- posterior stabilised prosthesis with a fixed plateau, toric trochlea, cemented dome patella (n=10); - TKA with a rotating platform, 2-facet trochlae, rotatory congruent patella (n=10); - TKA with a rotating platform, 2-facet trochale, without resurfacing (n=10); - TKA with a rotating platform, hollow anatomic trochlae (n=10). The following parameters were studied prospectively:
- pain assessed on a visual analogue scale; - clinical assessment of going up and down stairs (normal, step-by-step, with handrail); - kinematic assessment of active flexion extension (0°–120°) during which the position of the patella was measured in the three planes and the trajectory of the patella was noted in comparison with the healthy side and with the moment of the quadriceps; - efficacy of the quadriceps (Cibex).
- TKAs with a dome patella and those with an anatomic patella; - TKAs with an anatomic trochlae and those with a hollow trochlae; This difference basically involved the patellar tilt, lateral subluxation of the patella, and especially, the patellar trajectory between 20° and 90°, the toric trochlae with a dome patella having a more anterior trajectory than the normal knee. The clinical and functional study showed that:
- the percentage of totally pain-free femoropatellar articulations was higher for the hollow anatomic trochlae (96%) than for the three other types (75%) (p = 0.04); - the stairs function was better for all the anatomic trochlae compared with the dome trochlae (p = 0.05); - the efficacy of the quadriceps was the same for the four types of TKA.