Abstract. Objective. To compare the periprosthetic fracture mechanics between a collared and collarless fully coated cementless femoral stem in a composite femur. Methods. Two groups of six composite femurs (‘Osteoporotic femur’, SawBones, WA USA) were implanted with either a collared (collared group) or collarless (collarless group) cementless femoral stem which was otherwise identical by a single experienced surgeon. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. High speed video recording was used to identify fracture mechanism. Fracture torque and angular displacement were measured and rotational work and system stiffness were estimated for each trial. Results were compared between collared and collarless group and the comparison was evaluated against previously published work using fresh frozen femurs and the same protocol. Results. In composite femur testing median fracture torque (IQR) was greater with a collared versus collarless implant (48.41 [42.60 to 50.27] Nm versus 45.12 [39.13 to 48.09] Nm, p= 0.4). Median rotational displacement (IQR) was less with a collared versus collarless implant (0.29 [0.27 to 0.31] radians versus 0.33 [0.32 to 0.34] radians, p= 0.07). Estimated rotary work was similar between groups (5.76 [4.92 to 6.64] J versus 5.21 [4.25 to 6.04] J, p= 0.4). Torsional stiffness was greater with a collared versus collarless implant (158.36 [152.61, 163.54] Nm per radian versus 138.79 [122.53, 140.59] Nm per radian, p= 0.5). Collarless stems were seen to move independently of the femur and fracture patterns originated at the calcar. Conclusions. Testing with composite femurs using an established protocol produced similar results to previously published studies using human femurs, but the difference between collared and collarless stems was smaller. The internal homogenous foam material in composite femurs does not accurately represent the heterogeneous cancellous bone which supports a femoral stem in vivo and may lead to overestimation of implant stability. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Background. As the number of primary or revision TKA with stem extension cases are growing simultaneously, the number of periprosthetic fracture in these cases has also increased accordingly. However, there have been few reports on the classification and treatment of periprosthetic fracture following stemmed TKA and lack of information about the treatment outcome. The purposes of this study were 1) to demonstrate classification and management of periprosthetic fractures after stemmed TKA and 2) to report treatment outcome after the periprosthetic fractures. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 knees (15 patients) with an average age of 69.7 years. All cases were revision TKA cases, and there were 13 female and 2 male patients. The patients were treated nonoperatively or underwent operation by orthopedic principle. The period of union was evaluated by confirming the formation of callus crossing fragments in radiographs. We reviewed the complications and functional outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic fracture following revision TKA by assessing FF, FC and scoring WOMAC and KSS. Results. The classification of periprosthetic fractures of stemmed TKA was based on location of fracture and stability of implant. They were classified as follows: type I, metaphyseal fracture without loosening of implant [Fig. 1]; type II, diaphyseal fracture adjacent to stem without loosening of implant [Fig. 2]; type III, diaphyseal fracture away from stem without loosening of implant [Fig. 3]; and type IV, metaphyseal or diaphyseal fracture with loosening of implant [Fig. 4]. There were 1 case of type I, 9 cases of type II, 4 cases of type III and 3 cases of type IV fractures. The mean time for gaining radiographic union of type I was 3.3 month; type II was 4.4 month; type III was 4.6 month; and type IV was 3.9 month. Most of the metaphyseal fractures were comminuted and all cases of loosening of the femoral implant were found in the metaphyseal fractures. Nine periprosthetic fractures were fixed using locking plate (single locking plate : 4 cases, dual locking plate : 5 cases). The bone union period is much shorter in patients with dual plate fixation than single plate only. Range of motion, WOMAC and KSS were not significantly different between before fracture and after management of fracture. Complications included 1 metal failure, 2 loosening of implant and 1 postoperative infection. Conclusions. Metaphyseal fractures probably cause the collateral ligament insufficiency, and loosen the implant. Therefore, rotating hinge prosthesis should be used to stabilize the ligament of knee joint. Also, Revision TKA with longer stem should be considered if the stability of implant is not sure. When we underwent operation using plate fixation, dual plating provided better stability of fracture and shortened the union period than single plating. However, we need to approach individually depending on the patient, such as using cerclage wire, bone graft and so on. This study will help to establish appropriate treatment options according to each classification. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) that carries significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Currently, uncemented stems are highly preferred in primary THA, but have been associated with higher risk of PFF compared to cemented stems. The use of collared stems in uncemented primary THA has shown promise in reducing PFF rates postoperatively. This retrospective study included 2,294 uncemented primary THAs using the posterior approach performed by two attending surgeons from January 2016 to December 2022. Both surgeons switched from a collarless femoral stem design to a collared design in May 2020. Data was collected regarding stem design, frequency of PFF, and requirement for revision surgery. Periprosthetic fractures were identified and confirmed using medical records and/or radiographic imaging. Fracture rates and percentages between collared and collarless stems were then analyzed. A Fisher's Exact Test was performed to determine if there was a significant association between collared and collarless stem use on PFF rates. A total of 2,294 uncemented primary THAs performed by 2 surgeons were eligible for analysis. 903 (39.4%) patients received a collared stem, and 1,391 (60.6%) patients received a collarless stem. In total, 14 (0.6%) PFFs occurred over the study period. There was 1 fracture (0.1%) out of 903 collared stems, and 13 fractures (0.9%) out of 1,391 collarless stems (p = 0.012). Collared stems were associated with a significant decrease in PFF rate when compared to collarless stems in uncemented primary THA. Future studies are encouraged to continue to investigate PFF and other complication rates with the use of a collared stem design

