Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
The Bone & Joint Journal

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 40-B, Issue 3 | Pages 385 - 395
1 Aug 1958
D'aubigné RM Dejouany JP

1. An operation to re-establish the continuity of the bone after resection of tumours of the lower end of the femur or upper end of the tibia is described.

2. Sound bony union may be obtained, allowing walking with weight bearing after three to four months.

3. The combination of a massive tibial or femoral graft (Juvara procedure) with an intramedullary nail, a massive homogenous graft, and fixation of the patella to the autograft to accelerate its revascularisation. has given constant and rapid bony union in five cases.

4. This possibility gives real value to wide resection in the treatment of severe cases of giant-cell tumours. especially those that are recurrent. osteolytic or suspect of malignancy.

5. Its value in the treatment of sarcoma cannot be assessed in so short a series.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 34-B, Issue 1 | Pages 22 - 29
1 Feb 1952
D'Aubigné RM

Arthroplasty, with normal or nearly normal reposition, is possible in most old congenital dislocations of the hip in young adults. Reposition is possible even in very high dislocation, but it is difficult or impossible in aged patients and when arthritic changes have taken place. The reduction equalises the length of the extremities in unilateral cases, but makes operation on both sides necessary in bilateral cases. Post-operative complications may be largely avoided by a good technique and careful post-operative treatment. Stability is good, and consequently the limp is generally reduced. Mobility is as a rule sufficient, though often less than before operation when the hip was normally or excessively mobile. Pain is very often relieved or greatly reduced, but walking is generally limited. Even if the radiographic appearance of the hip is almost normal, the functional result may be imperfect.

This assessment is probably pessimistic, for two reasons: first, patients operated on are still improving; second, the improved technique of the later operations should give better results. Nevertheless, arthroplasty with reduction should be proposed to patients only suffering severe functional disability.