The treatment of paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures is likely one of the first procedures involving X-ray guided wire insertion that trainee orthopaedic surgeons will encounter. Pinning is a skill that requires high levels of anatomical knowledge, spatial awareness, and hand-eye coordination. We developed a simulation model using silicone soft-tissue and 3D-printed bones to allow development and practice of this skill at no additional risk to patients. For this model, we have focused on reusability and lowering raw-material costs without compromising fidelity. To achieve this, the initial bone model was extracted from open-source computed tomography scans and modified from adult to paediatric size. Muscle of appropriate robustness was then sculpted around the bones using 3D modelling software. A cutaneous layer was developed to mimic oedema using clay sculpturing on a plaster-casted paediatric forearm. These models were then used for 3D-printing and silicone casting respectively. The bone models were printed with settings to imitate cortical and cancellous densities and give high-fidelity tactile feedback upon drilling. Each humerus costs NZD $0.30 in material to print and can be used 1–3 times. Silicone casting of the soft-tissue layers imitates differing relative densities between muscle and oedematous cutaneous tissue, thereby increasing skill necessary to accurately palpate landmarks. Each soft-tissue sleeve cost NZD $70 in material costs to produce and can be used 20+ times. The resulting model is modular, reusable, and replaceable, with each component standardised and easily reproduced. It can be used to practice land-mark palpation and Kirschner wire pinning and is especially valuable in smaller centres which may not be able to afford traditional Saw Bones models. This low-cost model thereby improves equity while maintaining quality of simulation training

Augmented reality simulators offer opportunities for practice of orthopaedic procedures outside of theatre environments. We developed an augmented reality simulator that allows trainees to practice pinning of paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHF) in a radiation-free environment at no extra risk to patients. The simulator is composed of a tangible child's elbow model, and simulated fluoroscopy on a tablet device. The treatment of these fractures is likely one of the first procedures involving X-ray guided wire insertion that trainee orthopaedic surgeons will encounter. This study aims to examine the extent of improvement simulator training provides to real-world operating theatre performance.

This multi-centre study will involve four cohorts of New Zealand orthopaedic trainees in their SET1 year. Trainees with no simulator exposure in 2019 - 2021 will form the comparator cohort. Trainees in 2022 will receive additional, regular simulator training as the intervention cohort. The comparator cohort's performance in paediatric SCHF surgery will be retrospectively audited using routinely collected operative outcomes and parameters over a six-month period. The performance of the intervention cohorts will be collected in the same way over a comparable period. The data collected for both groups will be used to examine whether additional training with an augmented reality simulator shows improved real-world surgical outcomes compared to traditional surgical training. This protocol has been approved by the University of Otago Health Ethics committee, and the study is due for completion in 2024.

This study is the first nation-wide transfer validity study of a surgical simulator in New Zealand. As of September 2022, all trainees in the intervention cohort have been recruited along with eight retrospective trainees via email. We present this protocol to maintain transparency of the prespecified research plans and ensure robust scientific methods. This protocol may also assist other researchers conducting similar studies within small populations.

Aims

Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide.

Aims

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has well documented biochemical and mechanical risk factors. Femoral and acetabular morphologies seem to be equally important. Acetabular retroversion has a low prevalence in asymptomatic adults. Hips with dysplasia, osteoarthritis, and Perthes’ disease, however, have higher rates, ranging from 18% to 48%. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with SUFE using both validated radiological signs and tomographical measurements.

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) persists as a source of debate with the majority of surgeons selecting this option in a proportion of patients whom they regard as at increased risk of a subsequent slip.

Universal prophylactic pinning was introduced in our region in 2005 after an audit of ten years local practice identified 25% of unilateral cases presented with a subsequent slip. This study reports our experience between 2005 and 2020.

In this prospective study, 44 patients presented with 55 affected hips compared with 60 patients with 67 affected hips in the original study. Two patients were excluded as their initial slip had not been treated in our unit. Of the 42 hips seven were bilateral, 34 of the 35 unilateral hips underwent prophylactic pinning. The one exception subsequently underwent prophylactic pinning due to developing pain.

Consistent with our original series, at a minimum follow up of 13 months there have been no complications of infection, fracture, chondrolysis or avascular necrosis subsequent to prophylactic pinning.

Over 25 years 70 patients have undergone prophylactic pinning without complication. On the premise that 25% of our unpinned hips presented with subsequent slips before instituting our policy we estimate that we have prevented 17 subsequent slips over 25 years including the consequences which can be significant. We continue to advocate universal prophylactic pinning as an effective and safe practice in the management of SUFE.

