Background. Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the standard treatment for chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Accurate diagnosis of persistent infections at 2nd stage using established biomarkers and diagnostic criteria is of paramount importance. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin, and compare established diagnostic criteria from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM 2018) and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS 2021) to determine persistent PJI at the 2nd stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent 100 two-stage revisions (hip: 39, knee: 61). Synovial fluid samples were assessed for calprotectin and alpha-defensin levels. ICM 2018 and EBJIS 2021 were applied to all patients undergoing 2nd stage revision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden Index were utilized to determine optimal cut-off values, and correlations between biomarkers were evaluated. The microbiological spectrum was analyzed at 2nd stage and re-revision surgery. Results. Calprotectin levels showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 32.9%, and accuracy of 38.0% in predicting septic failure. Alpha-defensin showed sensitivity of 28.6%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 79.2%. Significant correlations included: calprotectin with PMN% (r = 0.471, p = 0.05) and alpha-defensin with WBC (r = 0.830, p < 0.01) in the successful cohort. For septic re-revisions, calprotectin and alpha-defensin were highly correlated (r = 0.969, p < 0.01). ICM correctly diagnosed persistent PJI in 26.7%, while EBJIS diagnosed 24.2%. The microbial spectrum shifted from gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria between reimplantation and re-revision surgeries. Conclusion. Synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin demonstrated limited accuracy in ruling out persistent PJI at reimplantation. The low sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria, combined with the observed shift in microbial spectrum, underscores the challenges in diagnosing persistent PJI during 2nd stage of a two-stage revisions arthroplasty

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main reasons for revision surgery after primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently the MSIS and EBJIS criteria sets are considered to be the gold standards in determining PJI. These criteria sets are complex and contain tests that are time-consuming and many are rather costly. Therefore, further research is indicated to find a simpler but equally reliable diagnostic test. In this study we evaluated the additional value of calprotectine measurement in synovial fluid in patients undergoing hip and knee (revision) arthroplasty following routine work-up. Method. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 182 synovial fluid samples from 143 patients with suspected PJI after UKA, TKA, THA or revision arthroplasty. Twenty-six of those cases were classified as PJI according to the MSIS and EBJIS criteria. Subsequently, synovial calprotectin was determined, using a lateral flow assay and two cut-off thresholds of ≥14 mg/L and ≥50 mg/L. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of synovial calprotectin was determined. Results. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥14 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 92.9% respectively. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥ 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.00), with 88.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 89.7% respectively. Conclusions. The value of calprotectin in synovial fluid gives valuable information with a single test result, resulting in high predictive value in the diagnosis of PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty and should seriously be considered as part of PJI diagnostics in an outpatient clinical setting. The high specificity can help rule in patients that are suspected of PJI. Therefor this test can be helpful in a preop diagnostic work-up to avoid unnecessary revisions in patients with well-placed and well-fixed arthroplasties with a suspected PJI. These conclusions are independent of which criteria set was used as a gold standard

Aim. We prospectively evaluated four different microbiological tools for diagnostics of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and assessed their impact on the categorization of infection according to EBJIS guidelines. We compared culture, in-house real-time mPCR for S. aureus, S. lugdunensis, S. hominis, S. epidermidis, S. capitis, S. haemolyticus, C. acnes (mPCR), broad-spectrum PCR (Molzym) with 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon Sanger sequencing (16S PCR), and 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon next-generation sequencing (16S NGS) on MiSeq (Ilumina). Methods. A total of 341 samples (sonication fluid, tissue biopsy, synovial fluid) were collected from 32 patients with suspected PJI who underwent 56 revision surgeries at the Orthopaedic Centre University Hospital Ljubljana, between 2022 and 2024. Samples were processed using standard protocols for routine culture, followed by DNA isolation using the MagnaPure24 (Roche). All samples were tested with mPCR, and an additional ≥4 samples from each revision (244 in total) were subjected to further metagenomic analysis. Culture results were considered positive if the same microorganism was detected in ≥2 samples, ≥50 CFU/ml were present in the sonication fluid, or ≥1 sample was positive for a more virulent microorganism or if the patient had received antibiotic treatment. Results. Each tool demonstrated high sensitivity for correct EBJIS categorization (100% culture and 16S NGS, 96.88% mPCR and 16S PCR). The highest specificity was observed with mPCR and 16S PCR (87.5%), while culture (79.17%) and NGS (37.5%) showed lower specificity. In 27% (15/56) of revisions, all microbiological tests were negative, although infection was confirmed with histology in one case, and four cases were classified as infection-likely based on clinical signs. In 20% (11/56) of cases, all microbiological tests were positive; in three cases a combination of other EBJIS criteria (without microbiology) categorized the episodes as infection-likely and one as infection-unlikely, emphasizing the importance of microbiological tests in diagnostic criteria. In 43% (24/56) of revisions categorized as infection-unlikely using a combination of other EBJIS criteria, five had positive culture, and three had positive mPCR and 16S PCR. Fifteen (62%) had positive 16S NGS, 12 due to a low number of reads, which may indicate low-grade infection or possible contamination. Conclusion. To date, no test can be established as the ultimate gold standard. The lack of interpretation criteria can result in low specificity of some methods, as the threshold is difficult to determine. A multidisciplinary approach with combination of microbiological tools is still considered the most efficient

Introduction. Since the expanded war in Ukraine in 2022, explosives, mines, debris, blast waves, and other factors have predominantly caused injuries during artillery or rocket attacks. These injuries, such as those from shelling shrapnel, involve high-energy penetrating agents, resulting in extensive necrosis and notable characteristics like soft tissue defects and multiple fragmentary fractures with bone tissue defects and a high rate of infection complications caused by multi resistant gram-negative (MRGN) pathogens. Material and Methods. We conducted a prospective study at our center between March 2022 and December 2023. Out of the 56 patients from Ukraine, 21 met the inclusion criteria who had severe war injuries were included in the study. Each of these patients presented with multiple injuries to both bones and soft tissues, having initially undergone treatment in Ukraine involving multiple surgeries. The diagnosis of infection was established based on the EBJIS criteria. Prior to our treatment patients had undergone multiple revision surgeries, including debridement, biopsies, implant and fixator replacement. Additionally, soft tissue management required previously VAC therapy and flap reconstruction for successful treatment. Results. All 21 infections manifested as bone infections (11; 52%), followed by implant-associated infections (5; 24%), soft tissue infections (4; 19%), and septic arthritis (1; 5%). In all patients, the infection was polymicrobial, caused by 3- and 4-MRGN pathogens, as Klebsiella pneumonia 4MRGN, Proteus mirabilis 4MRGN, Enterobacter cloacae 4MRGN etc. Upon admission, all patients carried a diagnosis and exhibited signs indicative of chronic infection. 19 (90.5%) patients required complex antibiotic regimens combined with multiple wound revisions and debridements, changes of fixators and combination of systemic and local antibiotic therapy. In 6 patients (28%) high dosages of local antibiotics such as gentamycin, vancomycin and meropenem were incorporated into a carrier of bio-absorbable calcium sulfate, calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite which were introduced into the hip joint, femoral canal or bone defect for dead space management during the surgery. When local antibiotics were administered at intervals, the microbiology results at implantation showed negative results. 2 (9%) patients had new infections (different site, different pathogens), 1 (4.8%) is still under the treatment. In 17 (81%) patients infection complications were treated successfully with no recurrence of infection. Conclusion. War injuries result in complex bone and soft-tissue infections caused by 3-, 4-MRGN pathogens. Addressing this challenge necessitates multidisciplinary approach with multiple, thorough surgical debridements, effective local, and systemic antimicrobial therapy. As for the outlook we can see potential in local antibiotic carriers

Aim. Diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be very challenging due to low-virulent microorganisms capable of forming biofilm. Clinical signs can be subtle and may be similar to those of aseptic failure. To minimize morbidity and mortality and to preserve quality of life, accurate diagnosis is essential. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of various diagnostic tests in diagnosing low-grade PJI. Methods. Patients undergoing revision surgery after total hip and knee arthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed using the components of the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI. For statistical analyses, the respective test was excluded from the infection definition to eliminate incorporation bias. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were used to calculate the diagnostic performance of each test, and their area-under-the-curves (AUC) were compared using the z-test. Results. 422 patients undergoing revision surgery after total hip and knee arthroplasty were included in this study. 208 cases (49.3%) were diagnosed as septic. Of those, 60 infections (28.8%) were defined as low-grade PJI (symptoms >4 weeks and caused by low-virulent microorganisms (e. g. coagulase-negative staphylococci, Cutibacterium spp., enterococci and Actinomyces)). Performances of the different test methods are listed in Table 1. Synovial fluid (SF) - WBC (white blood cell count) >3000G/L (0.902), SF - %PMN (percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils) > 65% (0.959), histology (0.948), and frozen section (0.925) showed the best AUCs. Conclusion. The confirmatory criteria according to the EBJIS definition showed almost ideal performances in ruling-in PJI (>99% specificity). Histology and synovial fluid cell count (SF-WBC and SF-%PMN) showed excellent accuracies for diagnosing low-grade PJI. However, a reduced immune reaction in these cases may necessitate lower cut-off values. Intraoperative frozen section may be valuable in cases with inconclusive preoperative diagnosis. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection(PJI). Shoulder PJI definition and diagnosis is challenging. Current PJI definitions, based overwhelmingly in hip/knee research, may not accurately diagnose shoulder PJI. Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of two PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. Method. This is a retrospective study of patients who have undergone total shoulder revision surgery for infection between 2005 and 2022. Cases were classified using two different PJI definitions: a)the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and; 2)the 2018 International Consensus Meeting(ICM) PJI specific shoulder definition. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and definitive classification also considered microbiology and histology results. Results. Preoperative and definitive PJI classification status of the 21 patients included were evaluated and is summarized in table 1. The shoulder specific 2018 ICM definition showed the highest agreement between preoperative and definitive classification (76.2%, k=0.153, p=0.006) compared to EBJIS (52.4%, k=0.205, p=0.006). In all cases, the classification was changed because of positive intraoperative microbiology (at least two identical isolates). Microbiology findings showed coagulase negative staphylococci, Staphyloccocus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes to be the most frequent. Four patients had polymicrobial infections. Conclusions. Both the EBJIS 2021 and 2018 ICM definitions have low accuracy in predicting shoulder PJI preoperatively. Clearly further studies with larger cohorts are in dire need focusing specifically on shoulder revision arthroplasty to improve on existing definitions. Caution is advised while extrapolating of criteria/thresholds recommended for hip/knee joints. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of inoculating homogenized tissue and bone biopsies in blood culture bottles (BCB) for patients with (suspected) orthopaedic device-related infections. As secondary objective the time to positivity (TTP) of BCB and Wilkins-Chalgren broth (conventional method) will be evaluated. Method. Patients undergoing revision surgery due to suspected or proven fracture-related infection (FRI) or periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) according to respectively Consensus definition and EBJIS definition are included. 1,2. A minimal of three macroscopic infected/inflamed tissue/bone samples are collected in a container with saline and glass beads. 1.5 mL of the homogenized suspension is inoculated in BacT/ALERT FA and FN Plus bottles for 14 days. The remaining suspension is inoculated in Wilkins-Chalgren broth for 10 days and subcultured when cloudy or after 10 days. TTP is defined as the time until definite identification of the pathogen in the Laboratory Information System. Results. Up to now, 25 patients have been included, 11 (44%) had concordant results in BCB and the CM. In 11 patients cultures showed negative results for both methods. Three patients tested positive with BCB but remained negative with the same pathogen in CM. In the first patient, the CM failed to identify anaerobic bacteria (i.e. Fusobacterium nucleatum). In the second patient, three BCB were positive with Staphylococcus capitis. The third patient showed an infection with Escherichia coli, which was detected in all samples from the BCB, while all cultures obtained with the CM remained negative. A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that this patient already received antibiotic therapy. BCB contain resins, which are capable of neutralizing antibiotic activity. Another case illustrating superiority of BCB involved an infection with Cutibacterium acnes, which showed positivity in six BCB, while only three were positive using the CM. We observed the shortest TTP with BCB. The median TTP of BCB was 32.0 hours (IQR 29.8) compared to a median TTP of 77.5 hours (IQR 107.6) when culturing with the CM. Contamination was seen in three patients with both methods, in eight patients contamination was only seen with the CM. For the remaining 14 patients no contamination was found. Conclusions. The results in this ongoing study indicate that the recovery of pathogens and TTP is better using BCB compared to CM. In addition, contamination occurs less frequently with the BCB method. Culturing tissue or bone biopsies in BCB seems a promising and faster detection method

Aim. To date, no ultimate diagnostic gold standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJI) has been established. In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a promising new tool, especially in culture-negative samples. In this prospective study, we performed metagenomic analysis using 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon NGS in samples from patients with suspected PJI. Methods. A total of 257 (187 culture-negative (CN) and 70 culture-positive (CP)) prospectively collected tissues and sonication fluid from 32 patients (56 revisions) were included. 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicons were sequenced using Illumina's MiSeq (California, USA) followed by bioinformatic analysis using nf-core/ampliseq pipeline. Results. We successfully sequenced 255 samples and detected a total of 105 microorganisms. These were mainly environmental microorganisms present in a small number of reads (≤100), indicating possible contamination. Pseudomonas spp. (non-aeruginosa species) was detected most frequently in 73% (187/255) of samples. The test showed limitations in species classification and identified microorganisms mainly at genus level. Significant differences in the number of reads were observed when comparing CN (≤100) and CP (≥1000) samples. In two CP, no bacteria were identified with sequencing, which is probably due to low bacterial load (1 CFU. Haemophilus spp. was detected with a significant number of reads (≥10000) in five samples from a single patient, in whom infection was considered likely according to EBJIS criteria, changing it to confirmed infection. Staphylococcus spp. was identified with ≥10000 reads in two CNs from an individual who was receiving antibiotic treatment at the time, had clinical signs of infection, and had a confirmed infection with S. lugdunensis one month earlier. Cutibacterium spp. with 36% (93/257) and Staphylococcus spp. with 34% (87/257) were detected with a minimal number of reads (≤100) in several CN, indicating possible contamination with normal skin microbiota. In one patient, Facklamia spp., an opportunistic pathogen, was detected in two samples by sequencing, but not by culture. Conclusions. We consider 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing to be a promising tool; however, further studies are needed to clarify uncertainties regarding the interpretation of the results in combination with other criteria. Using this method, we were able to successfully confirm infection in two patients whose microbiological results were initially negative, leading to a change from likely to confirmed infection in one case. The thresholds and interpretation of the results are currently unclear, therefore the method is being used experimentally rather than diagnostically at the time of writing

Aim. It still remains unclear whether postoperative antibiotic treatment is advantageous in presumed aseptic revision-arthroplasties of the hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC). The aim of this study was to evaluate if there is a difference in the septic and/or aseptic re-revision rate in patients with or without postoperative antibiotics. Method. In this retrospective propensity-score (PS) matched cohort-study we compared the re-revision rate and the microbiological spectrum in rTHA and rTKA treated with (AB-Group; n=70) and without (non-AB-Group; n=70) antibiotic treatment in patients with UPIC. Baseline covariates for PS-matching were type of revision, sex, Body-Mass-Index, age, Surgical-Site-Infection-Score, American-Society-of-Anesthesiologists-Classification, serum C-reactive-protein. All patients received routine antibiotic prophylaxis, but empiric AB treatment was started only in patients in the AB-Group. Post-operative treatment was decided on an individual basis according to the preference of the surgeon and the infectious disease specialist for a minimum duration of two weeks. In total, 90 rTHA (45 AB-Group, 45 in non-AB-Group) patients with UPICs and 50 rTKA (25 AB-Group, 25 in non-AB-Group) were included in the study. There was no significant variation in patient demographics. Results. After a median follow-up of 4.1 (IQR: 2.9-5.5) years after rTHA and rTKA, there was no higher re-revision rate (p=0.813) between the AB-group 10/70 (14.3%), and the non-AB-group 11/70 (15.7%). In the AB group, 4.3% (3/70) of patients underwent revision due to septic complications compared to 5.7% (4/70) in the non-AB group (survival log-rank: p=0.691). In total, 30/70 (42.9%) of patients in the AB-group and 23/70 (32.9%) of patients in the non-AB group were diagnosed as having an “infection likely” according to the PJI diagnostic criteria of EBJIS (p=0.223). All UPICs comprised low virulent microorganisms and were considered as a contaminant. In total, 68/70 (97.1%) of the patients in the AB-group received a dual antibiotic treatment for a mean duration of 41 (IQR: 23.5-56.5) days. Conclusion. Postoperative antibiotic treatment did not result in a decreased re-revision rate compared to non-antibiotic treatment in patients with UPIC in presumed aseptic rTHA and rTKA. UPICs with pathogens are likely to be a containment and therefore the classification of “infection likely” according to the EBJIS definition can be safely ignored

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications after joint replacement. It is associated with high morbidity and economic burden when misdiagnosed as an aseptic failure. Among all cases of PJI, up to 25% could yield negative cultures. Conversely, among cases of aseptic failures, up to 30% may actually be undiagnosed PJIs. In PJIs microbiological diagnosis is a key step for successful treatment. Sonication of the removed prosthesis is more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic-tissue culture, especially in patients who received antimicrobial therapy before surgery. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of classic sonication fluid cultures (SF-C) and sonication fluid incubation in blood culture bottle (SF-BCB). Method. Between 2016 and 2018 we analysed 160 revision procedures of joint arthroplasties. For each procedure, at least 5 microbiological and multiple histopathological samples were harvested, and explant sonication was performed which was further analysed by SF-C and SF-BCB. For SF-C classical cultivation of sonication fluid was performed. While for SF-BCB, 10 mL of sonication fluid was inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic lytic blood culture bottles. The definite diagnosis of PJI was based on the EBJIS definition. Results. Among 160 revisions, 59 PJIs were identified, 15 patients were treated with the debridement and implant retention, 7 patients with the one-stage and 35 with the two-stage exchange, remaining 2 were partial revisions. The sensitivity of SF-C and SF-BCB were 81.5% and 94.9%, respectively. The mismatch of microbe identification was observed in 5 cases. We observed positive SF-C while negative SF-BCB in 4 cases, among them having 2 positive histology. While 12 patients have negative SF-C and positive SF-BCB, among them 3 have positive and 6 negative histology. Among these 12 patients, typical low-grade microbes were identified in 9 cases (5 cases of C. acnes, 3 cases of S. epidermidis, and 1 case of S. capitis). Conclusions. The weakest point in all PJI diagnostic criteria is their sensitivity. SF-BCB demonstrates higher sensitivity in diagnosing PJI compared to SF-C. Therefore, it appears prudent to incorporate SF-BCB into the diagnostic protocol for all patients exhibiting either low-grade PJI symptoms or experiencing undiagnosed, presumably aseptic failures, where the likelihood of misdiagnosing infection is greatest

Aim. Candida species are uncommon pathogens causing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluated the surgical management and outcome of Candida PJI. Methods. Patients with EBJIS Definition confirmed PJI, due to Candida species, from 19 medical centres were assessed. Demographic, diagnostic, medical and surgical treatment and outcome data were collected. Results. 269 patients were recruited with follow-up for at least one year. Mean age was 70.2 years (+/- 12.4) with 10.8% being immunocompromised. The most common fungal species were C. albicans (55.8%), C. parapsilosis (29.4%), C. glabrata (7.8%) and C. tropicalis (5.6%). Co-infection with bacteria occurred in 138 (51.3%) cases. DAIR was performed in 96 (36.2%) cases, with 169 (63.8%) having implant exchange or removal (76 one-stage, 78 two-stage, 11 removal/Girdlestone arthroplasty, 2 amputation). Patient demographics and antifungal therapy were similar in all surgical groups. Overall, treatment was successful in 156 (58%) cases. Failure was more likely in older patients (>70 years; p=0.008) and those who had DAIR (OR 1.945; 1.156-3.279; p=0.004). Failure was less likely with C. parapsilosis infection compared to C. albicans (31.6% vs 48%; p=0.037). DAIR patients had more co-infection with bacteria (63.5% vs 47.4%; p=0.013) and more previous surgeries (median 4 vs 3; p=0.007), but multivariate analysis showed that these were not independent risk factors for failure. There was no difference in mortality between DAIR patients and those with other surgery (13.5% vs 17.7%; p=0.372). DAIR was successful in 45/96 (46.9%) cases compared to 110/169 (65.1%) cases with other surgery (p<0.004). Early DAIR (surgery performed <I month from implantation/infection onset) was not more effective than late DAIR (surgery performed after 1 month)(early DAIR 44.4% cure vs 63.9% cure in late DAIR; p=0.004). Two-stage revision was successful in 54/78 (69.2%), which was significantly better than DAIR (p=0.003). One-stage revision was successful in 51/76 (67.1%) patients; also significantly better than DAIR (p=0.002), but equivalent to two-stage revision (p=0.777). Conclusion. DAIR was successful in less than half of patients with Candida PJI. We could not identify any subgroup which might have better outcomes with this surgical option. Interestingly, almost 90% of our patients with Candida PJI had no immunocompromise. One or two-stage revision offer a better option, if possible, and do not increase mortality