Introduction: Management of periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a difficult clinical problem, requiring expertise in both trauma and revision surgery. Estimates of the prevalence of postoperative fracture range from 0.1% to 2.1%, and with rising numbers of patients in the population living with hip prostheses in situ there is evidence that their frequency is increasing. There remains a paucity of data on the functional outcome of these injuries, and the objective of this study was to analyse outcomes for revision THA following periprosthetic fracture, and compare these to elective revision surgery. Methods: 233 patients (234 hips) undergoing revision THA for femoral fracture were identified from the New Zealand National Registry, and clinical outcomes were measured using Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) completed six months post operatively. A control group of 234 patients undergoing elective revision THA was selected and matched for age, sex, and time since index operation. Results: Comparative analysis of the registry patients showed clinical outcomes were significantly worse following revision THA for fractured femur than in controls (mean OHS 28.6 vs 23.6, p=0.006), though this difference was not apparent in patients under the age of 65 years (mean OHS 26.1 vs 23.8, p =0.6). A higher mortality rate was found among fracture patients (17.1% versus 10.7 %, p=0.05), and a statistically significant higher number of periprosthetic fracture patients died within 6 months of their surgery in comparison to controls (7.3% versus 0.9%, p=0.003). A higher rate of re-revision was observed in the fracture group (7.7% versus 2.6%, p=0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge this study represents the largest comparative series of periprosthetic fractures in THA with functional outcome data yet reported. Management of patients with periprosthetic fractures requires recognition of the challenging nature of these injuries, their associated poor prognosis, and high complication rate

The Lubinus SP II is an anatomical femoral stem with high survivorship levels notably described in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. As the clinical and economic burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) continues to increase, it has been suggested that use of anatomical stems may facilitate more uniform cement mantles and improve implant survival. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship and PPF rate of the Lubinus SP II 150mm stem in a single UK centre. Between January 2007 and April 2012, 1000 consecutive THAs were performed using the Lubinus SP II femoral stem in our institution. Patient demographics and operative details were collected in a prospective arthroplasty database. Patient records and national radiographic archives were then reviewed at a mean of 12.3 years (SD 1.3) following surgery to identify occurrence of subsequent revision surgery, dislocation or periprosthetic fracture. Mean patient age at surgery was 69.3 years (SD 10.1, 24–93 years). There were 634 women (63%). Osteoarthritis was the operative indication in 974 patients (97%). There were 13 revisions in total (4 for recurrent dislocation, 3 for infection, 6 for acetabular loosening) and 16 dislocations (1.6%). Stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.6% (95 % confidence interval [CI], 99.5%–99.7%) and at 15 years was 98.8% (98.7%–98.9%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Analysis of all cause THA failure demonstrated a survivorship of 99.1% (99.0%–99.3%) at 10 years and 98.2% (98.1%–98.3%) at 15 years. There were 4 periprosthetic fractures in total (0.4%) at mean 12.3 year follow-up. The Lubinus SP II stem demonstrated excellent survivorship, low dislocation rates and negligible PPF rates up to 15 years following primary THA. Use of anatomical stems such as the Lubinus SPII would appear to be a wise clinical and economic investment for patients and healthcare systems alike

