Lengthening of the humerus is now an established
technique. We compared the complications of humeral lengthening
with those of femoral lengthening and investigated whether or not
the callus formation in the humerus proceeds at a higher rate than
that in the femur. A total of 24 humeral and 24 femoral lengthenings
were performed on 12 patients with achondroplasia. We measured the
pixel value ratio (PVR) of the lengthened area on radiographs and
each radiograph was analysed for the shape, type and density of
the callus. The quality of life (QOL) of the patients after humeral
lengthening was compared with that prior to surgery. The complication
rate per segment of humerus and femur was 0.87% and 1.37%, respectively.
In the humerus the PVR was significantly higher than that of the
femur. Lower limbs were associated with an increased incidence of
concave, lateral and central callus shapes. Humeral lengthening
had a lower complication rate than lower-limb lengthening, and QOL
increased significantly after humeral lengthening. Callus formation
in the humerus during the distraction period proceeded at a significantly
higher rate than that in the femur. These findings indicate that humeral lengthening has an important
role in the management of patients with achondroplasia.
The management of a significant bony defect following excision
of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral nonunion remains a challenge. We
present the outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral
shortening, stabilized with a long retrograde intramedullary nail,
accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis with
a temporary monolateral fixator. Eight men and two women underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique
between 2008 and 2016. Proximal locking of the nail and removal
of the external fixator was undertaken once the length of the femur
had been restored and prior to full consolidation of the regenerate.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients undergoing femoral lengthening by external fixation
tolerate treatment less well when compared to tibial lengthening.
Lengthening of the femur with an intramedullary device may have
advantages. We reviewed all cases of simple femoral lengthening performed
at our unit from 2009 to 2014. Cases of nonunions, concurrent deformities,
congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip
were excluded, leaving 33 cases (in 22 patients; 11 patients had
bilateral procedures) for review. Healing index, implant tolerance
and complications were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to analyse the position of
the acetabular and femoral components in total hip arthroplasty
undertaken using an anterior surgical approach. In a prospective, single centre study, we used the EOS imaging
system to analyse the position of components following THA performed
via the anterior approach in 102 patients (103 hips) with a mean
age of 64.7 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
We present a retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of 30 consecutive lengthenings in 27 patients with congenital short femur using the Ilizarov technique performed between 1994 and 2005. The mean increase in length was 5.8 cm/18.65% (3.3 to 10.4, 9.7% to 48.8%), with a mean time in the frame of 223 days (75 to 363). By changing from a distal to a proximal osteotomy for lengthening, the mean range of knee movement was significantly increased from 98.1° to 124.2° (p = 0.041) and there was a trend towards a reduced requirement for quadricepsplasty, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). The overall incidence of regenerate deformation or fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation was similar in the distal and proximal osteotomy groups (56.7% and 53.8%, respectively). However, in the proximal osteotomy group, pre-placement of a Rush nail reduced this rate from 100% without a nail to 0% with a nail (p <
0.001). When comparing a distal osteotomy with a proximal one over a Rush nail for lengthening, there was a significant decrease in fracture rate from 58.8% to 0% (p = 0.043). We recommend that in this group of patients lengthening of the femur with an Ilizarov construct be carried out through a proximal osteotomy over a Rush nail. Lengthening should also be limited to a maximum of 6 cm during one treatment, or 20% of the original length of the femur, in order to reduce the risk of complications.
We describe the technique and results of medial
submuscular plating of the femur in paediatric patients and discuss its
indications and limitations. Specifically, the technique is used
as part of a plate-after-lengthening strategy, where the period
of external fixation is reduced and the plate introduced by avoiding
direct contact with the lateral entry wounds of the external fixator
pins. The technique emphasises that vastus medialis is interposed
between the plate and the vascular structures. A total of 16 patients (11 male and five female, mean age 9.6
years (5 to 17)), had medial submuscular plating of the femur. All
underwent distraction osteogenesis of the femur with a mean lengthening
of 4.99 cm (3.2 to 12) prior to plating. All patients achieved consolidation
of the regenerate without deformity. The mean follow-up was 10.5 months
(7 to 15) after plating for those with plates still Placing the plate on the medial side is advantageous when the
external fixator is present on the lateral side, and is biomechanically
optimal in the presence of a femoral defect. We conclude that medial
femoral submuscular plating is a useful technique for specific indications
and can be performed safely with a prior understanding of the regional
anatomy. Cite this article:
Hip resurfacing is being performed more frequently in the United Kingdom. The possible benefits include more accurate restoration of leg length, femoral offset and femoral anteversion than occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared anteroposterior radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone hybrid THA (uncemented cup/cemented stem), with 28 who had undergone Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty (BHR). We measured the femoral offset, femoral length, acetabular offset and acetabular height with reference to the normal contralateral hip. The data were analysed by paired There was a significant reduction in femoral offset (p = 0.0004) and increase in length (p = 0.001) in the BHR group. In the THA group, there was a significant reduction in acetabular offset (p = 0.0003), but femoral offset and overall hip length were restored accurately. We conclude that hip resurfacing does not restore hip mechanics as accurately as THA.
Femoral lengthening using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor is a new technique. However, with intramedullary distraction the surgeon has less control over the lengthening process. Therefore, 33 femora lengthened with this device were assessed to evaluate the effect of operative variables under the surgeon’s control on the course of lengthening. The desired lengthening was achieved in 32 of 33 limbs. Problems encountered included difficulty in achieving length in eight femora (24%) and uncontrolled lengthening in seven (21%). Uncontrolled lengthening was more likely if the osteotomy was placed with less than 80 mm of the thick portion of the nail in the distal fragment (p = 0.052), and a failure to lengthen was more likely if there was over 125 mm in the distal fragment (p = 0.008). The latter problem was reduced with over-reaming by 2.5 mm to 3 mm. Previous intramedullary nailing also predisposed to uncontrolled lengthening (p = 0.042), and these patients required less reaming. Using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor, good outcomes were obtained; problems were minimised by optimising the position of the osteotomy and the amount of over-reaming performed.