Aims

Serum inflammatory parameters are widely used to aid in diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Due to their limited performances in the literature, novel and more accurate biomarkers are needed. Serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) and serum CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) have previously been proposed as potential new parameters, but results were mixed. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of AGR and CAR in diagnosing PJI and to compare them to the established and widely used marker CRP.

Aims

The number of revision arthroplasties being performed in the elderly is expected to rise, including revision for infection. The primary aim of this study was to measure the treatment success rate for octogenarians undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to a younger cohort. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality.

Aims

Current diagnostic tools are not always able to effectively identify periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Recent studies suggest that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) undergo changes under pathological conditions such as infection. The aim of this study was to analyze miRNA expression in hip arthroplasty PJI patients.

Aims

This study aims to assess the relationship between history of pseudotumour formation secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) implants and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate, as well as establish ESR and CRP thresholds that are suggestive of infection in these patients. We hypothesized that patients with a pseudotumour were at increased risk of infection.

Aims. Accurate diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a significant challenge for hip surgeons. Preoperative diagnosis is not always easy to establish, making the intraoperative decision-making process crucial in deciding between one- and two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJI. We aimed to evaluate the utility of intraoperative calprotectin lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) in THA patients with suspected chronic PJI. Methods. The study included 48 THAs in 48 patients with a clinical suspicion of PJI, but who did not meet European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI criteria preoperatively, out of 105 patients undergoing revision THA at our institution for possible PJI between November 2020 and December 2022. Intraoperatively, synovial fluid calprotectin was measured with LFI. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/l were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA; in negative cases, one-stage revision was performed. At least five tissue cultures were obtained; the implants removed were sent for sonication. Results. Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/l) in 27 cases; out of these, 25 had positive tissue cultures and/or sonication. Calprotectin was negative in 21 cases. There was one false negative case, which had positive tissue cultures. Calprotectin showed an area under the curve of 0.917, sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, negative predictive value of 95.2%, positive likelihood ratio of 10.6, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. Overall, 45/48 patients were correctly diagnosed and treated by our algorithm, which included intraoperative calprotectin measurement. This yielded a 93.8% concordance with postoperatively assessed EBJIS criteria. Conclusion. Calprotectin can be a valuable tool in facilitating the intraoperative decision-making process for cases in which chronic PJI is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):118–124

Aims

A higher failure rate has been reported in haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to non-haematogenous PJI. The reason for this difference is unknown. We investigated the outcome of haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI to analyze the risk factors for failure in both groups of patients.

Aim. While 16S rRNA PCR - Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach using partial-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bone and joint infections (BJI) in a clinical laboratory. Method. Sixty-two clinical samples from patients with BJI were sequenced on MinION* using the in-house partial amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. BJI were defined based on the ICM Philly 2018 and EBJIS 2021 criteria. Among the 62 samples, 16 (26%) were culture-positive, including 6 polymicrobial infections, and 46 (74%) were culture-negative from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Results. Results were obtained within one day. Setting a threshold at 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased interpretation of clinical samples. The partial 16S rRNA metagenomics approach had a greater sensitivity compared both to the culture method and the Sanger sequencing. All the 16 culture-positive samples were confirmed with the metagenomic sequencing. Bacterial DNA was detected in 32 culture-negative samples (70%), with pathogens consistent with BJI. The 14 Nanopore negative samples included 7 negative results confirmed after implementation of other molecular techniques and 7 false-negative MinION results: 3 Kingella kingae infections detected after targeted-PCR only, 2 Staphylococcus aureus infections and 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections sterile on agar plate media and detected only after implementation of blood culture media, advocating for the very low inoculum. Conclusions. The results discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. They confirmed that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicated that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories. * Oxford Nanopore Technologies

