Aims

Obtaining solid implant fixation is crucial in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) to avoid aseptic loosening, a major reason for re-revision. This study aims to validate a novel grading system that quantifies implant fixation across three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, diaphysis).

Aims

Therapeutic agents that prevent chondrocyte loss, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and osteoarthritis (OA) progression are required. The expression level of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains-containing protein 3 (EDIL3) in damaged human cartilage is significantly higher than in undamaged cartilage. However, the effect of EDIL3 on cartilage is still unknown.

The risk of AVN is high in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) and the optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. Our AVN rates in severe, unstable SCFE remained unchanged following the introduction of the Modified Dunn Procedure (MDP) and as a result, our practice evolved towards performing an Anterior Open Reduction and Decompression (AOR) in an attempt to potentially reduce the “second hit” phenomenon that may contribute. The aim of this study was to determine the early surgical outcomes in Unstable SCFE following AOR compared to the MDP. All moderate to severe, Loder unstable SCFEs between 2008 and 2022 undergoing either an AOR or MDP were included. AVN was defined as a non-viable post-operative SPECT-CT scan. Eighteen patients who underwent AOR and 100 who underwent MPD were included. There was no significant difference in severity (mean PSA 64 vs 66 degrees, p = 0.641), or delay to surgery (p = 0.973) between each group. There was no significant difference in the AVN rate at 27.8% compared to 24% in the AOR and MDP groups respectively (p = 0.732). The mean operative time in the AOR group was 24 minutes less, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). The post-reduction PSA was 26 degrees (range, 13–39) in the AOR group and 9 degrees (range, -7 to 29) in the MDP group (p<0.001). Intra-operative femoral head monitoring had a lower positive predictive value in the AOR group (71% compared to 90%). Preliminary results suggest the AVN rate is not significantly different following AOR. There is less of an associated learning curve with the AOR, but as anticipated, a less anatomical reduction was achieved in this group. We still feel that there is a role for the MDP in unstable slips with a larger remodelling component

Aims. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has demonstrated faster administration, lower burden of data capture and reduced floor and ceiling effects compared to traditional Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements (PROMs). We investigated the suitability of PROMIS Mobility score in assessing physical function in the sequelae of childhood hip disease. Methods. In all, 266 adolscents (aged ≥ 12 years) and adults were identified with a prior diagnosis of childhood hip disease (either Perthes’ disease (n = 232 (87.2%)) or Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (n = 34 (12.8%)) with a mean age of 27.73 years (SD 12.24). Participants completed the PROMIS Mobility Computer Adaptive Test, the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. We investigated the correlation between the PROMIS Mobility and other tools to assess use in this population and any clustering of outcome scores. Results. There was a strong correlation between the PROMIS Mobility and other established PROMs; NAHS (rs = 0.79; p < 0.001). There was notable clustering in PROMIS at the upper end of the distribution score (42.5%), with less seen in the NAHS (20.3%). However, the clustering was broadly similar between PROMIS Mobility and the comparable domains of the NAHS; function (53.6%), and activity (35.0%). Conclusion. PROMIS Mobility strongly correlated with other tools demonstrating convergent construct validity. There was clustering of physical function scores at the upper end of the distributions, which may reflect truncation of the data caused by participants having excellent outcomes. There were elements of disease not captured within PROMIS Mobility alone, and difficulties in differentiating those with the highest levels of function. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1089–1095

Introduction and Objective. Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common hip disorders in children and is characterized by a proximal femoral deformity, resulting in early osteoarthritis. Several studies have suggested that SCFE patients after in situ fixation show an altered gait pattern. Early identification of gait alterations might lead to earlier intervention programs to prevent osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to analyse gait alterations in SCFE patients after in situ fixation compared to typically developed children, using the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) system. Materials and Methods. This is a cross-sectional, multi-center case-control study in the Netherlands. Eight SCFE patients and eight age- and sex-matched typically developed were included from two hospitals. Primary outcomes were kinematic parameters (absolute joint angles), studied with gait analysis using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Secondary outcomes were spatiotemporal parameters, the Notzli alpha angle, muscle activation patterns (EMG), and clinical questionnaires (VAS, Borg CR10, SF-36, and HOOS), analyzed using non-parametric statistical methods. Results. Patients (mean BMI=28±9 kg/m. 2. ) showed altered gait patterns, with significantly increased external hip rotation and decreased downward pelvic obliquity during the pre-swing phase of the gait cycle compared to typically developed (mean BMI=22±3 kg/m. 2. ). Walking speed, cadence, % stance time, and step length were reduced in SCFE patients. Coefficient of variances of cadence, stance time, and step length were increased. Patients had a mean alpha angle of 64, SD=7.9. Clinical questionnaires showed that general health (SF-36) was 80±25, energy/fatigue (SF-36) was 67±15, pain (VAS) was 0±1.5, and total HOOS score was 85±18. Conclusions. SCFE patients after in situ fixation appear to have developed a compensation mechanism, showing slight alterations in gait parameters, good general health, little functional limitations of the hip, and no self-reported pain. Cam deformities, altered joint loading, and this compensation mechanism might influence long-term early osteoarthritis. BMI reduction should be implemented in care plans, as obesity might also play a role in unfavorable long-term outcomes

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) persists as a source of debate with the majority of surgeons selecting this option in a proportion of patients whom they regard as at increased risk of a subsequent slip. Universal prophylactic pinning was introduced in our region in 2005 after an audit of ten years local practice identified 25% of unilateral cases presented with a subsequent slip. This study reports our experience between 2005 and 2020. In this prospective study, 44 patients presented with 55 affected hips compared with 60 patients with 67 affected hips in the original study. Two patients were excluded as their initial slip had not been treated in our unit. Of the 42 hips seven were bilateral, 34 of the 35 unilateral hips underwent prophylactic pinning. The one exception subsequently underwent prophylactic pinning due to developing pain. Consistent with our original series, at a minimum follow up of 13 months there have been no complications of infection, fracture, chondrolysis or avascular necrosis subsequent to prophylactic pinning. Over 25 years 70 patients have undergone prophylactic pinning without complication. On the premise that 25% of our unpinned hips presented with subsequent slips before instituting our policy we estimate that we have prevented 17 subsequent slips over 25 years including the consequences which can be significant. We continue to advocate universal prophylactic pinning as an effective and safe practice in the management of SUFE

Aims

Osteonecrosis (ON) can cause considerable morbidity in young people who undergo treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The aims of this study were to determine the operations undertaken for ON in this population in the UK, along with the timing of these operations and any sequential procedures that are used in different joints. We also explored the outcomes of those patients treated by core decompression (CD), and compared this with conservative management, in both the pre- or post-collapse stages of ON.

Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is traditionally treated with in situ fixation using a threaded screw, leading to physeal arrest while stabilizing the femoral head. Recently, there has been interest in alternative methods of fixation for SCFE, aiming to allow growth and remodelling of the femoral neck postoperatively. One such option is the Free Gliding SCFE Screw (Pega Medical), which employs a telescopic design intended to avoid physeal compression. The objective of this study is to evaluate radiographic changes of the proximal femur following in situ fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw.

This study retrospectively evaluated 28 hips in 14 consecutive patients who underwent in situ hip fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw between 2014 and 2018. Initial postoperative radiographs were compared to last available follow-up imaging. Radiographic assessment included screw length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), posterior sloping angle (PSA), alpha angle, head-neck offset (HNO) and head-shaft angle (HSA).

Of the 28 hips reviewed, 17 were treated for SCFE and an additional 11 treated prophylactically. Average age at surgery was 11.7 years, with an average follow-up of 1.44 years. Screw length increased by 2.3 mm (p < 0.001). ATD decreased from 25.4 to 22.2 mm (p < 0.001). Alpha angle decreased from 68.7 to 59.8 degrees (p = 0.004). There was a trend towards an increase in HNO (p = 0.07). There was no significant change in PSA or HAS. There were three complications (two patients with retained broken guide wires, and one patient requiring screw removal for hip pain).

With use of the Free Gliding SCFE Screw, there was evidence of screw expansion and femoral neck remodelling with short-term follow-up. More research is required to determine the long-term impact of these changes on hip function, and to aid in patient selection for this technology.

Background

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) creates a complex deformity of the hip that can result in cam type of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), which may in turn lead to the early development of osteoarthritis of the hip. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existing literature reporting on the efficacy of hip arthroscopic treatment of patients with FAI secondary to SCFE.

Despite recent advances in the management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), controversy remains about the treatment of choice for unstable slips. Surgical dislocation and open reduction has the advantage of identifying and preserving the blood supply of femoral head thereby potentially reducing the risk of avascular necrosis, (AVN). There is large variation in the literature from several small series about reported AVN rates ranging from two to 66% for unstable SCFE treated with surgical dislocation. The aim of our study was to analyze our experience with acute open reduction and internal fixation of unstable acute and unstable acute on chronic slips using the technique of surgical dislocation described by Professor Reinhold Ganz.

