The purpose of this study was to investigate
whether a gender-specific high-flexion posterior-stabilised (PS)
total knee replacement (TKR) would offer advantages over a high-flex
PS TKR regarding range of movement (ROM), ‘feel’ of the knee, pain
and satisfaction, as well as during activity. A total of 24 female
patients with bilateral osteoarthritis entered this prospective,
blind randomised trial in which they received a high-flex PS TKR
in one knee and a gender-specific high-flexion PS TKR in the other
knee. At follow-up, patients were assessed clinically measuring
ROM, and questioned about pain, satisfaction and daily ‘feel’ of
each knee. Patients underwent gait analysis pre-operatively and
at one year, which yielded kinematic, kinetic and temporospatial
parameters indicative of knee function during gait. At final follow-up
we found no statistically significant differences in ROM (p = 0.82).
The median pain score was 0 (0 to 8) in both groups (p = 0.95).
The median satisfaction score was 9 (4 to 10) in the high-flex group
and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.98). The median
‘feel’ score was 9 (3 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to
10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.66). Gait analysis showed
no statistically significant differences between the two prosthetic
designs in any kinematic, kinetic or temporospatial parameters. Both designs produced good clinical results with
