The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome following arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with biceps lesions. This is a retrospective study of sixty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 68 ± 6 years) with seventy-two irreparable rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic biceps tenotomy (thirty-nine cases) or tenodesis (thirty-three cases). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean follow-up of thirty-five months (range, 24–52). Fifty-three patients (78%) were satisfied. Constant score improved from forty-six to sixty-seven points (p< 0.001). Presence of a healthy, intact teres minor on preoperative imaging correlated with increased postoperative external rotation (40 vs. 18°, p< 0.05) and higher Constant score (p< 0.05). Three patients with a pseudoparalyzed shoulder did not benefit from the procedure and did not regain active elevation above the horizontal level. By contrast, fifteen patients with painful loss of active elevation recovered active elevation. The acromiohumeral distance decreased 1 mm on average, and only one patient developed glenohumeral osteoarthritis. There was no difference between tenotomy and tenodesis (Constant Score sixty-one vs. seventy-three). A “Popeye” sign was clinically apparent in twenty-four tenotomy patients (61%), but none were bothered by it. Two patients required reoperation with a reverse prosthesis. Arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and tenodesis effectively treats severe pain or dysfunction caused by an irreparable rotator cuff tear associated with biceps pathology. Shoulder function is significantly lower if the teres minor is atrophic or fatty infiltrated. Pseudoparalysis or severe cuff arthropathy are contraindications

Management of the pathologic long-head biceps tendon remains controversial. Biceps tenotomy is a simple intervention but may result in visible deformity and subjective cramping. Comparatively, biceps tenodesis is technically challenging, and has increased operative times, and a more prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis, identify predictors for developing a deformity, and compare subjective and objective outcomes between those that have one and those that do not. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older with an arthroscopy confirmed biceps lesion were randomized to one of these two techniques. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were patient reported presence/absence of a popeye deformity, satisfaction with the appearance of their arm, as well as pain and cramping on a VAS. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa) was calculated between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of its occurrence. Linear regression was performed to identify if age, gender, or BMI were predictive of satisfaction in appearance if a deformity was present. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The incidence of popeye deformity was 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group (18 male, 1 female) with a relative risk of 3.5 (p=0.016). There was strong interrater agreement between evaluator and patient perceived deformity (kappa=0.636; p<0.001). Gender tended towards being a significant predictor of having a popeye with males having 6.6 greater odds (p=0.090). BMI also tended towards significance with lower BMI predictive of popeye deformity (OR 1.21; p=0.051). Age was not predictive (p=0.191). Mean (SD) satisfaction score regarding the appearance of their popeye deformity was 7.3 (2.6). Age was a significant predictor, with lower age associated with decreased satisfaction (F=14.951, adjusted r2=0.582, p=0.004), but there was no association with gender (p=0.083) or BMI (p=0.949). There were no differences in pain, cramping, or strength between those who had a popeye deformity and those who did not. The risk of developing a popeye deformity was 3.5 times higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis. Male gender and lower BMI tended towards being predictive of having a deformity; however, those with a high BMI may have had popeye deformities that were not as visually apparent to an examiner as those with a lower BMI. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger patients with low BMI to mitigate the risk of an unsatisfactory popeye deformity

Introduction and Objective

There remains much debate regarding the optimal method for surgical management of patients with long head of biceps pathology. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tenotomy versus tenodesis.

Study design: Retrospective study of 34 patients with a massive rotator cuff tear, who were treated with an arthroscopic tuberoplasty, debridement of the degenerate cuff and biceps tenotomy. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcome of a reversed decompression at the medium term follow up. Summary of background data: Rotator cuff repair can become impossible for massive tears in the elderly. If conservative management fails, a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used. However, Fenlin described in 2002 a tuberoplasty for this pathology and reported good to excellent results. This procedure appears to be well tolerated as it is arthroscopic, not time consuming and not depending on intensive physiotherapy. In case of failure, a primary RSA is still possible. Methods: 36 patients treated with a tuberoplasty between February 2002 and September 2006 were identified. One patient deceased, one patient developed Alzheimer dementia, leaving 34 patients available for follow-up. They completed the SF-36 questionnaire and the Simple shoulder test. They were clinically reviewed and scored with the Constant-Murley score. All 34 had complete radiographic work-up (x-ray; ultrasound) preoperatively and at final follow up. Results: Median age at operation was 71 years (range: 52,5 – 82,16). Mean follow-up was 3,1 years (SD: +/− 0,75). Mean operating time was 35 minutes (SD: +/− 12.33). There were no surgical complications. Postoperatively, there was an uneventful recovery in all patients. At final follow-up, two patients were revised to a RSA. One patient was revised after 9 months because of continuous pain and loss of function. The second patient developed a complete osteonecrosis and was revised after one year. The 32 remaining patients had a preoperative Constant-Murley score adjusted for age and gender of 34,8. This improved to an average of 84 at final follow up. The simple shoulder test improved from an average of 1,8 to 8,4. The average decrease of subacromial space was 2,34 mm and the loss of glenohumeral joint space was 0,57. Finally, the preoperative grade of arthrosis was 0,46 compared to a postoperative average of 1,1. At final follow-up, 85% (27/32) were either satisfied or very satisfied with the result. 12,5% (4/32) appreciated the result as only fair. 2,5% (1/32) was dissatisfied, but didn’t consider revision surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that a tuberoplasty with rotator cuff debridement and biceps tenotomy is a reliable treatment for massive rotator cuff tears in the elderly at medium follow up. In case of failure, revision to RSA is still a valuable option

The functional importance of the long head of biceps tendon remains controversial, but it is well accepted as an important source of anterior shoulder pain. Both biceps tenotomy and tenodesis have well-documented results in the native shoulder. Management of the long head of biceps tendon during shoulder arthroplasty remains controversial. The existing literature supports surgical treatment of the biceps during shoulder arthroplasty. Walch et al. reported the largest series in multicenter study of over eight hundred shoulder arthroplasty patients with or without biceps tenodesis. The authors found more reproducible pain relief with biceps tenodesis and no difference in range of motion. Similarly, Soliman et al. reported on a prospective review of 37 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for fracture randomly assigned to biceps tenodesis vs. no treatment. The authors found a statistically significant improvement in Constant score and shoulder pain with biceps tenodesis. If left untreated during shoulder arthroplasty, the intact biceps tendon may be a source of anterior shoulder pain requiring revision surgery. Tuckman et al. reported excellent pain relief after biceps tenotomy or tenodesis for biceps-related pain after previous shoulder arthroplasty. The decision to perform a biceps tenotomy versus a tenodesis during shoulder arthroplasty also remains controversial. Tenotomy may increase the risk of cosmetic pop-eye deformity and muscle cramping or fatigue over tenodesis. Therefore, routine long head of biceps soft tissue tenodesis is recommended during shoulder arthroplasty as it safe, reproducible, cost-effective, associated with improved outcome scores, and minimises the risk of cosmetic deformity and pain associated with biceps tenotomy

The long head of the biceps tendon has been proposed as a source of pain in patients with rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the objective, subjective, and radiographic results of arthroscopic biceps tenotomy in selected patients with rotator cuff tears. Three hundred seven arthroscopic biceps tenotomies were performed in patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears. All patients had previously failed appropriate nonoperative management. Patients were selected for arthroscopic tenotomy if the tear was thought to be irreparable or the patient was older and not willing to participate in the rehabilitation required following rotator cuff repair. One hundred eleven shoulders underwent a concomitant acromioplasty. The mean age at surgery was 64.3 years. The mean preoperative radiographic acromiohumeral interval measured 6.6 mm. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean 57 months follow-up (range 24 to 168 months). The mean Constant score increased from 48.4 points preoperatively to 67.6 points postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Eighty-seven percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Nine patients underwent an additional surgical procedure (three for attempt at rotator cuff repair and six for reverse prostheses for cuff tear arthropathy). The acromiohumeral interval decreased by a mean. 1.3 mm during the follow-up period and was associated with longer duration of follow-up (p < 0.0001). Preoperatively, 38% of patients had glenohumeral arthritis; postoperatively, 67% of patients had glenohumeral arthritis. Concomitant acromioplasty was statistically associated with better subjective and objective results only in patients with an acromiohumeral distance greater than 6 mm. Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff musculature had a negative influence on both the functional and radiographic results (p < 0.0001). Arthroscopic biceps tenotomy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears in selected patients yields good objective improvement and a high degree of patient satisfaction. Despite these improvements, arthroscopic tenotomy does not appear to alter the progressive radiographic changes that occur with long standing rotator cuff tears

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone

Introduction: A cosmetic deformity does not always occur after a biceps tenotomy. The anatomical restraints preventing distal excursion of the long head of biceps tendon following tenotomy have not previously been described. This study aims to evaluate the biceps sheath and its potential role as a restraint to distal excursion of the biceps following tenotomy. Methods: Fifteen fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected free of overlying soft tissues to reveal the rotator cuff, biceps sheath and long head of biceps muscle belly and tendon. Eight specimens were used for gross anatomical analysis. Measurements of the length of the biceps sheath on the humeral (bone) side and tendon side were made using a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Japan). The long head of biceps tendon was then released from the glenoid labrum and the excursion of the stump relative to the rim of the articular surface measured. The biceps sheaths of two specimens were used for histological analysis. Seven specimens were used for mechanical analysis. A humeral osteotomy was performed distal to the insertion of pectoralis major, leaving intact the biceps sheath and the muscle belly of long head of biceps. The proximal humerus was attached to a custom-designed jig and the muscle belly of biceps grasped in cryogenic grips. Specimens were loaded on an MTS 858 Bionix mechanical testing machine (MTS Systems, MN) in uniaxial tension at a rate of 1 mm/sec until failure was observed. Results: The biceps sheath surrounds the long head of biceps tendon and inserts into the bone of the proximal humerus. It is trapezoidal in cross-section, with a mean length of 75.1 mm on the bone side and 49.3 mm on the tendon side. The average excursion of the stump was to within 2.8 mm of the rim of the articular surface. Histological examination of the biceps sheath revealed membranous tissue consisting of loose soft tissue with fat and blood vessels. Synovial tissue was also identified. The sheath was seen to loosely attach to the biceps tendon, with a more intimate attachment to the periosteum. The mean force to pull the long head of biceps tendon out of the sheath 102.7 N (range 17.4 N–227.6 N). Discussion: The biceps sheath is a consistent structure intimately associated with the biceps tendon. It appears to contain blood vessels which provide nutrition to the tendon, similar to the vincula of flexor digitorum pro-fundus. Mechanical testing reveals that a substantial force is sometimes required to pull the biceps tendon from the sheath. This may explain why biceps tenotomy does not routinely result in a “Popeye” biceps

Introduction. Superior Labral Anterior Posterior Tears are being treated surgically in increasing numbers. Stiffness is the most common complication. We reviewed 115 cases of SLAP repairs to try and identify preoperative risk factors if any for stiffness. Methods. Retrospective cohort study of 115 patients who underwent SLAP repair. All patients failed attempts at conservative therapy including NSAIDS, Physical Therapy and cortisone injections. Results. Age ranged from 16–71 years, with an average age of 46. Male 84, Female 31. patient charts and operative notes were examined from 2004–2009. We used an average of 1.64 anchors per case; we performed arthroscopic Mumford on 15 patients, subscap repair (4), 19 cases with concomitant SLAP repair and Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Other procedures included Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis, chondroplasty, Microfracture, removal of loose bodies, synovectomy and lysis of adhesions. Twelve patients underwent revision surgery(10%) We had 5 cases of stiffness which required lysis of adhesions and synovectomy, 4 cases had previous SLAP and concomitant rotator cuff repair done at the index surgery, 4 cases had arthrosis noted at index surgery and underwent chondroplasty and 2 of them underwent micro fracture. During the revision surgery 4 had also a concomitant cuff tear (new) which required repair Average time from index surgery to revision was 11 months, the patients who developed adhesive Capsulitis and stiffness the average age was 56 years. We had 2 titanium metal anchors pull out and present as loose bodies with one of the anchor causing chondral damage, we stopped using metal anchors and we have not had this problem recur since.5 cases had Mumford procedure done during the revision surgery.5 cases needed repeat SLAP repairs and by increasing use of biceps tenotomy this incidence should decrease. Conclusions. Our large retrospective case series shows an acceptable complication rate. Stiffness (5%) is still the most common complication especially in patients older than 50, withpreexisting Glenohumeral arthritis and concomitant rotator cuff tears. Hopefully our early aggressive mobilization will decrease this incidence

Purpose: Arthroscopic arthroplasty for painful shoulder is not always successful. Repeated arthroscopy is sometimes discussed for patients with recurrent pain. The purpose of this work was to determine the technique and identify indications. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24 patients (13 men, 11 women), mean age 52 years, who underwent repeated arthroscopy after failure within 31 months of arthroscopic acromioplasty with no other intervention. Three groups were formed: group 1 (7 patients): subacromial impingement due to tendinitis with intact supraspinatus; group 2 (11 patients): subacromial impingement secondary to cuff tear; group 3 (6 patients): calcified tendinopathy. In group 1, the acromion was type 1 in three cases, type 2 in three and type 3 in one; repeated arthroscopy included complementary acromioplasty. In group 2, all patients had complementary acromioplasty; six of them with biceps tenotomy. In group 3, the remaining calcification was removed in all patients and complementary acromioplasty in three. Results: Mean follow-up was 21 months. In group 1, outcome was satisfactory in three patients (43%), irrespective of the acromial morphology. In group 2, outcome was satisfactory in six patients (55%), including five with acromioplasty with tenotomy and only one with complementary acromioplasty alone. In group 3, outcome was satisfactory in five patients (83%); one failure was attributed to remaining calcification; acromioplasty did not influence outcome. Discussion, conclusion: The acromion should not be considered as the principal cause of failure after first acromioplasty. In this series, only 33% of the patients who had complementary acromioplasty had a good outcome at last follow-up. Biceps tenotomy in patients with rotator cuff tears and removal of the calcium deposit in patients with calcified tenopathies should be considered first

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess long-term functional outcome after arthroscopic acromioplasty for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, to evaluate the efficacy of complementary procedures (biceps tenotomy, extended acromioclavicular resection), and to examine the course of anatomic lesions. Material and methods: From 1988 to 1994, 141 full-thickness rotator cuff tears were treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty. Ninety-eight patients, mean age 60 years, were reviewed clinically, radiographically, and sonographically at more than eight years. The mean preoperative Constant score was 48.5 points. The tear involved the supraspinatus in 18 cases, the supraspinatus and infraspinatus in 40, the supraspinatus and the subscapularis in ten, and all three tendons in 20. Coronal extension showed a distal tear in four, an intermediate tear in 52, and a retracted stump in 32. Systemic acromioplasty was associated in 36 patients with tenotomy of the long head of the brachial biceps and in 44 with acromioclavicular extension. Results: At mean follow-up of 10.7 years (8–13.5), the mean Constant score was 60 points. The clinical outcome was excellent or good in 39.7%, fair in 45.5%, and poor in 14.8. 62.5% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. The height of the subacromial space was 5.19 mm at last follow-up compared with 4.3 mm preoperatively. The antalgesic effect of biceps tenotomy was significant when the initial acromiohumeral space was less than 5 mm. This procedure did not produce any significant change in the subacromial height or development of osteoarthritis at last follow-up. Sonography showed stability of the size of the tear in 83.8% of the cases. The results were significantly less satisfactory when the initial tear involved the subscapularis or all three tendons. Conclusion: The clinical results of arthroscopic acropmioplasty for full-thickness tears show long-term stability. Biceps tenotomy improves the antalgesic effect significantly, particularly if the subachromial space measures less than 5 mm preoperatively, without causing significant radiological degradation. Extension to the acromioclavicular level should be systematic in patients with acromioclavicular pain preoperatively and/or radiological anomalies

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) is a challenging clinical problem in young patients. Given the possibility of early glenoid component loosening in this population with total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and subsequent need for early revision, alternative treatment options are often recommended to provide pain relief and improved range of motion. While nonoperative modalities including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and physical therapy focusing on rotator cuff strengthening and scapular stabilization may provide some symptomatic relief, young patients with glenohumeral OA often need surgery for improved outcomes. Joint preserving techniques, such as arthroscopic debridement with removal of loose bodies and capsular release, with or without biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, remains a viable nonarthroplasty option in these patients. Clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for glenohumeral OA in young patients have had favorable outcomes. Evidence suggests that earlier stages of glenohumeral OA have more favorable outcomes with arthroscopic debridement procedures, with worse outcomes being observed in patients with complete joint space loss and bipolar chondral lesions. More advanced arthroscopic options include inferior osteophyte excision and axillary neurolysis or microfracture of chondral lesions, both of which have demonstrated favorable early clinical outcomes. Patients with some preserved joint space and small osteophytes can avoid arthroplasty and have improved functional outcomes after arthroscopic debridement for glenohumeral OA. Caution should be advised when indicating this procedure for patients with large osteophytes, grade IV bipolar lesions, biconcave glenoids, and complete loss of joint space

The diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon remains controversial. There is uncertainty as to the role of the long head of biceps and it can be difficult to determine whether the patient's pathology is coming from the biceps or other adjacent structures. In addition, the appropriate type of treatment remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed the files of the senior author's experience in over 4000 arthroscopic shoulder procedures. We examined cases involving isolated biceps pathology, excluding those patients with rotator cuff tears and labral pathology, involving 92 biceps tenotomies and 103 biceps tenodeses. Our analysis supports the benefit of clinical examination over all types of radiological investigations. The benefits and technique of biceps tenodesis is described including surgical technique. Irritation by PLA interference screw is examined. A paradigm is put forward to help in diagnosis and management of these lesions. Long head of biceps pathology is a significant cause of shoulder pain in association with other shoulder problems and in isolation. Biceps tenodesis and tenotomy is an efficacious way of dealing with this pathology

The results of arthroscopic repair of tears of the sub-scapularis tendon in nine men and six women, ranging in age from 53 to 73 years, were followed up at a mean of 14 months (6 to 24). Three were complete tears, six 50%-tears and six 30%-tears. In seven patients there were associated tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, which were repaired arthroscopically during the same procedure. In each case the subscapularis tear was identified. In most patients a biceps tenotomy was necessary. The subscapularis footprint was prepared and the tendon was repaired using one or two anchors, each with two sutures, depending on the size of the tear. The mean pre-operative and postoperative Constant scores were 48 and 88 respectively. In most patients, power returned to almost normal and pain was almost completely relieved. Arthroscopic subscapularis repair is a relatively new procedure and seems to give good results

Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical results of arthroscopic release for the treatment of shoulder stiffness and to report the results according to etiology. Method: Thirty cases were reviewed in 29 patients with a mean age of 48 years [range, 25–75]. The mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 37.5 months [range, 6–120]. The stiffness was considered idiopathic (i.e. frozen shoulder) (10 cases), post-traumatic (eight cases) or post-surgical (12 cases). The release consisted of 14 rotator interval resections, four anterior capsulotomies, 20 anterior and inferior capsulotomies, three tenotomies of the superior portion of the subscapularis, and 11 biceps tenotomies or tenodeses. In 26 cases, associated extra-articular procedures were also performed, including 22 subacromial bursectomies and four acromioplasties. Patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 44 months [range, 12–99]. Results: Eighty-nine percent were satisfied or very satisfied. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 76%. The mean Constant score increased from 40 ± 13 points preoperatively to 74 ± 16 points postoperatively (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic shoulder release is effective for pain relief and improved function. The recovery of motion is better in idiopathic stiffness (i.e. frozen shoulder) than in post-traumatic and post-surgical stiffness. Resection of the rotator interval seems effective to restore external rotation and elevation

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of revision subacromial decompression and identify different pathologies. Materials/Methods. We analysed the patients who underwent Revision Arthroscopic Subacromial decompression from our prospective database of shoulder patients. Between April 2003 and Dec 2010, 797 patients underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Patients who underwent any other procedure i.e. biceps tenotomy, capsular release, cuff repair were excluded from the study. Of these, 37 underwent a revision subacromial decompression (Revision rate 4.6%). The indication for revision procedure was persistent pain or restricted movements not responding to physiotherapy and injections. Results. We found that 1) Patients having cuff pathology i.e. partial tear or degenerate cuff were more likely to need a revision procedure (11/37 and 92/797, p = 0.001). 2) The rate of ACJ excision done for residual pain after primary subacromial decompression was similar to the rate of ACJ excision at the time of the primary procedure (7/37 vs. 100/797, p= 0.5). 3) Presence of Calcific deposits did not have any influence on the risk of having a revision procedure (2/37 and 12/797, p= 0.1). 4) Patients found to have synovitis in the primary procedure were more likely to need revision procedure (10/37 and 81/797, p = 0.001). 5) Presence of biceps tendonitis did not significantly affect the risk of having a revision procedure after arthroscopic subacromial decompression (3 /37 and 21 /797, p = 0.5). Conclusion. Our revision rate is similar to those published in literature. In our failed cases there was a trend for patients to have an associated partial rotator cuff tear and synovitis

Aims: We reviewed our experience to determine the results of arthroscopic repair in patients over 50 with rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion in whom the repair was effected repairing the two lesions, or repairing the rotator cuff tears and performing a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Methods: We recruited 121 patients older than 50 years in whom a symptomatic rotator cuff tear had failed non-surgical management and was affecting daily activities. We assigned them retrospectively to one of the two groups: Group 1 underwent arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff and repair of the type II SLAP lesion. Group 2 underwent arthoscopic repair of the rotator cuff tear and a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Results: There was statistically significant difference in total postoperative UCLA scores and ROM when comparing the two groups postoperatively (P< 0.05). Conclusions: We compared the clinical outcome of patients over 50 affected by the association of rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion, in whom both the defects were repaired, or the rotator cuff tear was repaired and the long head of the biceps tendon was tenotomized. In our hands, the association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with the association of Type II SLAP lesion repair and rotator cuff repair at three years of follow-up

Background: Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis are less common than those involving the posterior superior rotator cuff. The purpose of this study is to report the results of repair of isolated tears of the subscapularis. Methods: Eighty-four shoulders that had undergone open repair of the subscapularis tendon were reviewed. The mean age at surgery was 53.2 years. The mean interval from onset of symptoms to surgery was 12.5 months. Fifty-seven tears were traumatic, and twenty-seven were degenerative in etiology. Twenty-three of the tears involved the superior third of the subscapularis tendon, forty-one involved the superior two thirds, and twenty were complete tears. Fifty-four shoulders had a dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon, while ten shoulders had a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon. Forty-eight shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis; thirteen shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy; and four shoulders underwent concomitant recentering of the biceps. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean fortyfive month follow-up (range 24 to 132 months). Results: The mean Constant score increased from 55.0 points preoperatively to 79.5 points postoperatively (p< 0.001). Seventy-five patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Preoperatively, four patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, twenty-five patients had mild glenohumeral arthritis and two patients had moderate glenohumeral arthritis. Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair was associated with improved subjective and objective results independent of the preoperative condition of the biceps tendon

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) represent a difficult situation especially in painful and pseudoparalytic patients. A new technique, consisting of an arthroscopic implantation of an inflatable biodegradable “balloon”, serving as a temporary subacromial spacer, has been introduced recently for MIRCTs. The purpose of this paper is: 1) to present the efficacy and safety results of patients treated with the balloon; 2) to show that these results are maintained over time, after balloon degradation; 3) to compare these results to published results of other procedures available for MIRCTs. This paper presents the first group of 22 patients (females/males 13/8, one bilateral), treated in a single-surgeon, prospective and on-going series of 97 shoulders operated with the balloon, since September 2010. The mean age is 69.3 (52–86) and the average follow-up 52.5 months. The balloon is inserted arthroscopically and inflated with saline. The procedure is simple with a short operative time (10–20 min). It can also supplement partial repairs, especially of the subscapularis, as well as repairable massive tears with bad tissue quality. The balloon is not used in severe cuff tear arthropathy or complete insufficiency of the external rotators. Final outcome scores, Constant (CS) and UCLA scores are obtained at least three years after complete balloon degradation (which occurs within 12 months), and are also compared to those of other treatments available for MIRCTs. No device related safety issues were observed in this group. Good results, including rapid pain relief and restoration of active motion, which maintained over time, are obtained in 85% of the patients. The CS has improved significantly (average preop/postop: pain 2.9/12.7; ADL 6.8/17.4; ROM 22.8/36.6; strength 3.1/5.6; TOTAL 35.8/72.3; NORMATIVE 42.7/86.4). The UCLA score has also improved significantly (preop/postop: pain 1.9/8.6; function 3.9/8.6; active flexion 3.5/4.5; strength in flexion 2.4/3.4; satisfaction 0/4.5; TOTAL 11.2/29.8). Pseudoparalysis is reversed (average preop/postop flexion 86°/156.8°). The CS and UCLA score for the balloon are superior compared to published results of debridement, biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, partial repair, tuberoplasty and latissimus dorsi transfer. CS (86.4/63.8), CS pain (12.7/11.9) and flexion (156.8/128.0) are also better for the balloon compared to the reverse prosthesis. The balloon is indicated for MIRCTs, as well as reparable massive tears with a high risk of retear. The implantation is a straightforward and short procedure, which has excellent safety profile and positive effect on painful MIRCTs including pseudoparalysis. The balloon provides significant improvement in the CS and UCLA score that persists way beyond its degradation. The balloon patients' shoulder function is superior to the other available treatment options. Additional studies are needed to further confirm the effectiveness of the balloon as a first line treatment for MIRCTs