The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of fibula non-union in patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis, and the incidence of symptoms following this. A consecutive series of 58 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis at a tertiary centre under a single surgeon were included. Data was collected prospectively. Plain radiographs were reviewed retrospectively by a blinded reviewer. Union was defined as the presence of bridging callous on two views. There were 58 distraction procedures performed. The mean age was 37.2 years (range 16.0 to 80.6). There were 36 males and 22 females. The mean follow-up was 23.4 months (4–70 months). 9 (15.5%) went onto non-union at frame removal. 3 (33.3%) of the 9 fibulas that did not unite developed symptoms. 2 (66.7%) of these required surgery in the form of fibula plating. Both of these patient's symptoms resolved following surgery. 3 (33.3%) of the 9 non-united fibulas also had tibial non-union compared to 1 of the 49 where the fibula united. There was no association between location of fibula osteotomy and development of non-union. 35 fibula osteotomies were performed in the third quarter. Of the fibulas that united, the mean fibula lengthening was 9.25 mm (range 1.2–27.8 mm). In the fibulas that went onto non-union the mean lengthening was 23.66 mm (range 5.1–51.5 mm) (P = 0.004). 54 (93.1%) of the tibias united following osteotomy and distraction, whilst 4 (6.9%) went onto non-union requiring operative treatment. Of the 4 tibias that did not unite, 3 (75%) also had fibula non-union (P = 0.01). Fibula non-union is a relatively common complication following osteotomy in distraction osteogenesis. The length of fibula distraction and tibia non-union are significant risk factors for the development of a fibula non-union. We recommend surgical intervention for those patients who have symptomatic fibula non-unions

Using human cadaver specimens, we investigated the role of supplementary fibular plating in the treatment of distal tibial fractures using an intramedullary nail. Fibular plating is thought to improve stability in these situations, but has been reported to have increased soft-tissue complications and to impair union of the fracture. We proposed that multidirectional locking screws provide adequate stability, making additional fibular plating unnecessary. A distal tibiofibular osteotomy model performed on matched fresh-frozen lower limb specimens was stabilised with reamed nails using conventional biplanar distal locking (CDL) or multidirectional distal locking (MDL) options with and without fibular plating. Rotational stiffness was assessed under a constant axial force of 150 N and a superimposed torque of ± 5 Nm. Total movement, and neutral zone and fracture gap movement were analysed.

In the CDL group, fibular plating improved stiffness at the tibial fracture site, albeit to a small degree (p = 0.013). In the MDL group additional fibular plating did not increase the stiffness. The MDL nail without fibular plating was significantly more stable than the CDL nail with an additional fibular plate (p = 0.008).

These findings suggest that additional fibular plating does not improve stability if a multidirectional distal locking intramedullary nail is used, and is therefore unnecessary if not needed to aid reduction.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:385–9.

In our cadaver study plating the fibula in addition to nailing the tibia decreased the mean rotation across the tibial osteotomy site compared to nailing the tibia alone. Although this is statistically significant (p=0.0034) it may not be clinically relevant as the mean values for ROM were 19.10 and 17.96 degrees respectively. Plating the fibula resulted in no statistically significant difference in the mean vertical displacement, angulation or neutral zone. Therefore, we may conclude that plating the fibula in a combined distal third tibia and fibula fracture does not enhance the stability of tibial IM nailing. The purpose of this study was to determine if combined distal third tibia and fibula fractures are more stable when fibular fixation is added to the standard tibial IM rodding. In combined distal third tibia and fibula fractures, plating the fibula does not enhance stability of intramedullary tibial nailing. No additional incision or soft tissue stripping is required for plating of the fractured fibula. The average range of motion in rotation was 19.1° for tibial and fibular fixation combined, and 18.0 ° for tibial fixation alone with a difference of 1.1°, which was clinically significant ( p=0.0034). The mean differences in vertical displacement, angulation, and neutral zone were not statistically significant. Five matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric lower limbs were dissected and stripped of soft tissue. Each tibia received a 9mm solid titanium nail that was locked proximally and distally. Fibular fixation consisted of a seven- hole LCDCP. A 1.5 cm section of tibia and a 1.0 cm section of fibula were removed. Testing was accomplished with an MTS machine. Vertical displacement was tested with an axial load to 500 N, rotation was tested with an internal and external torque of 5 Nm, and angulation was calculated from the vertical displacement data. All displacement data was measured across the osteotomy site. The mean range of motion in rotation was the only statistically significant finding. However, considering the average range of motion with and without fibular plating of 17.96° and 19.10° respectively, this finding is likely not clinically relevant. Funding: Tibial nails, bolts, fibular plates and screws provided by Synthes (Paoli, PA, USA)