Aim. Currently, gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including multidrug-resistant (MDR-GNB) pathogens, are gaining importance in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). To characterize the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) causing hip prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients treated at a Brazilian tertiary academic hospital. Method. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients over 60 years of age undergoing hip arthroplasty from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary academic trauma, which were diagnosed with hip prosthetic joint infection. PJI diagnosed was based on EBJIS criteria, in which intraoperative tissue cultures identified the pathogens. Demographics, reason for arthroplasty, type of implant and susceptibility patterns using disk diffusion method were analysed. Results. Overall, among 17 elderly patients diagnosed with hip infected arthroplasty, 45 bacterial isolated were identified. Debridement, irrigation, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) procedures due to uncontrolled infection occurred in 47.0% (n=8/17), and five patients underwent more than two DAIR surgeries. Tissue cultures yielded eleven different bacterial species, with GNB accounted for 64.4% (n=29/45) of pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified in 34.5% (n=10/29), 17.25% (n=5/29), 13.8% (n=4/29), and 13.8% (n=4/29), respectively. In the resistance profile analysis, E. coli was most sensitive to antibiotics, whereas K. pneumoniae showed resistance rates higher than 70% for cephalosporins, carbapenems, and quinolones. All A. baumannii isolates were resistant to meropenem, and 80% of these isolates were resistant to amikacin. Conclusions. This study emphasizes the role of GNB in the microbiological profile of PJI among elderly patients at a tertiary hospital in a Brazilian centre. The present study portrays a worryingly higher rates of MDR-GNB, mainly to quinolones and cephalosporins resistance which have been the cornerstone of PJI antibiotic treatment. In addition, higher rates carbapenems and aminoglycosides resistance shows a threat to antibiotic treatment of PJI. More global studies need to be carried out to show a likely change in the microbial epidemiology of PJI

Aim. Perioperative myocardial infarction/injury (PMI) is a common complication in noncardiac surgery, contributing to postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify the risk for PMI in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in comparison to primary hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to non-PJI revision surgery. Methods. Patients undergoing primary/revision THA/TKA at a University Hospital who were eligible for the institutional PMI screening and response program were prospectively included. Revision arthroplasties were divided into 2 groups (PJI revision and non-PJI revision). PJI was defined according to the EBJIS criteria, and included DAIR, one-stage and two-stage revisions. Non-PJI revisions included partial and/or complete exchange of components. The primary endpoint was PMI, secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality within 120 days. Results. The study population included 673 patients (443 primary THA/TKA, 119 PJI revision, 111 Non-PJI revision) enrolled from 05/2014 to 06/2018. The median age in all groups was 75 years. In primary, non-PJI and PJI revision surgery, 39%, 41% and 50%, respectively were male. PMI occurred in 12% of patients with primary arthroplasty compared to 20% and 35% in non-PJI and PJI revision, respectively (p<0.001 overall), with PJI having a significantly elevated risk over non-PJI revisions (p=0.014). Conversely, in MACE (4% primary vs 9% non-PJI vs 12% PJI, p=0.002) an all-cause mortality (2% primary vs 4% non-PJI vs 9% PJI, p<0.001) no significant difference between PJI and non-PJI revisions was observed. We found no difference for the risk of PMI comparing DAIR vs one-/two-stage PJI revision (p=0.88). In multivariable analysis (primary arthroplasty as reference), significant odds ratios for PMI included PJI (3, 1.7–5.3), coronary artery disease (2.9, 1.9–4.4), chronic heart faiure (1.3, 1.1–1.7) and age (1.1, 1.0–1.1 per each year age). Urgency of surgery, duration of surgery, to the presence of Staphylococcus aureus were not significant. impact on PMI. Conclusion. In PJI, PMI and MACE were 3-times, and death 4.5 times, respectively, more frequently observed than in primary arthroplasty. Also, PJI had the highest odds for PMI (3.0). Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the high PMI risk when performing revision surgery. This work confirms the importance of a peri-/postpoperative PMI screening and response program in the field of septic surgery