loose were shown to migrate more rapidly than successful cups. The average proximal migration at two years postoperatively for four groups of cups showed a monotonic relationship to the acetabular revision rate for aseptic loosening at 6.5 years. We conclude that acetabular cups which develop aseptic loosening as evidenced by pain, revision or screw fracture show increased proximal migration by one year, and that the 'migration rate' at two years can be used to predict the acetabular revision rate from aseptic loosening at 6.5 years

In laboratory tests, the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene used for the acetabular cups of Charnley hip prostheses has a very low wear rate against steel. In the body radiographic measurements indicate that the polyethylene wears more rapidly. In order to investigate this higher wear rate, the sockets of acetabular cups removed at post-mortem have been examined using optical and electron microscopy. It has been shown that a socket wears predominantly on its superior part and that this is a direct consequence of the orientation of the cup in the body and the direction of loading of the hip. In the worn region the femoral head in effect bores out a new socket for itself, a process which is visible with the naked eye after approximately eight years. Electron microscopy shows that the predominant wear mechanism is adhesion, but after about eight years the appearance of surface cracks suggests that surface fatigue is taking place in addition to this. Laboratory wear tests have shown that pure surface fatigue is not sufficient to account for the high clinical wear rate. Other deformation processes are suggested and discussed with regard to the higher clinical wear rate

We examined radiographic polyethylene wear in 233 cemented total hip arthroplasties (201 patients) with either a metal-backed or a non-metal-backed acetabular cup. All patients had identical cemented one-piece titanium femoral stems with a femoral head diameter of 28 mm. The mean linear wear rate was 0.11 mm/yr in metal-backed sockets and 0.08 mm/yr in non-metal-backed sockets (p = 0.0002). The mean volumetric wear rate was 66.2 mm3/yr in the metal-backed sockets and 48.2 mm3/yr in the polyethylene sockets (p = 0.0002). The addition of metal backing to a cemented acetabular cup therefore resulted in a 37% increase in mean polyethylene wear rates which may partially explain the higher failure rate of cemented metal-backed cups. Linear regression analysis also implicated increased follow-up time (log), gross acetabular migration, metal backing and male gender in increasing polyethylene wear. We advocate the use of an all-polyethylene cup in cemented total hip arthroplasty. The increased polyethylene wear must also cause concern about the wear rate of uncemented metal-backed acetabular sockets

Aims: Given that all previous reports on the increased-crystalinity, increased modulus of elasticity, yield strength and density Hylamer polyethylene have been based on observations on uncemented metal-backed acetabular cups, the aim of the present study is to investigate the rate of wear of a cemented Hylamer UHMWPE acetabular cup. Methods: 36 consecutive cases of THA (mean age: 54.7 years) using a cemented Hylamer UHMWPE acetabular cup and a cemented femoral stem were prospectively followed-up with yearly radiographs for an average period of 54.4 months. Two-dimensional femoral head penetration was determined from AP pelvic radiographs, using computeraided uniradiographic methodology. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify all predictor variables that may account for increased average linear and calculated volumetric wear (Kabo’s formula), as well as for increased total area of peri-prosthetic osteolysis on the femoral and acetabular sides. Results: The average linear wear rate was 0.35 mm/year (SD 0.12) with a significantly high average linear wear rate during the initial (‘wear-in’) period (approximately 12–18 months). The average total volumetric wear was calculated to 764.4 mm3 and the average volumetric wear rate to 169.8 mm3/year. Significant osteolysis was seen in an average of 1.5 (range: 0 to 7) out of the 7 Gruen zones on the femoral side and an average of 1 (range: 0 to 3) out of the 3 Charnley-Delee zones on the acetabular side. Conclusions: Increased rate of linear wear and a high rate of peri-prosthetic osteolysis have been observed in the early results of our series of cemented Hylamer UHMWPE acetabular cups

Background. Trust in the validity of a measurement tool is critical to its function in both clinical and educational settings. Acetabular cup malposition within total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to increased dislocation rates, impingement and increased wear as a result of edge loading. We have developed a THA simulator incorporating a foam/Sawbone pelvis model with a modified Microsoft HoloLens® augmented reality (AR) headset. We aimed to measure the trueness, precision, reliability and reproducibility of this platform for translating spatial measurements of acetabular cup orientation to angular values before developing it as a training tool. Methods. A MicronTracker® stereoscopic camera was integrated onto a HoloLens® AR system. Trueness and precision values were obtained through comparison of the AR system measurements to a gold-standard motion capture system”s (OptiTrack®) measurements for acetabular cup orientation on a benchtop trainer, in six clinically relevant pairs of anteversion and inclination angles. Four surgeons performed these six orientations, and repeated each orientation twice. Pearson”s coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were computed to assess correlation and agreement between the AR and Motion Capture systems. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to evaluate the degree of repeatability and reproducibility of the AR system by comparing repeated tasks and between surgeons, respectively. Results. The trueness of the AR system was 0.24° (95% CI limit 0.92°) for inclination and 0.90° (95% CI limit 1.8°) for anteversion. Precision was 0.46° for inclination and 0.91° for anteversion. There was significant correlation between the two methods for both inclination (r = 0.996, p<0.001) and anteversion (r = 0.974, p<0.001). Repeatability for the AR system was 0.995 for inclination and 0.989 for anteversion. Reproducibility for the AR system was 0.999 for inclination and 0.995 for anteversion. Conclusion. Measurements obtained from the enhanced HoloLens® AR system were accurate and precise in regards to determining angular measurements of acetabular cup orientation. They exceeded those of currently used methods of cup angle determination such as CT and computer-assisted navigation. Measurements obtained were also highly repeatable and reproducible, therefore this platform is accurately validated for use in a THA training simulator

Introduction. Durable bone fixation of uncemented porous-coated acetabular cups can be observed at a long-term, however, polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis may affect survivorship. Accurate wear measurements correlated with clinical data may offer unique research information of clinical interest about this highly debated issue. Objetive. We assessed the clinical and radiological outcome of a single uncemented total hip replacement (THR) system after twenty years analysing polyethylene wear and the appearance of osteolysis. Materials and Methods. 82 hips implanted between 1992 and 1995 were prospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 20.6 years (range, 18 to 23). A hemispherical porous-coated acetabular cup matched to a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem and a 28 mm standard PE liner, sterilised by gamma irradiation in air, was used in all hips. Radiological position and the possible appearance of loosening and osteolysis were recorded over time. Penetration of the prosthetic head into the liner was measured by the Roentgen Monographic Analysis (ROMAN) Tool at 6 weeks, 6 months, one year and yearly thereafter. Results. Six cups were revised due to wear and four due to late dislocation. All cups were radiographically well-fixed and all stems showed radiographic ingrowth. Six un-revised hips showed osteolysis on the acetabular side and two on the proximal femoral side. Creep at one year was 0.30 (±0.23) mm. Mean total femoral head penetration was 1.23 mm at 10 years, 1.52 mm at 15 years and 1.92 mm at 23 years. Overall mean wear was 0.12 (± 0.1) mm/year and 0.09 (±0.06) mm/year after the creep period. Mean wear was 0.08 (± 0.06) mm/year in hips without osteolysis and 0.14 (±0.03) mm/year in revised hips or with osteolysis (p<0.001). Conclusions. Although continued durable fixation can be observed with a porous-coated cups and a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem, true wear continues to increase at a constant rate over time. PE wear remains as the main reason for revision surgery and osteolysis in uncemented THR and does not stop after twenty years

Introduction. Appropriate acetabular cup orientation is an important factor in reducing instability and maximising the performance of the bearing after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). However, postoperative analyses of two large cohorts in the US have shown that more than half of cups are malorientated. In addition, there is no consensus as to what inclination and anteversion angles should be targeted, with contemporary literature suggesting that the orientation should be customised for each individual patient. The aim of this study was to measure the accuracy of a novel patient specific instrumentation system in a consecutive series of 22 acetabular cups, each with a customised orientation. Methodology. Twenty-two consecutive total hip replacement patients were sent for Trinity Optimized Positioning System (OPS) acetabular planning (Optimized Ortho, Sydney). The Trinity OPS planning is a preoperative, dynamic analysis of each patient performing a deep flexion and full extension activity. The software calculates the dynamic force at the hip to be replaced and plots the bearing contact patch as it traces across the articulating surface. The software modelled multiple cup orientations and the alignment which best centralised the load was chosen by the surgeon from the preoperative reports. Once the target orientations had been determined, a unique patient specific guide was 3D printed and used intra-operatively with a laser guided system to achieve the planned alignment, Fig 1. All patients received a post-operative CT scan at 3 months and the radiographic cup inclination and anteversion was measured. The study was ethically approved by The Avenue Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Trial Number 176. Results. The mean planned radiographic inclination, reference to the Anterior Pelvic Plane (APP), was 42.8° (range 36.2° – 50.1°). The mean planned radiographic anteversion, reference to the APP, was 28.3° (range 19.4° – 37.0°). Only 23% of the planned orientations fell within Lewinnek's “safe zone”, taking into consideration that that this safe zone is not comparable to the coronal plane of radiographs. However, all 22 cups were planned within a range of 40° ± 10° of inclination and 25° ± 10° of anteversion, when referenced to the coronal plane when supine. The mean inclination difference between the planned and achieved orientations was −1.3° (range −7.6° – 9.2°). The mean anteversion difference was 1.2° (range −5.3° – 7.0°). The mean absolute difference was 4.2° for inclination (range 0.4° – 9.2°) and 3.6° for anteversion (range 0.6° – 7.0°). All 22 cups were within ±10° of their intended target orientation, Fig 2. All 22 cups were within the range of 40° ± 10° of inclination and 25° ± 10° of anteversion, when reference to the coronal plane when supine, Fig 3. Conclusions. These are the early results of a new technology for planning and delivering a customised acetabular cup orientation. We expect further improvements in accuracy with current developments. However, the results suggest that Trinity OPS is a simple way to achieve a patient-specific cup orientation, with accuracy comparable to imageless navigation

Introduction: Hip resurfacing is a successful pain-relieving procedure which restores function in young patients. However, some patients have persisting pain. We suggest that load characteristics in relation to position of the cup may influence these symptoms. We aimed to determine the effect of acetabular cup inclination angle on pain following hip resurfacing. Methods: 92 consecutive hips in 81 patients were resurfaced with the ASR prosthesis. The average age was 56.5 years (35–72). 33 were female hips. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and UCLA activity scores were recorded pre-operatively and at last follow-up. Patient satisfaction was recorded. Acetabular cup inclination angle was measured. An acceptable angle for hip replacement is 45 degrees +/− 5 degrees. We therefore grouped cups into those above 50 degrees and those below. Average follow-up was 17.9 months (8–31). There were 39 hips with an angle less than 50 degrees (A), and 53 greater than 50 (B). Patients in each group were comparable for age, sex, follow-up and BMI. Results: In group A HHS improved from 53.4 to 98.7 and UCLA activity score improved from 4.2 to 7.5. All patients were extremely or very pleased. In group B HHS improved from 49.0 to 94.0 and UCLA activity score improved from 3.9 to 7.1. 48 of 53 patients were extremely or very pleased. At follow up 37 of 39 (95%) of patients in group A had no pain. In group B 35 of 53 had no pain (66%). This is a statistically significant difference when analysed with Fisher’s exact test (p< 0.05). Discussion: This study shows that an excessively open acetabular cup may contribute to persisting pain and patient dissatisfaction. This may be a result of excessive eccentric wear and metal ion deposition, and may lead to early failure of the prosthesis

Iliopsoas tendonitis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a considerable cause of pain and patient dissatisfaction. The optimal cup position to avoid iliopsoas tendonitis has not been clearly established. Implant designs have also been developed with an anterior recess to avoid iliopsoas impingement. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to determine the effect of cup position and implant design on iliopsoas impingement. Bilateral THA was performed on three fresh frozen cadavers using oversized (jumbo) offset head center revision acetabular cups with an anterior recess (60, 62 and 66 mm diameter) and tapered wedge primary stems through a posterior approach. A 2mm diameter flexible stainless steel cable was inserted into the psoas tendon sheath between the muscle and the surrounding membrane to identify the location of the psoas muscle radiographically. CT scans of each cadaver were imported in an imaging software. The acetabular shells, cables as well as pelvis were segmented to create separate solid models of each. The offset head center shell was virtually replaced with an equivalent diameter hemispherical shell by overlaying the outer shell surfaces of both designs and keeping the faces of shells parallel. The shortest distance between each shell and cable was measured. To determine the influence of cup inclination and anteversion on psoas impingement, we virtually varied the inclination (30°/40°/50°) and anteversion (10°/20°/30°) angles for both shell designs. The CT analysis revealed that the original orientation (inclination/anteversion) of the shells implanted in 3 cadavers were as follows: Left1: 44.7°/23.3°, Right1: 41.7°/33.8°, Left2: 40/17, Right2: 31.7/23.5, Left3: 33/2908, Right3: 46.7/6.3. For the offset center shells, the shell to cable distance in all the above cases were positive indicating that there was clearance between the shells and psoas. For the hemispherical shells, in 3 out of 6 cases, the distance was negative indicating impingement of psoas. With the virtual implantation of both shell designs at orientations 40°/10°, 40°/20°, 40°/30° we found that greater anteversion helped decrease psoas impingement in both shell designs. When we analyzed the influence of inclination angle on psoas impingement by comparing wire distances for three orientations (30°/20°, 40°/20°, 50°/20°), we found that the effect was less pronounced. Further analysis comparing the offset head center shell to the conventional hemispherical shell revealed that the offset design was favored (greater clearance between the shell and the wire) in 17 out of 18 cases when the effect of anteversion was considered and in 15 out of 18 cases when the effect of inclinations was considered. Our results indicate that psoas impingement is related to both cup position and implant geometry. For an oversized jumbo cup, psoas impingement is reduced by greater anteversion while cup inclination has little effect. An offset head center cup with an anterior recess was effective in reducing psoas impingement in comparison to a conventional hemispherical geometry. In conclusion, adequate anteversion is important to avoid psoas impingement with jumbo acetabular shells and an implant with an anterior recess may further mitigate the risk of psoas impingement

INTRODUCTION. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is regarded as one of the most successful surgeries in medicine. However, recent studies have revealed that ideal acetabular cup implantation is achieved less frequently than previously thought, as little as 50% of the time. It is well known that malalignment of the acetabular component in THA may result in dislocation, reduced range of motion, or accelerated wear. This study reports accuracy of a tactile robotic arm system to ream the acetabulum and impact an acetabulur cup compared to manual instrumentation. METHODS. 12 fresh frozen cadaveric acetabulae were pre-operatively CT scanned and 3D templating was used to plan the center of rotation, and anteversion and inclination of the cup. Each specimen received THA, six prepared manually and six prepared with robotic arm guidance. Tactile, visual, and auditory feedback was provided through robotic guidance as well as navigated guided reaming and cup impaction. The robotic guidance constrained orientation of instruments thus constraining anteversion, inclination, and center of rotation for reaming, trialing, and final cup impaction. Post-operative CT scans were taken of each specimen to determine final cup placement for comparison to the pre-operative plans. RESULTS. In all cases, robotic arm guidance resulted in ±4° of anteversion and ±5° of inclination each relative to the pre-operative plan. Absolute RMS errors were 2.16 ± 1.35° for anteversion and 1.91 ± 1.55° for inclination. Cup placement with robotic guidance was significantly more accurate and precise than placement with manual instruments. With manual instrumentation the errors were, on average, 4.0 times higher in anteversion and 5.9 times higher in inclination compared to robotic instrumentation. CONCLUSION. This tactile robotic system substantially improved the accuracy of acetabular reaming and placement of the final cup compared to traditional manual techniques. With greater knowledge of ideal acetabular cup position, highly accurate techniques may allow surgeons to decrease the risk of dislocation, promote durability and improve the ability to restore appropriate leg length and offset. Tactile robotics has proven to be safe and effective in both knee and hip surgery and provides the potential to redefine the “instrument set” used for orthopedic procedures

Revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular deficiency is a technically challenging operation. Many different methods have been described for the management of acetabular deficiency. These include augmentation with bone cement, structural allografts, impaction grafting, support rings with graft and reconstruction with a high centre of rotation. The long term results of many of these methods were variable. We reviewed the outcome of a stemmed acetabular cup (McMinn cup, Link UK) used with morsellised bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular deficiency. The implant was used only in the most severe cases of acetabular deficiency where it was impossible to achieve stable fixation using simpler methods. This device was used in only 13 out of 265 revision arthroplasties performed by the senior author. Between 1995 and 2002 13 acetabulae were reconstructed using a stemmed acetabular cup and non-structural morsellised bone graft. All were revision procedures with the number of previous operations on the same hip ranging between 1 and 4. 2 patients died from causes not related to surgery. 1 hip was revised for persistent discharge although no organisms were identified on repeated cultures. The mean follow-up of the remaining 10 hips was 72 months (range 46 – 108 months). All patients were satisfied with the results and their function improved significantly post-operatively. 8 of the 10 people report no pain from the hip and 2 reported slight or occasional pain which did not interfere with their activities at last follow-up. The mean Harris Hip Score was 84.6 (range 70 to 99.8). Radiological assessment showed regeneration of acetabular bone stock. Some X-Rays showed proximal migration of the cup but with no evidence of loosening at last follow-up. Acetabular reconstruction using the McMinn stemmed acetabular cup is a useful technique in revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular deficiency

Since the autumn of 2003, a computer-assisted system (VectorVision® Hip, version 2.1, Brain LAB, Germany) has been used to perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) operations in our hospital. In the present study, the postoperative acetabular cup position was evaluated using the records of the system and the data measured from postoperative radiographs. To date, 18 patients have been treated using this-system. We studied the cup inclination and anteversion records in this system recorded in the THA procedures. We also measured the cup inclination and anteversion using postoperative radiographs, according to the method described by Pradhan. The inclination and ante-version were the ‘operative’angles for this system and were the ‘radio graphical’ ones for measuring from the radiographs according to the definition described by Murray. The initial planning of the acetabular cup position was 45° ‘operative’ inclination and 20° ‘operative’ ante-version. From the system records, the average ‘operative’ inclination was 46.5°± 3.9° and the average ‘operative’ anteversion was 25.5°± 6.0°. The average ‘radio graphical’ inclination measured from the postoperative radiographs was 49.0°± 6.0°, and the average ‘radio graphical’ anteversion was 10.6°± 5.8°. Between the ‘operative’ angles from this system and the ‘radio graphical’ angles from the postoperative radiographs, the inclination was approximately the same, while the anteversion was different. When the ‘radio graphical’ anteversion was corrected for X-ray beam spreading and then converted to the ‘operative’ anteversion, the resulting ‘operative’ anteversion was 21.1°± 7.8°. And when the ‘operative’ anteversion recorded by this system was corrected for the pelvic tilt, the corrected ‘operative’ anteversion was 22.1°± 6.5°. The average difference between these corrected ‘operative’ anteversion in each case was 5.8°± 3.8°. Especially in 10 of the 18 cases, each difference was within 5°. The accuracy of the cup position using this computer-assisted system was shown by this study

Introduction: Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular cup was designed to reduce backside wear and stimulate osseo-integration of cup with bone. The cup has peripheral fit to improve the initial stability and further stability and longevity depends on the osseointegration of cup with acetabulum. The revision cup was intended to give added stability with screws in case of defective rim or large acetabulum. The aim of this study is to assess the radiological outcome following tantalum monoblock revision cup in total hip replacement. Methods: Between 1999 and 2000, 32 Tantalum mono-block revision acetabular cups was used in 31 patients. Standard hip radiographs were performed during post op, at three months, six months and then annually. X rays were assessed for loosening in De Lee and Charnley zones and for migration of cup. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 2 to 5 years), 31 hips in 30 patients were assessed. The average age of the patient was 62.4 years (39–78 years). Three Brookers type 1 and one type 2 heterotrophic ossification was seen. There was a gap of 2–5mm in Zone 1(6 patients), 1–5mm in Zone 2 (8 Patients) and 5mm in Zone 3 of one patient. At final follow up, all the gaps were filled, except for one, where 5mm gap was persistent. There was no migration of cup or problems with screws. All the patients were satisfied with the operation. Conclusion: Short term radiological result following uncemented revision tantalum monoblock acetabular cup in total hip replacement is highly encouraging. However, similar results from other centres and long term follow up studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of the revision cups

