The Femoral Neck System (FNS) was introduced as an alternative device for the fixation of neck of femur fractures (NOFFs). The purported advantages include superior angular and rotatory stability compared to multiple cancellous screws, via a minimally invasive instrumentation that is simpler than conventional fixed angle devices. There were limited clinical studies regarding the utility of this device. We aimed to study the outcomes of NOFFs fixed with the FNS. This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all undisplaced elderly (≥60 years old) undisplaced young, and displaced young NOFFs fixed with the FNS. Demographics, surgical parameters, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes including complications were reviewed. Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 75 [44,89] years old, had NOFF fixation using the FNS. Thirty-one (86.1%) had undisplaced fractures. There were 6 (16.7%), 26 (72.2%), and 4 (11.1%) subjects with Pauwels types 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Thirty-two (88.9%) had posterior tilt of <20º. The mean duration of surgery was 71±18 minutes. Excluding 4 patients whom required revision surgery, 2 patients whom demised, and 10 patients whom defaulted reviews, the mean follow-up duration was 55±13 weeks. Four complications were recorded, namely implant cut out at the femoral head at week 8, breaking of the locking screw at the run-off region at week 22, avascular necrosis at week 25, and a refracture following near fall, causing the fracture to fail in varus at week 7 postoperation. While reasonably fast to instrument, failures still occur and it is likely multifactorial. However, the rate of reoperation is lower than what has been reported for NOFFs fixed with the a fixed-angle device or 3 cancellous screws. In conclusion, the FNS is a reasonably safe instrument to use. Surgeons’ discretion is still needed in patient selection, keeping in mind the need for satisfactory radiological parameters

Aims

Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery.

Aims. In this study, we aimed to explore surgical variations in the Femoral Neck System (FNS) used for stable fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Methods. Finite element models were established with surgical variations in the distance between the implant tip and subchondral bone, the gap between the plate and lateral femoral cortex, and inferior implant positioning. The models were subjected to physiological load. Results. Under a load of single-leg stance, Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures fixed with 10 mm shorter bolts revealed a 7% increase of the interfragmentary gap. The interfragmentary sliding, compressive, and shear stress remained similar to models with bolt tips positioned close to the subchondral bone. Inferior positioning of FNS provided a similar interfragmentary distance, but with 6% increase of the interfragmentary sliding distance compared to central positioning of bolts. Inferior positioning resulted in a one-third increase in interfragmentary compressive and shear stress. A 5 mm gap placed between the diaphysis and plate provided stability comparable to standard fixation, with a 7% decrease of interfragmentary gap and sliding distance, but similar compressive and shear stress. Conclusion. Finite element analysis with FNS on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures revealed that placement of the bolt tip close to subchondral bone provides increased stability. Inferior positioning of FNS bolt increased interfragmentary sliding distance, compressive, and shear stress. The comparable stability of the fixation model with the standard model suggests that a 5 mm gap placed between the plate and diaphysis could viably adjust the depth of the bolt. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):102–111

Femoral neck fractures account for half of all hip fractures and are recognized as a major public health problem associated with a high socioeconomic burden. Whilst internal fixation is preferred over arthroplasty for physiologically younger patients, no consensus exists about the optimal fixation device yet. The recently introduced implant Femoral Neck System (FNS) (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) was developed for dynamic fixation of femoral neck fractures and provides angular stability in combination with a minimally invasive surgical technique. Alternatively, the Hansson Pin System (HPS) (Swemac, Linköping, Sweden) exploits the advantages of internal buttressing. However, the obligate peripheral placement of the pins, adjacent to either the inferior or posterior cortex, renders the instrumentation more challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FNS versus HPS in a Pauwels II femoral neck fracture model with simulated posterior comminution. Forty-degree Pauwels II femoral neck fractures AO 31-B2.1 with 15° posterior wedge were simulated in fourteen paired fresh-frozen human cadaveric femora, followed by instrumentation with either FNS or HPS in pair-matched fashion. Implant positioning was quantified by measuring the shortest distances between implant and inferior cortex (DI) as well as posterior cortex (DP) on anteroposterior and axial X-rays, respectively. Biomechanical testing was performed in 20° adduction and 10° flexion of the specimens in a novel setup with simulated iliopsoas muscle tension. Progressively increasing cyclic loading was applied until construct failure. Interfragmentary femoral head-to-shaft movements, namely varus deformation, dorsal tilting and rotation around the neck axis were measured by means of motion tracking and compared between the two implants. In addition, varus deformation and dorsal tilting were correlated with DI and DP. Cycles to 5/10° varus deformation were significantly higher for FNS (22490±5729/23007±5496) versus HPS (16351±4469/17289±4686), P=0.043. Cycles to 5/10° femoral head dorsal tilting (FNS: 10968±3052/12765±3425; HPS: 12244±5895/13357±6104) and cycles to 5/10° rotation around the femoral neck axis (FNS: 15727±7737/24453±5073; HPS: 15682±10414/20185±11065) were comparable between the implants, P≥0.314. For HPS, the outcomes for varus deformation and dorsal tilting correlated significantly with DI and DP, respectively (P=0.025), whereas these correlations were not significant for FNS (P≥0.148). From a biomechanical perspective, by providing superior resistance against varus deformation and performing in a less sensitive way to variations in implant placement, the angular stable Femoral Neck System can be considered as a valid alternative to the Hansson Pin System for the treatment of Pauwels II femoral neck fractures

Three Cannulated Screws (3CS), Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) with antirotation screw (DHS–Screw) or with a Blade (DHS–Blade) are the gold standards for fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Compared to 3CS, both DHS systems require larger skin incision with more extensive soft tissue dissection while providing the benefit of superior stability. The newly designed Femoral Neck System (FNS) for dynamic fixation combines the advantages of angular stability with a less invasive surgical technique. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performance of FNS in comparison to established methods for fixation of the femoral neck in a human cadaveric model. Twenty pairs of fresh–frozen human cadaveric femora were instrumented with either DHS–Screw, DHS–Blade, 3CS or FNS. A reduced unstable femoral neck fracture 70° Pauwels III, AO/OTA31–B2.3 was simulated with 30° distal and 15° posterior wedges. Cyclic axial loading was applied in 16° adduction, starting at 500N and with progressive peak force increase of 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Relative interfragmentary movements were evaluated with motion tracking. Highest axial stiffness was observed for FNS (748.9 ± 66.8 N/mm), followed by DHS–Screw (688.8 ± 44.2 N/mm), DHS–Blade (629.1 ± 31.4 N/mm) and 3CS (584.1 ± 47.2 N/mm) with no statistical significances between the implant constructs. Cycles until 15 mm leg shortening were comparable for DHS–Screw (20542 ± 2488), DHS–Blade (19161 ± 1264) and FNS (17372 ± 947), and significantly higher than 3CS (7293 ± 850), p<0.001. Similarly, cycles until 15 mm femoral neck shortening were comparable between DHS–Screw (20846 ± 2446), DHS–Blade (18974 ± 1344) and FNS (18171 ± 818), and significantly higher than 3CS (8039 ± 838), p<0.001. From a biomechanical point of view, the Femoral Neck System is a valid alternative to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, representing the advantages of a minimal invasive angle–stable implant for dynamic fixation with comparable stability to the two DHS systems with blade or screw, and superior to Three Cannulated Screws

We compared a modular neck system with a non-modular system in a cementless anatomical total hip replacement (THR). Each group consisted of 74 hips with developmental hip dysplasia. Both groups had the same cementless acetabular component and the same articulation, which consisted of a conventional polyethylene liner and a 28 mm alumina head. The mean follow-up was 14.5 years (13 to 15), at which point there were significant differences in the mean total Harris hip score (modular/non-modular: 98.6 (64 to 100)/93.8 (68 to 100)), the mean range of abduction (32° (15° to 40°)/28 (0° to 40°)), use of a 10° elevated liner (31%/100%), the incidence of osteolysis (27%/79.7%) and the incidence of equal leg lengths (≥ 6 mm, 92%/61%). There was no disassociation or fracture of the modular neck.

The modular system reduces the need for an elevated liner, thereby reducing the incidence of osteolysis. It gives a better range of movement and allows the surgeon to make an accurate adjustment of leg length.