MRI scan for the knee joint has often been regarded to be the non invasive alternative to a diagnostic arthroscopy. MRI scan is routinely used to support the diagnosis for meniscal or ACL injuries prior to recommending arthroscopic examination and surgery. Identification of meniscal tears can be difficult to interpret and can be observer dependent as well as dependent upon the sensitivity of the scanner. Similar difficulties may exists in clinical examination as well.

Our aim was to compare and correlate clinical, MRI and arthroscopic findings in the diagnosis of meniscal and Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injuries.

This was an observational study of 131 patients over 36 months who had both MRI and arthroscopic surgery.

Our study showed clinical examination had better sensitivity (0.86 vs 0.76)and specificity(0.73 v/s 0.52) in comparing to MRI in diagnosis of medial menisceal injuries. similarly +predictive value and −predictive value were higher for clinical examination. whereas for lateral menisceal and ACL injuries there were marginal differences in sensitivity, specificity and predictive values

We conclude that carefully performed clinically examination can give equally or better diagnosis of meniscal and ACL injuries in comparison to MRI scan.

MRI scan may be used to rule out such injuries rather than to diagnose them. MRI scan has much better negative predictive value than positive predictive value in both meniscal and ACL injuries diagnosis. When clinical signs and symptoms are inconclusive, performing MRI scan is likely to be more beneficial in avoiding unnecessary arthroscopic surgery.

When clinical diagnosis is in favour of either meniscal or ACL injuries, performing MRI scan prior to Arthroscopic examination is unlikely to be of significance. MRI scan should not be used as a primary diagnostic tool in meniscal and ACL injuries