Background. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty are relatively uncommon but are associated with significant morbidity. With an increasing number of total hip arthroplasties being carried out in an aging population we need to ensure correct implants are chosen for our patients. A recent review of NJR data suggested a significantly higher revision risk for the Zimmer CPT stems due to periprosthetic fractures when compared to the Stryker Exeter stems. Objectives. Our aim was to compare the biomechanics of periprosthetic fractures around the CPT and Exeter V40 stems in a composite saw bone model to identify if a difference in fracture risk exists between the two stems. We also compared the engineering design of the two implants in order to analyse the possible effect this may have on fracture risk. Study Design & Methods. Fourteen composite femurs were divided into two groups and cemented using Palacos R cement with either the CPT or Exeter V40 stem by a single surgeon. The implanted femurs were then mounted onto an Instron machine and were axially loaded and torqued to fracture with an axial compressive force of 2000N over 10 seconds followed by a rotation of 40 degrees applied over 1 second. A power calculation from a previous composite saw bone model study suggested that a minimum of 6 implanted femurs would be required in each group. Results. The implanted femurs invariably sustained fracture patterns similar to the Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture which are commonly seen in clinical practice. Implanted femurs with CPT stems suffered periprosthetic fractures with less rotation when compared to those femurs with the Exeter V40 stem (20.10 versus 33.60, p<0.01). We also found that CPT implanted femurs were fracturing at significantly lower torque values when compared to the Exeter V40 implanted femurs (124Nm Versus 174Nm, p<0.01). The energy release rate (G111) for CPT stems was 21.8Nm compared to 61.2Nm for Exeter V40 stems. The higher energy release with Exeter stems led to more comminuted fractures in Exeter implanted femurs when compared to the CPT femurs, which fractured earlier, but with simpler fracture patterns. Finite element method (FEM) simulation analysis showed that fractures initiated between the prosthesis and cement at the proximal end of the femur. Two dimensional sections at the same height showed a difference in bone-cement-implant geometrics at the critical point of failure suggesting that a design cause may be the reason for the higher risk of periprosthetic fractures in CPT implanted femurs. Conclusions. Our observations may explain the higher revision risk secondary to periprosthetic fractures that has been observed with the CPT stem when compared to the Exeter V40 stem

Introduction: The amount of tension which surgeons apply to a two-side Dall-Miles cable during the fixation of periprosthetic fracture has not been reported. Current study is the first report that reveals the real cable tension data which was intraoperatively measured. Methods: In vivo data of tightening torque was measured intraoperatively during Dall-Miles cable fixation surgeries for periprosthetic fracture of the femur. And the numerical relationship between torque and cable tension was assessed through mechanical tests. Using the torque vs. cable tension relationship, intraoperatively measured tightening torque was converted into a cable tension. Intraoperative measurement of tightening torque In vivo data of the maximal torque which was applied by an experienced surgeon was measured using a torquemeter. Total 11 cases of periprosthetic femoral fractures from 11 patients were participated with their agreement. A two-side Dall-Miles cable tightener (Stryker Co., USA) was used. To measure the torque of Dall-Miles tightener applied by a surgeon, a torquemeter (Torque driver 80FTD2-N-S, TOHNICHI, JAPAN) was connected to the Dall-Miles tightener through a square groove. The groove was machined with 1cm × 1cm × 1cm in dimension on the proximal end of the rotational shaft of the Dall-Miles tightener. Laboratory measurement of torque and tension To reveal the relationship between the torque of Dall-Miles cable tensioner and the tension of the cable, mechanical tests were done. A two-side Dall-Miles cable tightener were mounted to INSTRON (INSTRON, Norwood, MA, USA) using a customized fixation jig. One cable of 2 mm in diameter was connected to the upper head of INSTRON, and another to the lower headA preload was slowly applied to the cables up to 10 N so that the initially loose interaction among a tightener, two cables, and two loading heads of INSTRON became tight. Once the preloading finished, tightening torque and cable tension were simultaneously measured. The tightening torque was increased in increment of 1 N-m; accordingly, at each torque the tension hung to Dall-Miles cable was measured by reading loadcell data of INSTRON. Results: Intraoperative tightening torque Intraoperatively measured maximal torque applied to the Dall-Miles cable tensioner was 5.7±0.5 N-m. Numerical expression of torque-tension relationship Based on the data of tightening torque and cable tension measured from mechanical tests, the relationship between the torque (T) and tension (P) of Dall-Midles cable fixation system was numerically expressed. Total range of measured tightening torques and cable tensions was linearized. The linear expression was “T=106.8 × P”. Based on this numerical relationship, the amount of cable tension applied to the cable was calculated as 606.6±58 N. Discussion: This study revealed that 606.6±58 N of cable tension has been applied when an experienced surgeon does cable fixation of periprosthetic fracture. Authors believe that the torque-tension relationship will provide a key biomechanical clue for biomechanics scientists, and the amount of intraoperative cable tension measured at the time of Dall-Miles cable fixation for periprosthetic fracture will provide an important surgical key reference for the surgeons who use the cable fixation system

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and periprosthetic fracture (PF) are one of the most devastating complications in arthroplasty. Each complication by itself is challenging to solve. Yet, simultaneously, both complications are inconceivably complex to deal with, while the treatment regimen of PJI and PF are contradictory. Chronic PJI most often requires implant removal, while PF requires stability, regularly achieved by stable osteosynthesis. This study aims to (1) analyse the success rate of PJI with following concomitant PF during the treatment course in total hip arthroplasties (THA) and (2) to determine the risk factors for reinfection and subsequent revision surgery after treatment of PJI and PF. Method. This restrospective study analyzed 41 patients with concomitant PJI and PF during the PJI treatment period from 2013 to 2022 involving THA. Patients were divided in two cohorts termed success and failure and were statistically compared. The median follow-up time was 66 months (>12 months). All patients were considered individually and treated according to their individual needs in fracture and infection treatment. Re-arthroplasty survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Relevant risk factors were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test or Chi-square, depending on the variable's scale. Results. The overall success rate of our cohort was 70,7%. Twelve patients required re-operation due to reinfection, resulting in a cumulative 12-month-reinfection rate of 19,5%. The estimated cumulative reinfection free survival rate was 68,3%. Significance in risk factors for failure were found in pathogen virulence grade, Difficult to treat pathogen and number of debridement during interval. On average the Harris Hip score was 66 in the group of reinfection compared to 77 in the group of success. Conclusions. Reoperation and re-infection rate remains high in patients with simultaneous PJI and PF in THA. Due to the heterogeneity of the fractures, soft tissue conditions and pathogens found, treatment must be individualised to salvage the limb. However, small cohorts impact the statistical strength negatively due to instances of two rare complications

Mortality following revision hip surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) has been reported to be as high as 60% at 5 years. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality rate for PPF revisions, compared to revision for aseptic loosening or infection at our tertiary referral centre. Revision arthroplasty procedures performed for PPF, aseptic loosening or infection between January 2014 and December 2015 at our institution were identified using a prospectively collected PPF referral database and locally collected NJR data. Comparisons were made between the 3 groups for baseline demographics, admission to higher-level care, length of stay, complications, and Kaplan-Meier failure (mortality) at 1 & 5 years post-operative (with log-rank test for equality). There were 37 PPF, 71 infected and 221 aseptic revisions. PPF had a higher proportion of females (65% vs. 39% in infection and 53% in aseptic; p = 0.031) and grade 3 and 4 ASA patients (p = 0.006). Median time to surgery from injury for PPF was 8 days (95% CI, 6–16). Single-stage procedures were performed in 84% of PPF, 42% of infection and 99% of aseptic revisions (p < 0.001). 19% of PPF revisions required HDU admission, 1% in the aseptic group and none in the infection group (p<0.001). Median length of stay was significantly different (PPF 10; infection 14; aseptic 8 days (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1-year mortality were: PPF = 0%; infection = 2.8% (0.7–11.1%); aseptic = 0.9% (0.2–3.5%). 5-year mortality estimates were: PPF = 17.1% (8–34%), infection = 8.7% (4–18.3%), aseptic = 12% (8.4–17%). Log-rank test of equality was not significant, p=0.833. Despite the PPF group having an average delay to surgery of 8 days, higher ASA grades and more admissions to HDU there was no significant difference in mortality rates between the groups at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. Using a coherent MDT approach with dedicated healthcare professionals this service demonstrates a low post operative mortality rate which merits further investment and development

