Surgical reconstruction of deformed Charcot feet carries high risk of non-union, metalwork failure and deformity recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to these complications following hindfoot Charcot reconstructions. We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent hindfoot Charcot reconstruction with an intramedullary nail between 2007 and 2019 in our unit. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, weightbearing status and post-operative complications were noted. Metalwork breakage, non-union, deformity recurrence, concurrent midfoot reconstruction and the measurements related to intramedullary nail were also recorded.Introduction
Methods
The National Joint Registry has been capturing data on ankle replacement surgery since April 2010. This currently represents the largest cohort of ankles replacements captured worldwide and is a valuable resource to give us short term outcome of ankle replacement surgery. All the ankle replacements on the NJR were linked to the HES database using deterministic methods. The results were then anonymised. We then looked at Hopital admissions after the ankle replacement had taken place.Introduction:
Methods:
Surgeons, commissioners and patients are increasingly seeking more in depth details on outcomes of total ankle replacement (TAR). We set out to perform a detailed and up to date meta-analysis of the outcomes of TAR, with a focus on PROMS. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Science Citation Index databases using the terms “total”; “ankle”; “arthroplasty” or “replacement” to April 2012. We included all languages; series with greater than 20 TAR; minimum 2 years follow-up. We excluded papers on revisions; prostheses no longer marketed; and kin studies. We worked with the Cochrane Collaboration to adopt their methodology including the creation of a risk profile assessing all forms of bias.Introduction
Methods
The focus on evidence-based medicine has led to calls for increased levels of evidence in surgical journals. The purpose of the present study was to review the levels of evidence in articles published in the foot and ankle literature and to assess changes in the level of evidence over a decade. All articles from the years 2000 and 2010 in Foot and Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery, and all foot and ankle articles from JBJS A and JBJS B were analysed. Animal, cadaveric, basic science, editorials, surveys, letters to Editor and correspondence were excluded. Articles were ranked by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.Background
Methods
Calcaneal osteotomy is often performed together with other procedures to correct hindfoot deformity. There are various methods of fixation ranging from staples, headed or headless screws or more recently stepped locking plates. It is not clear if one method is superior to the other. In this series we compare the outcome of various methods of fixation with particular attention to the need for subsequent hardware removal. A retrospective review of the records of a consecutive series of patients who had a calcaneal osteotomy performed in our unit within the last 5 years was undertaken. All patients had had their osteotomy through an extended lateral approach to their calcaneous. The subsequent fixation was performed using one of three methods; a lateral plate placed through the same incision; a ‘headless’; or a ‘headed’ screw through a separate stab incision inserted through the infero-posterior heel. Records were kept of subsequent symptoms from the hardware and need for metalwork removal as well as any complications. When screws were inserted the entry point in relation to the weight-bearing surface of the calcaneous was also recorded.Introduction
Patients and Methods
The recent emphasis on using “evidence based medicine” for decision-making in patient care has prompted many publishers to mention the level of evidence of articles in their journals. The “quality” of a journal may thus be reflected by the proportion of articles with high levels of evidence and assist it achieve citations and therefore an Impact Factor. The purpose of this study was to survey published Foot and Ankle literature to evaluate changes in the level of evidence over ten years. Articles from Foot and Ankle International, JBJS Br, JBJS Am, Foot and Foot and Ankle Surgery were used. We looked at the years 2000 and 2010 and ranked the articles by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. 498 articles were ranked. Studies of animals, studies of Background
Methods
