Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 27
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 5 | Pages 828 - 829
1 May 2021
Ahmed I Chawla A Underwood M Price AJ Metcalfe A Hutchinson CE Warwick J Seers K Parsons H Wall PDH


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 13, Issue 3 | Pages 124 - 126
11 Mar 2024
Shen J Wei Z Sun D Wu H Wang X Wang S Luo F Xie Z

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(3):124–126.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 309 - 310
5 May 2023
Sharrock M Board T

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):309–310.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 9 | Pages 633 - 634
1 Sep 2020
Matsumoto K Ganz R Khanduja V


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 3, Issue 2 | Pages 152 - 154
7 Feb 2022
Khan ST Robinson PG MacDonald DJ Murray AD Murray IR Macpherson GJ Clement ND


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1015 - 1015
1 Sep 2024
Trompeter AJ Costa ML


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 11 | Pages 619 - 620
1 Nov 2017
Murray IR Murray AD Wordie SJ Oliver CW Murray AW Simpson AHRW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 29 - 31
20 Jan 2022
Ma M Tan Z Li W Zhang H Liu Y Yue C


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 2 | Pages 77 - 78
1 Feb 2020
Alt V Rupp M Langer M Baumann F Trampuz A

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(2):77–78.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 16 - 17
1 Jan 2021
McNally M Sousa R Wouthuyzen-Bakker M Chen AF Soriano A Vogely HC Clauss M Higuera CA Trebše R


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 4 | Pages 226 - 228
20 Apr 2022
Hiranaka T Suda Y Saitoh A Koide M Tanaka A Arimoto A Fujishiro T Okamoto K


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 6 | Pages 631 - 631
1 Jun 2024
Perry DC Dritsaki M Achten J Appelbe D Knight R Widnall J Roland D Messahel S Costa ML Mason J


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 226 - 227
1 Jun 2019
Danese I Pankaj P Scott CEH


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 11 | Pages 621 - 622
1 Nov 2017
Queen RM


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 9 | Pages 539 - 540
5 Sep 2018
Murray IR Geeslin AG Chahla J Murray AD Goudie EB Petrigliano FA Simpson AHRW LaPrade RF


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 7 | Pages 288 - 289
1 Jul 2019
Mayne E Raut P Memarzadeh A Arora A Khanduja V


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 7 | Pages 496 - 506
5 Jul 2023
Theunissen WWES Van der Steen MC Van Veen MR Van Douveren FQMP Witlox MA Tolk JJ

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the information topics that should be addressed according to the parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in the diagnostic and treatment phase during the first year of life. Second, we explored parental recommendations to further optimize the information provision in DDH care.

Methods

A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted between September and December 2020. A purposive sample of parents of children aged younger than one year, who were treated for DDH with a Pavlik harness, were interviewed until data saturation was achieved. A total of 20 interviews with 22 parents were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, independently reviewed, and coded into categories and themes.


Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):598–600.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 3, Issue 10 | Pages 777 - 785
10 Oct 2022
Kulkarni K Shah R Mangwani J Dias J

Aims

Deprivation underpins many societal and health inequalities. COVID-19 has exacerbated these disparities, with access to planned care falling greatest in the most deprived areas of the UK during 2020. This study aimed to identify the impact of deprivation on patients on growing waiting lists for planned care.

Methods

Questionnaires were sent to orthopaedic waiting list patients at the start of the UK’s first COVID-19 lockdown to capture key quantitative and qualitative aspects of patients’ health. A total of 888 respondents were divided into quintiles, with sampling stratified based on the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD); level 1 represented the ‘most deprived’ cohort and level 5 the ‘least deprived’.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 3 | Pages 184 - 201
7 Mar 2024
Achten J Marques EMR Pinedo-Villanueva R Whitehouse MR Eardley WGP Costa ML Kearney RS Keene DJ Griffin XL

Aims

Ankle fracture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries sustained in the UK. Many patients experience pain and physical impairment, with the consequences of the fracture and its management lasting for several months or even years. The broad aim of ankle fracture treatment is to maintain the alignment of the joint while the fracture heals, and to reduce the risks of problems, such as stiffness. More severe injuries to the ankle are routinely treated surgically. However, even with advances in surgery, there remains a risk of complications; for patients experiencing these, the associated loss of function and quality of life (Qol) is considerable. Non-surgical treatment is an alternative to surgery and involves applying a cast carefully shaped to the patient’s ankle to correct and maintain alignment of the joint with the key benefit being a reduction in the frequency of common complications of surgery. The main potential risk of non-surgical treatment is a loss of alignment with a consequent reduction in ankle function. This study aims to determine whether ankle function, four months after treatment, in patients with unstable ankle fractures treated with close contact casting is not worse than in those treated with surgical intervention, which is the current standard of care.

Methods

This trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial with an embedded pilot, and with 12 months clinical follow-up and parallel economic analysis. A surveillance study using routinely collected data will be performed annually to five years post-treatment. Adult patients, aged 60 years and younger, with unstable ankle fractures will be identified in daily trauma meetings and fracture clinics and approached for recruitment prior to their treatment. Treatments will be performed in trauma units across the UK by a wide range of surgeons. Details of the surgical treatment, including how the operation is done, implant choice, and the recovery programme afterwards, will be at the discretion of the treating surgeon. The non-surgical treatment will be close-contact casting performed under anaesthetic, a technique which has gained in popularity since the publication of the Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial. In all, 890 participants (445 per group) will be randomly allocated to surgical or non-surgical treatment. Data regarding ankle function, QoL, complications, and healthcare-related costs will be collected at eight weeks, four and 12 months, and then annually for five years following treatment. The primary outcome measure is patient-reported ankle function at four months from treatment.