Aims

Large bone defects resulting from osteolysis, fractures, osteomyelitis, or metastases pose significant challenges in acetabular reconstruction for total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and radiological outcomes of an acetabular reconstruction technique in patients at high risk of reconstruction failure (i.e. periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), poor bone stock, immunosuppressed patients), referred to as Hip Reconstruction In Situ with Screws and Cement (HiRISC). This involves a polyethylene liner embedded in cement-filled bone defects reinforced with screws and/or plates for enhanced fixation.

Aims

Custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) play an important role in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and pelvic tumour resection procedures. Accurate CTAC positioning is essential to successful surgical outcomes. While prior studies have explored CTAC positioning in rTHA, research focusing on tumour cases and implant flange positioning precision remains limited. Additionally, the impact of intraoperative navigation on positioning accuracy warrants further investigation. This study assesses CTAC positioning accuracy in tumour resection and rTHA cases, focusing on the differences between preoperative planning and postoperative implant positions.

Aims

The Vantage Total Ankle System is a fourth-generation low-profile fixed-bearing implant that has been available since 2016. We aimed to describe our early experience with this implant.

Aims

This study reports updates the previously published two-year clinical, functional, and radiological results of a group of patients who underwent transfibular total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), with follow-up extended to a minimum of five years.

Aims

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using trabecular metal (TM)-backed glenoid implants has been introduced with the aim to increase implant survival. Only short-term reports on the outcomes of TM-RTSA have been published to date. We aim to present the seven-year survival of TM-backed glenoid implants along with minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA. Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test. At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures. When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery

Introduction

The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups.

Introduction. The interaction between the mobile components of total elbow replacements (TER) provides additional constraint to the elbow motion. Semi-constrained TER depend on a mechanical linkage to avoid dislocation and have greater constraint than unconstrained TER that rely primarily in soft tissue for joint stability. Greater constraint increases the load transfer to the implant interfaces and the stresses in the polyethylene components. Both of these phenomena are detrimental to the longevity of TER, as they may result in implant loosening and increased damage to the polyethylene components, respectively[1]. The objective of this work was to compare the constraint profile in varus-valgus and internal-external rotation and the polyethylene stresses under loads from a common daily activity between two semi-constrained TER, Coonrad/Morrey (Zimmer-Biomet) and Discovery® (DJO), and an unconstrained TER, TEMA (LimaCorporate). Methods. We developed finite element (FE) models of the three TER mechanisms. To reduce computational cost, we did not include the humeral and ulnar stems. Materials were linear-elastic for the metallic components (E. Ti6Al4V. =114.3 GPa, E. CoCr. =210 GPa, v=0.33) and linear elastic-plastic for the polyethylene components (E=618 MPa, v=0.46; S. Y. =22 MPa; S. U. =230.6 MPa; ε. U. =1.5 mm/mm). The models were meshed with linear tetrahedral elements of sizes 0.4–0.6 mm. We assumed a friction coefficient of 0.02 between metal and polyethylene. In all simulations, the ulnar component was fixed and the humeral component loaded. We computed the constraint profiles in full extension by simulating each mechanism from 8° varus to 8° valgus and from 8° internal to 8° external rotation. All other degrees-of-freedom except for flexion extension were unconstrained. Then, we identified the instant during feeding that generated the highest moments at the elbow[2], and we applied the joint forces and moments to each TER to evaluate the stresses in the polyethylene. To validate the FE results, we experimentally evaluated the constraint of the design with highest polyethylene stresses in pure internal-external rotation and compared the results against those from a FE model that reproduced the experimental setup (Fig.1-a). Results. For each design, the constraint profiles in varus-valgus (Fig.2-a) were similar to internal-external rotation (Fig.2-b). All designs showed a lax zone in which the mechanisms rotated freely and an engagement zone in which the mobile components contacted, resulting in load transfer. The laxity of the Coonrad/Morrey and the Discovery® was similar and lower than that of the TEMA. After engagement, the stiffness of the TEMA was less than that of the Discovery® and the Coonrad/Morrey. The TEMA showed the lowest polyethylene stresses of all three designs under demanding loads during feeding. Only Discovery® and Coonrad/Morrey had zones reaching permanent deformation (Fig.3). For the Coonrad/Morrey, with the highest polyethylene stresses, the experimental and computational constraint profiles were similar (Fig.1-b). Discussion. The TEMA unconstrained design transferred less moment than semi-constrained designs, reducing the burden on the implant interfaces. Moreover, the TEMA design had lower stresses in the polyethylene components due to the combination of less constraint and a lack of sharp edges on the articular surfaces. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a semi-constrained joint replacement with an articulating cobalt-chromium glenosphere and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (PE). Because of its limited load bearing, surgeons and implant manufacturers have not elicited the use of highly cross-linked PE in the shoulder, and to date have not considered excessive PE wear in the reverse shoulder a primary concern. As the number of shoulder procedures is expected to grow exponentially in the next decade, however, it is important to evaluate how new designs and bearing materials interact and to have an understanding of what is normal in well-functioning joint replacements. Currently, no in vivo investigation into RTSA PE wear has been conducted, with limited retrieval and simulation studies. In vitro and in silico studies demonstrate a large range in expected wear rates, from 14.3 mm. 3. /million cycles (MC) to 126 mm. 3. /MC, with no obvious relationship between wear rate and polyethylene diameter. The purpose of this study is to evaluate, for the first time, both volumetric and linear wear rates in reverse shoulder patients, with a minimum six-year follow-up using stereo radiographic techniques. Methods. To date, seven patients with a self-reported well-functioning Aequalis Reversed II (Wright Medical Group, Edina, MN, USA) RTSA implant system have been imaged (mean years from surgery = 7.0, range = 6.2 to 9). Using stereo radiographs, patients were imaged at the extents of their range of motion in internal and external rotation, lateral abduction, forward flexion, and with their arm at the side. Multiple arm positions were used to account for the multiple wear vectors associated with activities of daily living and the shoulder's six degrees of motion. Using proprietary software, the position and orientation of the polyethylene and glenosphere components were identified and their transformation matrices recorded. These transformation matrices were then applied to the CAD models of each component, respectively, and the apparent intersection of the glenosphere into the PE recorded. Using previously validated in-house software, volumetric and maximum linear wear depth measurements were obtained. Linear regression was used to identify wear rates. Results. The volumetric and linear wear rates for the 36 mm PE liners (n = 5) were 39 mm. 3. /y (r. 2. = 0.86, range = 24 to 42 mm. 3. /y) and 0.09 mm/y (r. 2. = 0.96, range = 0.08 to 0.11 mm/y), respectively. Only two patients with 42 mm PE liners were evaluated. For these, volumetric and linear wear rates were 110 mm. 3. /y (r. 2. = 0.81, range = 83 to 145 mm. 3. /y) and 0.17 mm/y (r. 2. = 0.99, range = 1.12 to 1.15 mm/y), respectively. Conclusion. For the first time, PE wear was evaluated in the reverse shoulder in vivo. More patients are required for conclusive statements, but preliminary results suggest first order volumetric and linear wear rates within those predicted by simulation studies. It is interesting to note the increased wear with larger PE size, likely due to the increased contact area between congruent faces and the potential for increased sliding distance during arm motion

