The outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) deteriorates
with time, and additional procedures may be required. The aim of
this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes
between unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and total knee replacement
(TKR) after HTO as well as after primary UKR. A total of 63 patients (63
knees) were studied retrospectively and divided into three groups:
UKR after HTO (group A; n = 22), TKR after HTO (group B; n = 18)
and primary UKR (group C; n = 22). The Oxford knee score (OKS),
Knee Society score (KSS), hip–knee–ankle angles, mechanical axis
and patellar height were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. At
a mean of 64 months (19 to 180) post-operatively the mean OKS was
43.8 (33 to 49), 43.3 (30 to 48) and 42.5 (29 to 48) for groups
A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.73). The mean KSS knee score was
88.8 (54 to 100), 88.11 (51 to 100) and 85.3 (45 to 100) for groups
A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.65), and the mean KSS function score
was 85.0 (50 to 100) in group A, 85.8 (20 to 100) in group B and
79.3 (50 to 100) in group C (p = 0.48). Radiologically the results
were comparable for all groups except for patellar height, with
a higher incidence of patella infra following a previous HTO (p
= 0.02). Cite this article:
