Objectives. Modular dual-mobility (MDM) constructs are used to reduce dislocation rates after total hip replacement (THR). They combine the advantages of dual mobility with the option of supplementary acetabular screw fixation in complex revision surgery. However, there are concerns about adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) as a result of fretting corrosion between the metal liner and shell. Methods: The aim of this systematic review was to find and review all relevant studies to establish the outcomes and risks associated with MDM hip replacement. All articles on MDM THRs in the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Prospero databases were searched. A total of 14 articles were included. A random intercept logistic regression model was used for meta-analysis, giving estimated average values. Results: There were 6 cases of ARMD out of 1312 total. Estimated median incidence of ARMD from meta-analysis was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1 – 1.4%). Mean postoperative serum Cobalt was 0.81 μg/L (95% CI 0.33 – 1.29 μg/L), and Chromium was 0.77 μg/L (95% 0.35 – 1.19 μg/L), from 279 cases in 7 studies. Estimated median incidence of a serum cobalt or chromium ion measurement ≥1 μg/L was 7.9% (95% CI 3.5 – 16.8%), and ≥7 μg/L was 1.8% (95% CI 0.7 – 4.2%). Conclusions: ARMD is a rare but significant complication following total hip replacement using a MDM construct. Its incidence appears higher than that reported in non-metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements but lower than that of MoM hip replacements. MDM hip replacements are associated with raised serum metal ion levels postoperatively, but there was no correlation with worse clinical hip function within studies. Studies were poor quality and at high risk of confounding. Pending further work, MDM constructs should be used with caution, reserved for select cases at particularly high risk of dislocation

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate serum metal levels in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional compared to a modular dual-mobility bearing. Patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a modular dual-mobility or conventional polyethylene bearing. All patients received the same titanium acetabular and femoral component and a ceramic femoral head. Serum metal levels were drawn pre-operatively then annually for a minimum of two years postoperatively. An a priori power analysis determined that 40 patients (20 per cohort) were needed to identify a clinically relevant difference in serum cobalt of 0.35 ng/ml (ppb) at 90% power. Forty-six patients were randomized to a modular dual-mobility (n=25) or conventional bearing (n=21) with 40 at a minimum follow-up of two years. No differences in serum cobalt (mean 0.14 ppb [range, 0.075–0.29] vs. 0.20 ppb [range, 0.075–0.57], p=0.39) or chromium levels (mean 0.14 ppb [range, 0.05–0.50] vs. 0.12 ppb [range, 0.05–0.35], p=0.65) were identified between the modular dual-mobility and conventional cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in serum Co or Cr at two years postoperatively in subjects implanted with a ceramic head and this particular dual mobility bearing in comparison to a ceramic head and a conventional acetabular component. While modest expected elevations in serum Co and Cr were observed in the dual mobility group, in no case did the Co level exceed the laboratory reference range nor the threshold of one part per billion that has been associated with adverse local tissue reactions to mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion

Abstract. Objectives. Hip instability following total hip arthroplasty in treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fractures is reported at 8–11%. Utilising the principle of a small articulation to minimize the problems of wear coupled with a large articulation, dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty prostheses stabilise the hip further than conventional fixed-bearing designs. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of dislocation and complication between standard fixed-bearing and dual-mobility prostheses for the treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fractures. Methods. A four-year retrospective review in a large district general hospital was completed. All cases of intracapsular neck of femur fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty were identified through the theatre logbooks. Patient's operative and clinical notes were retrospectively reviewed to collect data. Results. A total of 91 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty for intracapsular neck of femur fracture in the four-year period. 61.5% were dual-mobility design versus 28.5% had fixed-bearing implants. There were no statistical differences between patient group characteristics. Choice of implant was dependent on surgeon preference. There was a 0.0% dislocation rate in the dual-mobility group versus 8.6% in the fixed-bearing prosthesis group. All dislocations occurred in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with 36.0mm fixed-bearing prosthesis via posterior surgical approach. There was no statistical difference in mortality between both groups. Conclusion. There was an increasing trend of towards the use of dual-mobility prosthesis for fractured neck of femur within this department with excellent outcomes. Dual-mobility designs provide reduced dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty in intracapsular neck of femur fractures compared to standard fixed-bearing designs at this institution. The authors recommend that all orthopaedic staff consider the use of dual-mobility prostheses in suitable patients and ensure trainees are suitably trained in use of dual-mobility designs. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate serum metal ion levels in patients undergoing THA with either a standard or modular dual-mobility bearing. Patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a modular dual-mobility or a standard polyethylene bearing. All patients received the same titanium acetabular and femoral component and a ceramic femoral head. Only patients without a prior history of metal implants in their body were eligible for inclusion, thus isolating serum metal ions to the prosthesis itself. Serum metal ion levels were drawn pre-operatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Power analysis determined that 40 patients (20 in each group) were needed to identify a clinically relevant difference in serum cobalt of 0.35 ng/ml (ppb) at 90% power assuming a pooled standard deviation of 0.31 ppb and alpha=0.05; an additional 30% were enrolled to account for potential dropouts. 53 patients were enrolled, with 22 patients in the modular dual-mobility group and 20 in the standard cohort with data available at one-year. No differences in the serum cobalt (0.17 ppb [range 0.07 to 0.50] vs. 0.19 ppb [range 0.07 to 0.62], p = 0.51) or chromium levels (0.19 ppb [range 0.05 to 0.56] vs. 0.16 ppb [range 0.05 to 0.61], p = 0.23) were identified. At 1 year postoperatively, no differences in serum cobalt or chromium levels were identified with this design of a modular dual mobility bearing when compared to a standard polyethylene bearing

In this study, we examined the impact of dual-mobility (DM) versus fixed-bearing (FB) implants on outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA), a common and successful operation. We examined all-cause revision, revision due to dislocation, postoperative complications and functional scores in patients undergoing primary and revision THA. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42023403736). The Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to 12th March 2023. Eligible studies underwent meta-analysis and methodological assessment using the ROBINS-I tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects maximum-likelihood model. Eight comparative, non-randomised studies involving 2,810 DM implants and 3,188 FB implants were included. In primary THA, the difference in all-cause revision was imprecise (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.25–2.72), whilst the DM cohort had a statistically significant benefit in revision due to dislocation (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02–0.28). In revision THA, the DM cohort showed significant benefit in all-cause revision (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31–1.05) and revision due to dislocation (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.53). DM implants were associated with a lower incidence of implant dislocation and infection. Functional outcome analysis was limited due to underreporting. No intraprosthetic dislocations were observed. The results suggest that contemporary DM designs may be advantageous in reducing the risk of all-cause revision, revision due to dislocation, and postoperative complication incidence at mid-term follow-up. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term performance of this design, especially in revision cases

There is a paucity of mid-term data on modular dual-mobility (MDM) constructs versus large (≥40 mm) femoral heads (LFH) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). The purpose of this study was to update our prior series at 10 years, with specific emphasis on survivorships free of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, and dislocation. We identified 300 revision THAs performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from 2011 to 2014. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n=65), dislocation (n=59), and reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol (n=57) were the most common reasons for index revision. Dual-mobility constructs were used in 124 cases, and LFH were used in 176 cases. Mean age was 66 years, mean BMI was 31 kg/m. 2. , and 45% were female. Mean follow-up was 7 years. The 10-year survivorship free of re-revision for dislocation was 97% in the MDM cohort and 91% in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of re-revision for dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 5.2; p=0.03). The 10-year survivorship free of any re-revision was 90% in the MDM cohort and 84% in the LFH cohort with a significantly increased risk of any re-revision in the LFH cohort (HR 2.5; p=0.04). The 10-year survivorship free of any dislocation was 92% in the MDM cohort and 87% in the LFH cohort. There was a trend towards an increased risk of any dislocation in the LFH cohort (HR 2.3; p=0.06). In this head-to-head comparison, revision THAs using MDM constructs had a significantly lower risk of re-revision for dislocation compared to LFH at 10 years. In addition, there was a trend towards lower risk of any dislocation. Level of Evidence: IV