Periprosthetic femoral fractures can occur as a complication of total hip arthroplasty and are often challenging to treat as the mechanical scenario is influenced by the presence of the metal prosthesis within the bone. This research focuses on finding the optimum fixation for transverse, Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures, stabilised using locking plates and secured using screws. The aim of this study was to experimentally validate a computer model of a human femur, develop that model to represent a periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation and show how the model could be used to indicate differences between plating techniques. In the first development stage, both a laboratory model and a finite element model were developed to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of an intact composite femur under axial loading. Axial strains were recorded along the medial length of the femur in both cases and compared to provide validation for the computational model predications. The computational intact femur model was then modified to include a cemented total hip replacement, and further adapted to include a periprosthetic fracture stabilised using a locking plate, with unicortical screws above, and bicortical screws below the transverse fracture. For the intact femur case, the experimental and computational strain patterns correlated well with an average difference of 16%. Following the inclusion of the stem, there was a reduction in the strain in the region of the prosthesis reducing by an average of 45%. There was also a large increase in bulk stiffness with the introduction of the prosthesis. When the fracture and plate fixation were included, there was little difference in the proximal strain where the stem dominated, and the strains in the distal region were found to be highly sensitive to the distribution of the screws. The results of this study indicate that screw configuration is an important factor in periprosthetic fracture fixation. A laboratory model of the periprosthetic facture case is now under development to further validate the computational models and the two approaches will then be used to determine optimum fixation methods for a range of clinical scenarios

Introduction and Aims: Periprosthetic fracture is a serious complication of increasing incidence in joint replacement. Our aim was to evaluate periprosthetic fracture patterns in our series of 1152 primary hip arthroplasties using a cementless proximally hydroxyapatie coated anatomic stem and to identify risk factors from parameters measured in our assessment of these patients. Method: All patients with periprosthetic fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty using the Anatomique Benoist Girard I (ABG I) hip system were identified. Parameters studied included time of fracture after surgery, patient age and fracture classification. The pre-operative cortical index in the fracture group was measured and compared with a group matched for age, gender, diagnosis, and body mass index. 1152 ABG I primary hip arthroplasties were performed in 1037 patients from 1991–1997. Osteoarthritis was diagnosed in 93% of cases. The average age was 65 years; there were 536 females and 501 males. Mean follow-up was 79.6 months. Results: Thirty-two patients, 16 male and 16 female, suffered a periprosthetic fracture. Thirty-one patients were treated for osteoarthritis and one for a femoral neck fracture. We retrieved complete records on 28 patients. The average age of the fracture group was 73 years, compared to 65 years for the whole series (p< 0.0001). The incidence of periprosthetic fracture increased with age. The relative risk for patients over 70 years for peri-prosthetic fracture is 4.7 greater (95% CI 2.14–10.21). Distinct fractures patterns were related to time from initial surgery. Four fractures occurred within three months of surgery; these early fractures exhibited a particular pattern. The remaining 24 occurred between four and 114 months after surgery. These late fractures exhibited a different but consistent fracture pattern. Two fractures in the early group were identified immediately post-operatively. All others presented after minor low energy trauma. The mean cortical index in the fracture group was 47% and in the matched group 51%. If the pre-operative cortical index is below 50%, the risk of periprosthetic fracture is 4.75 greater (odds ratio 4.75 CI 1.5–15.00). All fractures were adequately classified and managed by guidelines in the Vancouver classification. Conclusion: This study identified distinct fracture patterns related to time from surgery. Cortical index and age have predictive value in pre-operative assessment of fracture risk: cortical index below 50 and age above 70 are risk factors for periprosthetic fracture and should be considered with other parameters to minimise risk of this complication

PURPOSE OF STUDY. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty is a potentially serious and challenging complication and the incidence is continuously rising. The purpose of this study was to analyse the prevalence and analyse effectiveness of the various treatment methods for management of periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty, and to determine the clinical and radiographic results of patients following surgical treatment of these injuries. METHODS. We reviewed all patients with periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty treated surgically between 2003 and 2008 from the prospective hospital database. Medical and radiographic records were reviewed for patient characteristics, fracture characteristics, implant details, healing, and complications. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were reviewed at the time of admission, post-operatively and at follow up visits. Fractures were classified according to the Lewis and Rorabeck, Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the methods of Su and DeWal. RESULTS. 26 patients (average age= 77.6) had operative management for displaced fractures. Mechanical fall was the commonest mode of injury at a mean of 4.66 years post primary replacement. Locking plates was the commonest method of fixation for stable implant and displaced fractures [Lewis & Rorabeck type 2] and 2 patients had distal femoral replacements for unstable implants. Successful fracture healing within 6 months occurred in all but one patient. Full weight bearing mobilisation was achieved at 3 months in 94% and patients with distal femoral replacements achieved quickest recovery. CONCLUSIONS. Compared to the current literature, we had a satisfactory outcome in following individualised treatment of periprosthetic fractures after knee joint replacement. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around the knee commonly constitute a challenging problem and require an adequate analysis of fracture etiology and distal femoral replacement achieves satisfactory results in fractures with unstable implants

Purpose of the study: Few data are available concerning the proper management of patients with a periprosthetic fracture of the hip who presents biological signs of inflammation (increased WBC, sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein). The purpose of this work was to determine the prevalence of elevated biological markers in this type of patient and to determine the reliability of such markers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. Material and methods: A periprosthetic hip fracture was diagnosed in 204 patients from 2000 to 2006. The WBC count, the sedimentation rate and the serum CRP level were noted at admission to the emergency ward. The diagnosis of infection was confirmed by at least two positive bacteriological samples of tissue biopsy and/or joint fluid collected at surgery. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence of elevated biological markers of inflammation, the sensitivity, their specificity and their positive predictive value for deep infection. Results: Twenty-one patients (11.6%) developed a periprosthetic infection. Among the 204 patients, the WBC count increased in 16.2%, sedimentation rate in 33.3% and CRP in 50.5%. The sensitivity was 24% (WBC), 50% (sedimentation rate) and 83% (CRP). The specificity was 85% (WBC), 69% (sedimentation rate) and 56% (CRP). The positive predictive value was low (18, 21 and 29% respectively). Discussion: Markers of inflammation are frequently ordered before surgery to search for infection but can be elevated for various reasons. Most often, these markers are elevated because of the patient’s general status and are thus related to other co-morbid conditions and/or reaction to the new fracture. In this population, the WBC count did not contribute to the diagnosis of infection as only 24% of the infected patients had a high count. CRP and sedimentation rate and the WBC count had low positive predictive values. Conclusion: This study shows that an isolated elevation of biological markers of inflammation in a patient with a periprosthetic fracture is not a good indicator of infection

Periprosthetic fractures present an increasing workload as more hip arthroplasties are performed. They are often challenging to treat due to poor bone stock and patient frailty. We compare the early clinical and radiological results in 2 centres of 24 consecutive periprosthetic hip fractures in 24 patients, using a cannulated interlocked long stemmed titanium alloy femoral component with or without a hydroxyapatite (HA) coating (Cannulok revision prosthesis). The mean age at the time of operation was 79 years (range 65 to 92.4 years). The average length of follow up was 1.17 years (range 3 months to 5.3 years). All patients receiving a Cannulok revision stem with a minimum follow up of 3 months were included regardless of their primary aetiology and number of previous surgical procedures. Patients were reviewed and scored using the Merle d’Aubigne and Postal Score, Harris Hip Score and the WOMAC index at latest review. Periprosthetic fractures were classified using the Vancouver classification. At latest radiological review we measured subsidence, new bone formation (including presence of callus), osteolysis and radiolucent lines in all areas of the stem. Of the 24 fractures, 22 healed. In the 14 who had HA coated implants there was a 50% increase in bone. In the non-HA coated stems there was a 36% increase in bone radiologically. The mean Harris hip score was 74 at the latest post-operative review. The mean WOMAC and MDP scores were 48.7 and 7.7 respectively. The mean pain visual analogue score was 1.6 overall and 0 specifically for mid-thigh pain. We present encouraging early clinical and radiological results of the Cannulok stem system for treatment of complex periprosthetic fractures. This implant provides early fracture stability and subsequent biological bonding with an improvement in bone mass

We present a case of multifocal infection involving the left total hip replacement and the right total knee replacement of a patient, further complicated by an infected non-union of a periprosthetic fracture of the right knee. This required the unique simultaneous management of both infection eradication and fracture stabilization in the knee. Both sites were treated with a 2-stage procedure, including the novel use of a stemmed articulating spacer for the right knee. This spacer was made combining a retrograde humeral nail, coated with antibiotic-impregnated cement, and a pre-formed articulating cement spacer. The patient was able to weight-bear on this spacer. The fracture went on to unite, and a second stage was performed with the use of stemmed prosthesis and augments. She remains infection free 2 years after the second stage operation. The use of a stemmed articulating knee spacer can facilitate infection eradication and fracture stabilization while preserving some motion and weight-bearing ability in the 2 stage management of an infected periprosthetic fracture of the knee

Aim. Periprosthetic fractures are usually observed in patients aged over 65 years. The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femur and tibia fractures is rising with increasing number of hip and knee joint replacements and the increasing life expectancy. The aetiology of periprosthetic fractures is multifactorial. Minimal trauma is causal for the fracture in most cases. Other risk factors are: generalized osteoporosis, loosening of the prosthesis and revision arthroplasty. Our aim is restoration of the patient's pre-fracture functional status. Method. Between 2004 and 2009 in the Asklepios Orthopedic Clinic Hohwald 118 patients (82 women, 36 men) were operated because of periprosthetic fractures. Mean patient age at surgery was 71 years (range 60-87). The right treatment depends on the location of the fracture and the stability of the implant. Very important is also the quality of bone and the patient's general state of health. Results. A successful surgical treatment requires a careful preoperative planning. The type of the fracture with or without prostheses instability and with or without bone defect all have influence on the type of patients surgery. Two patients died within one year. There were 2 cases of infection and cases of 5 late healing. Fixation with different plates was used for 67 fractures, at intact and undamaged endoprosthesis was used usually osteosynthesis with “Less Invasive Stabilisation System” plate (LISS, NCB). It combines high primary stability with the biological advantages of a slide-insertion plate osteosynthesis. Retrograde nailing was possible in 5 patients and 8 further with screws and cerclage wiring. In 38 cases we changed the endoprosthesis partially or completely. We reconstructed prosthetic damage or periprosthetic fractures with bone defect using modular prostheses. This system allows a large number of additional components and their combination with cone blocks for reconstruction of severe bone defects. Conclusion. Periprosthetic fractures have such a range of clinical presentations that they need to be managed on individual basis. The best functional results for stable implants gived internal fixation with a plate. Alternative osteosynthetic techniques and additive minimal osteosynthesis can work better in special cases. Modular prostheses for bone replacement are a method of choice for fractures with extensive bone loss. Nonoperative treatment should only be performed in exceptional cases. Periprosthetic fractures are serious complications because of the mortality and the difficulty in achieving functional recovery after treatment. Our primary aim is remobilization as early as possible-that is the best prevention of secondary complications

Post-operative periprosthetic fracture of the femur (POPFF) is a growing problem associated with increased mortality. Most registry derived estimates of mortality only record patients who undergo revision and cohort studies are generally limited to a single center, which makes comparison for the purposes of service improvement difficult. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies reporting mortality following POPFF in the last decade. Study methodology was peer-reviewed (PROSPERO: CRD42020170819). Literature search was conducted using Medline and EMBASE. Primary exposure was the diagnosis of POPFF, and the primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality: whilst an inpatient, within 30-days, within 90-days and within one year of POPFF. Proportion of patients dying (95% CI [confidence interval]) was estimated using metaregression. Results were compared to mortality following neck of femur fracture (NOF) from international NOF registry data. 4841 patients from 35 cohort studies were included. Study quality was generally low with a majority limited to a single centre. Weighted mean follow-up was 2.3 years and the most common POPFF was UCS B. Pooled proportion dying as an inpatient was 2.4% (95% CI 1.6% to 3.4%). Pooled proportion dying within 30 days was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0% to 5.0%). Pooled proportion dying within 90 days was 4.8% (95% CI 3.6% to 6.1%). Pooled proportion dying within one year was 13.4% (95% CI 11.9% to 14.8%). Mortality following POPFF was similar to that of NOF up to 30 days, but better at one year. 3.3% of patients die following POPFF within 30 days of injury. Mortality is similar to that experienced by patients following NOF up to 30 days, but better at one year, which may represent the lower underlying risk of death in the POPFF cohort. These results may form the basis for evaluation of services treating POPFF in the future

Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after hip arthroplasty is a difficult problem. Management depends on different clinical factors and these are fractures are managed at District General Hospitals. Present series is of fifty such fractures presenting between 1999 and 2004 in two District General Hospitals in England. Number of female patients were more than males and majority of patients sustained these injuries after trivial fall. Outcome of management are analysed according to modified ‘Tower and Beals’ criteria (1999). Eleven patients lost to follow-up, twelve patients died (mortality was twenty-four percent) during follow-up. Twenty-one patients progressed to clinical and radiological union at an average of eight and eleven months respectively. Six patients are under follow-up. Although several results are published in literature but the present result is comparable to the most literatures. If certain principles are followed comparable results can be obtained in District General Hospitals by Surgeons with a special interest in the management of these fractures

Introduction: The JRI Furlong HAC LOL hemiarthroplasty stem has shown increased periprosthetic fracture rates compared to previous literature(15.2% vs 7.4%). This study will seek to identify a measurable radiographic index, the Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Index (MDI) score to determine whether intra-operative fracture in osteoporotic bone can be predicted to influence the type of prosthesis used (cemented or uncemented). Methodology: Over 5 years prospectively, a cohort of 560 consecutive patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (cemented and uncemented) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and radiographic analysis was performed. The Vancouver Classification was used to classify peri-prosthetic fracture. The MDI score was calculated using radiographs from the uncemented group. As a control (gold standard), Yeung et al’s CBR score was also calculated. From this, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was formulated for both scores and area under the curve (AUC) compared. Intra and inter-observer correlations were determined. Cost analysis was also worked out for adverse outcomes. Results: 407 uncemented and 153 cemented stems were implanted. 62 periprosthetic fractures occurred in the uncemented group (15.2%), 9 occurred in the cemented group (5.9%), p< 0.001. The revision rate for sustaining a periprosthetic fracture (uncemented group) was 17.7%, p< 0.001. MDI’s AUC was 0.985 compared to CBR’s 0.948, p< 0.001. The MDI score cut-off to predict fracture was 21, sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 99.8%, positive predictive value 90.5% and negative predictive value 98%. ANCOVA analysis ruled out any other confounding factors as being significant. The intra and inter-observer Pearson correlation scores were r=0.99, p< 0.001. The total extra cost due to the intra-operative fractures was ú40,140. Discussion: The MDI score has been shown to be a potentially useful, cost effective way of preventing this serious complication from occurring. We recommend that any femur scoring 21 or less on the MDI score be considered for cemented hemiarthroplasty. Level of evidence: Level 2 Diagnostic Study: Investigating a diagnostic test against gold standard

Dual mobility (DM) is most often used by surgeons to reduce instability in high risk patients. NJR data on DM has not demonstrated a reduction in all cause revision and has reported an increase in revision for peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF). The aim of our study was:

Prospective F/U of a DM implant since 2016 and enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure all-cause revision with secondary outcome including any re-operation and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). All patients were risk stratified and considered high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage, NJR and BC. Benchmarking data for comparison was obtained from same data sources we also considered all B type PPF that occurred with cemented polished taper stem (PTS).

159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 6.7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a PTS rate of Type B PPF 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to cTHA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Relative risks for dislocation 0.57 (95%CI 0.08–4.1) and PPF 1.75 (95%CI 0.54–5.72). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool.

The selective use of DM in high-risk patients can reduce the burden of instability. These individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. A “perfect storm” is created using a high-risk implant combination (DM & PTS) in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection.