The October 2013 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Cost effectiveness of Dupuytren’s surgery; A 'new horizon' in distal radius imaging; Undisplaced means undisplaced; The mystery of the distal radial fracture continues; How thick is thick enough?: articular cartilage step off revisited; Is the midcarpal joint more important than we think?; Plates and Kirschner wires; Better early results with an IM nail?

In Canada, Dupuytren's contracture is managed with partial fasciectomy or percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA). Injectable collagenase will soon be available. The optimal management of Dupuytren’s contracture is controversial and trade-offs exist between the different methods. Using a cost-utility analysis approach, our aim was to identify the most cost-effective form of treatment for managing Dupuytren’s contracture it and the threshold at which collagenase is cost-effective. We developed an expected-value decision analysis model for Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single finger, comparing the cost-effectiveness of fasciectomy, aponeurotomy and collagenase from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness, one-way sensitivity and variability analyses were performed using standard thresholds for cost effective treatment ($50 000 to $100 000/QALY gained). Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy was the preferred strategy for managing contractures affecting a single finger. The cost-effectiveness of primary aponeurotomy improved when repeated to treat recurrence. Fasciectomy was not cost-effective. Collagenase was cost-effective relative to and preferred over aponeurotomy at $875 and $470 per course of treatment, respectively. . In summary, our model supports the trend towards non-surgical interventions for managing Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single finger. Injectable collagenase will only be feasible in our publicly funded healthcare system if it costs significantly less than current United States pricing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1094–1100

Injectable collagenase is an alternative to surgical treatment for Dupuytren’s disease. Previous studies have reported on the effectiveness of collagenase in finger contractures. This prospective study reports on the short-term safety and efficacy of collagenase treatment in five thumb and first web space Dupuytren’s contractures. The thumb and first web space contractures were treated with injectable collagenase in four consecutive patients (five hands) with experience of previous surgical digital fasciectomy. The thumb contracture was measured by angle and span in two planes of thumb extension and abduction before injection and after manipulation. Collagenase treatment resulted in release of the contracture with a mean increase in thumb to index angle from 23° (10° to 35°) to 56° (45° to 60°) in extension and from 30° (10° to 50°) to 58° (50° to 65°) in abduction and a mean increase in span from 1.9 cm (1 to 3.5) to 3.9 cm (3 to 5) in extension and from 2.4 cm (1.5 to 3.5) to 3.9 cm (3 to 4.5) in abduction. All patients reported an increased range of movement and function and described collagenase therapy as preferable to surgery. In the short-term collagenase is an effective, well-tolerated and safe alternative to surgery for Dupuytren’s disease of the thumb

Introduction. Injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is a minimally invasive non-surgical therapy with efficacy in correcting Dupuytren's contracture (DC). In the concurrently run JOINT I and JOINT II studies, designed to follow clinical practice, we evaluated the efficacy of ?5 CCH injections in patients with DC. Methods. JOINT I and II were multicenter, 9-month, open-label studies in which DC patients with primary flexion deformities ?20° received ?3 CCH (0.58 mg) injections/joint (?5 injections/patient) at 30-day intervals into joints prioritized by extent of contracture. After the first injection, patients could opt to receive up to 2 additional injections in same cord or other cords regardless of outcome for the first joint. The primary endpoint was reduction in contracture to ?5° 30 days after the last injection. Data from JOINT I and II were pooled. Results. For the primary endpoint, 70% of MP (371/531) and 37% of PIP (128/348) joints showed a reduction in contracture to ?5° with CCH injections; 42% (223/531) of MP and 20% (69/348) of PIP joints reached success within 7 days of the first injection. Overall, 89% of MP (470/531) and 58% (202/348) of PIP joints showed clinical improvement (ie, ?50% reduction in contracture). Mean±SD percentage changes in contracture were 84±25% for MP joints and 55±41% for PIP joints. The 2 most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) localized to the injection site were edema peripheral and contusion. Two patients had treatment-related serious AEs (deep vein thrombosis; tendonitis), but no tendon ruptures or systemic reactions were noted. Conclusions. Pooled results from the JOINT studies designed to follow clinical practice, provide support for the efficacy of CCH in correcting DC. Efficacy and safety data from this analysis are comparable to those observed in randomized, placebo-controlled trials