A retrospective review of 11 patients (12 hips) treated by surgical dislocation, reduction and pinning as the primary procedure for unstable acute and unstable acute on chronic SCFE in a tertiary referral children's hospital was undertaken. This represents the entire series treated in this manner from September 2007 to January 2018. These procedures were performed by a team of Orthopaedic surgeons with significant experience performing surgical dislocation of the hip including patients with chronic SCFE, Perthes' disease, impingement and acetabular fractures. Demographic data, intraoperative records, postoperative notes and radiographs including details of subsequent surgery were reviewed.

There were seven boys and four girls with mean age of 13.4 years, range 11 to 15 years at the time of surgical dislocation. Out of 12 hips, two had acute unstable slip while the remaining 10 had acute on chronic unstable slip. Six patients had good or excellent results. The remaining six patients developed AVN of which three patients had total hip replacement at six months, 17 months and 18 months following primary procedure. Seven patients required more than one operation. Three patients lost their correction and required re fixation despite surgical dislocation, reduction and fixation being their primary procedure.

This series demonstrates a high percentage of AVN (50%) in severe unstable SCFE treated with surgical dislocation despite careful attention to retinacular flap development and intra operative doppler studies. This is in direct contrast to our experience with subcapital reorientation with surgical dislocation in stable slips where excellent results were achieved with a low rate of AVN. Pre-operative imaging with MRI and perfusion studies may identify where ischemia has occurred and might influence operative treatment. Based on our results, we do not recommend routine use of surgical dislocation in unstable SCFE. This technique requires further scrutiny to define the operative indications in unstable SCFE.

Aims

For paediatric and adolescent patients with growth potential, preservation of the physiological joint by transepiphyseal resection (TER) of the femur confers definite advantages over arthroplasty procedures. We hypothesized that the extent of the tumour and changes in its extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are essential factors in the selection of this procedure, and can be assessed with MRI. The oncological and functional outcomes of the procedure were reviewed to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Historically avoidance of avascular necrosis (AVN) has been the primary objective in the management of an acute unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). When achieved through pinning in situ it was invariably associated with significant malunion. With increasing appreciation of the consequences of femoroacetabular impingement, modern techniques aim to correct deformity and avoid AVN.

Exactly what constitutes an acute unstable SUFE is a source of debate but should represent 5–10% of all cases.

This audit reviewed cases over the past 25 years treated in one region. Of 89 patients with 113 slips, 21 hips were recorded as unstable. During this period the management has evolved from closed reduction and stabilization through pinning in situ, to open reduction.

Radiographic outcomes following these three treatment methods were compared with record of any subsequent surgery in the form of osteotomy or total hip arthroplasty.

Currently the lowest reported incidence of AVN in patients with an acute unstable slip is associated with the Parsch technique which combines open arthrotomy, digital reduction and screw fixation. Early outcomes with this technique are in accordance with those reported in the literature and represents a significant improvement in outcome when compared to earlier techniques used in the management of the severe unstable SUFE.

The modified Dunn procedure has the potential to restore the anatomy in hips with slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE) while protecting the blood supply to the femoral head. However, there is controversy about the risks associated with the procedure especially in the most severe capital slips.

Therefore, we report on (1) clinical outcome, (2) the cumulative survivorship with endpoints AVN and/or OA progression and (3) radiographic anatomy of the proximal femur at followup in patients treated with a modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE.

We performed a retrospective analysis involving 46 hips of 46 patients treated with a modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE (slip angle >60°) between 1999 and 2016.

Followup averaged 8 years, (range 1–17) with 2 patients lost to followup after one year.

The mean age was 13 years (range 9–19 years). Mean preoperative slip angle was 64° (range 60–90) and 14 out of 46 hips (30%) presented with unstable slips.

Clinical scores and PROMs were evaluated and the hips were followed standard x-rays. Cumulative survivorship (Kaplan-Meier) with three defined endpoints: (1) AVN; (2) progression by at least one OA grade according to Tönnis; (3) non-preserved hip joint.

(1)Mean Harris Hip score (HHS) was 93 points (66–100) and mean Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was 90 points (67–100) at last followup.

(2)Cumulative survivorship was 93% at 10-year followup. Three hips reached an endpoint. Two hips (4%) had AVN, one of them underwent hip arthrodesis. One hip had OA progression.

