A total of 31 patients, (20 women, 11 men; mean
age 62.5 years old; 23 to 81), who underwent conversion of a Girdlestone
resection-arthroplasty (RA) to a total hip replacement (THR) were
compared with 93 patients, (60 women, 33 men; mean age 63.4 years
old; 20 to 89), who had revision THR surgery for aseptic loosening
in a retrospective matched case-control study. Age, gender and the
extent of the pre-operative bone defect were similar in all patients.
Mean follow-up was 9.3 years (5 to 18). Pre-operative function and range of movement were better in the
control group (p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively) and pre-operative
leg length discrepancy (LLD) was greater in the RA group (p <
0.001). The post-operative clinical outcome was similar in both
groups except for mean post-operative LLD, which was greater in
the study group (p = 0.003). There was a significant interaction
effect for LLD in the study group (p <
0.001). A two-way analysis
of variance showed that clinical outcome depended on patient age
(patients older than 70 years old had worse pre-operative pain,
p = 0.017) or bone defect (patients with a large acetabular bone
defect had higher LLD, p = 0.006, worse post-operative function
p = 0.009 and range of movement, p = 0.005), irrespective of the
group. Despite major acetabular and femoral bone defects requiring complex
surgical reconstruction techniques, THR after RA shows a clinical
outcome similar to those obtained in aseptic revision surgery for
hips with similar sized bone defects. Cite this article:
