The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee and total hip replacements in 2017 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early post-operative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, hip or knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in peri-operative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilization therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. One can think pragmatically to get ahead and stay ahead of 3 predictable physiologic disturbances that adversely impact rapid recovery after knee and hip replacement: fluid/blood loss; pain; and nausea. The modern orthopaedic surgeon and his/her care team needs a simple strategy to pro-actively, not reflexively, manage each of those 3 predictable impediments to early recovery. Those surgical teams that routinely get ahead and stay ahead in each of those areas will routinely witness faster recovery, lower costs and greater patient satisfaction and that is clearly a win for patient and surgeon alike. Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction, decreases hospital stay, and facilitates discharge to home. Today's emphasis is on a multi-modal strategy that minimises the use of opioids. Most protocols use pre-operative medications including an NSAID, acetaminophen, an oral opioid and some include gabapentin. Regional anesthesia is typically preferred over general. Both peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular local anesthetic cocktail injections have proved as effective adjuncts in decreasing early post-operative pain. Post-operative oral medications delivered on a schedule, not just as needed, often include acetaminophen, an NSAID and some include gabapentin. Oral and parenteral opioids are reserved for breakthrough pain

The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee and total hip replacements in 2016 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early post-operative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, hip or knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in peri-operative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilisation therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. One can think pragmatically to get ahead and stay ahead of 3 predictable physiologic disturbances that adversely impact rapid recovery after knee and hip replacement: fluid/blood loss; pain; and nausea. The modern orthopaedic surgeon and his/her care team needs a simple strategy to pro-actively, not reflexively, manage each of those 3 predictable impediments to early recovery. Those surgical teams that routinely get ahead and stay ahead in each of those areas will routinely witness faster recovery, lower costs and greater patient satisfaction and that is clearly a win for patient and surgeon alike. Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction, decreases hospital stay, and facilitates discharge to home. Today's emphasis is on a multi-modal strategy that minimises the use of opioids. Most protocols use pre-operative medications including an NSAID, acetaminophen, an oral opioid and some include gabapentin. Regional anesthesia is typically preferred over general. Both peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular local anesthetic cocktail injections have proved as effective adjuncts in decreasing early post-operative pain. Post-operative oral medications delivered on a schedule, not just as needed, often include acetaminophen, an NSAID and some included gabapentin. Oral and parenteral opioids are reserved for breakthrough pain

Surgeons have widely disparate views on how to improve outcomes for patients following total knee arthroplasty. Over the past decade we have witnessed a remarkable transformation of the entire process of care surrounding total knee arthroplasty. The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee replacement in 2015 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early postoperative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in perioperative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilization therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. With that paradigm shift in the hospital/surgical part of the total knee experience comes renewed interest and emphasis on function after TKA. Most surgeons are well aware of a “satisfaction gap” between the results of total hip replacement and total knee replacement. While studies report varying percentages (based on the definition of satisfaction and particular patient populations) what is clear is that 10–20% of patients are not fully satisfied after knee replacement. Researchers have highlighted some of this discordance with the introduction of the Forgotten Joint Score. These researchers and others can consistently point to higher satisfaction or fewer residual symptoms in patients who have undergone hip arthroplasty versus knee arthroplasty. What is also interesting to note, however, is that even amongst otherwise healthy control patients there are more baseline symptoms referable to the knee than to the hip. This may indicate that with knee arthroplasty we are chasing a more elusive target than is the case in hip arthroplasty. Most surgeons today would agree that alignment plays an important role in TKA function and survival, but certainly factors other than alignment are also important in determining the survival of modern total knee replacements. The evidence suggests that ideal alignment after knee replacement is probably very specific for any given patient and influenced by individual differences. There is a complex interplay between limb alignment, component rotation, sizing, ligament balance, and gait dynamics. Moving forward, more attention needs to be devoted to function in knee replacement in order to improve patient satisfaction. While the mechanical axis has been useful, future improvements are dependent on hitting better targets. The historic focus on radiographic outliers to explain total knee failures has been incomplete at best and has possibly dulled and constrained our collective intellectual curiosity