(3)Postoperative slip angle was 7° (1–16). Alpha angle on axial radiograph was 39° (26–71) at followup. 41/44 hips (93%) had no OA (Tönnis 0).

The modified Dunn procedure largely corrected slip deformities with low apparent risk of progression to avascular necrosis or osteoarthritis at mean 8-years followup. The AVN rate in severe and unstable (30%) capital slip was 4% (2 hips) with this procedure.

Aims

High-quality clinical research in children’s orthopaedic surgery has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. This study used a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical trials in children’s orthopaedics.

Introduction

In situ pinning for classic slipped capital femoral epiphysis(SLIP) is evolving to a more direct and anatomic realignment of proximal femoral epiphysis; but in no study the result of such a treatment in Valgus Slip, an uncommon type of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, has been reported.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is associated with a spectrum of proximal femoral deformity and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Little attention has been given, however, to the possible effect of SCFE on remaining hip growth. Our observation that some acetabula in hips with SCFE have various dysmorphology led us to evaluate the growth of the hip in our patients with SCFE. We performed an IRB-approved retrospective study of our intramural SCFE database which identified 108 hips with unilateral SCFE, at least 2 years of radiographic followup, and closure of triradiate cartilage, greater trochanter and proximal femoral physis. The contralateral non-SCFE hip was used as control. Average age at presentation was 12.3 y. 49 patients were male, 59 female.

Statistically significant differences were noted between SCFE and control hip both at both presentation and last followup(FU): Mean LCEA lower in SCFE hip at presentation by 0.97 degree; increasing to 4.36 degrees at last FU(p<0.0001). No difference noted in mean Tonnis roof angle at presentation, but at last FU SCFE hips had mean roof angle difference of 3.2 degrees higher than control(p<.0001).

In some of our SCFE patients, acetabular deformity has impacted treatment. Ongoing studies may clarify risk factors for the development of problematic acetabular deformity associated with SCFE and perhaps allow prevention of secondary acetabular deformity.

The intra-epiphyseal growth of the proximal femur has been focus of studies because of the potential relationship with the development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement. We aimed to evaluate the developmental pattern of the epiphyseal tubercle and extension in normal boys and girls from eight to fifteen years, without hip conditions. We performed three-dimensional (3D) analysis of pelvic computed tomographic scans of 80 subjects with suspect of appendicitis, consisting of five boys and five girls for each age, from eight to 15 years old. Images were segmented slice by slice at the level of the growth plate using biplanar orientation. The 3D-segmented epiphyses were used to measure the location and height of the tubercle, the height of the epiphyseal extension, and the epiphyseal diameter. We found that the epiphyseal tubercle was eccentrically located at the posterolateral quadrant of the physeal surface. The absolute height of the epiphyseal tubercle did not vary between ages (R²=0.04; p=0.101). The epiphyseal diameter increased with age (R²=0.74; p<0.001), making the tubercle height proportionally smaller with the epiphyseal growth (9% reduction in tubercle height normalised by the epiphyseal diameter). The normalised epiphyseal extension height significantly increased by 160% from 8 to 15 years of age. Our observation validates the hypothesis of the cupping mechanism provided by the peripheral growth of the epiphyseal extension, while the epiphyseal tubercle relatively decreases in size during the skeletal growth. Further research will be important to determine the role of these structures in the epiphyseal stability.

Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice.

A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side.

In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;.

To identify the incidence of sequential slip of the unaffected hips in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE managed with prophylactic fixation or observation.

A retrospective review of all unilateral SCFE treated during 1998 to 2012 was undertaken. The study compares the incidence of sequential slip of the initially unaffected hip in patients managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. The study also reports the incidence avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and metal-work related problem in this group of patients. All patients included in this current work have at least 12 months of follow-up from the index slip.

A total of 44 cases had prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip (mean age 12.6 years,) and 36 patients managed with regular observation (mean age 13.4 years). Sequential slip of the unaffected hip was noted in a total of 10 patients (28 %) managed with regular observation and only in 1 patient (2%) managed with prophylactic fixation. A Fishers exact test showed significantly high incidence of sequential slip in unaffected hips when managed by regular observation (p-value-0.002). There is no evidence of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in the unaffected hip in both groups, 3 patients had metalwork related problem and one had superficial wound infection in prophylactic fixation group.

Simultaneous prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hips significantly reduces the incidence of sequential slip. This is a relatively safe procedure and should be advocated in all cases of unilateral SCFE to avoid potential complications and preserve function of the unaffected hip.