A statement of the purposes of the study and background. The biopsychosocial (BPS) model is recommended for managing non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) but the best method for teaching the BPS model is unclear. E-learning is a promising alternative to face-to-face methods. This study was a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded interview study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a main RCT and to explore the impact of an BPS for NSLBP e-learning programme on experienced practitioners' attitudes to back pain. A summary of the methods used and the results. Mixed methods evaluated the impact of an evidence-based e-learning programme on participants' attitudes to back pain. A pilot RCT assessed 45 experienced osteopaths' attitudes before and after the intervention, using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) and the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale (ABS). The qualitative study explored 9 participants' views on the e-learning programme and possible impact on their clinical practice. 91% of participants completed the course and the overall satisfaction was very high. Participants' views on the BPS model ranged between not being structural enough, already done and transformative. The e-learning programme was well accepted. It would be feasible to run a main study using the same recruitment procedures, eligibility criteria, randomisation procedure, consent process, data collection and outcome measures. Conclusion. E-learning is an appropriate tool to deliver CPD to experienced manual therapists. Although a pilot study, the results suggest a shift in practitioners' attitudes towards a more BPS view of back pain. A main trial should be undertaken to test the effectiveness of the intervention. No conflicts of interest. Funding acknowledgements: This research is part of Jerry Draper-Rodi's Professional Doctorate in Osteopathy, partly funded by the British School of Osteopathy

Purpose and background. Lower back pain is a leading cause of disability and a common condition seen by osteopaths. Evidence and advice for the safest lifting posture vary, as do healthcare practitioners' attitudes towards back pain. The aim of this study was to understand osteopaths' beliefs about safe lifting postures, their attitudes towards back pain, and to compare these findings with published data from physiotherapists and manual handling advisors. Methods and results. A cross-sectional electronic survey was used to invite a sample of UK osteopaths to select images that best represent their perception of safe lifting posture (straight or rounded back), and to complete the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ, Appendix 1). Data was analysed to assess lifting posture selection and relationship to back pain attitudes. 46 (85.2%) out of 54 osteopaths selected straight back posture as safest, these participants had significantly more negative attitudes to back pain injury (i.e. higher Back-PAQ scores), than the 8 osteopaths who selected a rounded back posture (p = 0.007). Data from 266 physiotherapists and 132 manual handling advisors revealed an overall agreement about straight back lifting posture, however revealed differences in Back-PAQ attitude between the professions. Conclusion. Despite a lack of evidence base and inconsistent recommendations, osteopaths in this survey and other healthcare practitioners believe that straight back lifting posture is the safest. Practitioners' attitudes vary and are known to influence their patients' attitudes and recovery behaviour. Further research is recommended to identify reasons for different beliefs, and their impact on advice-giving and patient outcomes. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding for the research: None

Background: General practitioners (GPs), orthopaedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, rheumatologists and pain consultants manage the majority of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) in the Republic of Ireland. However, little is known about their attitudes and beliefs and the factors that influenced them. This study aimed to investigate factors that influenced doctors’ attitudes and beliefs to CLBP. Method: A cross-sectional questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of GPs (n=750; 35%), and all orthopaedic surgeons (n=81), neurosurgeons (n=9), rheumatologists (n=26), and pain consultants (n=24) in the republic of Ireland. The questionnaire pack contained a demographic data form, two clinical vignettes, and an attitudes measure, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS.PT). Approval was obtained from the UCD Human Research Ethics Committee. Results: The response rate was 58% (n=523). Doctors were qualified 23.4±9.4 years. Analysis of the vignettes showed there was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between those who had undertaken postgraduate education (PGE) regarding referral rates to physiotherapy, investigations, or secondary care. Prescription rates were significantly lower for those who had undertaken PGE (88% v 94%, χ. 2. =4.95, p< 0.05), as was their biomedical score on the PABS.PT (41.3 v 43.1, df=507, p=0.03). The number of years since qualification was dichotomised (1–23 yrs, > 23 yrs), and there was no significant difference in the management of the vignettes, except referral rates for investigations which was greater for doctors qualified > 23 years (3% v 52%, χ. 2. =10.71, p=0.001). Conclusion: Demographic factors (PGE and the number of years since qualification) did not significantly influence doctors’ practice behaviour

The aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes and beliefs of military physiotherapists utilising the ‘Health care providers beliefs attitudes and impairments scale’ devised by Rainville et al (1994). The scale is a valid and reliable tool which indicates the likelihood of advice given to patients with a low back pain is either pro active or fear avoidant. The scale has been utilised amongst health care professionals and has shown a high degree of correlation with patient vignettes. A high score on the HC- PAIRS, is indicative of that advice given to patients is generally fear avoidant and cautious. Conversely, a low score supports current research and indicates that pro-active advice is more likely to be given to the patient. The HC PAIRS questionnaire was distributed to all 90 military physiotherapists currently serving in a clinical role. The questionnaire was accompanied by a letter explaining that the nature of the study and requesting the questionnaire be completed and that the biographical information of gender, rank, age range, years military service, years physiotherapy experience, qualification to practice as a physiotherapist and highest academic qualification obtained be recorded. A total of 83 returns were received. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the SPSS (version 14) statistical package. Results indicated a mean score of 50.86(SD 10.189). Military service equated to a mean of 8.86 years (SD 9.153), whilst physiotherapy experience gave a mean of 8.87 years (SD 6.327). Further statistical analysis was undertaken to establish whether there was a correlation between any of the biographical data collected and of the HC-PAIRS score. No correlation of statistical significance was identified in any of the categories. The results obtained from the military physiotherapists are very similar to those obtained in similar studies utilising civilian physiotherapists, moderately fear avoidant. Attitudes and beliefs would appear to be developed very early in the physiotherapist’s career, exposure to both clinical experience and military culture would appear to have minimal impact on these beliefs. This has important implications when changes to traditional management strategies are being considered and implemented. Correspondence should be addressed to Major M Butler RAMC, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon

Purpose of the study and background. Healthcare practitioners' (HCPs) attitudes and beliefs about MSK pain influence their practice behaviour. The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS), developed for use in the context of LBP, consists of two subscales (biomedical and biopsychosocial) is the most widely used measure. However, poor performance of the biopsychosocial orientation scale is attributed, in part, to inadequate conceptualisation of the orientation. Purpose. To develop a new biopsychosocial scale and adapt the PABS to assess HCPs' attitudes and beliefs about common MSK pain. Methods and results. A grounded conceptualisation process was conducted with 40 MSK HCPs and/or researchers using concept mapping methodology. The resultant conceptual framework consisted of six primary domains of biopsychosocial clinical orientation (bio-clinical, therapeutic relationship, individual patient aspects, emotions, social and work) and informed development of new scale items. These items were included with existing PABS items in a national survey of UK-based HCPs, and analysis was conducted on 587 responses. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified and confirmed a new 10-item biopsychosocial scale (Cronbach's alpha of 0.83). The new biopsychosocial and existing biomedical scales demonstrated good test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) 0.77 and 0.74 respectively). Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change were also established. Conclusion. The new generic MSK version of the PABS biopsychosocial scale shows promising structural validity and test-retest reliability. The existing PABS biomedical scale's structure and performance was upheld. The new conceptual framework provides a contemporary, comprehensive understanding of the biopsychosocial clinical approach to common MSK pain, with potential value for the development, delivery and evaluation of biopsychosocial clinical practice. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding:. Kirsty Duncan was the holder of an ACORN PhD studentship from Keele University. Part of the conceptualisation component of this work was also supported by a Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust International Lecture Fund Award. Annette Bishop and Nadine Foster were supported through an NIHR Research Professorship for Nadine Foster (NIHR-RP-011-015). NEF is an NIHR Senior Investigator. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health

Background: Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists play key roles in the management of low back pain patients in the UK In our previous work we used mixed methods to investigate theor cognitions and attitudes to treating back pain. We developed and tested a scale, the Attitudes to Back Pain- Musculoskeletal Practitioners Scale, which includes both a personal and professional dimensional. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the attitudes of three professional groups: Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Physiotherapists. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was sent to 300 practitioners randomly selected from the registers of each profession. The returned questionnaires (N=465, response rate 61%), including the new ABS-mp and a questionnaire about personal and professional factors were analysed, using ANOVA, to compare the responses from the three groups. Results: Physiotherapists tend to limit the number of treatment sessions offered to LBP patients. They work more clearly within a re-activation approach than their colleagues in the either of the other two professional groups. When practice setting (NHS versus private practice) was considered, the differences in personal interaction attitudes were unchanged but the differences in treatment orientation attitudes become less marked. Conclusions: Aspects associated with practice settings, and especially those concerned with working within the NHS or privately impact on practitioners attitudes. There are also some professional differences, indicating that physiotherapists hold attitudes more closely in line with current guidelines

Purpose and background: Practitioners’ beliefs about their professional role, their patients and the nature of back pain can impact on clinical decisions. These attitudes are likely to affect their choice to implement guidelines, whether they engage with their patients’ psychological problems, and their decisions about referral. We aimed to develop, test and explore the underlying dimensions of a new questionnaire, ‘The Attitudes to Back Pain Scale’ (ABS), in a specific group of clinicians, practitioners who specialise in musculoskeletal therapy: chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (COPs). Methods and Results: We used a mixed methods study design. Using transcripts of interviews with 42 practitioners, we constructed 54 attitudinal statements, grouped theoretically into six sub-headings. We tested the validity of our categorization on 14 practitioners, who carried out a sorting task, including a rating of difficulty in cat-egorising each item. We sent the draft questionnaires to a large random sample of practitioners (300 COPs). 546 questionnaires were returned (61%). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on split samples of the dataset. Separate exploratory analyses were done for attitudes concerned with personal interaction (34 items) and attitudes about treatment orientation (18 items), producing six domains ‘Limitations on sessions’, ‘Psychological’, ‘System and Void’, ‘Clinical Limitations’, ‘Reactivation’, and ‘Biomedical’. Confirmatory analyses indicated that the model tested presented a good fit. Validity interviews revealed high agreement of categorisation and low levels of difficulty in categorising the items. Conclusions: A new questionnaire for measuring clinicians’ attitudes towards back pain has been developed. Further work is required to assess the impact of these factors on practitioners’ behaviour and patient outcomes

Introduction: Previous studies have shown that advice given to patients with low back pain (LBP) by health care practitioners (HCPs) such as physiotherapists (PTs) and general practitioners (GPs) is not in line with guidelines about encouraging early return to work. The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes, beliefs and reported practice behaviour of UK GPs and PTs about LBP and to explore associations between these. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey of GPs and PTs (n=4000), including an attitudes measure, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS.PT), which measures ‘biomedical and behavioural orientations of HCPs. A vignette describing a patient with non-specific LBP, who had a four-week absence from work, was used to capture reported clinical management. This presentation will focus on the findings about work advice. Results: Response rates were 22% (n=446) for GPs and 55% (n=1091) for PTs. Almost one third of GPs (32%) and one in four PTs (25%) reported that they would advise the vignette patient to remain off work. The HCPs advising the vignette patient to remain off work had significantly higher biomedical (F. 1,988. =78.85, p< 0.001) and lower behavioural (F. 1,981. =31.89, p< 0.001) scores on the PABS.PT than those suggesting a return to work. Conclusion: An association between attitudes and reported practice behaviour was apparent, with HCPs operating within a predominantly biomedical framework being more likely to advise a patient with back pain to stay off work. Further research should explore how HCPs’ attitudes might be changed and whether this results in changes in work recommendations

Introduction and Objective

Scaphoid waist fractures (SWF) are notable in upper limb trauma and predominantly occur in young men. Morbidities associated with SWF include fracture non-union, premature arthritis and humpback deformity. Delayed treatment and non-adherence to fracture immobilisation increases likelihood of these complications. There is evidence that men engage in negative health behaviours such as delayed help-seeking. The Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) conducted interviews in individuals who had sustained a SWF. Although SWIFFT showed multiple social determinants for the overall injury and healing experience, a key factor this novel study considers is age and sex. This study aimed to analyse interview data from young male participants in SWIFFT to help distinguish the experience of SWF in young men, through exploring the influence of masculinity.

Study aim

There is an ever increasing demand for quality clinical trials in surgery. Surgeons' co-operation and enthusiasm to participate are important, if not crucial in success of such studies, especially if they are multi-centred. Clinician's individual uncertainty (equipoise) about a case has been often cited as an ethical basis for inviting a patient to take part in a clinical trial. This study aims to establish current attitudes of surgeons participating in a national multi-centred randomised controlled trial and explores an on line tool for instant assessment of collective uncertainty (equipoise) for individual clinical cases eligible for a trial.

Purpose and background

Pain related distress is associated with poor low back pain outcomes, and is challenging for practitioners to address. This study investigated osteopaths' beliefs about the relationship between chronic pain (CP) and distress (D). The research aimed to explore how patient's distress is understood and managed by osteopath educator clinicians with an interest in the field.

Purpose of the study and background

The biopsychosocial (BPS) model is now widely implemented in clinical practice. Most research on manual therapists' attitudes regarding psychosocial (PS) factors and NSLBP is from the physiotherapy profession. There is currently no literature available to understand how osteopaths integrate those factors with patients presenting with NSLBP. The University College of Osteopathy students being the future of the profession and receiving an accredited BPS teaching warranted the need for an investigation about their attitudes towards PS factors and NSLBP.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between patient psychological characteristics, adherence to rehabilitation physiotherapy and outcome at one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Methods: A group of 57 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction received a pre-operative psychological assessment comprising of five questionnaires; Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS), Recovery Locus of Control Scale (RLCS), Self-Motivation Inventory (SMI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Short Form Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ6). Four functional questionnaires were completed pre-operatively by the patient; Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC 2000), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Lysholm Score (LS), and Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS). Final outcome was assessed by repeating the functional questionnaires at 1-year post-operatively following rehabilitation. Anterior displacement of the tibia was recorded using a KT1000 arthrometer pre-operatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Adherence to rehabilitation was recorded using the Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (SIRAS) and attendance to physiotherapy appointments.

Results: The data were analysed using regression analysis. Self motivation, a higher athletic identity, good social support and an internal locus of control are all positive predictors of final outcome. Poor self motivation and an external locus of control are associated with less successful final outcome. Rehabilitation adherence is also a positive predictor of final outcome, although psychological factors were not found to be predictive of adherence to rehabilitation.

Discussion and Conclusion: Self motivation and an internal locus of control are positive predictors of adherence to physiotherapy and final outcome. These aspects can be reinforced during rehabilitation. Patients with an external locus of control and poor self-motivation can be identified and their pre- and post-operative management adapted to achieve optimal outcome.

Background: ProFaNE is an EC-funded network supporting collaboration between researchers in the field of falls injury prevention. One component of ProFaNE concerns psychosocial aspects of falls prevention, which include assessment of fear of falling and attitudes to falls prevention programmes. Findings from members’ collaborative qualitative research on attitudes to falls prevention will be presented.

Methods: We conducted interviews with older people, assessing their beliefs and attitudes regarding falls prevention programmes. Interviews were structured around the Theory of Planned Behaviour, were carried out in the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Norway, Greece and Italy. The thematic analysis reported here compares the beliefs of those who had taken part in a falls prevention programme and those who had not been offered this option.

Findings: Whilst many may reject the notion that falls are anything to do with them, participants reported being motivated to take part in programmes that are designed to improve strength and balance chiefly by a desire for, and experiences of, immediate benefits (including improved functioning and mobility, enjoyment and increased self-confidence) rather than by fear of falling. The main reported barriers to participation included lack of familiarity with such programmes, concern about exertion, transport and financial obstacles, and lack of motivation.

Conclusions: Falls prevention has negative connotations for many older people. Participation in falls prevention programmes may be enhanced by maximising and promoting their immediate benefits rather than their potential for reducing falls, by removing practical barriers, and by providing opportunities to sample programmes in order to demonstrate their immediate benefits. A focus on exercise as promoting health, fitness and independence may have wider acceptability.

Introduction: A Health Action Zone project has been designed to assess the effect of a public education programme to improve the community awareness of the correct approach to low back pain. As part of this project a preliminary survey of the public has been undertaken.

Methods: 195 members of the public were surveyed using by a number of members of the team using a pro-forma. Interview sites were selected to provide a cross section of the population of the community. Demographic details were collected together with data related to low back pain prevalence and attitudes to self management.

Discussion: The initial survey shows that people take too much rest and do too little exercise. The HAZ projects, which have been in existence for three years, have had small penetrance into the community. The Teesside Back Pain Partnership so far has focussed on individual education as part of other strategies. A radio, bus posters, leaf ets and posters campaign aimed at changing beliefs on back pain management. the pattern of behaviour is planned. The extremely low level of awareness of the TBPP will provide an opportunity to measure how much of any change may be attributed to this campaign.

Purpose: We carried out a questionnaire survey amongst all the members of the British Association for surgery of the Knee (BASK) to provide us with a guide to the current practice and opinions on cementing techniques in Knee replacement.

Materials & Methods: Between January and February 2003, all the three hundred members of the BASk were mailed a thirteen-question survey regarding the current practice of TKR with specific emphasis on the cementing techniques.

Conclusion: Our study shows the wide variation in current practice and attitudes towards cementing in Total Knee replacement amongst the specialist Knee surgeons of Britain, but the practice of the majority is in accordance with the guidelines issued by the BOA & BASK.

Introduction: Current guidelines from the British Orthopaedic Oncology Society indicate that the role of the orthopaedic surgeon in the management of the meta-static bone disease (MBD) of the long bones falls into two principal categories; prophylactic fixation of meta-static deposits at risk of fracture and stabilisation following pathological fractures. Bone biopsy and MRI scan is advocated if the primary tumour is not identified.

Aim: The aim of this study is to audit at the current practice in the South Trent region.

Method: A postal questionnaire with three case scenarios was sent to all orthopaedic consultants and SpR’s in the South Trent region. They were asked how they would manage a patient with a fracture and; a single bone metastasis and a known primary tumour, a single bone metastasis and an unknown primary tumour, and multiple metastases of unknown origin.

Results: 80 % of the questionnaires were completed and returned. In the presence of a known primary tumour and a single metastasis, 75 % would send intra-medullary reamings for histology at the time of fixation. In the presence of a single metastasis and an unknown primary tumour, 38 % would perform a biopsy prior to fracture fixation. In the event of multiple metastases with an unknown primary, 15 % would perform a biopsy.

Conclusion: There is a lack of consensus among the orthopaedic surgeons sampled about the management of the MBD. Intramedullary reamings sent during fixation have a high rate of false negative results but are still preferred by many surgeons to aid diagnosis in MBD. Thorough clinical and radiological assessments are probably more useful in the diagnosis of the primary tumour.

Introduction

There are over 110 special tests described in the literature for clinical examination of the shoulder, but there is no general consensus as to which of these are the most appropriate to use. Individual opinion appears to dictate clinical practice. Rationalising which tests and clinical signs are the most useful would not only be helpful for trainees, but would also improve day to day practice and promote better communication and understanding between clinicians.

Background: General practitioners (GPs), orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists and pain consultants manage the majority of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) in primary and secondary care settings in the Republic of Ireland. Little is known about their attitudes and beliefs to CLBP, although the existing literature highlights a range of factors influencing such beliefs including: past experience, education, time and resources¹. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing attitudes and beliefs of Irish doctors to the management of CLBP patients.

Method: A multiple case studies design of semi-structured audiotaped interviews (30 minutes) was conducted on a purposeful sample of GPs (n=7) and Consultants (n=7: orthopaedic surgeons, n=2; Pain consultants, n=2; Rheumatologists n=2 Neurosurgeon, n=1) in July 2006. Questions were devised based on the results of a systematic review of the literature of the topic. All interviews were subsequently transcribed, coded and a cross case analysis was constructed. Approval was obtained from the UCD Human Research Ethics Committee.

Results: The main emerging themes included Doctors current holistic management (referral for physical and mental health treatment), the negative impact of lack of resources on treatment options (lack of multidisciplinary services and prolonged waiting times for Consultant appointments), the influence of the medicolegal system on patients (increased stress) and Doctors (increased referral rates for investigations and procedures).

Conclusion: Doctors’ attitudes and beliefs regarding CLBP management may have important influences on both patient outcomes and resource utilization within the health service. These findings will inform a national postal survey of Doctors attitudes to CLBP.

Purpose: To quantify the amount of agreement among UK orthopaedic surgeons regarding the natural history and treatment including surgery and rehabilitation of the ACL deficient knee.

Methods: Following from Marx et al (Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):762–70) a surgeon mail survey was performed to 360 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee. Surgeons who had treated ACL deficient patients in the last year were asked to complete the survey. Thirty questions were included to determine the surgeons’ opinions regarding the natural history of the ACL deficient knee, indications for surgery and patient selection, surgical treatment and rehabilitation. Clinical agreement was present when 80% or more agreed on the same response option.

Results: 150 surgeons in total responded to the survey; 121 had treated ACL deficient patients in the past year. The mean age was 48.9 years and 83% considered their practice to be a subspecialty in knee surgery. The mean number of ACL reconstructions performed in the past year was 41 (range 1–210). Clinical agreement was present for 12 (40%) of the 30 questions; surgeons disagreed on 18 (60%) of the questions.

Conclusions: Similar significant variation regarding the management of ACL injuries is seen among members of BASK as among members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Clinical disagreement included whether ACL deficient patients can participate in all recreational sporting activities, that ACL reconstruction reduces the rate of arthrosis in the ACL deficient knee, and the use of bracing in non-surgically treated ACL deficient knees. Surgeons also disagreed about age, open growth plates, radiographic evidence of osteoarthrosis, pain, and, repairable and unrepairable meniscal tears in ACL deficient patients.