Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty preformed with the use of minimal incision surgery has received tremendous attention recently. Various surgical approaches have been introduced to minimize surgical trauma to the soft tissues. The mini invasive Modified Watson-Jones approach have been selected to decrease the perioperative complications associated with other mini invasive approaches that has been described.

The anterolateral mini incision is a new innovative approach using the intramuscular plan between the gluteus medius and the tensor fascia lata. This intermuscular interval through a small incision provides good exposure and preserves muscle integrity. Moreover, preserving the muscle integrity provides a very stable joint after implantation such that no restrictions is giving to the patient during the rehabilitation period.

Materials and Methods: Between July 2004 to September 2005, we used this approach on 60 sequential patients. Fifty patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 3-month and 6 month follow-up according to operating time, intraoperative blood loss, subcutaneous drains blood loss, post op pain control drugs requirements, short form 36 patient questionnaire (SF-36) scores and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). 4 patients had previous THA on the contralteral side.

Results: The average operation time was 137min (range 90–200min), there were no dislocations, the mean post operation blood transfusion requirements was 1.64, the mean subcutaneous drains blood loss was 241.9ml (range 20–620ml), there was significant improvement in function, pain, SF-36 and Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up examination. The average length of the incision was under 12cm. We had one reoperation due to deep infection. All four patients with bilateral THA preferred their last operation due to lack of post operative restrictions and due to shorter recovery of muscle strength.

Conclusion: We think that using mini invasive Modified Watson-Jones approach in total hip replacement surgeries is a preferable option. There are several advantages of using this approach compared with the more traditional techniques. Such a technique should help reduce morbidity and complication rates for those patients undergoing a total hip replacement.

Introduction: The anterior and anterolateral approach to the hip traditionally are well described exposures in primary hip arthroplasty with fewer dislocations than the posterior approach. A very debilitating complication associated with the anterolateral approach however is the persistent limp and positive Trendelenburg sign. We discuss our results with respect to abductor function and morphological integrity seen on MRI when using an approach in which we preserve the majority of gluteus medius. Methods: We carried out a prospective study of thirty-nine consecutive total hip replacements performed through a gluteus medius sparing anterolateral approach. The same hip surgeon performed all these between April and October 2004. Gait analysis and Trendelenburg tests were evaluated during clinical follow-up at six weeks and three months. Coronal STIR and T1 weighted MRI sequences of the abductors were performed between four and six weeks and the findings were agreed by the consensus of two radiologists. Results: At three-month follow-up all thirty-nine patients tested Trendelenburg negative. Post-operative radiographs showed satisfactory femoral and acetabular component position. MRI findings showed the gluteus medius tendon to be intact with no shortening on T1. Artefacts were found to be less marked in the higher field strength magnet but more apparent in the STIR weighted sequences. Discussion: We have tried to incorporate the advantages of reduced dislocation rate of the anterolateral approach, whilst avoiding violation of the abductors. The clinical result and radiographic findings we have presented suggest that the described exposure is an effective and safe method of approaching the hip, with minimal disruption of the abductor mechanism. In addition to maintaining the reduced dislocation rate associated with the standard anterolateral approach. Intact abductor function allows for rapid rehabilitation

Purpose. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyzes the anatomical factors likely to be related with intraoperative complications and the difficulties of access noted by the surgeons through a modified minimally invasive ALA. The aim is to define the profile for patient at risk of intraoperative complications during minimally invasive ALA. Methods. We retrospectively included 310 consecutive patients (100 males, 210 females) who had primary unilateral THA using the same technique in all cases. The approach was performed between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius and minimus, without incising or detaching muscles and tendons. Posterior translation was combined to external rotation for proximal femur exposure (Fig. 1). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. For the radiological evaluation, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions. Pelvic [Sacral slope, Pelvic incidence (PI), Anterior pelvic plane angle] and femoral parameters were measured preoperatively. We assessed all intraoperative and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation. Intraoperative complications included the femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure (limitations for exposure and lateralization of the proximal femur). The patients were divided into two groups: patients with or without intraoperative complications. Results. Ten patients (3.2%) had intraoperative femoral fractures (greater trochanter: 2 cases, calcar: 8 cases). Five fractures required additional wiring. Difficult access to proximal femur was reported in the operative records for 10 other patients (3.2%). There was no difference in diagnosis, age, sex, BMI between the patients with or without intraoperative complications. No significant group differences were found for surgical time, and blood loss. Patients with intraoperative complication, presented a significantly lower pelvic incidence than patients without intraoperative complications (mean PI: 39.4° vs 56.9°, p<0.001). The relative risk of intraoperative complications in patients with low PI (PI<45°) was more than thirteen times (relative risk; 13.3, 95% CI= 8.2 to 21.5. p<0.001) the risk for patients with normal and high PI (PI>45°). Conclusions. Anterolateral approach for THA implantation in lateral decubitus is reported to have anatomical and functional advantages. Nevertheless, the exposure of the femur remains a limitation. This study highlights a significant increased risk in case of low PI less than 45°. This specific anatomical pattern reduces the local working space as the possibility for posterior translation and elevation of the proximal femur is less on a narrow pelvis. This limitation is due to the length and the orientation of the hip abductor and short external rotator muscles related to the relative positions of iliac wing and greater trochanter (Fig. 2). This study points out the importance of pelvic incidence for the detection of anatomically less favourable patients for THA implantation using ALA. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The anterolateral surgical exposure to the distal tibia for pilon fractures has become more popular. One of the potential benefits over the commonly used anteromedial approach is a reduction in wound complications due to the improved soft tissue coverage of the anterolateral tibia. Minimal data exists regarding the rate of complications with the anterolateral approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate wound complications in the early postoperative period associated with the use of the anterolateral approach for pilon fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all operatively treated pilon fractures at our university level 1 trauma center from September 2005 through July 2007. Sixty-eight pilon fractures were identified. All patients were treated with a staged protocol utilizing immediate external fixation followed by delayed open reduction and internal fixation based upon the condition of the soft tissue envelope. Patients who had an anterolateral surgical approach were identified and their medical records were reviewed for the first six weeks postoperatively to determine the rate of wound complications. The endpoint of six weeks was chosen to identify complications related to the surgical exposure alone. Results: Thirty-six of the sixty-eight patients with pilon fractures had an anterolateral surgical exposure. One additional patient had an anterolateral incision performed for revision of a previously treated pilon fracture. 97% of these fractures were AO/OTA 43-C (three C1, nine C2, and twenty-three C3). The median time delay to definitive fixation was 19 days (10–38 days). Sixteen (44.4%) of the fractures were open, ten of which were Gustilo type III (five IIIA, four IIIB, and one IIIC). Eight of the thirty-seven patients had wound complications related to the anterolateral incision within the first six weeks of definitive fixation. Six patients (16%) had minor complications which were successfully treated with dressing changes and oral antibiotics, and two (5%) had major complications, with evidence of deep wound infection that required formal irrigation and debridement. Conclusion: In a case series with a high rate of complex open pilon fractures, open reduction and internal fixation utilizing an anterolateral approach provided good exposure of the distal tibia with a low incidence of early wound complications. Significance: Pilon fractures, especially high energy complex open ones, have a high risk of wound complications. Avoiding complications is the key in managing high energy pilon fractures. This case series provides evidence that the anterolateral approach has a low rate of wound complications in the most complex pilon fractures

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and outcomes of the ‘abductor sparing’ MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/G3) in comparison to the MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Method: A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate for the superiority of the new MIS Anterolateral approach (MIS Watson Jones/ G3). The sample size calculation was performed for alpha .05, power .90, to evaluate for effect size 0.5 in WOMAC using repeated measures analyses with baseline WOMAC as covariate. A total of 156 patients consented to participate in the trial and patients were assigned to MIS Antero-lateral approach or alternate MIS approach (MIS Direct Lateral or MIS Posterolateral). Patients were subjected to standardized anaesthetic and perioperative management protocols and were evaluated at standardized intervals to evaluate endpoints of early recovery (3 months) as well as endpoints of 12 and 24 months respectively. The primary outcome of interest was WOMAC, however secondary outcomes included SF-36, as well as parameters of health resource utilization and complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were perfomed. Results: Patient groups were found to be similar at baseline with regards to demographics and baseline quality of life outcomes (p> .05). Multivariate and repeated measures analyses demonstrated no superiority of the MIS Anterolateral approach on outcomes of WOMAC and other quality of life measures in comparison to MIS Direct Lateral and MIS Posterolateral approaches (p> .05). Health care resource utlization was also similar with length of stay, blood transfusion requirements and complications (p> .05). Conclusion: Our multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that the MIS Anterolateral approach is not superior to alternate MIS surgical approaches when evaluating outcomes of quality of life, complications, and health resource utilization. Surgeons should consider these outcomes, complications, and other relevant advantages and disadvantages of select surgical approaches when deciding on a technique for use in their orthopaedic practice

The Dall approach is a modified anterolateral approach with osteotomy of the anterior part of the greater trochanter. This approach relatively preserves the soft tissue tension during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We insert the stem and select a ball neck size so as to have a stable hip which will not dislocate easily during the trial reduction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of this method, to measure leg length discrepancy and offset discrepancy at postoperative radiographs. We selected patients for inclusion in this study from those who have more than a 120 degree of affected hip flection angle, the opposite hip is almost normal with a low leg length discrepancy (primary OA, osteonecrosis, Crowe 1 secondary OA, femoral neck fracture). All THA were performed with cement fixation using an alignment guide to ensure accurate acetabular positioning. The ball head's diameter used were all 26mm. From September 2011 to October 2013, 22 patients met inclusion criteria among 103 THA. The mean age for 22 subjects was 66.6±12 years. The mean flexion angle of preoperative hip joints was 127.2±6.1 degrees. The cup inclination was 43.8° ± 3.5°. Anteversion was 11.8°±6°. The mean preoperative leg length discrepancy was 5.8mm±6.3mm. The mean postoperative leg length discrepancy was 0.7±3.5mm. The mean postoperative offset discrepancy was 0.7±6.6mm. There were no dislocations in this series of 103 cases. Discussion. Dislocation and leg length discrepancies are major complications following a total hip arthroplasty. A good range of motion of the preoperative hip joint is considered a high risk dislocation factor. The Dall approach with minimal release of soft tissue related to a tension of hip joint offers maximal stability and the ability to accurately restore leg length

Recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance has advised against the continued use of the Thompson implant when performing hip hemiarthroplasty and recommended surgeons consider using the anterolateral surgical approach over a posterior approach. Our objective was to review outcomes from a consecutive series of Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty procedures performed in our unit and to identify any factors predicting the risk of complications. 807 Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty cases performed between April 2008 and November 2013 were reviewed. 721 (89.3%) were cemented and 86 (10.7%) uncemented. 575 (71.3%) were performed in female patients. The anterolateral approach was performed in 753 (93.3%) and the posterior approach with enhanced soft tissue repair in 54 (6.7%). Overall, there were 23 dislocations (2.9%). Dislocation following the posterior approach occurred in 13.0% (7 of 54) in comparison to 2.1% (16 of 753) with the anterolateral approach (odds ratio (OR) 8.5 (95% CI 2.8 to 26.3) p < 0.001). Surgeon grade and patient history of cognitive impairment did not have a significant impact on dislocation rate. Patients were discharged home in 459 cases (56.9%), to a care home or other hospital in 273 cases (33.8%). 51.8% (338 of 653) returned home within 30 days. 75 died during their admission (9.3%). 30-day mortality was 7.1% and 1-year mortality was 16.6%. Intraoperative fracture occurred in 15 cases (1.9%) of which 14 were cemented. Superficial or deep infection occurred in 33 cases (4.1%). We recommend against the continued use of the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty, as enhanced soft tissue repair did not reduce dislocation rates to an acceptable level. Our findings, however, demonstrate satisfactory results for patients treated with the Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty performed through an anterolateral approach. We suggest that the continued use of the Thompson implant in a carefully selected patient cohort is justifiable

The purpose of this experimental study was to elucidate the accuracy of neck-cut PSG setting, and femoral component implantation using neck-cut PSG in the THA through the anterolateral-approach relative to the preoperative planning goals, and to determine the usefulness of PSG compared with the procedure without PSG. A total of 32 hips from 16 fresh Caucasian cadaveric samples were used and classified into 4 groups: cementless anatomical stem implantation with wide-base-contact PSG (AWP: 8 hips, Fig.2); (2) cementless anatomical stem implantation with narrow-base-contact PSG (ANP: 8 hips, Fig.2); (3) cementless anatomical stem implantation without PSG (Control: 8 hips); and (4) cementless taper-wedge stem implantation with wide-base-contact PSG (TWP: 8 hips). The absolute error of PSG setting in the sagittal plane of the AWP group was significantly less than that of the ANP (p=0.003).THA with wide-base- contact PSG resulted in better alignment of the femoral component than THA without PSG or with narrow- base-contact PSG. Although the neck-cut PSG did not control the sagittal alignment of taper-wedge stem, the neck-cut PSG was effective to realise the preoperative coronal alignment and medial height for THA via the anterolateral approach regardless of the femoral component type. For figures and tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Migration of the trial femoral head is a rarely occurring complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using the anterolateral approach (ALA). This migration of the trial femoral head under the rectus femoris is extremely risky because of the anatomical situation. Analyzing the morphological character of a case of migration may help us to avoid this risk. Objective. We analyzed the three-dimensional bone morphology using computed tomography (CT) scan images to investigate the physiological characteristics of five migration cases. Methods. We examined 108 patients (21 men, 87 women, 113 hips) who underwent THA via the ALA. The average patient age was 62.9 (range: 30–87) years and average body mass index was 24.4 (range: 18.0–36.0) kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were dysplastic coxarthroses greater than Crowe type II, previous fractures, previous hip operations, and muscle disease. Three-dimensional models of the pelvis and femur were made using ZedHip software® (Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). The anterior superior iliac spine on the affected side (A) and contralateral side (A’), anterior inferior iliac spine (I), and greater trochanter tip (G) were noted in these models. The distances A–I, I–G, and A–G and the angle formed by AA’ and AI were measured (Figure 1, 2). Each hip was classified by the presence (group M) or absence (group N) of migration during surgery. A Fisher's exact probability test, Student's t-test, and Welch's t-test were used to compare the two groups, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results. In 5 of the 113 hips, the trial femoral heads migrated under the rectus femoris and were removed safely. No significant differences were found between the gender, height, weight, or BMI of the groups. The average A–I distance was 32.3±3.0 mm (mean±SD) in group M and 39.4±10.4 mm in group N; I–G was 52.2±8.2 mm in group M and 59.7±10.6 mm in group N; and A–G was 64.3±10.3 mm in group M and 76.3±12.3 mm in group N. The average angle formed by AA’ and AI was 50.5±5.8°. Significant differences between the two groups were found for the distances A–I and A–G. Conclusions. In 4.4% of cases, the trial femoral heads migrated under the rectus femoris, which creates a risk for serious complications because major nerve and blood vessels are located nearby. The tendency for migration was expected to be related to the balance between soft tissues. In this study, we found that migration tends to occur in patients with shorter distances between A and I, and A and G. The trial head should be dislocated more carefully in those patients

Purpose of the study: Survival of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) mainly depends on the choice of the implant and the quality of the implantation. Use of minimally invasive approaches remains a subject of controversy due to the uncertain implant position and questions concerning increased perioperative complications. The purpose of this work was to assess these two elements in a consecutive series of patients who underwent THA implanted via the minimally invasive anterolateral approach described by Rottinger. Materials and Methods: This was a consecutive series of 130 patients (84 female, 46 male, mean age 69 years, age range 46–91) operated by the same surgeon. Mean follow-up was twelve months (range 6 – 24 months). The clinical parameters studied were: the pre–and post-operative Postel-Merle-d’Aubigné (PMA) score, mean operative time, presence of perioperative surgical complications. Radiographic parameters studied were lucent lines (De Lee and Gruen), homogeneous cementing of the femoral piece, axial position of the femoral implant, angle of acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion (Hassan), and any leg length discrepancy. Results: Intraoperative complications were: one intraoperative mobilisation of a press-fit cup, one trochanter fracture. Postoperatively, the rate of dislocation was 2.3%. In 3.8% of the patients developed skin lesions or a local haematoma but none with infection. Mean operative time was 107 minutes (range 80–210). Mean postoperative PMA score was 17.4 versus 12.4 preoperatively. Patients were able to walk without limping 3.3 months postoperatively (range 0.5–12 months). Mean cup inclination and anteversion were 46.1° (28–60°) and 12.3° (0–35°) respectively. Leg length discrepancy was +4.8mm on average (operated side). Femoral alignment was ±3° relative to the femoral axis in 83% of hips. Homogeneous cementing of the femoral stem was noted in 84%. There was a learning curve with an 11% complication rate for the first twenty hips versus 4% for the remainder of the hips in this series. Discussion: In our hands, the minimally invasive anterolateral approach described by Rottinger enables proper reproducible THA implantation. The rate of intraoperative complications is low. There is a learning curve which was an estimated twenty cases in our series. This method has become our first-intention option for implantation of THA

Aim. The objective of this study was to evaluate the intermediate term clinical and radiological results of a new short stem hip implant. Methods. In 20 consecutive patients suffering from osteoarthritis with 25 affected hip joints (five cases were bilateral), the clinical and radiological results of 25 hip arthroplasties performed in one hospital between October 2009 and May 2014 through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach using a cementless short stem prosthesis type Aida and a cementless cup type Ecofit with a ceramic on ceramic pairing were evaluated prospectively. The median age of patients at time of surgery was 60 years (range, 42–71 years), 15 male (4 were bilateral) and 5 female patients (one was bilateral) were included in the study. The median clinical follow up was 30 months (range, 2–88 months), and the median radiological follow up was 30 months (range, 2–88 months). Results. Harris Hip Score improved from a median preoperative value of 53 to a median postoperative value of 96 (range, 73–100) at follow up. 22 hips (88%) showed an excellent postoperative Harris Hip Score, 2 hips (8%) a good postoperative Harris Hip Score, and one hip (4%) a fair postoperative Harris Hip Score. Only two patients complained of postoperative thigh pain. Regarding patient satisfaction, 15 patients (60%) were very satisfied, 10 patients (40%) were satisfied. None was unsatisfied. Radiological analysis showed that 19 stems (76%) were with stable bony ingrowth, two cases (8%) showed stable fibrous ingrowth. Four cases need further follow up for proper evaluation of stem fixation.(See Figures 1,2,3). Conclusion. The intermediate term survival of this new short stem is very promising, and achieving the goals of a standard hip arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the hip abductor strength in patients undergoing total hip replacement via anterolateral (Müller) or posterolateral (Gibson) approach. Methods: Biomechanical studies were performed prospectively on a group of 80 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty via the anterolateral (48 cases) or posterolateral approach (32 cases). There were 61 females and 19 males with an average age of 57 years (range 37 – 78 years). The isometric abductor strength was measured with the kinetic communicator device preoperatively and 6, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively. Results: Hip abductor strength improved postoperatively in both groups. The posterolateral surgical approach was associated with statistically significant higher abductor strength values. Conclusions: Posterolateral approach significantly increases the isometric abductor strength in relation to the anterolateral approach

In fall 2004 we started with minimal invasive hip surgery at our clinic. Our requirements: Use of our standard implant system (Bicon threaded cup and Zweymüller stem), fast realization of the minimal invasive procedure through the continuation of the used, anterolateral Watson-Jones approach, modified for this technique, retaining the supine position with unchanged orientation concerning the positioning of the implant parts. Our expectations: Reduction in operative trauma through lower blood loss with less post-operative pain, less limping especially during the first weeks, less trochanter pain through the preservation of the gluteal muscle tendons, fewer posterior dislocations by preservation of the dorsal capsule, and a better cosmetic result. The patient is placed in supine position on the standard OR table with the option of tilting the legs down. The contralateral leg lies on a leg holder in extended position, flexed by approx. 20 degrees. This allows to bring the leg in hyperextension (without hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine), adduction and external rotation during broaching the femur. The main criterion of the minimal invasivness is the preservation of the gluteal tendons and not primarily the reduction of the length of the skin incision. An extensive capsular release with partial dissection of the rectus tendon for exposure of the acetabulum is necessary. For the stem implantation a notching of the piriformis can be necessary in addition to this. During the stem preparation the soft tissues should not influence the axial entrance of the rasps into the femoral canal otherwise there is a danger of a dorsolateral perforation. Right-left-lateral-double-offset rasps and the use of manipulation rasps as trial prostheses have worked satisfactorily. Retrospective analyses of numerous peri- and post-operative data were accomplished, as well as radiological evaluations regarding the optimal position of the implanted joints, and compared with a conventional control group. After a learning curve the OP duration was the same in both groups. The development of the haemoglobin and hematocrit levels were identical, 1/3 of the patients needed blood subsitution (autologous or stored blood). 90% of the analysed postoperative x-rays in standing position showed equal bilateral leg length corresponding to the preoperative planning, the planned offset was achieved in 93%. Deviations of the remaining were without clinical relevance. The complication rate was 2,5%. Conclusions: The anterolaterale approach in supine position is standardised for the minimal invasive THR. The compliance with the developed implantation technique is a requirement for the optimal positioning of the prosthesis and to avoid complications. The subjective patient assessments, especially of those who experienced both methods, are impressive

Purpose: The interest in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total hip arthroplasty has not waned in anyway (THA). Different surgical approaches have been used to do MIS-THA. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of the THA using the minimally invasive postero-lateral approach (MIS-PL) and minimally invasive antero-lateral approach (MIS-AL).

Patients and Methods: Fifty randomly assigned patients with MIS-PL and 32 patients with MIS-AL were included in the study. There were no significant differences in age, sex, diagnosis, JOA score or body mass index in each group. The operation time, length of incision, blood loss, implant position, muscle recovery and complication were observed.

Results: Total blood loss and pain was significantly less in patients undergoing THA via MIS postero-lateral approach. In addition, the MIS-PL had improved recovery of muscle strength (hip flexion and abduction) which was statistically significant. Median cup inclination was 42.3 degrees (MIS-AL) and 41.7 degrees (MIS-PL). Median cup anteversion was 18.3 degrees (MIS-AL) and 15.9 degrees (MIS-PL), respectively. Roentgenographic evaluation of femoral component positioning showed no significant difference. Other postoperative data (length of hospital stay, operation time, complication) were comparable.

Conclusion: The MIS antero-lateral approach have often been selected to decrease the risk of dislocation, but this approach needs to release the one third of the gluteus medius from the greater trochanter. MIS postero-lateral approach caused less pain and improve recovery time, postero-lateral approach is more suitable for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

This single incision, anterolateral intermuscular approach (AL-IM) utilises the interval between gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata. The aims of the study were to compare the quality of life, satisfaction and complications of this approach with two of the most commonly used limited incision transmuscular (TM) approaches, namely the mini-posterior (P-TM) and the mini-direct lateral (L-TM). One hundred and ninety-nine patients receiving MIS THA surgical procedures were evaluated prospectively (63 AL-IM, 68 P-TM and 68 L-TM). The outcome variables were WOMAC function, pain, stiffness, SF-12 (physical & mental), Oxford-12, satisfaction and radiological outcome. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were performed. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, co-morbidity, or pre-op WOMAC, SF-12, Oxford-12 (p> 0.05). However, the AL-IM group was associated with superior outcomes (p< 0.05) in WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, global WOMAC, Oxford-12 and SF-12 physical component. In the short term the AL-IM approach provides significant improvements in quality of life scores over other limited incision approaches. It provides minimal soft tissue disruption and maintains the abductor musculature and posterior soft tissue envelope, with similar complications and radiological outcomes

Introduction: This single incision, anterolateral intermuscular approach (AL-IM) utilizes the interval between gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata. The aims of the study were to compare the quality of life, satisfaction and complications of this approach with two of the most commonly used limited incision transmuscular (TM) approaches, namely the mini-posterior (P-TM) and the mini-direct lateral (L-TM). Methods: 199 patients receiving MIS THA surgical procedures were evaluated prospectively (63 AL-IM, 68 P-TM and 68 L-TM). The outcome variables were WOMAC function, pain, stiffness, SF-12 (physical & mental), Oxford-12, satisfaction and radiological outcome. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were performed. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, co-morbidity, or pre-op WOMAC, SF-12, Oxford-12 (p> .05). However, the AL-IM group was associated with superior outcomes (p< .05) in WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, global WOMAC, Oxford-12 and SF-12 physical component. Conclusion: In the short term the AL-IM approach provides significant improvements in quality of life scores over other limited incision approaches. It provides minimal soft tissue disruption and maintains the abductor musculature and posterior soft tissue envelope, with similar complications and radiological outcomes

Introduction: The minimally invasive posterior approach has become a standard for total hip replacement (THR) but the interest for the other minimally invasive approaches has not waned in any way. We carried out a prospective and comparative study in order to analyse the interest of the anterolateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach in comparaison to a minimally invasive posterior (MIP) approach for THR.

Material and method: We carried out a prospective and comparative study. A group of 35 primaries THR with large head using the ALMI approach, as described by Bertin and Röttinger, was compared to a group of 43 primaries THR performed through the MIP approach. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, sex, bony mass index, ASA score, Charnley class, diagnoses and preoperative Womac index and PMA score. The preoperative Harris hip score was significantly lower in ALMI group. Early functional results have been evaluated thanks to Womac index and modified Harris hip score at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. A p value < 0.05 has been considered as significant.

Results: The duration of surgical procedure was longer and the calculated blood loss more important in ALMI group (respectively p=0.045 and p=0.07). The preoperative complications were significantly more frequent in this group with 4 greater trochanter fractures, 3 false routes, 1 calcar fracture, and 2 metal back bascules versus one femoral fracture in MIP group. Other postoperative data (implant positioning, morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, type of discharge) were comparable. The early functional results at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months were also comparable. No other complication has been noted during the first 6 months in the two groups.

Discussion and Conclusion: The ALMI approach uses the intermuscular interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius. It leaves intact the abductors muscles and the posterior capsule and short external rotators. The early clinical results are excellent despite of the initial complications related to the initial learning curve for this approach and the use of the large head with metal-on-metal bearing. The stability of the arthroplasty and the absence of muscular damage should permit to accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation in parallel with less preoperative complications after the initial learning curve.

Our unit historically performed total hip replacement (THR) through either posterior or anterolateral approaches. In November 2020 a group of 5 consultants transitioned to utilising the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA). Appropriate training was undertaken and cases were performed as dual consultant procedures with intraoperative radiography or robotic assistance. Outcomes were collated prospectively. These included basic demographics, intraoperative details, complication rates and Oxford Hip Scores. A total of 48 patients underwent DAA THR over 1 year. Mean age was 67 and ASA 2. Over this time period 140 posterior approach and 137 anterolateral approach THR's were performed with available data. Propensity score matching was performed on a 1:1 basis using BMI, Age, Sex and ASA as covariates to generate a matched cohort group of conventional approach THR (n=37). Length of stay was significantly reduced at 1.95 days (p<0.001) with DAA compared to Anterolateral and Posterior approach. There was no significant difference with length of surgery, blood loss, Infection, dislocation and periprosthetic fracture rate. There was no significant difference in Oxford Hip Score between any approach at 3 months or 1 year. The transition to this approach has not made a negative impact despite its associated steep learning curve, and has improved efficiency in elective surgery. From our experience we would suggest those changing to this approach receive appropriate training in a high-volume centre, and perform cases as dual consultant procedures

We aimed to examine outcomes between displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients managed with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemi-arthroplasty (HA) via the anterolateral vs. posterior approach. We used data from the HEALTH trial (1,441 patients aged ≥50 with displaced FNFs randomized to THA vs. HA). We calculated each patient's propensity to undergo arthroplasty via the posterior approach, and matched them to 1 control (anterolateral approach) based on age (±5 years), and propensity score. We used Chi-Square/Fisher-Exact tests to compare dichotomous outcomes, and repeated measures ANOVA to examine differences in patient-reported outcomes (via the WOMAC subscores) from baseline to one-year postoperative. We used logistic regression to identify independent predictors of reoperation for instability in the posterior group. We identified 1,306 patients for this sub-analysis, 876 (67.1%) who received arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach, and 430 (32.9%) a posterior approach. The unadjusted rate of reoperation was significantly higher in the posterior group (10.7% vs. 7.1%). Following propensity score matching, we retained 790 patients (395 per group), with no between-group differences in patient, fracture, or implant characteristics. The matched cohort had a higher rate of comorbidities, and were less likely to be employed vs. the unmatched cohort. The rate of treatment for dislocation remained higher in the posterior group (6.1% vs. 2.0%) following matching. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significantly better WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores in the posterior group. Between-group differences at 12-months were: pain - 0.59 (0.03–1.15); stiffness - 0.62 (0.35–0.87); function - 2.99 (0.12–5.86); total - 3.90 (0.24–7.56). We identified THA (vs. HA, odds ratio 2.05 [1.05–4.01]) as the only independent predictor of treatment for dislocation in the posterior group. Our analyses revealed that compromised patients with displaced FNFs who undergo arthroplasty via the posterior approach may report better symptoms at one-year vs. the anterolateral approach, despite a higher odds of reoperation for instability

Adequate perpendicular access to the posterolateral talar dome for osteochondral defect repair is difficult to achieve and a number of different surgical approaches have been described. This cadaveric study examined the exposure available from various approaches to help guide pre-operative surgical planning. Four surgical approaches were performed in a step-wise manner on 9 Thiel-embalmed cadavers; anterolateral approach with arthrotomy, anterolateral approach with anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL) release, anterolateral approach with antero-lateral tibial osteotomy, and anterolateral approach with lateral malleolus osteotomy. The furthest distance posteriorly which allowed perpendicular access with a 2mm k-wire to the lateral surface of the talar dome was measured from the anterior aspect of the talar dome. The mean antero-posterior diameter of the lateral talar domes included in this study was 45.1mm. An anterolateral approach to the ankle with arthrotomy provided a mean exposure of the anterior 1/3rd of the lateral talar dome. ATFL release increased this to 43.2%. A lateral malleolus osteotomy provided superior exposure (81.5% vs 58.8%) compared to an anterolateral tibial osteotomy. Only the anterior half of the lateral border of the talar dome could be accessed with an anterolateral approach without osteotomy. A fibular osteotomy provided best exposure to the posterolateral aspect of the talar dome and is recommended for lesions affecting the posterior half of the lateral talar dome