Since the introduction of the National Institute
for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on thromboprophylaxis
and the use of extended thromboprophylaxis with new oral agents,
there have been reports of complications arising as a result of
their use. We have looked at the incidence of wound complications
after the introduction of dabigatran for thromboprophylaxis in our
unit. We investigated the rate of venous thromboembolism and wound
leakage in 1728 patients undergoing primary joint replacement, both
before and after the introduction of dabigatran, and following its
subsequent withdrawal from our unit. We found that the use of dabigatran led to a significant increase
in post-operative wound leakage (20% with dabigatran, 5% with a
multimodal regimen; p <
0.001), which also resulted in an increased
duration of hospital stay. The rate of thromboembolism in patients
receiving dabigatran was higher (1.3%) than in those receiving the multimodal
thromboprophylaxis regimen, including low molecular weight heparin
as an inpatient and the extended use of aspirin (0.3%, p = 0.047).
We have ceased the use of dabigatran for thromboprophylaxis in these
patients. Cite this article:
We evaluated the quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis
in orthopaedic surgery by examining how they adhere to validated
methodological standards in their development. A structured review
was performed for guidelines that were published between January
2005 and April 2013 in medical journals or on the Internet. A pre-defined
computerised search was used in MEDLINE, Scopus and Google to identify
the guidelines. The AGREE II assessment tool was used to evaluate
the quality of the guidelines in the study. Seven international and national guidelines were identified.
The overall methodological quality of the individual guidelines
was good. ‘Scope and Purpose’ (median score 98% interquartile range
(IQR)) 86% to 98%) and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ (median score 90%,
IQR 90% to 95%) were the two domains that received the highest scores. ‘Applicability’
(median score 68%, IQR 45% to 75%) and ‘Editorial Independence’
(median score 71%, IQR 68% to 75%) had the lowest scores. These findings reveal that although the overall methodological
quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery
is good, domains within their development, such as ‘Applicability’
and ‘Editorial Independence’, need to be improved. Application of
the AGREE II instrument by the authors of guidelines may improve
the quality of future guidelines and provide increased focus on
aspects of methodology used in their development that are not robust. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:19–23.
Specific radiological features identified by Brandser and Marsh were selected for the analysis of acetabular fractures according to the classification of Letournel and Judet. The method employs a binary approach that requires the observer to allocate each radiological feature to one of two groups. The inter- and intra-observer variances were assessed. The presence of articular displacement, marginal impaction, incongruity, intra-articular fragments and osteochondral injuries to the femoral head were analysed by a similar method. These factors were termed ‘modifiers’ and are generally considered when planning operative intervention and, critically, they may influence prognosis. Six observers independently assessed 30 sets of plain radiographs and CT scans on two separate occasions, 12 weeks apart. They were asked to determine the presence or absence of specific radiological features. This simple binary approach to classification yields an inter- and intra-observer agreement which ranges from moderate to near-perfect (κ = 0.49 to 0.88 and κ = 0.57 to 0.88, respectively). A similar approach to the modifiers yields only slight to fair inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.20 to 0.34) and slight to moderate intra-observer agreement (κ = 0 to 0.55).
