Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 72 - 72
22 Nov 2024
Zouitni A van Oldenrijk J Bos K Croughs PD Yusuf E Veltman W
Full Access

Aim

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty. Diagnosing PJI can be challenging as preoperative screening and conventional cultures may be inconclusive. Sonication fluid culturing stands out as a valuable adjunct technique to improve microbiological PJI diagnosis. This study aims to determine the clinical relevance of routinely using sonication for all septic and aseptic revisions.

Method

All patients who underwent (partial) hip or knee revision arthroplasty for all causes between 2012 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the European Bone and Joint Society PJI criteria, we categorized them into three groups: infection confirmed, infection likely, and infection unlikely. We analyzed the clinical, laboratory, and radiological screening that could confirm or refute suspicion of PJI. We analyzed microbiology cultures and the most frequently detected microorganisms. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for synovial fluid cultures (preoperative), tissue cultures, and sonication fluid cultures. We determined the clinical relevance of sonication as the percentage of patients for whom sonication confirmed (microbiological) PJI diagnosis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2018
Wouthuyzen-Bakker M Sebillotte M Lomas J Kendrick B Palomares EB Murillo O Parvizi J Shohat N Reinoso JC Sánchez RE Fernandez-Sampedro M Senneville E Huotari K Allende JMB García AB Lora-Tamayo J Ferrari MC Vaznaisiene D Yusuf E Aboltins C Trebse R Salles MJ Benito N Vila A Del Toro MD Kramer T Petersdorf S Diaz-Brito V Tufan ZK Sanchez M Arvieux C Soriano A
Full Access

Aim

Late acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with surgical debridement and implant retention (DAIR) have a high failure rate. The aim of our study was to evaluate treatment outcome in late acute PJIs treated with DAIR versus implant removal.

Method

In a large multicenter study, late acute PJIs were retrospectively evaluated. Failure was defined as: PJI related death or the need for prosthesis removal or suppressive antibiotic therapy because of persistent or recurrent signs of infection. Late acute PJI was defined as < 3 weeks of symptoms more than 3 months after the index surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 92 - 92
1 Dec 2018
Wouthuyzen-Bakker M Sebillotte M Lomas J Taylor A Palomares EB Murillo O Parvizi J Shohat N Reinoso JC Sánchez RE Fernandez-Sampedro M Senneville E Huotari K Allende JB Garcia-Cañete J Lora-Tamayo J Ferrari MC Vaznaisiene D Yusuf E Aboltins C Trebse R Salles M Benito N Vila A Del Toro MD Kramer T Petershof S Diaz-Brito V Tufan ZK Sanchez M Arvieux C Soriano A
Full Access

Aim

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for all acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the efficacy of DAIR and identification of risk factors for failure in patients with late acute PJI, is not well described.

Method

Patients diagnosed with late acute PJI between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Late acute PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms (≤ 3 weeks) occurring ≥ 3 months after arthroplasty. Failure was defined as: i) the need for implant removal, ii) infection related death, iii) the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy due to persistent signs of infection and/or iv) relapse or reinfection during follow-up.