There has been an increasing use of early operative fixation for scaphoid fractures, despite uncertain evidence. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate up-to-date evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing the effectiveness of the operative and nonoperative treatment of undisplaced and minimally displaced (≤ 2 mm displacement) scaphoid fractures. A systematic review of seven databases was performed from the dates of their inception until the end of March 2021 to identify eligible RCTs. Reference lists of the included studies were screened. No language restrictions were applied. The primary outcome was the patient-reported outcome measure of wrist function at 12 months after injury. A meta-analysis was performed for function, pain, range of motion, grip strength, and union. Complications were reported narratively.Aims
Methods
The degree of displacement of a fracture of the distal radius
is an important factor which can be assessed using simple radiographic
measurements. Our aim was to investigate the reliability and reproducibility
of these measurements and to determine if they should be used clinically. A 10% sample was randomly generated from 3670 consecutive adult
patients who had presented to University Hospitals of Leicester
NHS Trust between 2007 and 2010 with a fracture of the distal radius.
Radiographs of the 367 patients were assessed by two independent
reviewers. Four measurements of displacement of the fracture were recorded
and the inter-observer correlation assessed using the intra-class
correlation coefficient.Aims
Patients and Methods