Introduction. The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man (NJR) monitors the performance of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants and summarizes usage and outcomes for specific hip systems. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine if survivorship for the PROCOTYL® L acetabular cup, a hemispherical press-fit cup coated with hydroxyapatite and a metal on XLPE articulation, is significantly different from all other cementless cups in the NJR and 2) to analyze patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) at a minimum five year follow-up for the subject cup. Methods. The database of the NJR was searched for demographic information and survivorship data for all THAs performed with the PROCOTYL® L cup (metal on XLPE) and all other cementless cups. Survivorship data for both groups was adjusted to exclude metal on metal bearings and compared for all revisions and acetabular revisions only. The Cox Proportional Hazards model for the revision risk ratio of the subject cup to all cementless cups was also calculated. Patients with the subject cup implanted for at least five years were mailed a PROMs program questionnaire consisting of the Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores. No pre-operative PROMs scores were collected. Results. Patient demographic information for the subject system and all cementless cups is provided in Figure 1. As seen in Figure 2, the six-year survivorship for the 1,172 THAs using the subject system (97.8%) was slightly higher than the survivorship for all cementless cups (97.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 3). The 1, 2, and 5 year survivorship for the subject cup also exceeded the survivorship of all cementless cups, but without statistically significant differences. When just the cup was revised, the subject system survivorship was similar to survivorship for all cementless cups for years 1 through 6 (Figure 2). Patients with the subject system implanted for an average of 5.73 – 5.75 years reported average Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS Scores of 39.13 ± 9.93, 0.775 ± 0.273, and 75.87 ± 17.71, respectively. Conclusions. The subject acetabular cup was associated with survivorship similar to that of other cementless acetabular cups. Patients implanted with the subject system for at least five years reported what are considered satisfactory Oxford Hip, EQ5D, and EQVAS score outcomes. These results represent the first report of midterm outcomes with the subject system. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction: Malpositioning of the acetabular cup component in total hip arthroplasty can result in increased wear, early nonseptic loosening and is the most common cause of dislocation. Previous research has defined a safe zone with an inclination of 40±10 degrees and anteversion of 15±10 degrees. The purpose of this study was to compare cup placement using imageless navigation to a historical control group using CT based measurements. Methods: 34 patients receiving a primary hip replacement between June 2005 and December 2006 were enrolled in the study. Alignment of the implant is based on the acquisition of landmarks (ASIS and pubic tubercle) and placement of tracking pins into the ASIS. The target position for all patients was 45 degrees of inclination and 15 degrees of anteversion. The position was determined by postoperative Ct scans of the pelvis. This group was compared to a matched control group. Results: Descriptive statistics revealed that the demographics of both groups were comparable. Mean cup placement in the navigation group was 46.6±5.9 deg of inclination and 18.8±5.6 deg of anteversion. Mean cup placement in the control group was 48.4±8.85 deg of inclination and 22.33±10.9 deg of anteversion. With navigation 73.7% resp 89.5% of cups were placed within the safe zone for inclination resp. anteversion whereas only 56.2% resp. 50% of cups were placed with freehand technique. Taking both inclination and anteversion into consideration 68.4% of cups were placed in the safe zone with navigation. Only 12.5% were placed for both inclination and anteversion were placed into the safe zone. Discussion: Computer navigation for total joint arthroplasty, if helpful to the surgeon, has to increase reliability of component placement and show a significant reduction in variation compared to freehand techniques. Our results demonstrate that imageless navigation is a reliable tool which significantly increases precision of acetabular cup placement. Further studies are needed to evaluate and further increase the accuracy of the system

We wanted to solve the problem of acetabular dysplasia with a cementless total hip endoprothesis by using a smaller acetabular cup in order to fit the size of the dysplastic acetabulum without using any additional bone transplantation for superstructure of the acetabulum. By using this type of acetabular reconstruction we can preliminarily conclude that the bone superstructure of the acetabulum can be avoided and that problems may occur if remodelation of the bone transplant has failed. Irregular biomechanical bending in the supraacetabular region can also be avoided. Uncured developmental dysplasia of the hip joint (DDH) is a huge problem to solve in elderly patients. DDH can be expressed in several forms according to stage, i.e., in young and elderly patients we can find different consequences, from slight to moderate supraacetabular dysplasia combined with anterior dysplasia, valgus and anteversion of the proximal femur, to high hip luxation. In efforts to find a better way to solve slight and moderate supraacetabular dysplasia (in some cases combined with high luxation), we have tried to use a smaller acetabular cup that will fit the dysplastic acetabulum, combined with a higher hip centre, dysplastic polyethylene, and a longer femoral neck to avoid leg length discrepancy and weakness of the gluteal musculature. From January 1999 to January 2000 we performed the above-mentioned type of operation in 33 patients (25 females, 8 males) with dysplastic coxarthrosis of the hip. Age range was from 32 to 63 years. In all cases we performed the application of a Zimmer or Biomet smaller acetabular cementless cup after reaming the acetabulum near the internal lamina of the iliac bone. Good primary fixation of the acetabulum was achieved in all of the cases. Supraacetabular reconstruction was not used. In some cases where the dysplasia was very expressive, we left the acetabular cup uncovered for about 0.5 cm. In the postoperative period we advised the patient to load the operated leg over two crutches without full weight bearing for approximately six weeks. After that time period and according to clinical and radiographic findings, we prescribed walking with one crutch, and walking without crutches four months later. The follow-up period is short but preliminary results of our study are satisfactory. There were no early postoperative complications. Incorporation of bone was good in the acetabular cups measured with radiographs and in some cases with Tc99m. In some cases where we left part of the cup uncovered, there was supraacetabular formation of new bone after six months

Objectives. Total hip replacement is increasingly being conducted in younger and more active patients, so surgeons often use bearing surfaces with improved wear characteristics, such as ceramic on ceramic. The primary objective of this study was to determine if survivorship for a BIOLOX® delta ceramic on delta ceramic couple used with the PROCOTYL® L acetabular cup is significantly different from all other cementless cups in a large arthroplasty registry. The secondary objective of this study was to analyze patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) of the subject cup with a minimum five year follow-up. Methods. Patient demographics and survivorship data was collected from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man (NJR) database for all total hip replacements performed with the PROCOTYL® L cup used in combination with a delta-on-delta articulation, as well as for all other cementless cups. Survivorship data was compared for all revisions and cup revisions only and data was adjusted to exclude metal on metal articulations. The hazard ratio of the subject system to all cementless cups was also calculated with the Cox Proportional Hazards model. Patients with the subject components implanted for a minimum of five years completed Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS score questionnaires. Results. The patient demographic data collected for the subject components and all cementless cups is provided in Figure 1. Six-year survivorship for the subject cup (98.6%) was similar to survivorship for all cementless cup revisions in the NJR database (98.5%), as seen in Figure 2. When the cup alone was revised, six-year survivorship of the subject cup (98.6%) and all NJR cementless cups (98.5%) was also similar. However, the subject cup survivorship remained at 98.6% from 4 to 6 years post-implantation, while survivorship for all cementless cups decreased slightly from years 4 to 6. The similarities between the revision risk of the subject system and all cementless cups in the NJR can be seen in the Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratios provided in Figure 3. Patients with the subject cup implanted for an average of 5.88 years reported Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores of 39.60 ± 10.78, 0.801 ± 0.259, and 75.49 ± 19.25, respectively. Conclusions. The subject acetabular cup with a ceramic on ceramic articulation exhibited similar survivorship to all other cementless acetabular cups, excluding those with metal on metal bearings, in the NJR. Patients implanted with the subject system for an average of 5.88 years reported what are considered satisfactory Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores. This survivorship and PROMs data is the first report of mid-term outcomes with the subject components