The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is an MRI-specific assessment tool to grade trochlear dysplasia. The aim of this study is to validate clinically the OBC by demonstrating its use in selecting treatments that are safe and effective. The OBC and the patellotrochlear index were used as part of the Oswestry Patellotrochlear Algorithm (OPTA) to guide the surgical treatment of patients with patellar instability. Patients were assigned to one of four treatment groups: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr); MPFLr + tibial tubercle distalization (TTD); trochleoplasty; or trochleoplasty + TTD. A prospective analysis of a longitudinal patellofemoral database was performed. Between 2012 and 2018, 202 patients (233 knees) with a mean age of 24.2 years (SD 8.1), with recurrent patellar instability were treated by two fellowship-trained consultant sports/knee surgeons at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. Clinical efficacy of each treatment group was assessed by Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores at baseline, and up to 60 months postoperatively. Their safety was assessed by complication rate and requirement for further surgery. The pattern of clinical outcome over time was analyzed using mixed regression modelling.Aims
Methods
Trochlear dysplasia is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral instability. The Dejour classification is currently considered the standard for classifying trochlear dysplasia, but numerous studies have reported poor reliability on both plain radiography and MRI. The severity of trochlear dysplasia is important to establish in order to guide surgical management. We have developed an MRI-specific classification system to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia, the Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC). This is a four-part classification system comprising normal, mild, moderate, and severe to represent a normal, shallow, flat, and convex trochlear, respectively. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the OBC and compare it with that of the Dejour classification. Four observers (two senior and two junior orthopaedic surgeons) independently assessed 32 CT and axial MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia and classified each according to the OBC and the Dejour classification systems. Assessments were repeated following a four-week interval. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined by using Fleiss’ generalization of Cohen’s kappa statistic and S-statistic nominal and linear weights.Aims
Methods
Both conservative and operative forms of treatment
have been recommended for patients with a ‘floating shoulder’. We
compared the results of conservative and operative treatment in
25 patients with this injury and investigated the use of the glenopolar
angle (GPA) as an indicator of the functional outcome. A total of
13 patients (ten male and three female; mean age 32.5 years (24.7
to 40.4)) were treated conservatively and 12 patients (ten male
and two female; mean age 33.67 years (24.6 to 42.7)) were treated
operatively by fixation of the clavicular fracture alone. Outcome
was assessed using the Herscovici score, which was also related
to changes in the GPA at one year post-operatively. The mean Herscovici score was significantly better three months
and two years after the injury in the operative group (p <
0.001
and p = 0.003, respectively). There was a negative correlation between
the change in GPA and the Herscovici score at two years follow-up
in both the conservative and operative groups, but neither were
statistically significant
(r = -0.295 and r = -0.19, respectively). There was a significant
difference between the pre- and post-operative GPA in the operative
group (p = 0.017). When compared with conservative treatment, fixation of the clavicle
alone gives better results in the treatment of patients with a floating
shoulder. The GPA changes significantly with fixation of clavicle
alone but there is no significant correlation between the pre-injury
GPA and the final clinical outcome in these patients. Cite this article:
