Aims

The aim of this study was to establish consensus statements on medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, and rehabilitation and return to sporting activity in patients with patellar instability, using the modified Delphi process.

The December 2022 Foot & Ankle Roundup. 360. looks at: Evans calcaneal osteotomy and multiplanar correction in flat foot deformity; Inflammatory biomarkers in tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction; Takedown of ankle fusions and conversion to total ankle arthroplasty; Surgical incision closure with three different materials; Absorbable sutures are not inferior to nonabsorbable sutures for tendo Achilles repair; Zadek’s osteotomy is a reliable technique for treating Haglund’s syndrome; How to best assess patient limitations after acute Achilles tendon injury; Advances in the management of infected nonunion of the foot and ankle

Aims

Although absorbable sutures for the repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) have been attracting attention, the rationale for their use remains insufficient. This study prospectively compared the outcomes of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for the repair of acute ATR.

Introduction

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated.

Background

We prospectively studied achilles tendon acute rupture cases operated over 2 years and reviewed the causes, treatment options, outcome and complications. Our Aim of the study was to look at the different suture materials used and to observe for their complications.

The August 2015 Foot & Ankle Roundup. 360 . looks at: Is orthosis more important than physio in tibialis posterior deficiency?; Radiographic evaluation of ankle injury; Sciatic catheter quite enough!; A fresh look at avascular necrosis of the talus; Total ankle and VTE; Outcomes of posterior malleolar fracture; Absorbable sutures in the Achilles tendon; Lisfranc injuries under the spotlight

Absorbable suture anchors have become more and more important in rotator cuff surgery due to their easy revisability. In osteoporotic bone however they are thought to be of minor primary stability. Purpose of the present study was to compare different absorbable and non-absorbable suture anchors in their pullout strength depending on bone density. The absorbable screw-anchor SPIRALOK5mm (DePuyMitek, Raynham, MA, USA), the titanium screw-anchor SUPER-REVO5mm and the tilting-anchor ULTRASORB (both ConmedLinvatec, Largo, FL, USA) were tested, each anchor representing a different material and design. On the basis of bone density measurement by CT-scans a healthy (mean-age. 42 years) and a osteopenic (mean-age: 74 years) group of cadaveric human humeri were formed. Each anchor was inserted in the greater tuberosity six times. They were inserted according to the manufacturers instructions with the supplied suture material. An incremental cyclic loading was performed, starting with 75N. Until failure the tensile load was increased by 25N after every 50 cycles. The ultimate failure loads, the anchor displacements and the modes of failure were recorded. In the non-osteopenic bone group, the absorbable SPIRALOK achieved a significantly better pullout strength (mean: 274N) than the titanium screw-anchor SUPER-REVO (mean: 188N) and the tilting-anchor ULTRASORB (mean: 192N). In the osteopenic bone group no significant difference in the pullout strength was found. The failure mechanisms, such as anchor pullout, rupture at eyelet, suture breakage and breakage of eyelet, varied between the anchors. In the osteopenic group the number of anchor pullouts clearly increased. The present study demonstrates that absorbable suture anchors do not have lower pullout strengths than metal anchors. Depending on their design they can even outmatch metal anchor systems. The results of our study suggest that the anchor design has a crucial influence on primary stability, whereas the anchor material is less important

Introduction: Arthroscopic stabilisation of shoulder joint for instability following a traumatic dislocation is gaining popularity. It has various advantages like being minimally invasive, causes minimal damage to the shoulder muscles, quicker rehabilitation, minimal loss of external rotation, and addresses the pathology. This can be performed using non-absorbable suture anchors to repair the Bankart’s lesion, which involves arthroscopic knot tying. Recently, devices, which avoid tying knots, and are absorbable, have been developed for arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart’s repair using knotless, bio-absorbable suture anchor device.

Methods: A total of 32 patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder of traumatic origin underwent arthroscopic stabilisation using absorbable knotless suture anchors (Mitek U.K.). Average follow up was 2.4 years. Oxford shoulder instability score were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Results: The average age of patients at surgery was 24 (18–28). The average number of dislocations per patient were three. The average hospital stay was 1.1 days. The mean operating time was 70 minutes. 90.6 % (29 out of 32) had no further instability or dislocation. The recurrence rate was 9.4% (3 out of 32). The two redislocations required open repair and one patient has a residual instability. The average Oxford instability score was 22. All the patients returned to their pre-operative occupation. Of the 7 keen sportsmen, 5 returned to their contact sports at pre-injury level and 2 returned to their contact sports at a slightly lower level. In two cases we had breakage of anchor loop intraoperatively. Two patients had initial stiffness, which eventually resolved. No other complication was noted.

Conclusion: The clinical outcome of arthroscopic stabilisation of shoulder using knotless bio-absorbable suture anchors are good and are comparable to other methods of arthroscopic Bankart’s repair. The advantages are that the anchors are absorbable and there is no knot tying involved.

In a prospective, randomised study on the repair of tears of the rotator cuff we compared the clinical results of two suture techniques for which different suture materials were used.

We prospectively randomised 100 patients with tears of the rotator cuff into two groups. Group 1 had transosseous repair with No. 3 Ethibond using modified Mason-Allen sutures and group 2 had transosseous repair with 1.0 mm polydioxanone cord using modified Kessler sutures. After 24 to 30 months the patients were evaluated clinically using the Constant score and by ultrasonography.

Of the 100 patients, 92 completed the study. No significant statistical difference was seen between the two groups: Constant score, 91% vs 92%; rate of further tear, 18% vs 22%; and revision, 4% vs 4%. In cases of further tear the outcome in group 2 did not differ from that for the intact repairs (91% vs 91%), but in group 1 it was significantly worse (94% vs 77%, p = 0.005).

Overall, seven patients had complications which required revision surgery, in four for pain (two in each group) and in three for infection (two in group 1 and one in group 2).