Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure from rupture, attenuation, or malposition may cause recurrent subjective instability and objective laxity, and occurs in 3% to 22% of ACL reconstruction (ACLr) procedures. Revision ACLr is often indicated to restore knee stability, improve knee function, and facilitate return to cutting and pivoting activities. Prior to reconstruction, a thorough clinical and diagnostic evaluation is required to identify factors that may have predisposed an individual to recurrent ACL injury, appreciate concurrent intra-articular pathology, and select the optimal graft for revision reconstruction. Single-stage revision can be successful, although a staged approach may be used when optimal tunnel placement is not possible due to the position and/or widening of previous tunnels. Revision ACLr often involves concomitant procedures such as meniscal/chondral treatment, lateral extra-articular augmentation, and/or osteotomy. Although revision ACLr reliably restores knee stability and function, clinical outcomes and reoperation rates are worse than for primary ACLr. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(5):474–480

Abstract. The radiographic or bony landmark techniques are the two most common methods to determine Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) femoral tunnel placement. Their intra/inter-observer reliability is widely debated. The palpation technique relies on identifying the medial epicondyle (ME) and adductor Tubercle (AT). The central longitudinal artery and associated vessels (CLV) are consistently seen in the surgical dissection during MPFL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomic relationship of CLV to ME-AT and thereby use CLV as an important vascular landmark during MPFL reconstruction. A retrospective review of MRI scans in skeletally mature patients presenting to a tertiary referral knee clinic was undertaken. Group-N consisted of any presentation without patellofemoral instability or malalignment (PFI). Group-P with PFI. MRI's were reviewed and measured by two Consultant Radiologists for the CLV-ME-AT anatomy and relationship. Following exclusions 50 patients were identified in each group. The CLV passed anterior to the AT and ME in all patients. ME morphology did not differ greatly between the groups except in the tubercle height, where there was a statically but not clinically significant difference (larger in the non-PFI group, 2.95mm vs 2.52mm, p=0.002). The CLV to ME Tip distance was consistent between the groups (Group PFI group 3.8mm & ‘normal’ non-PFI Group 3.9mm). The CLV-ME-AT relationship remained consistent despite patients presenting pathology. The CLV consistently courses anterior to ME and AT. The CLV could be used as a vascular landmark assisting femoral tunnel placement during MPFL reconstruction

Correct femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical in obtaining good clinical outcomes. We aimed to delineate whether any difference exists between the anteromedial (AM) and trans-tibial (TT) portal femoral tunnel placement techniques on the primary outcome of ACLR graft rupture. Adult patients (>18year old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2011 – January 2018 were identified and divided based on portal technique (AM v TT). The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Univariate analysis was used to delineate association between independent variables and outcome. Binary logistic regression was utilised to delineate odds ratios of significant variables. 473 patients were analysed. Median age at surgery was 27 years old (range 18–70). A total of 152/473, (32.1%) patients were AM group compared to 321/473 (67.9%) TT. Twenty-five patients (25/473, 5.3%) sustained graft rupture. Median time to graft rupture was 12 months (IQR 9). A higher odds for graft rupture was associated with the AM group, which trended towards significance (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.90 – 4.56, p=0.081). Older age at time of surgery was associated with a lower odds of rupture (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.98, p=0.014). There is no statistically significant difference in ACLR graft rupture rates when comparing anteromedial and trans-tibial portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. There was a trend towards higher rupture rates in the anteromedial portal group

Evaluate precisely and reproducibly tridimensional positioning of bone tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACL). To propose biplanar stereoradiographic imaging as a new reference in tridimensional evaluation of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Comparing knee 3D models issued from EOStm low-irradiation biplanar X-Ray with those issued from computed tomography (CT-Scan) high definition images will allow a bone morphological description of a previously unseen precision. We carried out the transfer of 3D models from EOStm X-Ray images obtained from 10 patients in the same reference frame with models issued from CT-Scan. Two evaluators reconstructed both pre-operative and post-operative knees, using two different stereoradiographic projections, for a total of 144 knee 3D models from EOStm. A surface analysis by distance mapping allowed us to know the differences or errors between the homologous points of the EOStm and CT reconstructions, the latter being our “bronze-standard”. At the femur, we obtained a mean (95% confidence level) error of 1.5 mm (1.3–1.6) between the EOStm models compared to the Arthro-CT segmentations when using AP-LAT incidences, compared to 1 mm (1.0 – 1.1) with oblique projections. For the tunnels placement analysis, the total radius difference between EOStm and Arthro-CT's femoral tunnel apertures was 0.8 mm (0.4–1.2) in AP-LAT and 0.6 mm (0.0–1.2) in oblique views. These femoral apertures positioning on EOStm models were within 4.3 mm (3.0–5.7) of their homologues on CT-Scan models, 4.6 mm (3.5–5.6) with the oblique views. Furthermore, 9.3o (7.2–11.4) of difference in direction between femoral tunnels from EOStm models and CT reconstructions is obtained with AP-LAT projections, 8.3o (6.6–10) with obliques views. Measures of these parameters were also performed at the tibia. According to the intra and inter-reproducibility analysis of our knee 3D models, EOStm biplanar X-Ray images prove to be fast, efficient and precise in the design of ACLR 3D models with respect to CT-Scan. Our results also propose the recourse of oblique stereoradiographic projections for the realization of knee 3D models. These models will be subjects of further analysis and will allow us eventually to propose a new frame of reference guiding the positioning of the tunnels in the ACLR

Anatomic all-inside ACL reconstruction using TransLateral technique is a relatively new technique that reduces surgical invasion and pain leading to early recovery. We evaluated clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary anatomic all-inside ACL reconstruction using TransLateral technique. Retrospective case-series evaluating patients undergoing surgery from June 2013 – December 2017. Patients were followed up clinically and using PROMS including EQ-5D, KOOS, IKDC and Tegner scores. Paired two-tailed student t-tests were used to assess clinical significance. 138 patients were included (115 males, 23 females). Mean age was 30 years (range 16.0 – 60.2). Graft choice included isolated semitendinosus (n=115) or both semitendinosus and gracilis (n=26). Mean graft length and diameter were 62.1mm and 8.7mm. Sixteen cases (11.3%) returned to theatre; MUA for arthrofibrosis (n=4), infection (n=2), haemarthrosis (n=1) and metalwork failure (n=1). Incidence of graft re-rupture was 5.7% (n=8); 7 cases were in the mid-bundle femoral tunnel placement. 52.5% (n=74) had complete peri-operative PROMS scores. Mean peri-operative EQ-5D VAS scores were 69.8 and 78.2 (p=0.02). Mean peri-operative KOOS scores for all domains demonstrated significant improvements (p<0.001). Mean peri-operative IKDC scores were 46.1 and 72.5 (p<0.05) and peri-operative Tegner activity scores were 3.3 and 5.3 (p<0.001). Anatomic all-inside ACL reconstruction using TransLateral technique demonstrates favourable clinical and biomechanical advantages including independent anatomic femoral tunnel placement, bone preservation and use of single tendon graft. Patients report significant improvements in pain, functional outcome, quality of life and return to sports. Mid-bundle femoral tunnel placement has been abandoned due to higher failure rate

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is commonly performed and has been for many years. Despite this, the technical details related to ACL anatomy, such as tunnel placement, are still a topic for debate. In this paper, we introduce the flat ribbon concept of the anatomy of the ACL, and its relevance to clinical practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1020–6

Aims

To compare radiographic failure and re-operation rates of anatomical coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructional techniques with non-anatomical techniques after chronic high grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries.

There has been a lot of focus on the value of anatomic tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction, and the relative merits of single and double bundle grafts. Multiple cadaveric and animal studies have compared the effects of tunnel placement and graft type on knee biomechanics. 45 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included into our study. Femoral tunnel position was analysed by two independent doctors using the radiographic quadrant method as described by Bernard et al., and the mean values calculated. Forty-one of these patients completed a KOOS questionnaire. The mean ratio ‘a’ was 26.57% and mean ratio ‘b’ was 30.04% as compared to 24.8% (+/− 2.2%) and 28.5% (+/− 2.5%) respectively quoted by Bernard et.al, as the ideal tunnel position. Only twenty-three of these femoral tunnels were in the anatomic range. Analysis of forty-one KOOS surveys (23 anatomic, 18 non-anatomic) revealed no significant difference in total score or subscales between the anatomic and non-anatomic groups (p= >0.05). Our study suggests that the ideal tunnel position, as described by Bernard et.al. may not be ideal and fixed

Introduction. Anatomical reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been shown to improve patient outcome. The posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) is an easily identifiable landmark on MRI and arthroscopy, which could help plan tibial tunnel position in the sagittal plane and provide anatomical graft position intra-operatively. Method. Our method for anatomical tibial tunnel placement is to establish the relation of the posterior border of AHLM to the centre of the ACL footprint on a pre-operative sagittal MRI. Based on this relationship studied on preoperative MRI scan, posterior border of AHLM is used as an intra- operative arthroscopic landmark for anatomic tibial tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction. This relationship has been studied on 100 MRI scans where there was no ACL or LM injury (Bone and Joint Journal 2013 vol 95-B, SUPP 19). The aim of the study is to validate our method for anatomical tibial tunnel placement. Results. 25 patients with ACLR where there were both pre and post op MRI scan with good quality images of AHLM and tibial tunnel opening were included in this study. The preoperative relationship between posterior border of AHLM and centre of ACL footprint was compared with that between the posterior border of AHLM and centre of tibial tunnel on postop MRI scans. The measurements were done by two observers on two different occasions to establish intra and inter observer correlation. Discussion and Conclusion. There was significant correlation between pre-op (0.4mm) and post-op (0.4mm) distances between the AHLM and the centre of the ACL footprint/graft. There was significant inter-observer correlation (paired T-test =0.89, p<0.05) in pre- and post-op measurements. No significant difference was found in the difference between the means in pre-op and post-op MRI scans between observers (p=0.79). These results suggest that the AHLM is a reliable and valid intra-operative marker for anatomic ACL tibial tunnel placement

Background:. The Lateral Intercondylar Ridge (LIR) gained notoriety with arthroscopic trans-tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction where it was mistakenly used to position the ‘over the top’ guide resulting in graft malposition. With anatomic ACL reconstruction some surgeons use the same ridge to define the anterior margin of the ACL femoral insertion in order to guide graft placement. However there is debate about whether this ridge is a consistent and reliable anatomical structure. The aim of our study was to identify whether the LIR is a consistent anatomical structure and to define its relationship with the femoral ACL insertion. Methods:. In the first part, we studied 23 dry bone specimens. Using a digital microscribe, we created a 3D model of the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle to evaluate whether there was an identifiable bony ridge. In the second part, we studied 7 cadaveric specimens with soft tissues intact. The soft tissues were dissected to identify the femoral ACL insertion. A 3D reconstruction of the femoral insertion and the surface allowed us to define the relationship between the LIR and the ACL insertion. Results:. All specimens (23 dry bones; 7 intact soft tissues) had a defined ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle. The ridge extends from the apex point of the lateral intercondylar notch, where the posterior condyle meets the femoral shaft, and extends obliquely to the articular margin. The mean distance from the midpoint of the posterior condylar articular margin was 10.1 mm. The ridge was consistently located just anterior to the femoral ACL insertion. Conclusion:. This study shows that the LIR is a consistent anatomical structure that defines the anterior margin of the femoral ACL insertion. This supports its use as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction surgery. Abstract 28

Graft-tunnel mismatch of the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft is a major concern during anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction if the femoral tunnel is positioned using a far medial portal technique, as the femoral tunnel tends to be shorter compared with that positioned using a transtibial portal technique. This study describes an accurate method of calculating the ideal length of bone plugs of a BPTB graft required to avoid graft–tunnel mismatch during anatomical ACL reconstruction using a far medial portal technique of femoral tunnel positioning.

Based on data obtained intra-operatively from 60 anatomical ACL reconstruction procedures, we calculated the length of bone plugs required in the BPTB graft to avoid graft–tunnel mismatch. When this was prevented in all the 60 cases, we found that the mean length of femoral bone plug that remained in contact with the interference screw within the femoral tunnel was 14 mm (12 to 22) and the mean length of tibial bone plug that remained in contact with the interference screw within the tibial tunnel was 23 mm (18 to 28). These results were used to validate theoretical formulae developed to predict the required length of bone plugs in BPTB graft during anatomical ACL reconstruction using a far medial portal technique.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:324–8.

Summary Statement. ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft was quantitatively evaluated using a robotic testing system. Biomechanical results on joint stability and graft function support its use as an alternative to the hamstrings. Introduction. Recently, a number of surgeons have chosen the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft as an alternative autograft over the hamstrings tendon for ACL reconstruction because its bone-to-bone healing on one side, large size, and preservation of lateral and rotatory knee function could lead to fewer post-operative complications. However, there have been little or no biomechanical studies that quantitatively evaluate knee function after reconstruction using a QT autograft. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the function of a reconstructed knee with a QT autograft and compare the results with a quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis (QSTG) tendon autograft on the same knee. Methods. Ten human cadaveric knees (57.4 ± 4.2 years of age) were tested using a robotic/UFS testing system in 4 knee states: intact, ACL-deficient, and after ACL reconstruction with both QT and QSTG autografts. Reconstructions were performed in randomised order using posterolateral femoral tunnel placement. The knee kinematics in each state were measured at 5 flexion angles (full extension, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) under 3 externally applied loading conditions: (1) 134 N anterior tibial load (ATL), (2) 134 N ATL with 200 N axial compression, and combined rotatory (CR) load of 10 Nm valgus and 5 Nm internal tibial torque (at 15° and 30°). Based on the established procedure, knee kinematics and in-situ forces were obtained using the principle of superposition. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare anterior tibial translation (ATT) and in-situ forces between the knee states at each flexion angle, with a Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Results. Under the ATL, the ATT was found to be restored to within 1.1 mm of the intact knee for both reconstructions (P > 0.05). The in-situ forces in the grafts were also not significantly different from those in the intact ACL except in deep flexion (P < 0.05 at 90° for both grafts). With added axial compression, both reconstructions could still restore the ATT to within 2.4 mm of the intact joint at all flexion angles, and the in-situ forces in both grafts were within 25 N of the intact ACL at 15°, 30°, and 60° (P > 0.05). Under the CR load, knee kinematics and in-situ forces in the grafts were not significantly different from the intact ACL at any tested angle (P > 0.05). Further, no significant differences could be detected between the reconstructions under any experimental condition (P > 0.05). Discussion/Conclusion. ACL reconstruction with a QT autograft was found to restore knee function close to levels of the intact knee and similar to those reconstructed with a QSTG autograft. These results support clinical findings suggesting the QT autograft as a viable alternative for ACL reconstruction

Background:. The term ‘resident's ridge’ originated from trans-tibial ACL reconstruction where a bony ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle was mistakenly thought to represent the posterior articular margin of the condyle. This was then mistakenly used to position the ‘over the top’ guide resulting in graft malposition. With anatomical anteromedial ACL reconstruction some surgeons use the same ridge to define the anterior margin of the ACL femoral insertion in order to guide graft placement. However there is debate about whether this ridge is a consistent and reliable anatomical structure. There are no anatomical studies that define the features of the ‘resident's ridge’. Therefore, our aim was to identify whether the ‘resident's ridge’ is a consistent anatomical structure in non-operated human cadaveric femoral specimens. Methods:. Using a digital microscribe, we mapped the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle in cadaveric human femora denuded of soft tissue. This technique creates an exact 3D model of surfaces and from this we evaluated whether there was an identifiable bony ‘residents ridge’. 23 cadaveric specimens were used. Results:. All 23 specimens had a defined identifiable ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle. When viewed anatomically, the proximal extent of the ridge lies at the superior junction of the articular margin and the femoral shaft. From this point, the ridge forms an oblique line travelling proximal-to-distal and anterior-to-posterior to a point approximately 30–40% anterior to the posterior articular margin. The ridge therefore divides the medial surface into anterior 2/3. rd. and posterior 1/3. rd. when viewed anatomically. Conclusion:. This study shows that the “resident's ridge” is a consistent anatomical structure that defines the anterior margin of the ACL insertion. This therefore supports its use as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction surgery

The February 2014 Knee Roundup. 360 . looks at: whether sham surgery is as good as arthroscopic meniscectomy; distraction in knee osteoarthritis; whether trans-tibial tunnel placement increases the risk of graft failure in ACL surgery; whether joint replacements prevent cardiac events; the size of the pulmonary embolism problem; tranexamic acid and knee replacement haemostasis; matching the demand for knee replacement and follow-up; predicting the length of stay after knee replacement; and popliteal artery injury in TKR