We evaluated the impact of pre-coating the tibial
component with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) on implant survival
in a cohort of 16 548 primary NexGen total knee replacements (TKRs)
in 14 113 patients. In 13 835 TKRs a pre-coated tray was used while
in 2713 TKRs the non-pre-coated version of the same tray was used.
All the TKRs were performed between 2001 and 2009 and were cemented.
TKRs implanted with a pre-coated tibial component had a lower cumulative
survival than those with a non-pre-coated tibial component (p =
0.01). After adjusting for diagnosis, age, gender, body mass index,
American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, femoral coupling design, surgeon
volume and hospital volume, pre-coating was an independent risk
factor for all-cause aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.75, p = 0.006).
Revision for aseptic loosening was uncommon for both pre-coated
and non-pre-coated trays (rates of 0.12% and 0%, respectively).
Pre-coating with PMMA does not appear to be protective of revision
for this tibial tray design at short-term follow-up. Cite this article:
We review our experience of Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty
(TEA) for fractures of the distal humerus in non-rheumatoid patients
with a minimum of ten years follow-up. TEA through a triceps splitting approach was peformed in 37 non-rheumatoid
patients for a fracture of the distal humerus between 1996 and 2004.
One patient could not be traced and 17 had died before the tenth
anniversary of their surgery. This left 19 patients with a minimum
follow-up of ten years to form the study group. Of these, 13 patients
were alive at the time of final review. The other six had died,
but after the tenth anniversary of their elbow arthroplasty. Their
clinical and radiological data were included in the study. Aims
Patients and Methods
Hip implant retrieval analysis is the most important
source of insight into the performance of new materials and designs
of hip arthroplasties. Even the most rigorous