The entirety of the patient experience after contemporary total knee and total hip replacements in 2016 is markedly different from that encountered by patients just a decade ago. Ten years ago most patients were treated in a traditional sick-patient model of care and because they were assumed to require substantial hospital intervention, many cumbersome and costly interventions (e.g. indwelling urinary catheters, patient-controlled-analgesic pumps, autologous blood transfusion, continuous passive motion machines) were a routine part of the early post-operative experience. Today the paradigm has shifted to a well-patient model with a working assumption that once a patient has been medically optimised for surgery then the intervention itself, hip or knee replacement, will not typically create a sick-patient. Instead it is expected that most patients can be treated safely and more effectively with less intensive hospital intervention. While as orthopaedic surgeons we are enamored with the latest surgical techniques or interesting technologies most busy surgeons recognise that advances in peri-operative pain management, blood management, and early-mobilization therapy protocols account for the greatest share of improvements in patient experience over the past decade. One can think pragmatically to get ahead and stay ahead of 3 predictable physiologic disturbances that adversely impact rapid recovery after knee and hip replacement: fluid/blood loss; pain; and nausea. The modern orthopaedic surgeon and his/her care team needs a simple strategy to proactively, not reflexively, manage each of those 3 predictable impediments to early recovery. Those surgical teams that routinely get ahead and stay ahead in each of those areas will routinely witness faster recovery, lower costs and greater patient satisfaction and that is clearly a win for patient and surgeon alike. Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction, decreases hospital stay, and facilitates discharge to home. Today's emphasis is on a multi-modal strategy that minimises the use of opioids. Most protocols use pre-operative medications including an NSAID, acetaminophen, an oral opioid and some include gabapentin. Regional anaesthesia is typically preferred over general. Both peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular local anesthetic cocktail injections have proved as effective adjuncts in decreasing early post-operative pain. Post-operative oral medications delivered on a schedule, not just as needed, often include acetaminophen, an NSAID and some included gabapentin. Oral and parenteral opioids are reserved for breakthrough pain

Aims

In a multicentre, randomised study of adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis, we investigated the effect of adding gelatine matrix with human thrombin to the standard surgical methods of controlling blood loss.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the results and complications of tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with treatment using the traditional Ilizarov method.

Amin A, Watson A, Mangwani J, Nawabi DH, Ahluwalia R, Loeffler M. A prospective randomised controlled trial of autologous retransfusion in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2008;90-B:451–454

We hypothesised there was no clinical value in using an autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drain in either primary total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) in terms of limiting allogeneic blood transfusions when a modern restrictive blood management regime was followed. A total of 575 patients (65.2% men), with a mean age of 68.9 years (36 to 94) were randomised in this three-arm study to no drainage (group A), or to wound drainage with an ABT drain for either six hours (group B) or 24 hours (group C). The primary outcome was the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin (Hb) levels, length of hospital stay and adverse events. This study identified only 41 transfused patients, with no significant difference in distribution between the three groups (p = 0.857). The mean pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) value in the transfused group was 12.8 g/dL (9.8 to 15.5) versus 14.3 g/dL (10.6 to 18.0) in the non-transfused group (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.86). Post-operatively, the median of re-transfused shed blood in patients with a THR was 280 mL (Interquartile range (IQR) 150 to 400) and in TKR patients 500 mL (IQR 350 to 650) (p <  0.001). ABT drains had no effect on the proportion of transfused patients in primary THR and TKR. The secondary outcomes were also comparable between groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:765–71

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a multi-modal blood conservation protocol that involved pre–operative autologous blood donations (2 units) in conjunction with erythropoietin supplementation as well as intra-operative conservation modalities. Methods. A retrospective chart review of 90 patients with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty done between 2006–2009 by one of the 3 senior authors was performed. Patients donated two units of blood 4 weeks prior to surgery and also received erythropoietin injections (40,000 units: 3 weeks, 2 weeks and 1 week prior to surgery). Intra- operative blood management included use of pneumatic tourniquet, re-infusion drains, local epinephrine injections and fibrin spray. Post-operatively, autologous transfusions were provided based on symptoms. Pre-donation blood levels, peri-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels along with transfusion records were assessed. Results. The mean pre-donation hemoglobin was 13.1 g/dL. After 2 units of autologous blood donation and procrit injections, the mean preoperative hemoglobin was 13.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin dropped to 9.8 g/dL on postoperative day 3. The mean drop in hemoglobin from preadmission testing was 3.3 g/dl. Overall, 30% patients required autologous blood transfusion and no patients required allogenic transfusion. Conclusion. This multi-modal protocol was effective in not only avoiding allogeneic transfusions following bilateral TKA but also resulted in high blood levels at the time of discharge. This protocol was effective in eliminating allogenic transfusions and maintaining blood levels

