Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common injuries that represent 17% of all adult upper extremity fractures. Some fractures deemed appropriate for nonsurgical management following closed reduction and casting exhibit delayed secondary displacement (greater than two weeks from injury) and require late surgical intervention. This can lead to delayed rehabilitation and functional outcomes. This study aimed to determine which demographic and radiographic features can be used to predict delayed fracture displacement. This is a multicentre retrospective case-control study using radiographs extracted from our Analytics Data Integration, Measurement and Reporting (DIMR) database, using diagnostic and therapeutic codes. Skeletally mature patients aged 18 years of age or older with an isolated DRF treated with surgical intervention between two and four weeks from initial injury, with two or more follow-up visits prior to surgical intervention, were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with multiple injuries, surgical treatment with fewer than two clinical assessments prior to surgical treatment, or surgical treatment within two weeks of injury. The proportion of patients with delayed fracture displacement requiring surgical treatment will be reported as a percentage of all identified DRFs within the study period. A multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess case-control comparisons, in order to determine the parameters that are mostly likely to predict delayed fracture displacement leading to surgical management. Intra- and inter-rater reliability for each radiographic parameter will also be calculated. A total of 84 age- and sex-matched pairs were identified (n=168) over a 5-year period, with 87% being female and a mean age of 48.9 (SD=14.5) years. Variables assessed in the model included pre-reduction and post-reduction radial height, radial inclination, radial tilt, volar cortical displacement, injury classification, intra-articular step or gap, ulnar variance, radiocarpal alignment, and
Background and Aims:. Forearm fractures are common in the paediatric population and most are treated in a moulded plaster of Paris (POP) cast. It is our concern that many casts applied by our registrars are sub-optimal and that we need to improve our training process. The aim of our study was to review the adequacy of forearm cast application in paediatric patients at our institution and to identify if there is a need for a more formal training program with regard to plaster cast application. Methods:. A retrospective review of control x-rays of forearm fractures treated at our institution was undertaken. X-rays that were reviewed were done as part of the routine treatment protocol. X-ray measurements to assess POP application were the
Fractures of the forearm (radius or ulna or both)
in children have traditionally been immobilised in plaster of Paris (POP)
but synthetic cast materials are becoming more popular. There have
been no randomised studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials.
The aim of this study was to investigate which cast material is
superior for the management of these fractures. We undertook a single-centre
prospective randomised trial involving 199 patients with acute fractures
of the forearm requiring general anaesthesia for reduction. Patients
were randomised by sealed envelope into either a POP or synthetic
group and then underwent routine closed reduction and immobilisation
in a cast. The patients were reviewed at one and six weeks. A satisfaction
questionnaire was completed following the removal of the cast. All
clinical complications were recorded and the cast indices were calculated.
There was an increase in complications in the POP group. These complications
included soft areas of POP requiring revision and loss of reduction
with some requiring re-manipulation. There was an increased mean
padding index in the fractures that lost reduction. Synthetic casts
were preferred by the patients. This study indicates that the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction
are superior using synthetic casts with no reduction in safety. Cite this article:
Forearm fractures in children have a tendency
to displace in a cast leading to malunion with reduced functional
and cosmetic results. In order to identify risk factors for displacement,
a total of 247 conservatively treated fractures of the forearm in
246 children with a mean age of 7.3 years ( Fractures of both forearm bones in children have a strong tendency
to displace even in an above-elbow cast. Severe fractures of the
non-dominant arm are at highest risk for displacement. Radiographs
at set times during treatment might identify early displacement,
which should be treated before malunion occurs, especially in older children
with less potential for remodelling. Cite this article:
Redisplacement is the most common complication
of immobilisation in a cast for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures
of the forearm in children. We have previously shown that the three-point
index (TPI) can accurately predict redisplacement of fractures of
the distal radius. In this prospective study we applied this index
to assessment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm in children
and compared it with other cast-related indices that might predict
redisplacement. A total of 76 children were included. Their ages,
initial displacement, quality of reduction, site and level of the
fractures and quality of the casting according to the TPI, Canterbury
index and padding index were analysed. Logistic regression analysis
was used to investigate risk factors for redisplacement. A total
of 18 fractures (24%) redisplaced in the cast. A TPI value of >
0.8 was the only significant risk factor for redisplacement (odds
ratio 238.5 (95% confidence interval 7.063 to 8054.86); p <
0.001). The TPI was far superior to other radiological indices, with
a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 97% in successfully predicting
redisplacement. We recommend it for routine use in the management
of these fractures in children. Cite this article:
Introduction. To investigate if the gap index measured in the follow-up X-rays predicts the reduction of swelling in the plaster cast thereby increasing the risk of re-displacement of fracture treated by manipulation alone. Materials/Methods. We selected for this study a cohort of children who presented with a traumatic displaced fracture of distal radius at the junction of metaphysis and diaphysis who were treated with manipulation alone. This cohort was chosen because of the high risk of re-displacement following closed manipulation of this unstable fracture and to maintain uniformity of the fracture type.
The February 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360 . looks at: ABC treated with suction and curettage; peri-acetabular osteotomy;
The October 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: magnetic growing rods and scoliosis correction; maintaining alignment after manipulation of a radial shaft fracture; Glaswegian children and swellings of obscure origin; long-term outcome of femoral derotation osteotomy in cerebral palsy; lower-leg fractures and compartment syndrome in children; fractures of the radial neck in children; management of the paediatric Monteggia fracture; and missing the dislocated hip in Western Australia.
Aim. Up to 34% of fractures of the distal radius in children can ‘re-displace’ early after reduction. Main risk factors are initial displacement (bayonet apposition, > 50% translation, and > 30°angulation), isolated distal radius fracture, associated ulna fracture at the same level, inadequate initial closed reduction and poor casting technique. This study was to identify the rate of ‘re-displacement’ following first successful reduction in distal radius fractures. We also assessed the risk factors associated with initial injury and compared the efficacy of the available indices to assess the quality of casting. Materials & Methods. We performed a case note based radiographic analysis of 90 distal radius fractures treated at our centre from 2005 to 2008. A cohort of 18 patients with re-displacement was compared with 72 patients with maintenance of reduction. Radiological indices were calculated to assess the quality of casting technique. The patient and fracture demographics were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA, Fisher's Exact Test and multiple logistic regression analysis. Results. The rate of ‘re-displacement’ in our study was 20 %. A desirable
Introduction and aims. Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures has traditionally used plaster of Paris. Recently, synthetic casting materials have been used. There have been no studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials. The aim of this study is to investigate whether one material is superior for paediatric forearm fracture management. Methods. A single-centre prospective randomised trial of patients presenting to the Women's and Children's Hospital with acute fractures of the radius and/or ulna was undertaken. Patients were enrolled into the study on presentation to the Emergency Department and randomised by sealed envelope into either a fiberglass or plaster of Paris group. Patients then proceeded to a standardised method of closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Clinical follow-up occurred at one and six weeks post-immobilisation. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed following cast removal at six weeks. All clinical complications were recorded and
Introduction. Displaced distal radius fractures in children have been treated in above elbow plaster casts since the last century.
We present an objective method for predicting the redisplacement of paediatric forearm and wrist fractures. Novel radiographic measurements were defined and their value assessed for clinical decision making. In Phase I of the study we defined the
Introduction: Traditionally Short arm plaster casts have been used to treat distal radius fractures. Judging adequacy of immobilisation has never been defined. A significant proportion of these fractures loose reduction due to inadequate immobilisation. A new non-invasive external fixator technology has been introduced to address the shortcomings of plaster casts. Aim: Is the new non invasive fixator better at reducing skin device interface movement, than conventional plasters. Materials and Methods: A prospective healthy volunteer study involving application of Short arm plaster of Paris cast, fibreglass cast and a new device Cambfix non-invasive wrist fixator with 15 forearms in each group, was undertaken. IRB approval and informed consent obtained from the volunteers. Colle’s type cast configuration was used. Displacement at the skin-cast and skin-new device interface was measured at proximal and distal ends. Maximal displacements noted immediately after application and after a specified intervals. Casts were windowed at the end of experiment and
Introduction: We aimed to assess a simple radiological method of predicting redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures. The
Purpose: Waterproof casts have been shown to be a safe and effective means of immobilization in children with minimally displaced fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if waterproof Gore-Tex-lined casts are as effective as traditional cotton-lined casts in the immediate postoperative period after closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in children. Method: We performed a retrospective review of distal radius fractures that underwent closed reduction and application of a long-arm cast between June 2004 and December 2006. A total of 124 cases were included (55 Gore-Tex; 69 traditional cotton-lined). The primary outcome measure was redisplacement in the cast. The
We aimed to assess a simple radiological method of predicting redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures. The
Aims:. 1) To determine the predictive value of a simple stability test in children’s wrist fractures treated with simple manipulation and plaster of Paris (PoP) cast immobilisation. 2) To determine the effect of cast quality as reflected in the skin cast distance (distance between the cast and the skin in the plane of major displacement or angulation) and the
Background: The epidemiology of fracture in children has been reported in detail by other authors. The most common mechanism in their study was a fall in or around the house onto an outstretched hand causing a fracture of the distal radius and ulna. These injuries accounted for 35.8% of all fractures in this age group and the annual incidence was estimated to be 16 per 1000 children in the UK. The controversial issues in the management of distal radius fracture involve what constitutes a degree of fracture displacement and angulation likely to be compensated by remodelling with growth over time, indications for fracture stabilisation with wires or other invasive methods compared with plaster casting alone, details of the position of the arm during immobilisation in a cast, and whether the cast should immobilise the wrist alone or both, the wrist and the elbow. The management of buckle fractures of the distal radius is relatively uncontroversial, involving splintage for symptomatic relief from pain. Some authors have advocated removable wrist supports, with discontinuation of splintage at the parents’ discretion. We performed a systematic review of all areas of the management of distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children. Growth plate injuries were not included for analysis. Methods: Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials which compared types of immobilisation and the use of wire fixation for distal radius fractures in children were included. Types of outcome measures:. Radiological deformity. Effect of