Total shoulder arthroplasty has gone through several generations, as instruments and implant designs have given surgeons both more options in the alignment of the components and more guidance in the best choices to make. However, while the measurement of alignment has become more sophisticated, the importance of particular aspects of alignment to actual patient comfort and function has been less completely characterised. Overstuffing of the joint and proud humeral heads have been most associated with clinical failure. The efforts to avoid this can be divided into two camps: 1.) The anatomic school, who believe an experienced surgeon can divine the correct anatomy that existed before the distortions of arthritis began, and that the surgeon should make free-hand cuts and alignments to restore the normal anatomy. 2.) The cutting-guide school, who believe that average versions and positions avoid error and that soft-tissue balancing requires occasional deviations from “normal” anatomy. Reverse total shoulder replacement in contrast is a semi-constrained implant, with built-in “internal impingement” at the extremes of motion, which can cause notching and/or instability (levering out). Initial European experience favored placing the humeral component in 0 degrees, but most surgeons have gravitated toward 15–20 degrees of retroversion to allow easy conversion from/to a hemiarthroplasty as needed. Increased retroversion may block internal rotation, and increased anteversion limits external rotation

Aims

The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of different treatment options for glenoid loosening following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a minimum follow-up of two years.

Aims

Patients with a failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have limited salvage options. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of revision RSA when used as a salvage procedure for a failed primary RSA.

Aims

The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed HA to rTSA.

Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Some authors have recommended converting to a prosthesis that provides varus/valgus constraint while others have recommended primary repair. In this study we report the results of a 45 patients who sustained intra-operative MCL injuries during primary TKA that were treated with primary repair. Of 3922 consecutive primary TKA there were 48 (1.2%) intra-operative MCL lacerations or avulsions. One patient was lost and one died before 24-month follow-up. All but one patient underwent primary repair with placement of components without varus/valgus constraint. This left 45 knees with a mean follow up of 89 months (range, 24 – 214 months). The mean HSS knee scores increased from 47 to 85 points (p<0.001). No patients had subjective complaints of instability. No patients had excessive varus/valgus laxity when tested in full extension and 30 degrees of flexion. The range of motion at the time of final follow-up averaged 110 degrees (range, 85 – 130 degrees). Five knees required treatment for stiffness with 4 knees undergoing manipulation under anesthesia and 1 knee undergoing open lysis of adhesions with polyethylene articular surface exchange. Two knees underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. In the three knees that underwent open revision, the MCL was noted to be in continuity and without laxity. Primary repair with 6 weeks of post-operative hinged bracing after iatrogenic injury to the MCL during primary TKA was successful at preventing instability although stiffness was seen in approximately 10% of patients. The increased morbidity associated with implantation of a semi-constrained or constrained implant may be unwarranted in this situation