Blood loss during total knee replacement (TKR) remains a significant concern. In this study, 114 patients underwent TKR, and were divided into two groups based on whether they received a new generation fibrin sealant intra-operatively, or a local infiltration containing adrenaline. Groups were then compared for mean calculated total blood volume (TBV) loss, transfusion rates, and knee range of movement. Mean TBV loss was similar between groups: fibrin sealant mean was 705 ml (281 to 1744), local adrenaline mean was 712 ml (261 to 2308) (p = 0.929). Overall, significantly fewer units of blood were transfused in the fibrin sealant group (seven units) compared with the local adrenaline group (15 units) (p = 0.0479). Per patient transfused, significantly fewer units of blood were transfused in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 units) compared with the local adrenaline group (1.67 units) (p = 0.027), suggesting that the fibrin sealant may reduce the need for multiple unit transfusions. Knee range of movement was similar between groups. From our results, it appears that application of this newer fibrin sealant results in blood loss and transfusion rates that are low and similar to previously applied fibrin sealants.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:135–9.

Autologous retransfusion and no-drainage are both blood-saving measures in total hip replacement (THR). A new combined intra- and post-operative autotransfusion filter system has been developed especially for primary THR, and we conducted a randomised controlled blinded study comparing this with no-drainage. A total of 204 THR patients were randomised to autologous blood transfusion (ABT) (n = 102) or no-drainage (n = 102). In the ABT group, a mean of 488 ml (. sd. 252) of blood was retransfused. The mean lowest post-operative haemoglobin level during the hospital stay was higher in the autotransfusion group (10.6 g/dl (7.8 to 13.9) vs 10.2 g/dl (7.5 to 13.3); p = 0.01). The mean haemoglobin levels for the ABT and no-drainage groups were not significantly different on the first day (11.3 g/dl (7.8 to 13.9) vs 11.0 g/dl (8.1 to 13.4); p = 0.07), the second day (11.1 g/dl (8.2 to 13.8) vs 10.8 g/dl (7.5 to 13.3); p = 0.09) or the third day (10.8 g/dl (8.0 to 13.0) vs 10.6 g/dl (7.5 to 14.1); p = 0.15). The mean total peri-operative net blood loss was 1464 ml (. sd. 505) in the ABT group and 1654 ml (. sd. 553) in the no-drainage group (p = 0.01). Homologous blood transfusions were needed in four patients (3.9%) in the ABT group and nine (8.8%) in the no-drainage group (p = 0.15). No statistically significant difference in adverse events was found between the groups. The use of a new intra- and post-operative autologous blood transfusion filter system results in less total blood loss and a smaller maximum decrease in haemoglobin levels than no-drainage following primary THR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:616–22

There is currently no consensus about the mean volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012. Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss.

We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760 patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (> 5500 ml), the resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger’s test, which did not show any small-study effects (p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I² = 90%; p < 0.001).

Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to autotransfusion in these patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:683–8.

Introduction. Early rehabilitation and discharge following minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty has potential risks including the possibility that patients may become progressively anemic at home. The current study assess the use of pre-emptive autologous blood transfusion on the length of stay, readmission, and allogenous transfusion. Methods. Patients treated by primary total hip arthroplasty using the superior capsulotomy technique were studied. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 were patients who did donate autologous blood and received an intra-operative pre-emptive transfusion. There were 283 patients in Group 1. Group 2 were patients who were medically capable of donating autologous blood but did not for non-medical reasons. There were 71 patients in Group 2. Patients who did not donate autologous blood for medical reasons (preoperative Hgb less than 11.5, age over 80) were excluded. All patients received general anesthesia. Length of stay, allogenous transfusion and readmission were compared. Results. The mean length of stay after surgery for the Group 1 patients who received autologous blood donation during primary THA was 1.56 days (SD 78 days, range 0–4). The mean length of stay for the Group 2 patients who did not donate or receive autologous blood during primary THA was 1.87 days (SD 84 days, range 1–4). Patients who received autologous blood donation had a significantly shorter post-surgical length of stay than patients who did not (p = .002, Mann-Whitney test). Patients who did not donate and preemptively receive autologous blood received significantly more allogenous blood (Mann-Whitney, p=.0004). Moreover 15% of those who auto-donated were given allogenic transfusions, while 37% of those who did not auto-donate were given allogeneic transfusions. One patient who did receive autologous transfusion and was discharged on day 2 sustained an NSAID induced GI-bleed 3 weeks postop and was admitted for transfusion and treatment. There were no other readmissions in either group. Conclusions. Patients who receive pre-emptive autologous blood transfusion intra-operatively when treated specifically by total hip arthroplasty using the superior capsulotomy technique under general anesthesia have shorter hospital stays and lower allogenous transfusion rates than a matched cohort of patients that did not donate and receive autogenous blood

Introduction. The current study reports on the impact of immediate mobilization of patients treated by tissue-preserving, computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty on length of stay, disposition, and complications. Methods. From March, 2010 to April, 2011, a total of 231 consecutive primary THA were performed. Of these, 218 hips met the inclusion criteria of treatment using the superior capsulotomy surgical technique. 1. (Fig. 1), navigation of acetabular component implantation using a patient-specific mechanical navigation device (HipSextant™ navigation System, Surgical Planning Associates, Inc., Boston, MA). 2. , and patient age less than 80 years. Mean age of the patients was 57.3 years (range 23.5–79.9 years). The superior capsulotomy approach. 1. was used in all cases. This technique allows for both the femoral and the acetabular components to be placed with the patient in a lateral position through an incision in the superior capsule, posterior to the abductors and anterior to the short external rotators. The hip is not dislocated during surgery. Rather, the femur is prepared in situ through the top of the femoral neck, the neck is then transected, and the femoral head is excised en bloc. The acetabulum is prepared under direct vision using angled reamers, and the socket is placed with an offset inserter. The final construct is then reduced in situ. The protocol also involved the use of pre-emptive oral analgesia, pre-emptive autologous blood transfusion, and immediate mobilization. 3. Length of stay and disposition in this study group were compared to a cohort of 698 total hip arthroplasty performed at the same institution by all other techniques. Results. In the 218 hips in this study, the mean length of stay was 1.65 days with 97% of patients discharged directly home. Comparatively, the control group of 698 primary hips had an average length of stay of 3.2 days with 68% of patients discharged directly home. Of the 3 patients transferred to rehabilitation, one had cerebral palsy and another had end stage renal disease, a mechanical heart valve, and a longstanding complete sciatic palsy on the contralateral side. One patient, discharged on post op day 3, was readmitted 3 weeks postop for a GI bleed in association with prolonged anti-inflammatory use prior to surgery. Otherwise, there were no readmissions, reoperations, dislocations, nerve injuries, or post-discharge blood transfusions. Conclusions. The current study demonstrates that performing THA with combined tissue preservation and mechanical navigation techniques together with immediate mobilization can be safe and effective and have the potential of greatly reducing healthcare costs and dependence upon prolonged institutionalization following surgery

Intra-operative, peri-articular injection of local anaesthesia is an increasingly popular way of controlling pain following total knee replacement. At the same time, the problems associated with allogenic blood transfusion have led to interest in alternative methods for managing blood loss after total knee replacement, including the use of auto-transfusion of fluid from the patient’s surgical drain. It is safe to combine peri-articular infiltration with auto-transfusion from the drain. We performed a randomised clinical trial to compare the concentration of local anaesthetic in the blood and in the fluid collected in the knee drain in patients having either a peri-articular injection or a femoral nerve block. Clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic were found in the fluid from the drains of patients having peri-articular injections (4.92 μg/ml (sd 3.151)). However, none of the patients having femoral nerve blockade had detectable levels. None of the patients in either group had clinically relevant concentrations of local anaesthetic in their blood after re-transfusion.

The evidence from this study suggests that it is safe to use peri-articular injection in combination with auto-transfusion of blood from peri-articular drains during knee replacement surgery.

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a Multi-modal Blood Conservation protocol that involves pre–operative autologous blood donations (2 units) in conjunction with Erythropoietin supplementation as well as intra-operative conservation modalities. Methods. A retrospective review of 104 patients with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty done between 2006-2009 was performed. Patients donated two units of blood, 4 weeks prior to surgery and also received Erythropoetin injections (40 k units 3weeks,2 weeks and 1 week prior to surgery). Intra- operative Blood Management included symptom-based transfusions, blood salvage devices, local epinephrine injections and fibrin spray. Pre-donation blood levels, peri-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels along with transfusion records were assessed. Results. The mean pre-donation hemoglobin was 13.1 g/dL. After 2 units of autologous blood donation and procrit injection, the mean hemoglobin was 13.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin dropped to a nadir of 9.8 g/dL on postoperative day 3. The mean drop in hemoglobin from preadmission testing was 3.3g/dl. Overall, 28 % patients required autologous blood transfusion and no patients required allogeneic transfusion if the protocol was followed. 6 patients (5.8%) did require allogeneic transfusions but all 6 were protocol violations and did not follow the proposed treatment regiment. Conclusion. This multi-modal protocol was effective in not only avoiding allogeneic transfusions following Bilateral TKA but also resulted in high blood levels at the time of discharge. This protocol was effective in eliminating allogeneic transfusions and maintaining blood levels

To determine the current practice of scoliosis surgery in the UK. A 10 point questionnaire was constructed to identify the philosophy of surgeons on various aspects of scoliosis surgery such as choice of implant, bone graft, autologous blood transfusion (ABT), cord monitoring and computer assisted surgery. Results are compared with the current best evidence. Consultants and Fellows attending the 2009 British Scoliosis Society meeting. 50 questionnaires were completed: 45 Consultants and 5 Fellows. All pedicle screw construct favored by 25/50, hybrid 24/50 (one undecided). Posterior construct of less than 10 levels, 20/50 would not cross-link, 11/50 used one and 19/20 used two or more. More than ten levels 17/50 considered cross-links unnecessary, 4/50 used one and 29/50 used two or more. 88% preferred titanium alloy implants, while a mixture of stainless steel and cobalt chrome was used by others. For bone graft, substitutes (24), iliac crest (14), allograft (12) and demineralised bone matrix (9) in addition to local bone. 10/50 would use recombinant bone morphogenetic protein (3 for revision cases only). 39/50 routinely used intra-operative cell salvage or ABT drains and 4/50 never used autologous blood. All used cord monitoring, Sensory (19/50), Motor (2/50) and combined (29/50). None used computer-aided surgery. 26 operated alone 12 operated in pairs and 12 varied depending on type of case. This survey has brought to light interesting variations in scoliosis surgery in UK. It may reflect the conflicting evidence in the literature

Simultaneous bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to bring greater patient satisfaction, reduce in-patient stay and recovery, with similar outcomes to single sided or staged TKA, but higher complication rates. No validated selection criteria exist. We report the results of a single surgeon's experience of simultaneous bilateral TKA, using set guidelines for patient selection. A prospectively maintained database of all simultaneous bilateral TKA performed between 2002 and 2008 was retrospectively analysed, supplemented by case-note review. Outcome measures included length of stay, blood loss and transfusion rates, complications and functionality and validated outcome scores. 40 patients were included, 23 male and 17 female, all with osteoarthritis. Mean age was male 64.9 and female 61.3 years. Mean ASA grade was 1.8. All fitted selection criteria. Mean tourniquet time was right 79.1 minutes and left 83.6 minutes. Preoperative mean haemoglobin level was 141.8 g/dl and mean post operative level of 87.3 g/dl. 13 patients received purely autologous blood transfusion, 16 patients purely allogenic and 6 patients received both. There was 1 intraoperative complication (Medial collateral injury), 3 minor post operative complications which recovered prior to discharge. There were no thromboembolic events or deaths. Mean follow-up was 32.7 months (range 3-79 months). Mean in-patient stay was 7.5 days. Mean range of movement at most recent follow up was right 1.0 to 119.1 degrees flexion and left 1.0 to 120.8 degrees flexion. Mean Knee Society Scores pre- versus post-operatively were: 67 knee/62 function versus 90 knee/82 function. Oxford Knee Scores, Pre- versus post-operatively were: 43 versus 35 (Scoring 0-60, lowest best outcome). We demonstrate that with appropriate selection criteria, simultaneous bilateral TKA is safe and successful, giving excellent functional outcomes