The prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral torsion (FT) and tibial torsion (TT) is unknown in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT, and which subgroups are associated with combined abnormalities of FT and TT. We retrospectively evaluated symptomatic patients with FAI or hip dysplasia with CT scans performed between September 2011 and September 2016. A total of 261 hips (174 patients) had a measurement of FT and TT. Their mean age was 31 years (SD 9), and 63% were female (165 hips). Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (48 hips, 27 patients) who had CT scans including femur and tibia available for analysis, which had been acquired for nonorthopaedic reasons. Comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.Aims
Methods
In many papers, the diagnosis of pincer-type
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is attributed to the presence
of coxa profunda. However, little is known about the prevalence
of coxa profunda in the general population and its clinical relevance. In order to ascertain its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects
and whether it is a reliable indicator of pincer-type FAI, we undertook
a cross-sectional study between July and December 2013. A total
of 226 subjects (452 hips) were initially screened. According to
strict inclusion criteria, 129 asymptomatic patients (257 hips)
were included in the study. The coxa profunda sign, the crossover
sign, the acetabular index (AI) and lateral centre–edge (LCE) angle were
measured on the radiographs. The median age of the patients was
36.5 years (28 to 50) and 138 (53.7%) were women. Coxa profunda was present in 199 hips (77.4%). There was a significantly
increased prevalence of coxa profunda in women (p <
0.05) and
a significant association between coxa profunda and female gender
(p <
0.001) (92% When the presence of all radiological signs in the same subject
was considered, pincer-type FAI was found in only two hips (one
subject). We therefore consider that the coxa profunda sign should
not be used as a radiological indicator of pincer-type FAI. We consider
profunda to be a benign alteration in the morphology of the hip
with low prevalence and a lack of association with other radiological
markers of FAI. We suggest that the diagnosis of pincer-type FAI
should be based on objective measures, in association with clinical
findings. Cite this article:
