header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 44 - 44
1 Jan 2004
Welby F Nourissat C Bajer B Bégué T Masquelet A
Full Access

Purpose: Reconstruction of massive bone loss with cancellous bone deposited in a pseudomembrane induced by a cemented strut was performed in 40 procedures. We evaluated the 5-year results of this technique for the treatment of gaps measuring more than 5 cm.

Material and methods: We reviewed 12 patients; all had suffered major loss of tibial bone. The operations consisted in resection, insertion of a cement strut, and closure with a local are free flap over he disinfected soft tissues. The second operation at least two years later used a fragmented autologous cancellous graft leaving the membrane intact. The fibula was used as a tutor whenever possible. Bone losses measured 5 to 25 cm in young men who had infection after trauma or, in one patient, tumour resection. We analysed clinical and radiological outcome.

Results: All patients were seen five to ten years after initial management. At last follow-up, all wounds had dried and bone healing was solid. All had required secondary repeated grafts, realignment surgery (for valgus and varus) or operations related to the initial injury (arthrodesis, claw toe). Generally, the patients had resumed their occupational and recreational activities. The walking distance was not limited and single leg stance was painless. The radiological analysis demonstrated a trend towards graft tubulisation.

Discussion: The stut technique using cement induces the formation of a pseudo-synovial membrane. This technique has been used for more than ten years in our unit to treat circumferential defects. Bone healing was achieved in all patients. The main complication was valgus malalignment which almost always requires surgical correction. Rapid healing is not a function of the extent of the gap but rather the radical nature of the resection and the quality of the cover. This technique should be compared with other alternatives used to fill major bone gaps (Illizarov, vascularised bone transfer).