Aims

Delayed diagnosis is a well-known complication of a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. If left untreated, the dislocated radial head later becomes symptomatic. The purposes of this study were firstly, to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of open reduction of the radial head and secondly, to identify the factors that may affect the outcome of this procedure.

Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice.

A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side.

In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;.

Purpose

We share our experience in management of failed in-situ pinning in severe unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) by surgical dislocation approach.

We undertook a retrospective comparative study of all patients with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis presenting to a single centre between 1998 and 2011. There were 45 patients (46 hips; mean age 12.6 years; 9 to 14); 16 hips underwent intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy and 30 underwent pinning in situ, with varying degrees of serendipitous reduction. No patient in the osteotomy group was lost to follow-up, which was undertaken at a mean of 28 months (11 to 48); four patients in the pinning in situ group were lost to follow-up, which occurred at a mean of 30 months (10 to 50). Avascular necrosis (AVN) occurred in four hips (25%) following osteotomy and in 11 (42%) following pinning in situ. AVN was not seen in five hips for which osteotomy was undertaken > 13 days after presentation. AVN occurred in four of ten (40%) hips undergoing emergency pinning in situ, compared with four of 15 (47%) undergoing non-emergency pinning. The rate of AVN was 67% (four of six) in those undergoing pinning on the second or third day after presentation. Pinning in situ following complete reduction led to AVN in four out of five cases (80%). In comparison, pinning in situ following incomplete reduction led to AVN in 7 of 21 cases (33%). The rate of development of AVN was significantly higher following pinning in situ with complete reduction than following intracapsular osteotomy (p = 0.048). Complete reduction was more frequent in those treated by emergency pinning and was strongly associated with AVN (p = 0.005). Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay of at least two weeks. The place of emergency pinning in situ in these patients needs to be re-evaluated, possibly in favour of an emergency open procedure or delayed intracapsular osteotomy. Non-emergency pinning in situ should be undertaken after a delay of at least five days, with the greatest risk at two and three days after presentation. Intracapsular osteotomy should be undertaken after a delay of at least 14 days. In our experience, closed epiphyseal reduction is harmful. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:412–19

This purpose of this study was to investigate whether prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis affects subsequent femoral morphology.

To determine the effect of prophylactic pinning on growth we compared contralateral hip radiographs of 24 proximal femora prophylactically pinned with 26 cases observed, in a cohort of patients with unilateral SUFE. Validated measurements were used to determine hip morphology; the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance (TTD) to articulo-trochanteric distance (TTD:ATD) in addition to direct measurement of the femoral neck length. Post-operative radiographs were compared to radiographs taken at a 12–84 months follow-up.

Comparing pinned and unpinned hips the neck length was shorter (mean 5.1 mm vs 11.1 mm) and the ATD was lower (p=0.048). The difference between initial and final radiograph TTD:ATD ratio for each case was calculated. The average was 0.63 in the prophylactically pinned group and 0.25 in the unpinned group (p=0.07).

When hips of the same patient were compared on final radiographs, there was a smaller difference in TTD:ATD between the two sides when the patient had been prophylactically pinned (0.7) as opposed to observed (1.47). This was not statistically significant (p=0.14).

Universal prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and alteration of the proximal femoral morphology is one reason for this.

Our results show that prophylactic pinning does not stop growth but does alter subsequent proximal femoral morphology by causing a degree of coxa vara and breva. Some loss of growth in the prophylactically pinned hip contributes to reduction in leg length inequality at skeletal maturity which is advantageous.

No iatrogenic complications were observed with single cannulated screw fixation. Prophylactic pinning prevents the potential catastrophe of a subsequent slip, is safe and the effect on growth is, if anything, beneficial.

Level of evidence: III

Supracondylar humeral fractures are common in children, but there are no classification systems or radiological parameters that predict the likelihood of having to perform an open reduction. In a retrospective case–control study we evaluated the use of the medial spike angle and fracture tip–skin distance to predict the mode of reduction (closed or open) and the operating time in fractures with posterolateral displacement. A total of 21 patients (4.35%) with a small medial spike angle (< 45°) were identified from a total of 494 patients, and 42 patients with a medial spike angle of > 45° were randomly selected as controls. The medial spike group had significantly smaller fracture tip–skin distances (p < 0.001), longer operating times (p = 0.004) and more complications (p = 0.033) than the control group. There was no significant difference in the mode of reduction and a composite outcome measure. After adjustments for age and gender, only fracture tip–skin distance remained significantly associated with the operating time (β = -0.724, p = 0.042) and composite outcome (OR 0.863 (95% confidence interval 0.746 to 0.998); p = 0.048).

Paediatric orthopaedic surgeons should have a lower threshold for open reduction when treating patients with a small medial spike angle and a small fracture tip–skin distance.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1290–4.

We present our experience of the modified Dunn procedure in combination with a Ganz surgical dislocation of the hip to treat patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The aim was to prospectively investigate whether this technique is safe and reproducible. We assessed the degree of reduction, functional outcome, rate of complications, radiological changes and range of movement in the hip. There were 28 patients with a mean follow-up of 38.6 months (24 to 84). The lateral slip angle was corrected by a mean of 50.9° (95% confidence interval 44.3 to 57.5). The mean modified Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 89.1 (sd 9.0) and the mean Non-Arthritic Hip score was 91.3 (sd 9.0). Two patients had proven pre-existing avascular necrosis and two developed the condition post-operatively. There were no cases of nonunion, implant failure, infection, deep-vein thrombosis or heterotopic ossification. The range of movement at final follow-up was nearly normal. This study adds to the evidence that the technique of surgical dislocation and anatomical reduction is safe and reliable in patients with SCFE.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:424–9.

Improvements in the surgical technique of total knee replacement (TKR) are continually being sought. There has recently been interest in three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. The 3D images are increasingly used for the production of patient-specific models, surgical guides and custom-made implants for TKR.

The users of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) claim that they allow the optimum balance of technology and conventional surgery by reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. In this way the advantages of accuracy and precision claimed by computer navigation techniques are achieved without the disadvantages of additional intra-operative inventory, new skills or surgical time.

This review describes the terminology used in this area and debates the advantages and disadvantages of PSI.

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis has been shown to be safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip. This treatment remains controversial due to the potential for harm caused to an apparently unaffected hip. There is evidence that pinning of an already slipped epiphysis causes growth disturbance of the proximal femur, however Hagglund showed that there is not necessarily growth arrest at the physis after pinning, as the slip occurs at the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate with no damage to the germative layer. This was confirmed by Guzzanti who confirmed that a single screw provided epiphyseal stability and preserved potential for growth. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether prophylactic pinning affects subsequent growth of the unaffected hip.

In order to determine the effect of prophylactic pinning we compared radiographs skeletally mature patients who had either undergone the procedure (group 1), not undergone the procedure but had pinning of the affected side (group 2), and adults with no history of SUFE (group 3). We measured the articulo-trochanteric distance and calculated the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance to articulo-trochanteric distance. These measures have been used in previous studies and shown to be reliable indicators of disturbed proximal femoral growth. As this was a pilot study we recruited 8 to each group.

The absolute sum of the ATDs were 219mm (average 27.3mm) Group 1, 213mm (average 26.6mm) Group2 and 258mm (average 32.5mm). The average trochanter-trochanter: ATD ratio in group 1 was 2.7 (1.9 - 3.8) compared to 2.7 (2.3 - 3.2) and 2.3 (1.9 - 2.7) in groups 2 and 3 respectively.

Our results suggest no difference in subsequent growth between hips that are prophylactically pinned and those that are not. They also show that unpinned hips go on to grow abnormally when compared to normal hips suggesting perhaps sub-clinical SUFE.

These results have prompted expansion of the study to include much a higher number of patients.

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional and radiographic results of these two surgical techniques using a prospective study.

Material and methods: This study involved two consecutive series of 70 patients with a posterior fracture of the distal radius. Mixed multiple pinning (MMP) consisted in the combination of two styloid pins and two infrafocal dorsal pins. The anterior plate was a locked ITS. The patients decided when it was appropriate to wear a brace postoperatively. Functional assessment used the range of motion, the Quick DASH score, and a self-evaluation of the number of days the brace was worn. Ulnar variance, sagittal and frontal inclination of the radial epiphysis were measured pre- and postoperatively at 45 days.

Results: At mean follow-up of 11.8 months (3–34), the functional outcome was comparable in the two groups but the patients with a plate fixation wore the brace less. Radiographically, there was no loss of final reduction with the plate fixation whereas with the pinning, there was a progressive loss of ulnar variance and less than 2% over-reduction. Major complications (tendon tears, nerve injury) were less frequent with pinning.

Conclusion: Globally, plate fixation enabled more rapid mobilisation of the wrist. Nevertheless this method has its drawbacks (duration of the operation, material availability, cost). In our opinion the mixed multiple pinning method is the treatment of choice for fractures free of major instability or anterior or circumferential comminution.

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to compare two types of treatment for fractures of the distal radius with posterior shift: the volar locking plate (c) or mixed multiple pinning (MMP). We conducted a prospective randomised trial.

Material and methods: One hundred ten patients aged over 50 years victims of an articular or extra-articular fracture of the distal radius with posterior shift were included in this study. Mean age was 74 years. Patients were recruited via our emergency unit. After obtaining the written informed consent of the patients, patients were assigned to a treatment group using the nQuery Advisor 6.01 available on the internet, 24 hours/d 7d/7. Patients were treated by one of the two surgical techniques according to the randomisation. Patients were reviewed at 3 and 6 weeks and at 3 and 6 months. The DASH and Herzberg scores were noted and plain x-rays of the wrist (ap and lateral views) were obtained at each visit.

Results: Fifty-two patients were treated with MMP and 50 with VLP. Postoperative anteversion of he radial glenoid was significantly better in patients treated with MMP. At six months, the DASH and Herzberg score were significantly better in the LAP group.

Discussion: MMP allows better anteversion of the glenoid than VLP. However, with MMP there is a risk of over reduction (15% of patients in our series). Treatment with VLP should enable restoration of better radius length with a lesser loss at three months than with MMP. All studies reported, irrespective of the function score used, have found better functional outcome with plating than with pinning.

Conclusion: MMP offers a less costly alternative for the treatment of most all distal fractures of the radius with posterior shift. This option provides quite satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. There is a risk of postoperative defect in reduction or stability with MMP, suggesting surgeons should opt for another technique, VLP for example.

A prospective study to examine the outcome of closed fixation technique in managing the unstable, intra-articular fractures of the distal radius by using k-wires only is undertaken.

Sixty-two wrists with unstable distal radius fractures were treated with closed manipulation and closed pinning of the fracture. Ten are between fifty-one and eighty-one years old and fifty-two are below fifty years of age. Both readial styloid and the dorsal cortex of the distal fragment provided the entry points. All fractures were reduced with fingfer trap traction. Tran osseous and intra-medulaary pinning was carried out in all the fractures. In this two step technique, first the radial articular surface is stabilised. Then, axial stability is provided by trans-epiphyseal intramedullary nails. Emphasis was laid on the reduction, complications and fracture healing.

All fractures healed. A ‘concentric’ collapse varying from 1 to 3 mm was seen in twenty-six cases. No loss of reduction was seen. Surprisingly, no cutaneous radial nerve injuries, no tendon related complications were seen. Five pins in three patients were loose and were removed betweeen seven to thirty days. None had repeat surgeries.

Sound technique is key to success. The longer the collective length of the intra- medullary pins the greater remained the stability of the fracture construct. Ulnar bone provides as a pillar to assemble the distal radius. Fracture of the distal ulna (not merely a fracure of the ulnar styloid) required an additional support in the form of an external fixator in only two patients. Since the follow-up is not very long (mean six months), the author contends to say that the short term results are rewarding with this technique. The unsatisfactory results reported in literature from the closed pinning is largely from inadequate fixations used. When proper technique is applied the radial articular surface is held on the distal shaft to permit only a minimal collapse that is concentric; and compression at the fracture site promoting excellent healing is the rewarding result.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common pediatric hip disorder. The most devastating complication is development of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In order to reduce the potential for this complication occurring following delayed contralateral SCFE, there has been consideration in the literature of prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of this treatment strategy.

The outcome probabilities and utilities utilised in a decision analysis of prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in SCFE, reported by Kocher et al, were used in this study. Costing data, reported in 2005 Canadian dollars, was obtained from our institution. Using this data, an economic evaluation was performed. The time horizon was four years, so as to follow the adolescents to skeletal maturity. Discounting was performed at 3% per year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the effect of variation of the outcome probabilities and utilities.

In all analyses, prophylactic pinning resulted in cost savings but lower utility, compared to the currently accepted strategy of observation of the contralateral hip. The results were most sensitive to an increase in the probability of a delayed contralateral SCFE to 27%. Using the base case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $7856.12 per utility gained. Using the most sensitive probability of a delayed contralateral SCFE of 27%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $27,252.92 per utility gained.

The results of this study demonstrated overall cost savings with prophylactic treatment, however the utility was lower than the standard treatment of observation. For both the base case and sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than the accepted threshold of $50,000 per quality adjusted life year gained. It should be noted that the use of a four year time horizon excluded consideration of the costs related to total hip arthroplasty for the sequelae of AVN. A prospective, randomised controlled trial, with an accompanying economic evaluation, is required to definitively answer the question of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment. On the basis of this cost-effectiveness analysis, prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in SCFE cannot be recommended. A prospective, randomised controlled trial, with an accompanying economic evaluation, is required to definitively answer the question of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment.