Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 1 | Pages 29 - 29
1 Feb 2012
Malviya A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2017
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2019
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 2 | Pages 41 - 42
1 Apr 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2018
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Dec 2016
Coughlin TA


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 3 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jun 2016
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Aug 2014
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 33 - 35
1 Aug 2014

The August 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at: Antibiotic loaded ceramic of use in osteomyelitis; fibronectin implicated in cartilage degeneration; Zinc Chloride accelerates fracture healing in rats; advertisements and false claims; Net Promoter Score: substance or rhetoric?; aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and dissection, stress and the soul.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 1 | Pages 23 - 25
1 Feb 2013

The February 2013 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: to splint or not to splint; salvage of the unsalvageable; a close shave for malunions; a classic approach to malunion; diabetic carpal tunnel; capsulodesis; a wrist from a fibula; thumb-based osteoarthritis - a further opinion from the Editor-in-Chief.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 7
1 Aug 2012
Rajasekaran S

In 2006, approximately 1.3 million peer-reviewed scientific articles were published, aided by a large rise in the number of available scientific journals from 16 000 in 2001 to 23 750 by 2006. Is this evidence of an explosion in scientific knowledge or just the accumulation of wasteful publications and junk science? Data show that only 45% of the articles published in the 4500 top scientific journals are cited within the first five years of publication, a figure that is dropping steadily. Only 42% receive more than one citation. For better or for worse, “Publish or Perish” appears here to stay as the number of published papers becomes the basis for selection to academic positions, for tenure and promotions, a criterion for the awarding of grants and also the source of funding for salaries. The high pressure to publish has, however, ushered in an era where scientists are increasingly conducting and publishing data from research performed with ‘questionable research practices’ or even committing outright fraud. The few cases which are reported will in fact be the tip of an iceberg and the scientific community needs to be vigilant against this corruption of science.