Dual-mobility (DM) bearings are effective to mitigate dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data on its use for treating dislocation is scarce. Aim of this study was to compare DM bearings, standard bearings and constrained liner (CL) in revision THA for recurrent dislocation and to identify risk factors for re-dislocation. We reviewed 100 consecutive revision THAs performed for dislocation from 2012 and 2019. 45 hips (45%) received a DM construct, while 44 hips (44%) and 11 hips (11%) had a standard bearing and CL, respectively. Rates of re-dislocation, re-revision for dislocation and overall re-revision were compared. Radiographs were assessed for cup positioning, restoration of centre of rotation, leg length and offset. Risk factors for re-dislocation were determined by cox regression analysis. Modified Harris hip scores (mHHS) were calculated. Mean follow-up was 53 months (1 to 103). DM constructs were used more frequently in elderly patients (p=0.011) and hips with abductor deficiency (p< 0.001). The re-dislocation rate was 11.1% for DM bearings compared with 15.9% for standard bearings and 18.2% for CL (p=0.732). Revision-free survival for DM constructs was 83% (95% CI 0.77 – 0.90) compared to 75% (95% CI 0.68 – 0.82) for standard articulations and 71% (95% CI 0.56 – 0.85) for CL (p=0.455). Younger age (HR 0.91; p=0.020), lower comorbidity (HR 0.42; p=0.031), smaller heads (HR 0.80; p=0.041) and cup retention (HR 8.23; p=0.022) were associated with re-dislocation. Radiological analysis did not reveal a relationship between restoration of hip geometry and re-dislocation. mHHS significantly improved from 43.8 points to 65.7 points (p<0.001) with no differences among bearing types. Our findings suggest that DM bearings do not sufficiently prevent dislocation in revision THA for recurrent dislocation. Reconstruction of the abductor complex may play a key role to reduce the burden in these high-risk patients

Dual-mobility constructs (DMCs) are increasingly used for total hip replacement (THR) following hip fracture. The aims of this study were to identify whether there was a difference in all-cause construct survival following THR with a DMC (DMC-THR) or with a conventional construct following hip fracture, and to identify the expected net all-cause construct survival for DMC-THR performed for hip fracture. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies (including joint registries) including DMC-THR for hip fracture which provided Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates. The primary outcome was all-cause construct survival over time. 318 papers and 17 registry reports were identified. Three studies (two registry reports and one cohort study utilising joint registry data) met the inclusion criteria, including 8,834 DMC-THRs and 63,865 conventional THRs. Upon meta-analysis, DMC-THRs had lower all-cause construct survival. Five-year KM estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 95.3% (94.6–95.9%) for DMC-THR and 96.1% (95.9–96.3%) for conventional THR. These results suggest there is a small absolute but not clinically significant all-cause implant survival difference between THR with DMC and conventional implants following hip fracture. Given the higher comparative cost of DMC, this analysis does not support its routine use

Introduction. Modular dual-mobility constructs reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, questions about metal ions from the cobalt-chrome (CoCr) liner persist, and are particularly germane to patients being revised for adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) to metal. We determined the mid-term serum Co and Cr levels after modular dual-mobilities used in revision and complex primary THAs, and specifically included patients revised for ALTR. Methods. Serum Co and Cr levels were measured prospectively in 22 patients with a modular dual-mobility construct and a ceramic femoral head. Patients with CoCr heads or contralateral THAs with CoCr heads were excluded. Mean age 64 years with 50% female. The mean follow-up was 4 years. Indications for modular dual-mobility were: periprosthetic joint infection treated with 2-stage exchange and subsequent reimplantation (n=8), ALTR revision (n=7), complex primary THA (n=6), and periprosthetic femoral fracture (n=1). Mean preoperative Co and Cr in patients revised for an ALTR were 29.7 µg/L and 21.5 µg/L, respectively. Results. Mean Co and Cr levels were 0.26 µg/L and 0.82 µg/L, respectively, at most recent follow-up. No patients had a cobalt level ≥1 µg/L. Only one patient had a chromium level ≥1 µg/L. That patient's chromium level was 12 µg/L at 57 months after revision THA for ALTR (and decreased 10-fold from a preoperative Cr of 113 µg/L). Conclusion. At a mean of 4 years, no patient with a modular dual-mobility construct and ceramic femoral head had elevated cobalt levels, including seven patients revised specifically for ALTR. While further studies are required, we support selective use of a modular dual-mobility construct in revision and complex primary THAs for patients at high risk for instability. Summary. At a mean of 4 years after revision or complex primary THAs with a modular dual-mobility construct and a ceramic head, none of 22 patients had serum cobalt levels that measured ≥1 µg/L

Instability and aseptic loosening are the two main complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Dual-mobility (DM) cups were shown to counteract implant instability during rTHA. To our knowledge, no study evaluated the 10-year outcomes of rTHA using DM cups, cemented into a metal reinforcement ring, in cases of severe acetabular bone loss. We hypothesized that using a DM cup cemented into a metal ring is a reliable technique for rTHA at 10 years, with few revisions for acetabular loosening and/or instability. This is a retrospective study of 77 rTHA cases with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky ≥ 2C) treated exclusively with a DM cup (NOVAE STICK; SERF, DÉCINES-CHARPIEU, FRANCE) cemented into a cage (Kerboull cross, Burch-Schneider, or ARM rings). Clinical scores and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The main endpoints were revision surgery for aseptic loosening or recurring dislocation. With a mean follow-up of 10.7 years [2.1-16.2], 3 patients were reoperated because of aseptic acetabular loosening (3.9%) at 9.6 years [7-12]. Seven patients (9.45%) dislocated their hip implant, only 1 suffered from chronic instability (1.3%). Cup survivorship was 96.1% at 10 years. No sign of progressive radiolucent lines were found and bone graft integration was satisfactory for 91% of the patients. The use of a DM cup cemented into a metal ring during rTHA with complex acetabular bone loss was associated with low revision rates for either acetabular loosening or chronic instability at 10 years. That's why we also recommend DM cup for all high risk of dislocation situations

Introduction: Many publications have already shown the great interest of dual-mobility concept which significantly reduces the rate of prosthetic dislocation and thus find its place for patients at high risk of post operative instability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the prevalence of prosthetic instability in revision total hip arthroplasty using a dualmobility cup. Materials and Methods: Our multicentric series consists of 163 revision total hip arthroplasties performed between may 1999 and may 2004. The mean age at revision was 70 years and the mean follow-up period was 56 months. The primary etiology necessitating revision is aseptic loosening. According to the SOFCOT classification, the acetabular deficiency was grade IV 9 times, grade III 47 times, grade I or II 107 times. All the implanted acetabular components are SERF dual-mobility implants. This system consists of a metal back which can be HA-coated and Press Fit or cemented in a Kerboull cross or in a Novae Arm. The mobile-bearing insert which allows a dual articulation between the head and the metal back is of polyethylene. We implanted 119 HA-coated press-fit cups and cemented 44 dual-mobility cups in a support ring or in a Kerboull cross. Results: The mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score is 14,1 at the last follow-up and 4,2 in the preoperative period. We reported 8 complications: 6 early dislocations and 2 acetabular revisions for secondary mobilisation of the cup. Discussion: According to Huten’s 1996 SOFCOT teaching conference, this rate ranges between 2 and 5% and we have already published a series of 106 dual-mobility with no dislocation at a 10 year follow-up period. With 4% dislocations at a mean follow-up of 56 months, the dual-mobility cup seems to provide high stability in revision hip surgery when other factors such as muscular deficiency, extended synovectomies, difficult implant placement, encourage an uncertain postoperative prosthetic stability. These results have to be compared to those of other systems such as constrained acetabular cups or tripolar cups. Conclusion: This is why dual-mobility remains an efficient and reliable choice to avoid prosthetic dislocation in revision surgery. Moreover, we encourage the use of dual-mobility cup in any high risk situation in terms of post-operative instability such as for old or neurological patients

Abstract. Objectives. Modular dual-mobility (MDM) constructs are used to reduce dislocation rates after total hip replacement (THR). They combine the advantages of dual mobility with the option of supplementary acetabular screw fixation in complex revision surgery. However, there are concerns about adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) as a result of fretting corrosion between the metal liner and shell. Methods. The aim of this systematic review was to find and review all relevant studies to establish the outcomes and risks associated with MDM hip replacement. All articles on MDM THRs in the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Prospero databases were searched. A total of 14 articles were included. A random intercept logistic regression model was used for meta-analysis, giving estimated mean values. Results. There were 6 cases of ARMD out of 1312 total. Estimated median incidence of ARMD from meta-analysis was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1 – 1.4%). Mean postoperative serum Cobalt was 0.81 μg/L (95% CI 0.33 – 1.29 μg/L), and Chromium was 0.77 μg/L (95% 0.35 – 1.19 μg/L), from 279 cases in 7 studies. Estimated median incidence of a serum cobalt or chromium ion measurement ≥1 μg/L was 7.9% (95% CI 3.5 – 16.8%), and ≥7 μg/L was 1.8% (95% CI 0.7 – 4.2%). Conclusions. ARMD is a rare but significant complication following total hip replacement using a MDM construct. Its incidence appears higher than that reported in non-metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements but lower than that of MoM hip replacements. MDM hip replacements are associated with raised serum metal ion levels postoperatively, but there was no correlation with worse clinical hip function within studies. Studies were poor quality and at high risk of confounding. Pending further work, MDM constructs should be used with caution, reserved for select cases at particularly high risk of dislocation. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The increased torque required to dislocate dual mobility (DM) components may increase peri-prosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) risk. Current literature often relies on revision as an endpoint and may underestimate PPF. This study aims to review PPF rate, risks and treatment following primary DM implantation.

Prospective cohort study of 549 patients following primary DM total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2013 and 2021. Collected data included demographics, indication for surgery, cortical index and PPF.

549 patients were identified with primary DM THA. Mean age was 73 years (26–96). 446 (81.2%) patients had their index surgery following hip fracture. 18 patients (3.27%) sustained a PPF. Cumulative PPF rate was 1.5% at 1-year, 2.2% at 5-years and 3.27% overall. PPF was higher in patients undergoing surgery following hip fracture (4%) vs. other indications (1%). OR 4.04 (95% CI:0.53, 30.72), p=0.219. Mean cortical index was lower in patients with PPF 0.4 (95% CI:0.36, 0.45) compared to those without 0.46 (95% CI:0.45, 0.46) p=0.029. Treatment for PPF included 10 (55.6%) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), 7 (38.9%) revision THA and 1 conservatively managed.

PPF rate following DM use is higher in our cohort than published rates. Our rates are comparable to some papers when subgroup analysis of older patients and cemented taper slip stems are considered. PPF risk with DM may be increased in patients undergoing surgery after hip fracture or with a lower cortical index preoperatively. Over half of PPF were managed with ORIF and may mask PPF risk studies that report using revision as an endpoint.

Introduction:. The higher resisting torque against dislocation and the large range of motion due to the enlarged effective head diameter substantiate the use of eccentric dual-mobility cups in case of total hip joint instability [1,2]. As a result of force-dependent self-centering mechanism, an increased movement of the intermediate-component can be expected whose effect on wear propagation is unknown so far. Currently available hip joint simulators are only able to vary the load by the absolute value and not by the direction of resulting force. Therefore, the uniaxial force transmission may lead to a unique and stable alignment of the intermediate-component during testing. The purpose of this numerical study was to evaluate relative movements of the intermediate-component during daily life activities with respect to wear propagation. Method:. The numerical analysis was based on a standard dual-mobility system consisting of a polished metallic cup, a UHMWPE intermediate-component (40 mm outer diameter) with an eccentric offset of 2 mm and a 28 mm ceramic femoral head [Fig. 1]. The relative motion of the intermediate-component was affected by the geometrically generated self-centering torque (T. C. ) and the friction torque for inner (T. Fi. ) and outer (T. Fo. ) articulation around the centre of rotation Z. 1. [Fig. 2]. In order to consider lubrication conditions the lambda ratio was estimated for different daily life activities [3], including the calculation of composite roughness and minimum film thickness for a ball-on-plate configuration. The friction torque was related to the product of load (FRes), lever arm and the coefficients of friction which were determined using the equation proposed by [4]. Depending on load FRes and load orientation angle βthe equilibrium of moments around Z. 1. was established. Results:. Due to surface roughness and calculated minimum film thickness (0.1 to 0.62 μm), boundary lubrication was determined for both inner and outer articulation. The average coefficient of friction was 0.01825 for inner and 0.0751 for outer bearing. Torque patterns were obtained for different load orientation angles [Fig. 3]. In case of an angle β between 15° and 45° the friction torque dominated compared to the self-centering mechanism which resulted in a fixed intermediate-component position. Increasing the orientation angle β above 45° lead to a superiority of the self-centering effect as can be found for varus positions. Discussion:. In case of daily life activities the load vector FRes varies within the range of 30° in the frontal plane [3]. Therefore, the angle β ranges below 30° which leads to a fixed position of the intermediate-component. Consequently, the self-centering mechanism seems to have no negative influence on the wear propagation of dual-mobility cup systems. The presented numerical analysis permits a variation of implant-specific dimensions, but is limited to polyethylene wear couples

Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration.

Prospective follow-up of the Duplex^TM implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website.

159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool.

We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection.

Dual Mobility (DM) Total Hip Replacements (THRs), are becoming widely used but function in-vivo is not fully understood.

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of impingement of a modular dual mobility with that of a standard cup.

A geometrical model of one subject's bony anatomy \[1\] was developed, a THR was implanted with the cup at a range of inclination and anteversion positions (Corail® stem, Pinnacle® cup (DePuy Synthes)). Two DM variants and one STD acetabular cup were modelled. Joint motions were taken from kinematic data of activities of daily living associated with dislocation \[2\] and walking. The occurrence of impingement was assessed for each component combination, orientation and activity. Implant-implant impingement can occur between the femoral neck and the metal or PE liner (DM or STD constructs respectively) or neck-PE mobile liner (DM only).

The results comprise a colour coded matrix which sums the number of impingement events for each cup position and activity and for each implant variant.

Neck-PE mobile liner impingement, occurred for both DM sizes, for all activities, and most cup placement positions indicating that the PE mobile liner is likely to move at the start of all activities including walking.

For all constructs no placement positions avoided neck-metal (DM) or neck-PE liner (STD) impingementevents in all activities. The least number of events occurred at higher inclination and anteversion component positions. In addition to implant-implant impingement, some instances of bone-bone and implant-bone impingement were also observed.

Consistent with DM philosophy, neck-PE mobile liner impingement and liner motion occurred for all activities including walking. Neck-liner impingement frequency was comparable between both DM sizes (metal liner) and a standard cup (PE liner).

Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a frequent cause of revision and patients with intrinsic risk factors have been identified. The use of dual mobility (DM) cup has shown great efficiency in preventing dislocation, with questions regarding selective or absolute use. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of single mobility THA (SM-THA) and DM-THA, when used for selected patients.

This retrospective continuous cohort study evaluated 490 patients of whom 275 received SM-THA and 215 received DM-THA. There were 304 primary osteoarthritis (62%), 121 femoral neck fractures (24%) and 65 other indications (14%). The surgical approach was anterior (AA) in 79% and posterior (PA) in 21% of cases. In the DM-THA group, 189 patients (87%) presented at least one dislocation risk factor compared to 128 patients (46%) in the SM-THA group. The primary outcome was revision for all causes, with or without implant removal. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay.

There was no difference in all cause revision at two years follow up with 9 procedures (3.2%) in SM-THA group and 11 in DM-THA group (5.1%) (p=0.3). There were 3 dislocations in SM-THA group (3 AA) and 3 in DM-THA group (2 PA and 1 AA) (p=0.4).

The length of stay was significantly longer in DM-THA group with 7 days (2–12) compared to 4 days (1–7) in SM-THA group (p=0.001).

SM-THA and DM-THA are two complementary devices in the management of patients requiring primary THA. SM-THA is a safe option for patients without dislocation risk factors, especially when using AA. The identification of such factors is important to select patients requiring DM-THA and provide reproducible outcomes in a University Hospital practice including various levels of surgeon experience.

Adverse spinopelvic mobility (SPM) has been shown to increase risk of dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In patients undergoing THA, prevalence of adverse SPM has been shown to be as high as 41%. Stiff lumbar spine, large posterior standing pelvic tilt and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as risk factors for increased hip instability. Dislocation rates for dual mobility articulations have been reported to be 0% to 1.1%. The aim of this study was to determine the early survivorship from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) of patients with adverse SPM who received a dual mobility articulation.

A multicentre study was performed using data from 229 patients undergoing primary THA, enrolled consecutively. All the patients who had one or more adverse spine or pelvic mobility parameters had a dual mobility articulation inserted at the time of their surgery. Average age was 76 (22 to 93) years and 63% were female. At a mean of 2.1 (1 – 3.3) years post-op, the AOANJRR was analysed for follow-up. Reasons for revision and types of revision were identified.

The AOANJRR reported two revisions. One due to infection and the second due to femoral component loosening. No revisions for dislocation were reported. One patient died with the prosthesis in situ. Kaplan Meier survival was 99.3% (CI 98.3% − 100%) at 2 years.

DM bearings reduce the risk of dislocation of primary THA in patients with adverse spine and pelvic mobility.

Dislocation post THA confers a higher risk of re-dislocation (Kotwal et al, 2009). The dual mobility (DM) cup design (1974) was aimed at improving the stability by increasing the femoral head to neck ratio (Cuthbert et al., 2019) combining the ideas of low friction arthroplasty with increased jump distance associated with a big head arthroplasty.

Understand the dislocation rates, rates of aseptic loosening, infection rate and revision rates between the 2 types of constructs to provide current and up-to date evidence.

Medline, pubmed, embase and Cochrane databases were used based on PRISMA guidelines. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. Studies (English literature) which used DM construct with atleast 6 months follow-up used as intervention and non DM construct as control were included. 2 independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer in case of difference in opinion regarding eligibility. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and secondary outcome was rate of revision.

564 articles identified out of which 44 articles were screened for full texts and eventually 4 systematic review articles found eligible for the study. Thus, study became a review of systematic reviews. From the 4 systematic reviews, another 35 studies were identified for data extraction and 13 papers were used for meta-analysis. Systematic reviews evaluated, projected an average follow up of 6-8 years with significantly lower dislocation rates for DM cups. The total number of patients undergoing DM cup primary THA were 30,559 with an average age 71 years while the control group consisted of 218,834 patients with an average age of 69 years. DM group had lower rate of dislocation (p < 0.00001), total lower rate of cup revision (p < 0.00001, higher incidence of fracture (p>0.05).

DM THA is a viable alternative for conventional THA. The long-term results of DM cups in primary THA need to be further evaluated using high quality prospective studies and RCTs.

Abstract